0001838128false6890000202543330001300006200047800043259000665000460006250004201000339400003137900060800050000066420001164000295100010530001280003100000000005000002023-04-182023-04-30
The lesser of the estimated useful life or length of the lease Not
depreciated4698200068510004011000145290004098080004275422000490046000100001100261000813024900025330341143025000302500035700000000002023-10-313767000000P6Y0000000000001200000.0000018381282021-01-012021-06-3000018381282021-02-012021-02-250001838128lowlf:OMGMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:OMGMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:OMGMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:OMGMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:EMMember2020-04-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:EMMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:EMMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:EMMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:AdministrativeMember2020-04-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:AdministrativeMember2018-01-012018-12-310001838128lowlf:AdministrativeMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:AdministrativeMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:AdministrativeMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:AdministrativeMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:AdministrativeMember2021-04-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:SharebasedCompensationMember2020-04-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:SharebasedCompensationMember2018-01-012018-12-310001838128lowlf:SharebasedCompensationMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:SharebasedCompensationMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:SharebasedCompensationMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:SharebasedCompensationMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:SharebasedCompensationMember2021-04-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:ProfessionalFeesMember2020-04-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:ProfessionalFeesMember2018-01-012018-12-310001838128lowlf:ProfessionalFeesMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:ProfessionalFeesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:ProfessionalFeesMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:ProfessionalFeesMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:ProfessionalFeesMember2021-04-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:SalariesAndBenefitsMember2020-04-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:SalariesAndBenefitsMember2018-01-012018-12-310001838128lowlf:SalariesAndBenefitsMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:SalariesAndBenefitsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:SalariesAndBenefitsMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:SalariesAndBenefitsMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:SalariesAndBenefitsMember2021-04-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:LicensingAndSuppliesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:LicensingAndSuppliesMember2018-01-012018-12-310001838128lowlf:LicensingAndSuppliesMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:TransactionAndOtherSpecialChargesMember2018-01-012018-12-310001838128lowlf:TransactionAndOtherSpecialChargesMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:TransactionAndOtherSpecialChargesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:SeptemberTwentyTwentyMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:AugustTwentyTwentyMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:FebruaryTwentyTwentyMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:SeptemberTwentyTwentyMember2020-01-012020-12-3100018381282017-01-012017-12-300001838128lowlf:StockOptionsMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:StockOptionsMember2020-04-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:StockOptionsMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:StockOptionsMember2021-04-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:StockOptionsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2020-04-012020-06-300001838128us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2018-01-012018-12-310001838128us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2021-04-012021-06-3000018381282020-11-012020-11-3000018381282019-03-012019-03-310001838128us-gaap:SeriesBPreferredStockMember2018-10-310001838128lowlf:JanuaryOneTwoThousandNineteenMember2021-06-3000018381282020-01-012020-12-300001838128lowlf:WarrantPurchaseAgreementMember2020-01-012020-12-300001838128lowlf:WarrantPurchaseAgreementMember2020-04-012020-04-130001838128lowlf:WarrantPurchaseAgreementMember2020-04-130001838128lowlf:WarrantPurchaseAgreementMember2020-04-012020-04-300001838128lowlf:WarrantPurchaseAgreementMember2020-05-012020-05-310001838128lowlf:NotePayableTwoMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:NotePayableTwoMember2021-06-300001838128us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtMember2020-12-310001838128us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtMember2019-12-310001838128us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:NotePayableOneMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:NotePayableOneMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:NotePayableOneMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:NotePayable2Member2020-12-310001838128lowlf:NotePayable2Member2019-12-310001838128lowlf:NotePayable2Member2021-06-300001838128lowlf:VehicleLoansMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:VehicleLoansMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:VehicleLoansMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:SuperVotingSharesMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:SuperVotingSharesMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:SuperVotingSharesMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingSharesMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingSharesMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingSharesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingSharesMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingSharesMember2020-12-310001838128us-gaap:TradeNamesMember2021-06-300001838128us-gaap:TradeNamesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128us-gaap:TradeNamesMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128us-gaap:TradeNamesMember2019-12-310001838128us-gaap:TradeNamesMember2020-12-310001838128us-gaap:TechnologyBasedIntangibleAssetsMember2021-06-300001838128us-gaap:TechnologyBasedIntangibleAssetsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128us-gaap:TechnologyBasedIntangibleAssetsMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128us-gaap:TechnologyBasedIntangibleAssetsMember2019-12-310001838128us-gaap:TechnologyBasedIntangibleAssetsMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:BrandingRightsMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:BrandingRightsMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:BrandingRightsMember2020-12-310001838128us-gaap:CustomerRelationshipsMember2020-12-310001838128us-gaap:CustomerRelationshipsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:IndefiniteLifeIntangiblesMemberus-gaap:TradeNamesMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:IndefiniteLifeIntangiblesMemberus-gaap:TradeNamesMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:IndefiniteLifeIntangiblesMemberus-gaap:TradeNamesMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:DefiniteLifeIntangiblesMemberus-gaap:TechnologyBasedIntangibleAssetsMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:OtherIntangiblesMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:OtherIntangiblesMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:OtherIntangiblesMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:OtherIntangiblesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:BrandingRightsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128us-gaap:CustomerRelationshipsMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:BrandingRightsMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:CostOfGoodsSoldMember2020-04-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:CostOfGoodsSoldMember2018-01-012018-12-310001838128lowlf:CostOfGoodsSoldMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:CostOfGoodsSoldMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:CostOfGoodsSoldMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:CostOfGoodsSoldMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:CostOfGoodsSoldMember2021-04-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:PropertyandequipmentnetMember2020-04-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:PropertyandequipmentnetMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:PropertyandequipmentnetMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:PropertyandequipmentnetMember2018-01-012018-12-310001838128lowlf:PropertyandequipmentnetMember2021-04-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:PropertyandequipmentnetMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:RightOfUseAssetsMember2018-12-310001838128lowlf:RightOfUseAssetsMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:RightOfUseAssetsMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:RightOfUseAssetsMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:RightOfUseAssetsMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:RightOfUseAssetsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:RightOfUseAssetsMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128us-gaap:ConstructionInProgressMember2018-12-310001838128us-gaap:ConstructionInProgressMember2020-12-310001838128us-gaap:ConstructionInProgressMember2021-06-300001838128us-gaap:ConstructionInProgressMember2019-12-310001838128us-gaap:ConstructionInProgressMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128us-gaap:ConstructionInProgressMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128us-gaap:ConstructionInProgressMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128us-gaap:VehiclesMember2018-12-310001838128us-gaap:VehiclesMember2019-12-310001838128us-gaap:VehiclesMember2021-06-300001838128us-gaap:VehiclesMember2020-12-310001838128us-gaap:VehiclesMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128us-gaap:VehiclesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128us-gaap:VehiclesMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:EquipmentsMember2018-12-310001838128lowlf:EquipmentsMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:EquipmentsMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:EquipmentsMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:EquipmentsMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:EquipmentsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:EquipmentsMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2018-12-310001838128us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2019-12-310001838128us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2021-06-300001838128us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2020-12-310001838128us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember2018-12-310001838128us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember2019-12-310001838128us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember2021-06-300001838128us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember2020-12-310001838128us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128us-gaap:LandAndBuildingMember2018-12-310001838128us-gaap:LandAndBuildingMember2020-12-310001838128us-gaap:LandAndBuildingMember2021-06-300001838128us-gaap:LandAndBuildingMember2019-12-310001838128us-gaap:LandAndBuildingMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128us-gaap:LandAndBuildingMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128us-gaap:LandAndBuildingMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:PrivatePlacementsMember2019-03-032019-04-020001838128lowlf:PrivatePlacementsMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:JanuaryOneTwoThousandNineteenMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:LongtermdebtnetMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:PropertyandequipmentnetMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:CurrentportionoflongtermdebtMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:ConstructioninprogressMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:LeaseholdimprovementsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:BuildingsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128srt:MaximumMemberlowlf:MachineryandequipmentMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128srt:MinimumMemberlowlf:MachineryandequipmentMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128srt:MaximumMemberus-gaap:VehiclesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128srt:MinimumMemberus-gaap:VehiclesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128srt:MaximumMemberlowlf:FurnitureandfixturesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128srt:MinimumMemberlowlf:FurnitureandfixturesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:OfficeequipmentMembersrt:MaximumMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128srt:MinimumMemberlowlf:OfficeequipmentMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:KaizenIncMemberlowlf:MayOneTwentyNineteenMemberlowlf:AssetPurchaseAgreementMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:KaizenIncMemberlowlf:MayOneTwentyNineteenMemberlowlf:AssetPurchaseAgreementMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:KaizenIncMemberlowlf:MayOneTwentyNineteenMemberlowlf:AssetPurchaseAgreementMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:KaizenIncMemberlowlf:MayOneTwentyNineteenMemberlowlf:AssetPurchaseAgreementMember2020-07-150001838128lowlf:KaizenIncMemberlowlf:MayOneTwentyNineteenMemberlowlf:AssetPurchaseAgreementMember2020-07-012020-07-150001838128lowlf:KaizenIncMemberlowlf:MayOneTwentyNineteenMemberlowlf:AssetPurchaseAgreementMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:TerminatedAcqusitionMember2021-01-012021-01-310001838128lowlf:PurchaseAgreementMemberlowlf:LasVegasMember2020-01-012020-12-300001838128lowlf:PurchaseAgreementMemberlowlf:LasVegasMember2021-01-310001838128lowlf:PurchaseAgreementMemberlowlf:LasVegasMember2020-07-012020-07-170001838128lowlf:WVapesMemberlowlf:PurchaseAgreementMember2019-11-012019-11-300001838128lowlf:WVapesMemberlowlf:PurchaseAgreementMember2019-05-012019-05-140001838128lowlf:LowellFarmServiceMember2021-06-290001838128lowlf:TheHaciendaCompanyLLCMember2021-02-012021-02-250001838128lowlf:LowellFarmServiceMember2021-06-012021-06-290001838128lowlf:TheHumbleFlowerCoMemberlowlf:AssetPurchaseAgreementMember2019-04-180001838128lowlf:TheHumbleFlowerCoMemberlowlf:AssetPurchaseAgreementMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:TheHumbleFlowerCoMemberlowlf:AssetPurchaseAgreementMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:TheHumbleFlowerCoMemberlowlf:AssetPurchaseAgreementMember2019-04-012019-04-180001838128lowlf:TerminatedAcqusitionMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:TerminatedAcqusitionMember2021-01-310001838128lowlf:TerminatedAcqusitionMember2020-07-012020-07-170001838128lowlf:FairValueOfNetAssetsAcquiredMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:TheHaciendaCompanyLLCMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:TheHaciendaCompanyLLCMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:TheHumbleFlowerCoMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:TheHumbleFlowerCoMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:TheHumbleFlowerCoMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:TheHumbleFlowerCoMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:KaizenIncMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:KaizenIncMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:KaizenIncMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:KaizenIncMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:LowellFarmServiceMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:LowellFarmServiceMember2021-01-012021-06-3000018381282021-04-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2021-04-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2021-04-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:SuperVotingShareMember2021-04-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingShareMember2021-04-012021-06-3000018381282021-03-310001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2021-03-310001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2021-03-310001838128lowlf:SuperVotingShareMember2021-03-310001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingShareMember2021-03-310001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:SuperVotingShareMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingShareMember2021-06-300001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:SuperVotingShareMember2021-01-012021-06-300001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingShareMember2021-01-012021-06-3000018381282020-04-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2020-04-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2020-04-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:SuperVotingShareMember2020-04-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingShareMember2020-04-012020-06-3000018381282020-03-310001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2020-03-310001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2020-03-310001838128lowlf:SuperVotingShareMember2020-03-310001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingShareMember2020-03-310001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:SuperVotingShareMember2020-12-310001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingShareMember2020-12-3100018381282020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2020-01-012020-12-310001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingShareMember2020-01-012020-12-3100018381282020-06-300001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2020-06-300001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2020-06-300001838128lowlf:SuperVotingShareMember2020-06-300001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingShareMember2020-06-3000018381282020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:SuperVotingShareMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingShareMember2020-01-012020-06-300001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:SuperVotingShareMember2019-12-310001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingShareMember2019-12-3100018381282019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:SuperVotingShareMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingShareMember2019-01-012019-12-310001838128lowlf:ClassABSharesMember2019-01-012019-12-3100018381282018-12-310001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2018-12-310001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2018-12-310001838128lowlf:ClassABSharesMember2018-12-3100018381282018-01-012018-12-310001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2018-01-012018-12-310001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2018-01-012018-12-310001838128lowlf:SuperVotingShareMember2018-01-012018-12-310001838128lowlf:SubordinateVotingShareMember2018-01-012018-12-310001838128lowlf:ClassABSharesMember2018-01-012018-12-3100018381282017-12-310001838128lowlf:AccumulatedDeficitsMember2017-12-310001838128lowlf:ShareCapitalMember2017-12-310001838128lowlf:ClassABSharesMember2017-12-3100018381282020-12-3100018381282019-12-3100018381282021-06-30iso4217:USDxbrli:sharesiso4217:USDxbrli:sharesxbrli:pure
|
Filed Pursuant to Rule
424(b)(3)
|
PROSPECTUS
|
Registration Statement No.
333-259174
|
7,997,520 Subordinate Voting
Shares
Lowell Farms Inc.
This prospectus
relates to 7,997,520 Subordinate Voting Shares of Lowell Farms
Inc., a British Columbia, Canada corporation, that may be sold from
time to time by the selling securityholders set forth in this
prospectus under the heading “Selling Securityholders”
beginning on page 22 which we refer to as the “Selling
Securityholders.”
We will not receive
any proceeds from the sale of the securities under this
prospectus.
Information
regarding the Selling Securityholders, the amounts of Subordinate
Voting Shares that may be sold by them and the times and manner in
which they may offer and sell the Subordinate Voting Shares under
this prospectus is provided under the sections titled
“Selling Securityholders” and “Plan of
Distribution,” respectively, in this prospectus. We have not
been informed by any of the Selling Securityholders that they
intend to sell their securities covered by this prospectus and do
not know when or in what amounts the Selling Securityholders may
offer the securities for sale. The Selling Securityholders may sell
any, all, or none of the securities offered by this
prospectus.
The Selling
Securityholders and intermediaries through whom such securities are
sold may be deemed “underwriters” within the meaning of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to the
securities offered hereby, and any profits realized or commissions
received may be deemed underwriting compensation. We have agreed to
indemnify the Selling Securityholders against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act.
The Subordinate
Voting Shares are listed for trading on the Canadian Securities
Exchange (“CSE”) under the symbol “LOWL”
and are traded over-the-counter in the United States on the OTCQX
under the symbol “LOWLF.” On August 24, 2021, the last
reported sale price of our Subordinate Voting Shares on the CSE was
C$1.60 per share.
Investing in our
securities involves a high degree of risk. See the section titled
“Risk Factors,” which begins on page 5.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission
nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of
these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
You should rely
only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not
authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to provide you
with information concerning us, except for the information
contained in this prospectus. The information contained in this
prospectus is complete and accurate only as of the date on the
front cover page of this prospectus, regardless of the time of
delivery of this prospectus or the sale of any securities. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not
soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the
offer or sale is not permitted.
The date of this
prospectus is September 17, 2021
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PF-1
|
|
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This registration
statement includes “forward-looking information” and
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Canadian securities laws and United States securities laws
(collectively, “forward-looking statements”). In some
cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words
such as “may,” “will,” “would,”
“could,” “should,” “believes,”
“estimates,” “projects,”
“potential,” “expects,”
“plans,” “intends,”
“anticipates,” “targeted,”
“continues,” “forecasts,”
“designed,” “goal,” or the negative of
those words or other similar or comparable words. Any statements
contained in this registration statement that are not statements of
historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. We
have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current
expectations and projections about future events and financial
trends that we believe may affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and future growth prospects. The
forward-looking statements contained herein are based on certain
key expectations and assumptions, including, but not limited to,
with respect to expectations and assumptions concerning receipt
and/or maintenance of required licenses and third party consents
and the success of our operations, are based on estimates prepared
by us using data from publicly available governmental sources, as
well as from market research and industry analysis, and on
assumptions based on data and knowledge of this industry that we
believe to be reasonable. These forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance or development and involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are in some
cases beyond our control. As a result, any or all of our
forward-looking statements in this registration statement may turn
out to be inaccurate. Factors that may cause actual results to
differ materially from current expectations include, among other
things, those listed under “Risk Factors.” Except as
required by law, we assume no obligation to update or revise these
forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information
becomes available after the date of this registration statement.
You should, however, review the factors and risks we describe in
the reports we will file from time to time with the SEC after the
date of this registration statement.
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS
Unless the context
indicates or suggests otherwise, references to “we,”
“our,” “us,” the “Company,” or
“Lowell Farms” refer to Lowell Farms Inc., a
corporation organized under the laws of British Columbia, Canada,
individually, or as the context requires, collectively with its
subsidiaries. We changed our name from Indus Holdings, Inc. to
Lowell Farms Inc, effective March 1, 2021. For a discussion of our
corporate history, see “Corporate Information”
beginning on page 40 below.
In this prospectus,
currency amounts are stated in U.S. dollars (“$”),
unless specified otherwise. All references to C$ are to Canadian
dollars.
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary does
not contain all of the information that is important to you. You
should read the entire prospectus, including the Risk Factors and
our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus before making an investment
decision.
General
We are a
California-based cannabis company with vertically integrated
operations including large scale cultivation, extraction,
processing, manufacturing, branding, packaging and wholesale
distribution to retail dispensaries. We manufacture and distribute
proprietary and third-party brands throughout the State of
California, the largest cannabis market in the world. We also
provide manufacturing, extraction and distribution services to
third-party cannabis and cannabis branding companies.
On February 25,
2021, we acquired the Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell Smokes trademark
brands, product portfolio and production assets from The Hacienda
Company, LLC, a California limited liability company
(“Hacienda”), and its subsidiaries. The acquisition is
referred to in this Form S-1 as the “Lowell
Acquisition.” The Lowell Acquisition expanded our product
offerings by adding a highly regarded, mature line of premium
branded cannabis pre-rolls, including infused pre-rolls, to our
product portfolio under the Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell Smokes
brands. The Lowell Acquisition also expanded our offerings of
premium packaged flower, concentrates, and vape products. We
believe our pre-existing strengths in cultivation and sourcing will
enhance the value of the brands and products acquired in the Lowell
Acquisition.
The Lowell
Acquisition also substantially broadened our customer base by
adding highly developed direct-to-consumer channels to complement
our pre-existing network of retail dispensary customers. This
addition to our customer base has resulted in broader geographic
coverage in California by the combined business.
We operate a
225,000 square foot greenhouse cultivation facility and a 40,000
square foot processing facility in Monterey County, a 15,000 square
foot manufacturing and laboratory facility in Salinas, California,
a separate 20,000 square foot distribution facility in Salinas,
California and a warehouse depot and distribution vehicles in Los
Angeles, California.
Corporate Information
We are incorporated
under the laws of British Columbia, Canada. On April 26, 2019, we
completed a reverse takeover transaction with Indus Holding
Company, a Delaware corporation. On March 1, 2021, in connection
with the Lowell Acquisition, we changed our name to Lowell Farms
Inc.
THE OFFERING
Subordinate Voting
Shares Offered:
|
|
7,997,520
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Subordinate
Voting Shares:
|
|
78,992,636
|
|
|
|
Use of
Proceeds:
|
|
We are not selling
any securities under this prospectus and we will not receive any
proceeds from any sale of securities by the Selling
Securityholders.
|
|
|
|
CSE Symbol for
Subordinate Voting Shares:
|
|
LOWL
|
|
|
|
OTCQX Symbol for
Subordinate Voting Shares:
|
|
LOWLF
|
RISK FACTORS
Investing in our securities involves a high
degree of risk. Investors should carefully consider the risks
described below and all of the other information set forth in this
Registration Statement on Form S-1, including our financial
statements and related notes and “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations,” before deciding to invest in our common stock.
If any of the events or developments described below occur, our
business, financial condition, or results of operations could be
materially or adversely affected. As a result, the market price of
our common stock could decline, and investors could lose all or
part of their investment.
Risks Related to Our Business and
Industry
Cannabis Continues to be a Controlled Substance
under the CSA and is Illegal Under United States federal
law.
The Company is
engaged directly in the medical and adult-use cannabis industry.
The Company derives all of its revenues from the State of
California and conducts its activities in accordance with
applicable state and local laws. Even though the Company’s
cannabis-related activities are compliant with applicable state and
local law, such activities remain illegal under U.S. federal
law.
In the United
States, cannabis is extensively regulated at the state level. 36
States, the District of Columbia and four US territories have
legalized medical cannabis in some form. Of these States, 15
States, including California, have legalized cannabis for adult
use. Notwithstanding the permissive regulatory environment of
cannabis at the State level, cannabis continues to be categorized
as a Schedule I controlled substance under the CSA and as such, the
cultivation, manufacture, distribution, sale and possession of
cannabis violates federal law. Although the Company believes its
business is compliant with applicable State and local law, strict
compliance with state and local laws with respect to cannabis may
not absolve the Company of liability under federal law, nor may it
provide a defense to any federal proceeding which be brought
against the Company. Any such proceedings brought against the
Company may result in a material adverse effect on the
Company.
Since the
cultivation, manufacture, distribution, sale and possession of
cannabis is illegal under federal law, the Company may be deemed to
be aiding and abetting illegal activities. Under these
circumstances, U.S. law enforcement authorities, in their attempt
to regulate the illegal use of cannabis, may seek to bring an
action or actions against the Company, including, but not limited
to, a claim regarding the possession and sale of cannabis, and/or
aiding and abetting another’s criminal activities. The
federal law provides that anyone who “commits an offense or
aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its
commission, is punishable as a principal.” As a result, the
DOJ could allege that Lowell Farms has “aided and
abetted” violations of federal law by providing financing and
services to its subsidiaries. Under these circumstances, a federal
prosecutor could seek to seize the assets of the Company, and to
recover any “illicit profits” previously distributed as
of such time to shareholders resulting from any of the foregoing.
In these circumstances, the Company’s operations would cease,
shareholders could lose their entire investment and directors,
officers and/or shareholders may be left to defend any criminal
charges against them at their own expense and, if convicted, be
sent to federal prison. Such potential criminal liability of our
shareholders could arise solely by virtue of their activities as
shareholders. Such an action would result in a material adverse
effect on the Company.
The United States
Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) enforces the laws
of the United States. Crossing the border while in violation of the
CSA and other related federal laws may result in denied admission,
seizures, fines and apprehension. CBP officers administer the
Immigration and Nationality Act to determine the admissibility of
travelers, who are non-U.S. citizens, into the United States. An
investment in the Company, if it became known to CBP, could have an
impact on a shareholder’s admissibility into the United
States and could lead to a lifetime ban on admission.
Enforcement of U.S. Federal Law Could Damage
the Company’s Operations and Financial
Position.
Since 2014, the
United States Congress has passed appropriations bills that have
included the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment. For now, the
Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment, as discussed above, is the only
statutory restraint on enforcement of federal cannabis laws. Courts
in the U.S. have construed these appropriations bills to prevent
the federal government from prosecuting individuals or businesses
when those individuals or businesses operate in strict compliance
with state and local medical cannabis regulations; however, this
legislation only covers medical cannabis, not adult-use cannabis,
and has historically been passed as an amendment to omnibus
appropriations bills, which by their nature expire at the end of a
fiscal year or other defined term.
The
Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment may or may not be included in future
omnibus appropriations packages or continuing budget resolutions,
and its inclusion or non-inclusion, as applicable, is subject to
political changes. Because this conduct continues to violate
federal law, U.S. courts have observed that should the Congress at
any time choose to appropriate funds to fully prosecute the CSA,
any individual or business - even those that have fully complied
with State law - could be prosecuted for violations of federal law
and if the Congress restores such funding, the federal government
will have the authority to prosecute individuals and businesses for
violations of the law while it lacked funding, to the extent of the
CSA’s five-year statute of limitations applicable to
non-capital CSA violations. The Company may be irreparably harmed
by any change in enforcement policies by the federal or applicable
state governments, which could have a material adverse effect on
the Company’s business, revenues, operating results and
financial condition as well as the Company’s
reputation.
Violations of any
federal laws and regulations could result in significant fines,
penalties, administrative sanctions, convictions or settlements
arising from civil proceedings conducted by either the federal
government or private citizens, or criminal charges, including, but
not limited to, disgorgement of profits, cessation of business
activities or divestiture. This could have a material adverse
effect on the Company, including its reputation and ability to
conduct business, its holding (directly or indirectly) of cannabis
licenses in California, the listing of its securities on any stock
exchange, its financial position, operating results, profitability
or liquidity or the market price of its shares. In addition, it
will be difficult for the Company to estimate the time or resources
that would be needed in connection with the investigation of any
such matters or its final resolution because, in part, the time and
resources that may be needed are dependent on the nature and extent
of any information requested by the applicable authorities
involved, and such time or resources could be
substantial.
As a result of the
conflicting views between states and the federal government
regarding cannabis, investments in cannabis businesses in the U.S.
are subject to inconsistent legislation and regulation. The
response to this inconsistency was addressed in Cole Memorandum,
acknowledging that notwithstanding the designation of cannabis as a
controlled substance at the federal level in the United States,
several U.S. states had enacted laws relating to cannabis for
medical purposes. The Cole Memorandum outlined certain enforcement
priorities for the DOJ relating to the prosecution of cannabis
offenses. In particular, the Cole Memorandum noted that in
jurisdictions that have enacted laws legalizing cannabis in some
form and that have also implemented strong and effective regulatory
and enforcement systems to control the cultivation, manufacturing,
distribution, sale and possession of cannabis, conduct in
compliance with those laws and regulations is less likely to be a
priority at the federal level. Notably, however, the DOJ did not
provide specific guidelines for what regulatory and enforcement
systems it deemed sufficient under the Cole Memorandum
standard.
In light of limited
investigative and prosecutorial resources, the Cole Memorandum
concluded that the DOJ should be focused on addressing only the
most significant threats. States where cannabis had been legalized
were not characterized as a high priority. In March 2017, the then
newly appointed Attorney General Jeff Sessions again noted limited
federal resources and acknowledged that much of the Cole Memorandum
had merit; however, he disagreed that it had been implemented
effectively. Accordingly, on January 4, 2018, Attorney General
Sessions issued the Sessions Memorandum, which rescinded the Cole
Memorandum on the basis that the direction provided therein was
unnecessary, given the well-established principles governing
federal prosecution that are already in place. Those principals are
included in chapter 9-27-000 of the United States Attorneys’
Manual and require federal prosecutors deciding which cases to
prosecute to weigh all relevant considerations, including federal
law enforcement priorities set by the Attorney General, the
seriousness of the crime, the deterrent effect of criminal
prosecution and the cumulative impact of particular crimes on the
community. Due to the ambiguity of the Sessions Memorandum and the
lack of clarity provided by the DOJ since then, there can be no
assurance that the federal government will not seek to prosecute
cases involving cannabis businesses that are otherwise compliant
with State law.
The effect of the
rescission of the Cole Memorandum remains to be seen. Currently,
federal prosecutors are free to utilize their prosecutorial
discretion to decide whether to prosecute cannabis activities
despite the existence of state-level laws that may be inconsistent
with federal prohibitions. No direction was given to federal
prosecutors in the Sessions Memorandum as to the priority they
should ascribe to such cannabis activities, and resultantly it is
uncertain how active federal prosecutors will be in relation to
such activities. While some U.S. Attorneys expressed support for
the rescission of the Cole Memorandum, numerous government
officials, legislators and federal prosecutors in states with
medical and adult-use cannabis statutes announced their intention
to continue the Cole Memorandum-era status quo.
The impact that
this lack of uniformity between state and federal authorities could
have on individual state cannabis markets and the businesses that
operate within them is unclear, and the enforcement of relevant
federal laws is a significant risk. Potential federal prosecutions
could involve significant restrictions being imposed upon the
Company or third parties, while diverting the attention of key
executives. Such proceedings could have a material adverse effect
on the Company’s business, revenues, operating results and
financial condition, as well as the Company’s reputation and
prospects, even if such proceedings were concluded successfully in
favor of the Company. Such proceedings could involve the
prosecution of key executives of the Company or the seizure of
corporate assets.
With a new
administration at the U.S. federal level, it is possible that
additional changes (whether positive or negative) could occur.
There can be no assurance as to the position any new administration
may take on marijuana and a new administration could decide to take
a stronger approach to the enforcement of federal laws. Any
enforcement of current federal laws could cause significant damage
to the Company’s operations and financial position. Further,
future presidential administrations may want to treat marijuana
differently and potentially enforce the federal laws more
aggressively.
The Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment may not be
Renewed Potentially Resulting in DOJ Enforcement Activities Against
Entities in the Cannabis Industry.
The
Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment, as discussed above, prohibits the DOJ
from spending funds appropriated by Congress to enforce the tenets
of the CSA against the medical cannabis industry in states which
have legalized such activity. On December 27, 2020, the amendment
was renewed through the signing of the fiscal year 2021 omnibus
spending bill and is effective through September 30, 2021. There
can be no assurance that the federal government will not seek to
prosecute cases involving medical cannabis businesses that are
otherwise compliant with state law. Such potential proceedings
could involve significant restrictions being imposed upon the
Company or third parties, while diverting the attention of key
executives. Such proceedings could have a material adverse effect
on the Company, even if such proceedings were concluded
successfully in favor of the Company.
Federal and State Forfeiture Laws Could Result
in Seizure of our Assets.
As an entity that
conducts business in the cannabis industry, the Company is subject
to U. S. federal and state forfeiture laws (criminal and civil)
that permit the government to seize the proceeds of criminal
activity. Civil forfeiture laws could provide an alternative for
the federal government or any state (or local police force) that
wants to discourage residents from conducting transactions with
cannabis related businesses but believes criminal liability is too
difficult to prosecute. Also, an individual can be required to
forfeit property considered to be the proceeds of a crime even if
the individual is not convicted of the crime, and the standard of
proof in a civil forfeiture matter is lower than the standard in a
criminal matter. Shareholders of the Company located in
jurisdictions where cannabis remains illegal may be at risk of
prosecution under federal and/or state conspiracy, aiding and
abetting, and money laundering statutes, and be at further risk of
losing their investments or proceeds under forfeiture statutes.
Many states remain fully able to take action to prevent the
proceeds of cannabis businesses from entering their state. Because
state legalization is relatively new, it remains to be seen whether
these states would take such action and whether a court would
approve it. Current and prospective securityholders of the Company
or any entity related thereto should be aware of these potentially
relevant federal and State laws in considering whether to remain
invested or invest in the Company or any entity related
thereto.
Future Research may Lead to Findings that
Vaporizers, Electronic Cigarettes and Related Products are not Safe
for Their Intended Use.
Vaporizers,
electronic cigarettes and related products were recently developed
and therefore the scientific or medical communities have had a
limited period of time to study the long-term health effects of
their use. Currently, there is limited scientific or medical data
on the safety of such products for their intended use and the
medical community is still studying the health effects of the use
of such products, including the long-term health effects. If the
scientific or medical community were to determine conclusively that
use of any or all of these products pose long-term health risks,
market demand for these products and their use could materially
decline. Such a determination could also lead to litigation,
reputational harm and significant regulation. Loss of demand for
our product, product liability claims and increased regulation
stemming from unfavorable scientific studies on cannabis vaporizer
products could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
We May Have Limited Access to Capital as a
Result of our Business and Operations.
Because the Company
cultivates, processes, possesses, and distributes cannabis products
in violation of the CSA, a significant proportion of providers of
debt and equity capital are unwilling or unable to enter into
financing transactions with the Company. As a result, the
Company’s access to capital is and may continue to be
extremely limited, which inhibits the ability of the Company to
fund operations and investments in growth initiatives. The
Company’s financial results, financial condition, business
and prospects are and may continue to be materially adversely
affected by its inability to access capital.
Anti-Money Laundering Laws and Regulations May
Limit Access to Traditional Banking Funds and
Services.
The Company is
subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the U.S. and Canada
that involve money laundering, financial recordkeeping and proceeds
of crime, including the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by Title III
of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate
Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA
PATRIOT Act), the U.S. Anti-Money Laundering Laws, 18 U.S.C.
§§ 1956, 1957, the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering)
and Terrorist Financing Act (Canada), as amended and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder, the Criminal Code (Canada) and
any related or similar rules, regulations or guidelines, issued,
administered or enforced by governmental authorities in the U.S.
and Canada. Further, under federal law, banks or other financial
institutions often refuse to provide a checking account, debit or
credit card, small business loan, or any banking services that
could be found guilty of money-laundering, aiding and abetting or
conspiracy to businesses involved in the cannabis industry due to
the present state of the laws and regulations governing financial
institutions in the U.S. The lack of banking and financial services
presents unique and significant challenges to businesses in the
U.S. cannabis industry. While Lowell Farms has maintained bank
accounts, the loss of such accounts and the potential lack of a
secure place in which to deposit and store cash, the inability to
pay creditors through the issuance of checks and the inability to
secure traditional forms of operational financing, such as lines of
credit, are some of the many challenges presented to U.S. cannabis
companies, and which could conceivably impact the Company, by the
unavailability of traditional banking and financial
services.
Despite these laws,
FinCEN issued the FinCEN Guidance in 2014, which as described
above, outlines the pathways for financial institutions to bank
state sanctioned cannabis businesses in compliance with federal
enforcement priorities. The FinCEN Guidance echoed the enforcement
priorities of the Cole Memorandum. Under these guidelines,
financial institutions must submit a Suspicious Activity Report
(“SAR”) in connection with all cannabis-related banking
activities by any client of such financial institution, in
accordance with federal money laundering laws. These
cannabis-related SARs are divided into three categories - cannabis
limited, cannabis priority, and cannabis terminated - based on the
financial institution’s belief that the business in question
follows state law, is operating outside of compliance with state
law, or where the banking relationship has been terminated,
respectively.
The FinCEN Guidance
states that in some circumstances, it is permissible for banks to
provide services to cannabis-related businesses without risking
prosecution for violation of federal money laundering laws. It
refers to supplementary guidance included in the Cole Memorandum.
The revocation of the Cole Memorandum has not yet affected the
status of the FinCEN Guidance, nor has the United States Department
of the Treasury given any indication that it intends to rescind the
FinCEN Guidance itself. Although the FinCEN Guidance remains
intact, it is unclear whether the current administration or future
administrations will continue to follow the guidelines of the
FinCEN Guidance. The DOJ continues to have the right and power to
prosecute crimes committed by banks and financial institutions,
such as money laundering and violations of the Bank Secrecy Act,
that occur in any state including states that have in some form
legalized the sale of cannabis. Further, the conduct of the
DOJ’s enforcement priorities could change for any number of
reasons. A change in the DOJ’s priorities could result in the
DOJ’s prosecuting banks and financial institutions for crimes
that were not previously prosecuted.
In the event that
any of the Company’s operations, or any proceeds thereof, any
dividends or distributions therefrom, or any profits or revenues
accruing from such operations in the United States were found to be
in violation of money laundering legislation or otherwise, such
transactions may be viewed as proceeds of a crime under one or more
of the statutes noted above or any other applicable legislation.
Apart from the consequences of any prosecution in connection with
such violation, among other things, this could restrict or
otherwise jeopardize the Company’s ability to declare or pay
dividends, effect other distributions or subsequently repatriate
such funds back to Canada.
Restricted Access to Banking Services Could
Make Operating our Business and Maintaining our Finances
Difficult.
The FinCEN
Guidance, as further described above, remains effective to this
day, in spite of the fact that the Cole Memorandum was rescinded
and replaced by the Sessions Memorandum. The FinCEN Guidance does
not provide any safe harbors or legal defenses from examination or
regulatory or criminal enforcement actions by the DOJ, FinCEN or
other federal regulators, though. Thus, most banks and other
financial institutions in the U.S. do not appear to be comfortable
providing banking services to cannabis-related businesses, or
relying on this guidance, which can be amended or revoked at any
time by the current or future federal administrations. In addition
to the foregoing, banks may refuse to process debit card payments
and credit card companies generally refuse to process credit card
payments for cannabis-related businesses. As a result, the Company
may have limited or no access to banking or other financial
services in the U.S. The inability or limitation in the
Company’s ability to open or maintain bank accounts, obtain
other banking services and/or accept credit card and debit card
payments may make it difficult for the Company to operate and
conduct its business as planned or to operate
efficiently.
Heightened Scrutiny by Securities Regulatory
Authorities in the United States and Canada May Impact
Investors’ Ability to Transact in the Company’s
Securities.
The Company’s
existing operations in the United States, and any future operations
or investments, may become the subject of heightened scrutiny by
regulators, stock exchanges and other authorities in the United
States and/or Canada. As a result, the Company may be subject to
significant direct and indirect interaction with public officials.
It is impossible to determine the extent of the impact of any new
laws, regulations or initiatives that may be proposed, or whether
any proposals will become law or otherwise be adopted, and there
can be no assurance that heightened scrutiny will not in turn lead
to the imposition of certain restrictions on the Company’s
ability to operate or invest in the United States or any other
jurisdiction, in addition to those described herein.
The Company’s
operations in the United States cannabis market may become the
subject of heightened scrutiny by regulators, stock exchanges,
clearing agencies and other authorities in Canada. It has been
reported by certain publications in Canada that the Canadian
Depository for Securities Limited is considering a policy shift
that would see its subsidiary, CDS Clearing and Depository Services
Inc. (“CDS”), refuse to settle trades for cannabis
issuers that have investments in the United States. CDS is
Canada’s central securities depository, clearing and
settlement hub settling trades in the Canadian equity, fixed income
and money markets. CDS or its parent company has not issued any
public statement with regard to these reports. On February 8, 2018,
following discussions with the Canadian Securities Administrators
and recognized Canadian securities exchanges, CDS signed the CDS
Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with The Aequitas
NEO Exchange Inc., the CSE, the Toronto Stock Exchange, and the TSX
Venture Exchange. The MOU outlines the parties’ understanding
of Canada’s regulatory framework applicable to the rules and
procedures and regulatory oversight of the exchanges and CDS as it
relates to issuers with cannabis-related activities in the United
States. The MOU confirms, with respect to the clearing of listed
securities, that CDS relies on the exchanges to review the conduct
of listed issuers. As a result, there currently is no CDS ban on
the clearing of securities of issuers with cannabis -related
activities in the United States. However, if CDS were to proceed in
the manner suggested by these publications, and apply such a ban on
the clearing of securities of the Company, it would have a material
adverse effect on the ability of the Company’s shareholders
to effect trades of shares through the facilities of a stock
exchange in Canada, as a result of which such shares could become
highly illiquid.
The Depositary
Trust Company (“DTC”) is the primary depository for
securities in the United States. Several major U.S. securities
clearing companies that provide clearance, custody and settlement
services in the United States terminated providing clearance
services to issuers in the cannabis industry, including those that
operate entirely outside the United States, in response to the
Sessions Memo. As a result of these decisions, U.S. securityholders
may experience difficulties depositing securities of cannabis
companies in the DTC system or reselling their securities in open
market transactions, including transactions facilitated through the
CSE. Many larger U.S. broker-dealers own U.S. securities companies
that self-clear transactions. However, some U.S. brokerages have
adopted policies precluding their clients from trading securities
of cannabis issuers.
Changes in State or Federal Political/or
Regulatory Climate Could Impact the Company’s
Business.
The success of the
Company’s business strategy depends on the legality of the
cannabis industry in the states in which the Company operates, and
the lack of federal enforcement of its laws that make cannabis
businesses illegal. The political environment surrounding the
cannabis industry in general can be volatile and the statutory and
regulatory framework remains in flux. Despite widespread state
legalization, the risk remains that a shift in the regulatory or
political realm could occur and have a drastic impact on the
industry as a whole, adversely impacting the Company’s
business, results of operations, financial condition or
prospects.
Delays in enactment
of or changes in new state regulations, or changes in federal laws
or enforcement priorities, could restrict the Company’s
ability to reach strategic growth targets and lower return on
investor capital. The strategic growth strategy of the Company will
be reliant upon state regulations being implemented to facilitate
the operation of medical and adult-use cannabis in California. If
such regulations are not timely implemented, or are subsequently
repealed or amended, or contain prolonged or problematic phase-in
or transition periods or provisions, the Company’s ability to
achieve its growth targets, and thus, the return on investor
capital, could be adversely affected. The Company is unable to
predict with certainty when and how the outcome of these complex
regulatory and legislative proceedings will affect its business and
growth.
Further, there is
no guarantee that state laws legalizing and regulating the sale and
use of cannabis will not be repealed or overturned, or that local
governmental authorities will not limit the applicability of state
laws within their respective jurisdictions. If the federal
government begins to enforce federal laws relating to cannabis in
states where the sale and use of cannabis is currently legal, or if
existing applicable state laws are repealed or curtailed, the
Company’s business, results of operations, financial
condition and prospects would be materially adversely affected. It
is also important to note that local and city ordinances may
strictly limit and/or restrict cannabis businesses in a manner that
will make it extremely difficult or impossible to transact business
that is necessary for the continued operation of the cannabis
industry, including the Company. Federal actions against
individuals or entities engaged in the cannabis industry or a
repeal of applicable cannabis related legislation could adversely
affect the Company and its business, results of operations,
financial condition and prospects.
The medical and
adult-use cannabis industries are in their infancy and the Company
anticipates that the current California regulations will be subject
to change as California’s regulation of the cannabis industry
matures. The Company’s compliance program emphasizes security
and inventory control to ensure strict monitoring of cannabis and
other inventory from cultivation to sale or disposal. Additionally,
Lowell Farms has created standard operating procedures that include
descriptions and instructions for monitoring inventory at all
stages of cultivation, processing, manufacturing, distribution,
transportation and delivery. The Company will continue to monitor
compliance on an ongoing basis in accordance with its compliance
program, standard operating procedures, and any changes to
applicable regulation.
Overall, the
medical and adult-use cannabis industry is subject to significant
regulatory change at each of the local, state and federal level.
The inability of the Company to respond to the changing regulatory
landscape may cause it to be unsuccessful in capturing significant
market share and could otherwise harm its business, results of
operations, financial condition or prospects.
Investors Could Be Disqualified From Ownership
in the Company.
The Company’s
business is in a highly regulated industry in which many states
have enacted extensive rules for ownership of a participant
company. Investors in the Company could become disqualified from
having an ownership stake in the Company under relevant laws and
regulations of applicable state and/or local regulators, if the
applicable owner is convicted of a certain type of felony or fails
to meet the requirements for owning equity in a company like the
Company.
Negative Public Opinion and Perception of the
Cannabis Industry Could Adversely Impact Our Ability to Operate and
Our Growth Strategy.
Government policy
changes or public opinion may result in a significant influence
over the regulation of the cannabis industry in Canada, the United
States or elsewhere. The Company believes the medical and adult-use
cannabis industry is highly dependent on consumer perception
regarding the safety and efficacy of such cannabis. Consumer
perceptions regarding legality, morality, consumption, safety,
efficacy and quality of cannabis are mixed and evolving. Public
opinion and support for medical and adult-use cannabis has
traditionally been inconsistent and varied from jurisdiction to
jurisdiction. While public opinion and support appears to be rising
for legalizing medical and adult-use cannabis, it remains a
controversial issue subject to differing opinions surrounding the
level of legalization (for example, medical cannabis as opposed to
legalization in general). A negative shift in the public’s
perception of cannabis in the United States or any other applicable
jurisdiction could affect future legislation or regulation. Among
other things, such a shift could cause state jurisdictions to
abandon initiatives or proposals to legalize medical and/or
adult-use cannabis, or could result in adverse regulatory changes
in California, thereby limiting the Company’s growth
prospects and number of new state jurisdictions into which the
Company could expand. Any inability to fully implement the
Company’s expansion strategy may have a material adverse
effect on its business, results of operations or
prospects.
Significant Licensure Requirements and
Limitations in States Where Cannabis is Legal Could Impact the
Company’s Ability to Maintain its
Operations.
The Company’s
business is subject to a variety of laws, regulations and
guidelines relating to the cultivation, manufacture, management,
transportation, extraction, storage and disposal of cannabis,
including laws and regulations relating to health and safety, the
conduct of operations and the protection of the environment.
Achievement of the Company’s business objectives are
contingent, in part, upon compliance with applicable regulatory
requirements and obtaining all requisite regulatory approvals.
Changes to such laws, regulations and guidelines due to matters
beyond the control of the Company may cause adverse effects to the
Company.
The Company will be
required to obtain or renew government permits and licenses for its
current and contemplated operations. Obtaining, amending or
renewing the necessary governmental permits and licenses can be a
time-consuming process involving numerous regulatory agencies,
involving public hearings and costly undertakings on the
Company’s part. The duration and success of the
Company’s efforts to obtain, amend and renew permits and
licenses will be contingent upon many variables not within its
control, including the interpretation of applicable requirements
implemented by the relevant permitting or licensing authority. The
Company may not be able to obtain, amend or renew permits or
licenses that are necessary to its operations. Any unexpected
delays or costs associated with the permitting and licensing
process could impede the ongoing or proposed operations of the
Company. To the extent permits or licenses are not obtained,
amended or renewed, or are subsequently suspended or revoked, the
Company may be curtailed or prohibited from proceeding with its
ongoing operations or planned renovation, development and
commercialization activities. Such curtailment or prohibition may
result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s
business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
California state licenses, and some local licenses, are renewed
annually. Each year, licensees are required to submit a renewal
application per guidelines published by the BCC (for state
licenses) or the applicable local regulatory body (for local
licenses), including the DCR. While renewals are annual, there is
no ultimate expiry after which no renewals are permitted.
Additionally, with respect to the renewal process, provided that
the requisite renewal fees are paid, the renewal application is
submitted in a timely manner and there are no material violations
noted against the applicable license, the Company would expect to
receive the applicable renewed license in the ordinary course of
business.
Under MAUCRSA,
after January 1, 2018, only license holders are permitted to engage
in commercial cannabis activities. A prerequisite to obtaining a
California state license is obtaining a valid license, permit or
authorization from a local municipality. The process associated
with acquiring a permanent state license is onerous and there are
no assurances that the Company, or any subsidiary or entity to
which the Company will provide or intends to provide services, will
be granted any licenses or any renewals thereof. Because there are
different licenses for different types of commercial cannabis
activities, even if the Company, any subsidiary and/or any such
entity to which the Company will provide services or intends to
provide services is granted one or more licenses, there are no
assurances that they will be granted all of the licenses they will
need to effectuate the Company’s business plan. Further, as
part of the permitting and licensing process in California, state
and local officials may conduct both random and scheduled
inspections of cannabis operations. The Company is required to
comply with both state laws and regulations and applicable local
ordinances and codes. Compliance with both state and local laws may
be burdensome and failure to do so could result in the loss of
licenses, civil penalties and possibly criminal prosecution. While
the compliance controls of Lowell Farms have been developed to
mitigate the risk of any material violations of any license it
holds arising, there is no assurance that the Company’s
licenses will be renewed by each applicable regulatory authority in
the future in a timely manner. Any unexpected delays or costs
associated with the licensing renewal process for any of the
licenses held or to be held by the Company could impede the ongoing
or planned operations of the Company and have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s business, financial condition,
results of operations or prospects.
The Company may
become involved in a number of government or agency proceedings,
investigations and audits. The outcome of any regulatory or agency
proceedings, investigations, audits, and other contingencies could
harm the Company’s reputation, require the Company to take,
or refrain from taking, actions that could harm its operations or
require the Company to pay substantial amounts of money, harming
its financial condition. There can be no assurance that any pending
or future regulatory or agency proceedings, investigations and
audits will not result in substantial costs or a diversion of
management’s attention and resources or have a material
adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial
condition, results of operations or prospects.
Reclassification of Cannabis in the United
States Could Adversely Impact the Company’s Business and
Growth Strategy.
If marijuana is
re-categorized as a Schedule II or lower controlled substance, the
ability to conduct research on the medical benefits of cannabis
would most likely be improved; however, if cannabis is
re-categorized as a Schedule II or other controlled substance, and
the resulting re-classification would result in the requirement for
U.S. FDA approval if medical claims are made for the
Company’s products such as medical cannabis, then as a
result, such products may be subject to a significant degree of
regulation by the U.S. FDA and DEA. In that case, the Company may
be required to be registered (licensed) to perform these activities
and have the security, control, recordkeeping, reporting and
inventory mechanisms required by the DEA to prevent drug loss and
diversion. Obtaining the necessary registrations may result in
delay of the cultivation, manufacturing or distribution of the
Company’s anticipated products. The DEA conducts periodic
inspections of certain registered establishments that handle
controlled substances. Failure to maintain compliance could have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial
condition and results of operations. The DEA may seek civil
penalties, refuse to renew necessary registrations, or initiate
proceedings to restrict, suspend or revoke those registrations. In
certain circumstances, violations could lead to criminal
proceedings. Furthermore, if the U.S. FDA, DEA, or any other
regulatory authority determines that the Company’s products
may have potential for abuse, it may require the Company to
generate more clinical or other data than the Company currently
anticipates in order to establish whether or to what extent the
substance has an abuse potential, which could increase the cost
and/or delay the launch of that product.
Service Providers May Suspend or Withdraw
Services if an Adverse Change in Cannabis Regulation
Occurs.
As a result of any
adverse change to the approach in enforcement of United States
cannabis laws, adverse regulatory or political change, additional
scrutiny by regulatory authorities, adverse change in public
perception in respect of the consumption of marijuana or otherwise,
third party service providers to the Company could suspend or
withdraw their services, which may have a material adverse effect
on the Company’s business, revenues, operating results,
financial condition or prospects.
Increasing Legalization of Cannabis and Rapid
Growth and Consolidation in the Cannabis Industry may Further
Intensify Competition.
The cannabis
industry is undergoing rapid growth and substantial change, and the
legal landscape for medical and recreational cannabis is rapidly
changing internationally. An increasing number of jurisdictions
globally are passing legislation allowing for the production and
distribution of medical and/or recreational cannabis in some form
or another. Entry into the cannabis market by international
competitors might lower the demand for our products.
The foregoing
legalization and growth trends in the cannabis industry has
resulted in an increase in competitors, consolidation and formation
of strategic relationships. Such acquisitions or other
consolidating transactions could harm us in a number of ways,
including by losing strategic partners if they are acquired by or
enter into relationships with a competitor, losing customers,
revenue and market share, or forcing us to expend greater resources
to meet new or additional competitive threats,all of which could
harm our operating results. As competitors enter the market and
become increasingly sophisticated, competition in the cannabis
industry may intensify and place downward pressure on retail prices
for products and services, which could negatively impact
profitability.
The Company May Encounter Difficulties Entering
its Contracts in Federal and Some State Courts.
Due to the nature
of the Company’s business and the fact that its contracts
involve cannabis and other activities that are not legal under
federal law, the Company may face difficulties in enforcing its
contracts in federal and certain state courts. The inability to
enforce any of the Company’s contracts could have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results,
financial condition or prospects. California enacted a law that
provides that notwithstanding any other law, commercial activity
relating to medicinal cannabis or adult-use cannabis conducted in
compliance with California law and any applicable local standards,
requirements, and regulations shall be deemed to be all of the
following: (1) a lawful object of a contract, (2) not contrary to,
an express provision of law, any policy of express law, or good
morals, and (3) not against public policy.
The Company’s articles of incorporation
provides that the Supreme Court of the Province of British
Columbia, Canada and the appellate Courts therefrom are the sole
and exclusive forum for any derivative action brought on behalf of
the company, which may limit our investors’ flexibility in
selecting a forum for any future disputes.
Our articles of
incorporation provides that the Supreme Court of the Province of
British Columbia, Canada and the appellate Courts therefrom are the
sole and exclusive forum for any derivative action brought on
behalf of the company. Our articles of incorporation do not limit
the ability of investors to bring direct actions outside of British
Columbia, Canada, including those arising under the Exchange Act
and the Securities Act. Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), creates
exclusive federal jurisdiction over actions brought to enforce any
duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and
regulations thereunder, and Section 22 of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), creates
concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits
brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities
Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Neither investors nor
the Company and may waive compliance with the federal securities
laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, and it is therefore
uncertain whether the exclusive forum provision of our charter
would be enforced by a court as to derivative claims brought under
the Exchange Act or the Securities Act. Furthermore, the exclusive
forum provision of our charter may increase the costs to investors
in bringing claims, may discourage investors from bringing claims
and may limit investors’ ability to bring claims in a
judicial forum that they find favorable.
The COVID-19 Pandemic May Adversely Affect Our
Business and Financial Condition.
The COVID-19
pandemic has adversely impacted commercial and economic activity
and contributed to significant volatility in the equity and debt
markets in the U.S. and Canada. The impact of the outbreak
continues to develop and many jurisdictions, including the State of
California and local municipalities, have instituted quarantines,
prohibitions on travel and the closure of offices, businesses,
schools, retail stores and other public venues. Individual
businesses and industries are also implementing similar
precautionary measures. Those measures, as well as the general
uncertainty surrounding the dangers and effects of COVID-19, have
created significant disruption in supply chains and economic
activity. New strains of the virus have been identified originating
in the U.S. and elsewhere. These new strains may have different
transmission, morbidity and mortality rates than the original
virus, and the COVID-19 vaccines developed to date may not be
effective to provide immunization against new strains of the virus.
While the Company has continuously sought to assess the potential
impact of the pandemic on its financial condition and operating
results, any assessment is subject to extreme uncertainty as to
probability, severity and duration. The continued spread of the
virus globally could result in a protracted world-wide economic
downturn, the effects of which could last for some period after the
pandemic is controlled and/or abated and our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially
adversely affected. The impact of COVID-19 could have the effect of
heightening many of the other risk factors described
herein.
The Company has
attempted to assess the impact of the pandemic by identifying risks
in the following principle areas.
o
|
Price Volatility.
Since the COVID-19 outbreak commenced, the securities markets in
the U.S. and Canada have experienced a high level of price and
volume volatility and wide fluctuations in the market prices of
securities of many companies, which have not necessarily been
related to the operating performance, underlying asset values or
prospects of such companies. Future developments may adversely
impact the price of the Subordinate Voting Shares.
|
o
|
Mandatory Closure. In
California, the Company’s business has been deemed an
“essential service,” permitting the Company to stay
open despite the mandatory closure of non-essential businesses. The
Company continues to work closely with state and local regulators
to remain operational, but there is no guarantee further measures
may nevertheless require it to shut operations.
|
o
|
Customer Impact.
While the Company has not experienced an overall downturn in demand
for its products in connection with the pandemic, fluctuating rates
of illness, as well as quarantining, self-quarantining,
“social distancing” and other responsive measures, may
have a material negative impact on demand for its products while
the pandemic continues. Certain of the Company’s customers
have altered operating procedures as a result of the outbreak and
the impact of such changes is being monitored by the
Company.
|
o
|
Supply Chain
Disruption. The Company relies on third party suppliers for
equipment and services to produce its products and keep its
operations going. If its suppliers are unable to continue operating
due to mandatory closures or other effects of the pandemic, it may
negatively impact its own ability to continue operating. At this
time, the Company has not experienced any failure to secure
critical supplies or services. However, disruptions in our supply
chain may affect our ability to continue certain aspects of the
Company’s operations or may significantly increase the cost
of operating its business and significantly reduce its
margins.
|
o
|
Staffing Disruption.
The Company is, for the time being, implementing among its staff
where feasible “social distancing” measures recommended
by such bodies as the Center of Disease Control, the Presidential
Administration, as well as state and local governments. The Company
has cancelled non-essential travel by employees, implemented remote
meetings where possible, and permitted all staff who can work
remotely to do so. For those whose duties require them to work
on-site, measures have been implemented to reduce infection risk,
mandating additional cleaning of workspaces and hand disinfection,
providing masks and gloves to certain personnel. Nevertheless,
despite such measures, the Company may find it difficult to ensure
that its operations remain staffed due to employees falling ill
with COVID-19, becoming subject to quarantine, or deciding not to
come to come to work on their own volition to avoid infection. At
certain locations, the Company has experienced increased
absenteeism due to the pandemic. If such absenteeism increases, the
Company may not be able, including through replacement and
temporary staff, to continue to operate in some or all locations.
In addition, the Company may incur increased medical
costs/insurance premiums as a result of these health risks to its
personnel.
|
o
|
Regulatory Backlog.
Regulatory authorities, including those that oversee the cannabis
industry on the state level, are heavily occupied with their
response to the pandemic. These regulators as well as other
executive and legislative bodies in California may not be able to
provide the level of support and attention to day-to-day regulatory
functions as well as to needed regulatory development and reform
that they would otherwise have provided. Such regulatory backlog
may materially hinder the development of the Company’s
business by delaying such activities as product launches, facility
openings and approval of any future business acquisitions, thus
materially impeding development of its business.
|
The Company is
actively addressing the risk to business continuity represented by
each of the above factors through the implementation of a broad
range of measures throughout its structure and is re-assessing its
response to the COVID-19 pandemic on an ongoing basis. The above
risks individually or collectively may have a material impact on
the Company’s ability to generate revenue. Implementing
measures to remediate the risks identified above may materially
increase our costs of doing business, reduce our margins and
potentially result in or increase losses. While the Company is not
currently in financial distress, if the Company’s financial
situation materially deteriorates as a result of the impact of the
pandemic, the Company could eventually be unable to meet its
obligations to third parties, which in turn could lead to
insolvency and bankruptcy of the Company.
The regional stay
home order, announced by the California Department of Public Health
on December 3, 2020, as supplemented by an additional order
executed on December 6, 2020, was issued to apply across California
on a regional basis in respect of certain designated regions. It is
required to go into effect in respect of a particular region at
11:59 p.m. the day after such region has been announced to have
less than 15% ICU availability. Among other implications in the
event this order becomes effective in respect of a
region:
o
|
private gatherings of
any size are prohibited in such region,
|
o
|
all individuals
living in such region are required to stay home except as necessary
to conduct activities associated with the operation, maintenance,
or usage of critical infrastructure, as required by law, or as
specifically permitted by this order,
|
o
|
indoor and outdoor
restaurant dining, personal care services and indoor recreational
facilities are required to close in such region,
|
o
|
critical
infrastructure sectors may operate in such region and must continue
to modify operations pursuant to the applicable sector guidance,
and
|
o
|
all retailers in such
region may operate indoors at no more than 20% capacity and must
follow the public health guidance for retailers.
|
Apart from the
conditions under which this stay home order is required to be
followed, California state counties may exercise discretion to
apply this order voluntarily.
The Company
facilities are not currently subject to any stay home orders. The
Company’s cultivation, manufacturing and distribution
operations and the Company’s various suppliers of raw
materials or inputs are considered to be a part of the essential
infrastructure sectors and as such do not require a reduction in
their scope or amount of activity. The end purchasers of products
distributed by the Company, being cannabis retail dispensaries
located across California, may be or become subject to this stay
home order. They would nonetheless be able to continue to operate
curbside pick-up and delivery services and potentially limited
capacity indoor operations in order to effect the sale of their
products, as they too are considered essential businesses.
Nonetheless, the impact of this stay home order may be to lessen
the demand for the Company’s products. The extent to which
this stay home order may impact the Company’s business,
financial position, results of operations and cash flows is highly
uncertain and cannot be quantified at this time. The Company will
continue to monitor the impact of this stay home order and take
measures that alter its business operations as may be required by
federal, state or local authorities and/or that the Company deems
are in the best interests of its employees, customers, suppliers,
shareholders and other stakeholders.
Wildfire Risks in Certain Areas of California
Could Adversely Impact the Company’s
Operations.
Certain areas of
California, including certain areas nearby the Company’s
cultivation facility in Monterey County, can be negatively impacted
by wildfires. Wildfires can cause smoke and ash to pass through
greenhouse vents and cause cannabis plants to fail testing. As a
result, the Company will close the greenhouse vents when needed to
prohibit smoke and ash from entering the greenhouses at its
cultivation facility. However, closing the greenhouse vents may
cause elevated temperatures within the greenhouses and as a result
induced plant stress, thereby negatively affecting plant yields.
Wildfires can also cause essential sunlight to be blocked out,
thereby negatively affecting plant yields in another manner.
Overall, such wildfires can materially disrupt the Company’s
ability to harvest cannabis crops, significantly diminishing both
the size and quality of the crops harvested, the Company’s
supply chain, and other operations and as a result can negatively
impact the Company’s business, financial position, results of
operations and cash flows. Wildfires that occurred in late summer,
early fall 2020 negatively impacted the Company’s business,
financial position, results of operations and cash flows during the
third quarter of 2020 and are expected to continue to have a
negative impact for the fourth quarter of 2020 and potentially
beyond as the Company completes its production from cannabis crops
that were impacted by such wildfires that occurred earlier this
year. In the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company installed
automated environmental control systems within individual grow
rooms at its cultivation facility. While the Company believes that
the addition of such systems should mitigate future negative
effects of wildfires that may occur nearby the Company’s
cultivation facility, there is no guarantee that such negative
effects would in fact be mitigated. The extent to which any such
future wildfires or any other natural disaster impacts the
Company’s results will depend on future developments, which
are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.
Risks Related to our
Acquisitions
The anticipated benefits of the Lowell
Acquisition may not be realized or may take longer than expected to
realize.
Historically, the
Company and the Lowell brands businesses have operated
independently. The future success of the Lowell Acquisition,
including anticipated benefits, depends, in part, on our ability to
optimize our combined operations. The optimization of our
operations following the Lowell Acquisition will be a complex and
time-consuming process and if we experience difficulties in this
process, the anticipated benefits may not be realized fully or at
all, or may take longer to realize than expected, which could have
an adverse effect on us for an undetermined period. There can be no
assurances that we will realize the potential operating
efficiencies, synergies and other benefits currently anticipated
from the Lowell Acquisition.
The integration of
the Lowell brands businesses and the Company’s historical
operations may present material challenges, including, without
limitation:
o
|
combining the
leadership teams and corporate cultures of the Company and
Hacienda;
|
o
|
the diversion of
management’s attention from other ongoing business concerns
and performance shortfalls as a result of the devotion of
management’s attention to the integration of the
businesses;
|
o
|
managing a larger
combined business;
|
o
|
maintaining employee
morale and retaining key management and other employees at the
combined company;
|
o
|
retaining existing
business and operational relationships, and attracting new business
and operational relationships;
|
o
|
the possibility of
faulty assumptions underlying expectations regarding the
integration process;
|
o
|
consolidating
corporate and administrative infrastructures and eliminating
duplicative operations;
|
o
|
managing expense
loads and maintaining currently anticipated operating margins;
and
|
o
|
unanticipated issues
in integrating information technology, communications and other
systems.
|
Some of these
factors are outside of our control, and any one of them could
result in delays, increased costs, decreases in the amount of
potential revenues or synergies, potential cost savings, and
diversion of management’s time and energy, which could
materially affect our financial position, results of operations,
and cash flows.
We may complete additional acquisitions, enter
into new lines of business and expand into new geographic markets
and businesses, each of which may result in upfront costs and
additional risks and uncertainties in our
businesses.
We intend, if
market conditions warrant, to grow our businesses by acquiring
additional businesses, expanding existing products lines, entering
into new product lines and entering new geographic markets.
Attempts to expand our businesses involve a number of special
risks, including some or all of the following:
o
|
the required
investment of capital and other resources;
|
o
|
the diversion of
management’s attention from our existing
businesses;
|
o
|
the assumption of
liabilities in any acquired business;
|
o
|
the disruption of our
ongoing businesses;
|
o
|
entry into markets or
lines of business in which we may have limited or no
experience;
|
o
|
compliance with or
applicability to our businesses of regulations and laws, including,
in particular, regulations and laws in new states and localities,
and a lack of experience in interacting with the regulatory
authorities responsible for enforcing these regulations and laws;
and
|
o
|
increasing demands on
our operational and management systems and controls.
|
In addition, the
acquisition of additional businesses would involve some or all of
the integration risks identified above with respect to the Lowell
Acquisition. Not all of our historical acquisitions have been
successful. Because we have not yet identified these potential new
acquisitions, product line expansions, and expansions into new
geographic markets or lines of business, we cannot identify all of
the specific risks we may face and the potential adverse
consequences on us and their investment that may result from any
attempted acquisition or expansion.
Loss of Foreign Private Issuer
Status
As of January 1,
2021, the Company ceased to meet the definition of a “foreign
private issuer” set out in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. As
of that date, the aggregate number of Super Voting Shares and
Subordinate Voting Shares, held of record, directly or indirectly,
by U.S. Residents exceeded 50% of the aggregate number of Super
Voting Shares and Subordinate Voting Shares issued and outstanding.
As a result of the loss of foreign private issuer status and the
filing of our Form 10 that became effective on May 8, 2021, we are
subject to SEC disclosure rules and other rules and regulations
applicable to domestic issuers. These obligations require
significant financial and management resources. We are also subject
to liability under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.
Liability under these acts can lead to monetary fines, limitations
on future financings and, if imposed, may impede our ability to
finance our business.
Risks Related to the Securities of the
Company
Unpredictability Caused by the Company’s
Capital Structure Could Adversely Impact the Market for the
Company’s Securities.
Although other
Canadian-listed companies have dual class or multiple voting and
exchangeable share structures, given the other unique features of
the capital structure of the Company, including the existence of a
significant amount of redeemable equity securities that have been
issued by, and are issuable pursuant to the exercise, conversion or
exchange of the applicable convertible and exchangeable securities
of, Indus Holding Company, which equity securities are redeemable
from time to time for Subordinate Voting Shares in accordance with
their terms, the Company is not able to predict whether this
structure will result in a lower trading price for or greater
fluctuations in the trading price of the Subordinate Voting Shares
or will result in adverse publicity to the Company or other adverse
consequences.
Investors Could be Diluted by Future
Financings.
The Company may
need to raise additional financing in the future through the
issuance of additional equity securities or convertible debt
securities. If the Company raises additional funding by issuing
additional equity securities or convertible debt securities, such
financings may substantially dilute the interests of shareholders
of the Company and reduce the value of their investment and the
value of the Company’s securities.
The Market for Subordinate Voting Shares May be
Illiquid.
There may not be an
active, liquid market for the Subordinate Voting Shares. There is
no guarantee that an active trading market for the Subordinate
Voting Shares will be maintained on the CSE. Investors may not be
able to sell their Subordinate Voting Shares quickly or at the
latest market price if trading in the Subordinate Voting Shares is
not active.
The Market Price of the Subordinate Voting
Shares is Volatile.
The market price of
the Subordinate Voting Shares cannot be predicted and has been and
may be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to
numerous factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s
control. This volatility may affect the ability of holders of
Subordinate Voting Shares to sell their securities at an
advantageous price. Market price fluctuations in the Subordinate
Voting Shares may be due to the Company’s operating results
failing to meet expectations of securities analysts or investors in
any period, downward revision in securities analysts’
estimates, adverse changes in general market conditions or
competitive, regulatory or economic trends, adverse changes in the
economic performance or market valuations of companies in the
industry in which the Company operates, acquisitions, dispositions,
strategic partnerships, joint ventures, capital commitments or
other material public announcements by the Company or its
competitors or government and regulatory authorities, operating and
share price performance of the companies that investors deem
comparable to the Company, addition or departure of the
Company’s executive officers and other key personnel, along
with a variety of additional factors. These broad market
fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of the
Subordinate Voting Shares.
Financial markets
have at times historically experienced significant price and volume
fluctuations that have particularly affected the market prices of
equity and convertible securities of companies and that have often
been unrelated to the operating performance, underlying asset
values or prospects of such companies. Accordingly, the market
price of the Subordinate Voting Shares and any other listed
securities of the Company, from time to time, may decline even if
the Company’s operating results, underlying asset values or
prospects have not changed. Additionally, these factors, as well as
other related factors, may cause decreases in asset values that are
deemed to be other than temporary, which may result in impairment
losses. There can be no assurance that continuing fluctuations in
price and volume will not occur. If such increased levels of
volatility and market turmoil arise or continue, the
Company’s operations may be adversely impacted and the
trading price of the Subordinate Voting Shares and such other
securities may be materially adversely affected.
Future sales of Subordinate Voting Shares in
the public market, or the perception that such sales may occur,
could adversely affect the prevailing market price of the
Subordinate Voting Shares.
As of July 30,
2021, there are 78,992,636 Subordinate Voting Shares outstanding
and the following Subordinate Voting Shares are issuable upon the
conversion, redemption, or exercise of derivate securities of
Lowell Farms and Indus Holding Company:
o
|
13,803,168
Subordinate Voting Shares are issuable upon the redemption of all
of the Class B Common Shares of Indus Holding Company (“Indus
Class B Common Shares”);
|
o
|
77,628,692
Subordinate Voting Shares are issuable upon the redemption of all
of the Class C Common Shares of Indus Holding Company (“Indus
Class C Common Shares” and, together with the Indus Class B
Common Shares, “Indus Redeemable Shares”) issuable upon
conversion of convertible debentures of Indus Holding Company
(excluding accrued and unpaid interest) and 78,628,692 Subordinate
Voting Shares are issuable upon the exercise of warrants issued in
the Convertible Debenture Offering;
|
o
|
11,500,000
Subordinate Voting Shares are issuable upon the exercise of the
warrants (the “December 2020 Warrants”) issued by the
Company (then named Indus Holdings, Inc.) in its December 2020 Unit
offering described herein (the “December 2020 Unit
Offering”);
|
o
|
2,411,516 Subordinate
Voting Shares are issuable upon the exercise of warrants issued by
Indus Holding Company prior to the RTO to investors in debentures
of Indus Holding Company;
|
o
|
1,332,710 Subordinate
Voting Shares are issuable upon the exercise of compensation
options held by financial advisors to the Company and/or Indus
Holding Company;
|
o
|
7,313,500 Subordinate
Voting Shares are issuable upon the exercise of options issued
pursuant to the Company’s equity incentive plans, of which
1,541,000 of such shares were vested as of July 30, 2021;
and
|
o
|
1,735,000 Subordinate
Voting Shares are subject to outstanding restricted stock units
issued pursuant to the Company’s equity incentive plans, none
of which were vested as of July 30, 2021.
|
22,643,678 of the
outstanding Subordinate Voting Shares were issued in the Lowell
Acquisition and are subject to a restriction on resale under
Canadian law until June 26, 2021. Furthermore, 5,000,000 of the
22,643,678 Subordinate Voting Shares issued in the Lowell
Acquisition are held in escrow and, absent offsetting claims for
indemnification, will be released on November 25,
2021.
7,997,520 of the
outstanding Subordinate Voting Shares were issued in connection
with the acquisition of the real property, improvements, related
assets and equity interests from C Quadrant LLC and are subject to
a restriction on resale under Canadian law until October 27, 2021.
Furthermore, 309,981 Subordinate Voting Shares issued in this
acquisition are held in escrow and, absent offsetting claims for
imdemnification, will be released on June 29, 2022.
The remainder of
the outstanding Subordinate Voting Shares, as well as any
securities issued upon conversion or exercise thereof, may be
resold pursuant to Rule 905 under the Securities Act of 1933 or any
other applicable exemption from registration, and no such shares
are subject to a contractual lock-up restriction.
Future sales of
Subordinate Voting Shares in the public market, or the perception
that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the prevailing
market price of the Subordinate Voting Shares.
The Company has experienced negative operating
cash flows throughout its history.
The Company had
negative operating cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2020, and 2019. Operating cash flows may decline in certain
circumstances, many of which are beyond the Company’s
control. As a result, the Company may need to allocate a portion of
its existing working capital or a portion of the net proceeds of
the Offering or any future securities issuance to fund any such
negative operating cash flow in future periods.
Risks Related to the Support
Agreement
The Company and
Indus Holding Company are parties to an amended and restated
support agreement dated as of April 10, 2020. The purpose of the
support agreement is to ensure that pro rata ownership of the
Company’s operating subsidiaries by holders of Subordinate
Voting Shares relative to holders of Indus Redeemable Shares is not
diluted as Indus Class B Common Shares and Indus Class C Common
Shares are redeemed for Subordinate Voting Shares or as other
securities are issued by the Company. In order to avoid such
dilution, the support agreement provides that upon any redemption
of Indus Class B Common Shares or Indus Class C Common Shares for
Subordinate Voting Shares, or upon any issuance of additional
Subordinate Voting Share by the Company, an equivalent number of
Indus Class A Common Shares will be issued to the Company by Indus
Holding Company. If the support agreement does not operate as
intended, and in particular if the Indus Class A Common Shares
issued to the Company in the future are not sufficient to maintain
an equivalent per share interest of the Subordinate Voting Shares
and the Indus Redeemable Shares in the Company’s operating
subsidiaries, the participation of holders of Subordinate Voting
Shares in any dividends and liquidating distributions by such
operating subsidiaries could be adversely impacted.
The Company is a tax resident of both the U.S.
and Canada and is, therefore, generally subject to both U.S. and
Canadian taxation, which may adversely affect its results of
operations.
The Company is
treated as a United States company for U.S. Federal income tax
purposes under section 7874 of the Code and is subject to United
States Federal income tax on its worldwide income. However, for
Canadian income tax purposes, the Company is, regardless of any
application of section 7874 of the Code, treated as a resident of
Canada for purposes of the Income
Tax Act (Canada). As a result, the Company is subject to
taxation both in Canada and the United States, which could have a
material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of
operations.
USE OF PROCEEDS
We are not selling
any securities under this prospectus and we will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of securities by the Selling
Securityholders.
SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS
The Selling
Securityholders may from time to time offer and sell any or all of
our securities set forth below pursuant to this prospectus. When we
refer to “Selling Securityholders” in this prospectus,
we mean the persons listed in the table below, and the pledgees,
donees, permitted transferees, assignees, successors and others who
later come to hold any of the Selling Securityholders’
interests in our securities other than through a public
sale.
The following table
sets forth, as of the date of this prospectus:
|
●
|
the name of the
Selling Securityholders for whom we are registering shares for
resale to the public,
|
|
●
|
the number of shares
that the Selling Securityholders beneficially owned prior to the
offering for resale of the securities under this
prospectus,
|
|
●
|
the number of shares
that may be offered for resale for the account of the Selling
Securityholders pursuant to this prospectus, and
|
|
●
|
the number and
percentage of shares to be beneficially owned by the Selling
Securityholders after the offering of the resale securities
(assuming all of the offered shares are sold by the Selling
Securityholders).
|
This table is
prepared solely based on information supplied to us by the listed
Selling Securityholders.
Selling Securityholder
|
|
Number of Subordinate Voting Shares Owned Prior
to Offering
|
|
|
Percentage of Subordinate Voting Shares Owned
Prior to Offering
|
|
|
Number of Subordinate Voting Shares Offered for
Sale
|
|
|
Number of Shares of Subordinate Voting Shares
Owned Assuming Sale of All Shares Offered
|
|
|
Percentage of Subordinate Voting Shares Owned
Assuming Sale of All Shares Offered
|
|
C Quadrant
LLC(1)
|
|
|
7,997,520
|
|
|
|
11.32
|
%
|
|
|
7,997,520
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
(1)
|
The business address
of the Selling Securityholder is: 43264 Business Park Dr, Temecula,
CA 92590.
|
Acquisition of Resale
Securities
7,997,520
Subordinate Voting Shares of Lowell Farms Inc. will be offered for
resale by the Selling Securityholders. The Selling Securityholders
acquired the 7,997,520 Subordinate Voting Shares as part of the
consideration for the acquisition of real property and related
assets of a cannabis drying and midstream processing facility
located in Monterey County. The consideration consisted of
$9,000,000 in cash and 7,997,520 of the Company’s subordinate
voting shares.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
General
We are a
California-based cannabis company with vertically integrated
operations including large scale cultivation, extraction,
processing, manufacturing, branding, packaging and wholesale
distribution to retail dispensaries. We manufacture and distribute
proprietary and third-party brands throughout the State of
California, the largest cannabis market in the world. We also
provide manufacturing, extraction and distribution services to
third-party cannabis and cannabis branding companies.
On February 25,
2021, we acquired the Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell Smokes trademark
brands, product portfolio and production assets from Hacienda and
its subsidiaries. The Lowell Acquisition expanded our product
offerings by adding a highly regarded, mature line of premium
branded cannabis pre-rolls, including infused pre-rolls, to our
product portfolio under the Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell Smokes
brands. The Lowell Acquisition also expanded our offerings of
premium packaged flower, concentrates, and vape products. We
believe our pre-existing strengths in cultivation and sourcing will
enhance the value of the brands and products acquired in the Lowell
Acquisition.
The Lowell
Acquisition also substantially broadened our customer base by
adding highly developed direct-to-consumer channels to complement
our pre-existing network of retail dispensary customers. This
addition to our customer base has resulted in broader geographic
coverage in California by the combined business.
On June 29, 2021,
we announced that we acquired real property and related assets of a
first-of-its-kind cannabis drying and midstream processing facility
located in Monterey County, nearby our flagship cultivation
operation. The 10-acre, 40,000 square foot processing facility will
provide drying, bucking, trimming, sorting, grading, and packaging
operations for up to 250,000 pounds of wholesale cannabis flower
annually. The new facility will process nearly all the cannabis
that we grow at our existing cultivation operations. Additionally,
we are commissioning a new business unit called Lowell Farm
Services (“LFS”), which will engage in fee-based
processing services for regional growers from the Salinas Valley
area, one of the largest and fastest growing cannabis cultivation
regions in the country. LFS operations are expected to become
operational during the third quarter of 2021.
We operate a
225,000 square foot greenhouse cultivation facility and a 40,000
square foot processing facility in Monterey County, a 15,000 square
foot manufacturing and laboratory facility in Salinas, California,
a separate 20,000 square foot distribution facility in Salinas,
California and a warehouse depot and distribution vehicles in Los
Angeles, California.
Product Offerings
Our product
offerings includes flower, vape pens, oils, extracts, chocolate
edibles, mints, gummies, beverages, tinctures and pre-rolls. We
sell our products under owned and third-party brands.
Brands we own
include the following:
o
|
Lowell Herb Co. and
Lowell Smokes - premium packaged flower, pre-roll, concentrates,
and vape products.
|
o
|
Cypress Reserve
– a premium flower brand reserved for the Company’s
highest potency harvests from its greenhouses.
|
o
|
Flavor Extracts
– provides crumble and terp sugar (which is an edible
cannabis product with isolated and enhanced flavor and aromas)
products that are hand-selected for optimum flavor and premium
color.
|
o
|
Kaizen – a
premium brand offering a full spectrum of cannabis
concentrates.
|
o
|
House Weed – a
value driven flower and concentrates offering, delivering a
flavorful and potent experience with dependable
quality.
|
o
|
Moon – offers a
range of cannabis bars, bites and fruit chews in a variety of
delicious flavors, focused on high-potency, high-quality and
high-value.
|
o
|
Altai –
combines confections with high quality cannabis to create delicious
hand-crafted and award-winning edibles.
|
o
|
Humble Flower – a
premium brand offering cannabis-infused topical creams, balms and
oils.
|
o
|
Original Pot Company
– infuses its baked edibles with high quality
cannabis.
|
o
|
CannaStripe –
offers a range of gummy edibles, high-quality,
high-value.
|
o
|
Acme Elixirs –
provides high quality, lab-tested vaporizing pens.
|
The Lowell Herb Co.
and Lowell Smokes brands were acquired in the Lowell Acquisition.
Our remaining brands were developed prior to the
acquisition.
We exclusively
manufacture and distribute Dr. Raw tinctures and topicals in
California. We also provide third party extraction processing and
third-party distribution services, and bulk extraction concentrates
and flower to licensed manufacturers and distributors. Our focus
during 2020 was on our ow
ned brands and
limiting the number of third-party brands manufactured and
distributed. The Lowell Acquisition is a significant expansion of
this strategy.
Cultivation
We conduct cannabis
cultivation operations located in Monterey County, California. We
currently operate a cultivation facility which includes four
greenhouses totaling approximately 225,000 square feet sited on 10
acres located on Zabala Road. Farming cannabis at this scale
enables us to curate specialized strains and maintain greater
control over the quantity and quality of cannabis available for our
products, preserving the consistency of our flower and cannabis
feedstocks for our extraction laboratory and product manufacturing
operations.
The first harvest
was in the third quarter of calendar 2017. We are nearing
completion of a series of facility upgrades to our greenhouses and
supporting infrastructure, which when completed will increase
facility output approximately four times from that generated in
2019. These facility improvements include separate grow rooms
configured with drop-shades, supplemental lighting, upgraded
electrical capability with environmental controls and automated
fertigation, raised gutter height in two of the greenhouses and
expanded dry room capacity capable of handling the increased
output. We harvested approximately 9,000 and 17,000 pounds of
flower in 2019 and 2020, respectively, and are currently projecting
to harvest up to 40,000 to 45,000 pounds in 2021 as a result of
these facility upgrades and improvements. We have invested
approximately $6 million in our greenhouse renovations to date with
planned additional investments. The completion and commissioning of
the renovated greenhouses and headhouse is expected to further
reduce unit costs of cultivation and make available additional
cannabis flower and feedstocks for our extraction and processing,
packaging and distribution operations.
We maintain a
strict quality control process which facilitates a predictable
output yield of pesticide-free products.
Extraction
Extraction
operations were first launched by us in the third quarter of 2017
with the commissioning of our 5,000 square foot licensed laboratory
within our Salinas manufacturing facility. The lab contains six
separate rooms that can each house one independent closed loop
volatile extraction machine (meaning that the machine does not
expose the products to open air), which are designed to process the
cannabis through the application of hydrocarbon or ethanol
solvents, to extract certain concentrated resins and oils from the
dried cannabis. This process is known as volatile extraction, which
is an efficient and rapid method of extracting cannabis. These
resins, oils and concentrates are sold as ingestible products known
as “shatter,” rosin, wax, sugar, diamonds,
“caviar,” and “crumble”.
We currently own
and operate five closed loop volatile extraction machines, each
housed in a separate room, and each having the capacity to process
approximately 100 pounds of dry product per day yielding
approximately 5 kilograms of cannabis concentrates. We also
currently own and operate 14 purge ovens to work in conjunction
with the five extraction units in the laboratory. Purge ovens, also
known as vacuum ovens, are used after the processing by the
extraction units to remove the solvents from the end-product in a
low pressure and high heat environment.
The extraction
operations utilize cannabis feedstocks from our cultivation site,
supplemented with feedstock acquired from multiple third-party
cultivations. Concentrate production is packaged as branded
extracts, such as crumble, shatter, wax and sugar for distribution,
incorporated into its manufactured edible products and sold in bulk
to other licensed enterprises. In addition, extraction is provided
on a fee-based service on third-party material.
Manufacturing
Our manufacturing
facility is located in Salinas, California and houses our edible
product operations and extraction and distillation operations. The
edible product operations utilize internally produced cannabis oil,
which can also be supplied from multiple external sources. Our
manufacturing operations produce a wide variety of cannabis-infused
products in our 15,000 square foot manufacturing facility in
Salinas. Our products include chocolate confections, beverages,
baked goods, hard and soft non-chocolate confections, and topical
lotions and balms. Lowell Farms utilizes modern commercial
production equipment and employs food grade manufacturing
protocols, including industry-leading standard operating procedures
designed so that its products meet stringent quality standards. We
have implemented updated compliance, packaging and labeling
standards to meet the requirements of the California Medical and
Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act with the advent of
adult use legalization in California.
We also operate an
automated flower packaging line and a pre-roll assembly line for
making finished goods in those respective categories with feedstock
grown by the Lowell Farms cultivation operations.
Distribution and Distribution
Services
We have a primary
distribution center, warehouse and packing facility located in
Salinas, California and a service center and distribution depot in
Los Angeles, California. We provide physical warehousing and
delivery to retail dispensary customers throughout the State of
California for our manufactured products as well as third party
branded products distributed on behalf of third parties. In
addition, we distribute all finished goods produced at the Hacienda
facility. Deliveries are made daily to over 80% of the licensed
dispensaries in California utilizing a fleet of 39 owned and leased
vehicles. We provide warehousing, delivery, customer service and
collection services for the third-party brands. We will increase
our fleet of vehicles as necessary to meet delivery requirements
from increased proprietary and third-party brand
sales.
Technology Platform
We maintain an
automated, on-demand supply chain logistics platform, utilizing
e-commerce, enterprise resource planning and other technology to
manage product movement, order taking and logistics
needs.
Inventory Management
We have
comprehensive inventory management procedures, which are compliant
with the rules set forth by the California Department of Consumer
Affairs’ Bureau of Cannabis Control and all other applicable
state and local laws, regulations, ordinances, and other
requirements. These procedures ensure strict control over Lowell
Farms’ cannabis and cannabis product inventory from
cultivation or manufacture to sale and delivery to a licensed
dispensary, distributor or manufacturer, or disposal as cannabis
waste. Such inventory management procedures also include measures
to prevent contamination and maintain the quality of the products
cultivated, manufactured or distributed.
Sources, Pricing and Availability of Raw
Materials, Component Parts or Finished Products
We presently source
all flower feedstock for sale primarily from our cultivation
facility. We have developed relationships with local cannabis
growers whereby flower quantities are readily available at
competitive prices should the sourcing need arise. We source our
biomass needs in extraction from our cultivation facility and from
third-party suppliers. Remaining biomass material is readily
available from multiple sources at competitive prices. Lowell Farms
manufactures substantially all cannabis oil and distillate needs
from its internal extraction operations. A small amount of
specialized cannabis oil is procured from multiple external sources
at competitive prices. Lowell Farms manufactures all finished goods
for its proprietary brands. Third party distributed brand product
is sourced directly from third party partners.
U.S. Cannabis Market
The emergence of
the legal cannabis sector in the United States, both for medical
and adult use, has been rapid as more states adopt regulations for
its production and sale. A majority of Americans now live in a
state where cannabis is legal in some form and almost a quarter of
the population lives in states in which both medical and
recreational use is permitted as a matter of, and in accordance
with, applicable state and local laws.1 According to
Fortune Business Insights, the global legal marijuana market is
anticipated to reach a value of US$97.35 billion by the end of 2026
from US$10.60 billion in 2018. The market is predicted to rise at a
compounded annual growth rate of 32.6% during the period 2019 to
2026.2
____________________
1 Nichols,
Chris (2018). Do a majority of Americans live in states with legal
marijuana. https://www.politifact.com/california/statements/2018/apr/19/john-chiang/do-majority-americans-live-states-legal-marijuana/
The use of cannabis
and cannabis derivatives to treat or alleviate the symptoms of a
wide variety of chronic conditions, while not recognized by the
FDA, has been accepted by a majority of citizens with a growing
acceptance by the medical community. A review of the research,
published in 2015 in the Journal of the American Medical
Association, found solid evidence that cannabis can treat pain and
muscle spasms.3 The pain component
is particularly important, because other studies have suggested
that cannabis can replace pain patients’ use of highly
addictive, potentially deadly opiates.4 Although hemp,
defined as cannabis and derivatives of cannabis with not more than
0.3% THC, has been descheduled from the Controlled Substances Act,
the FDA has regulatory oversight over foods, drugs, cosmetics
containing cannabis under the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act of 1938.
It is possible that as the federal and state agencies legalize
certain products, the FDA may issue rules and regulations,
including good manufacturing practices related to the growth,
cultivation, harvesting and processing of such products, even if
they are not marketed as drugs. It is possible that the FDA would
require that facilities where medical-use cannabis is grown to
register with the FDA and comply with certain federally prescribed
regulations, certifications, testing, or other requirements. The
potential impact on the cannabis industry is uncertain and could
include the imposition of new costs, requirements, and
prohibitions.
Although we are not
currently engaged in the production or distribution of medical
marijuana products, the FDA has jurisdiction over our flower, oil,
vape and edible products, among others. The FDA is currently taking
action in the form of Warning Letters, but may also take more
extreme enforcement such as recalls, disgorgement or penalties. If
we are unable to comply with regulations or facility registration
as prescribed by the FDA, it may have an adverse effect on our
business, operating results, and financial condition.
Polls conducted
throughout the United States consistently show overwhelming support
for the legalization of medical cannabis, together with strong
majority support for the full legalization of recreational
adult-use cannabis. As of November 11, 2019, “Around
nine-in-ten Americans favor legalization for recreational or
medical purposes” and “Only 8% say it should not be
legal.”5 These are large
increases in public support over the past 40 years in favor of
legal cannabis use.
Today cannabis is
legal in some form in a total of 36 states, the District of
Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. On the
recreational side, there are currently 15 States, plus the District
of Columbia and four U.S. territories, in which the recreational
sale of cannabis has been approved. These States include Oregon,
Washington, Nevada, California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Michigan,
Vermont, Alaska, Illinois, Maine, New Jersey, Arizona, South Dakota
and Montana. With respect to medical marijuana, as more research
centers study the effects of cannabis-based products in treating or
addressing therapeutic needs, and assuming that research findings
demonstrate that such products are effective in doing so,
management believes that the size of the U.S. medical cannabis
market will also continue to grow as more States expand their
medical marijuana programs and new States legalize medical
marijuana. Although the Company only operates in the State of
California, it may seek opportunities to expand into other States
within the United States that have legalized cannabis use either
medicinally or recreationally.
Notwithstanding
that 36 states and the District of Columbia have now legalized
adult-use and/or medical cannabis, cannabis remains illegal under
U.S. federal law with cannabis listed as a Schedule I drug under
the Controlled Substance Act, or CSA. See “United States Regulatory
Environment”.
__________________________
2 Cannabis/Marijuana
Market Size. (August 2019) Retrieved from https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/cannabis-marijuana-market-100219
3 Grant, Igor
MD (2015). Medical Use of Cannabinoids. Journal of American Medical
Association, 314: 16, 1750-1751. doi:
10.1001/jama.2015.11429.
4 Bachhuber,
MA, Saloner B, Cunningham CO, Barry CL. (2014). Medical Cannabis
Laws and Opioid Analgesic Overdose Mortality in the United States,
1999-2010. JAMA Intern Med. 174(10):1668-1673. doi:
10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4005.
5 Pew Research
Organization (November 11, 2019). Two-thirds of Americans support
marijuana legalization. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/11/14/americans-support-marijuana-legalization/
Growth Strategy
While the
legalization of cannabis throughout the United States continues to
expand both in the adult use (recreational) and medical markets,
and the size of the U.S. cannabis market will continue to provide
growth opportunities, management believes that focusing on the
substantial California market and becoming profitable and
self-sustaining is the appropriate near-term growth strategy for
the Company.
We plan to
capitalize on the significant increase in cannabis consumption in
California through the robust marketing of the recently acquired
Lowell branded products and our other proprietary brands, the
continued expansion of our brand and distribution footprint and the
exploitation of our increased cultivation capacity. We will
selectively seek opportunities to further expand our brands and
operations in California through acquisitions or
alliances.
We may also seek to
expand our cultivation footprint within California by either
purchasing an existing cultivation business or by entering into a
lease arrangement with a suitable property to develop cultivation
facilities. We currently have no retail facilities within the state
of California but continue to evaluate such opportunities and could
seek to enter retail at a future date.
Also, we may
consider, but do not currently have definitive plans or timelines
for our expansion beyond California as these markets continue to
expand.
Competitive Conditions
We compete with
other branded licensed cultivators, manufacturers and distributors,
offering similar products and services, within
California.
Currently, the
California cannabis industry is largely comprised of small to
medium-sized entities. We believe that the vast majority of our
competitors are relatively small operations. Over time, it is
expected that within California the industry will begin to
consolidate as market-share will increasingly favor larger and more
sophisticated operators.
We expect to face
additional competition from new entrants. To remain competitive, we
expect to invest in scale, people, processes and technology to
maintain cost and product leadership over our
competitors.
We may not have
sufficient resources to maintain research and development,
marketing, sales and support efforts on a competitive basis, which
could materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations or prospects.
Also, we expect to
face continued competition from the illicit or
“black-market” commercial activities that still operate
within the state. Despite state-level legalization of cannabis in
the United States, such operations remain abundant and present
substantial competition to Lowell Farms. In particular, illicit
operations, because they are largely clandestine, are not required
to comply with the extensive regulations with which we must comply
in order to conduct business, and accordingly may have
significantly lower costs of operation. It is estimated that the
current illicit cannabis market in California exceeds $8.5
billion.6
Intangible Property
To date, we have 11
registered federal trademarks with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office and 3 California state trademark registrations. In
addition, we have 8 federal trademark application pending. We own
over 100 website domains, including www.lowellfarms.com, and
numerous social media accounts across all major platforms. Lowell
Farms maintains strict standards and operating procedures regarding
its intellectual property, including the regular use of
nondisclosure, confidentiality, and intellectual property
assignment agreements.
Lowell Farms has
developed numerous proprietary technologies and processes. These
proprietary technologies and processes include its information
system software, cultivation, edible manufacturing and extraction
techniques, quality and compliance processes and new product
development processes. While actively exploring the patentability
of these techniques and processes, Lowell Farms relies on
non-disclosure/confidentiality arrangements and trade secret
protection. Lowell Farms has invested significant resources towards
developing recognizable and unique brands consistent with premium
companies in analogous industries.
__________________________
6 https://www.northbaybusinessjournal.com/article/business/analyst-california-cannabis-market-isnt-slowed-by-covid-and-should-reach/
The USPTO may deny
federal trademark registration to any name, product, or other
assets that violate the law, including cannabis products. However,
hemp-derived goods and CBD products with less than 0.3% THC, as
well as ancillary products or services, may be eligible for federal
trademark registration. Additionally, the USPTO may accept
trademark applications for consulting services or goods that do not
directly involve the cannabis flower, such as computer software,
educational platforms, and brand apparel. Cannabis products, goods,
and services that do not meet the USPTO standard for trademark
registration may qualify for state trademark registration in states
where such products, goods, and services have been
legalized.
No guarantee can be
given that Lowell Farms will be able to successfully assert its
trademark rights, nor can the company guarantee that its trademark
registrations will not be invalidated, circumvented or challenged.
Any such invalidity, particularly with respect to a product name,
or a successful intellectual property challenge or infringement
proceeding against the company, could have a material adverse
effect on Lowell Farms’ business.
Employees
Lowell Farms
employs personnel with a wide range of skill sets, including those
with masters’ and bachelors’ degrees in their
respective fields. With respect to cultivation, Lowell Farms
recruits individuals with plant science and agricultural
experience, and personnel have the practical experience necessary
to cultivate high yielding, multiple strain variety cannabis plants
and to develop new cannabis strains through selective horticultural
practices. With regard to extraction, Lowell Farms recruits
individuals with extraction and distillation experience for its
product lines, and personnel have the practical experience and
knowledge necessary to process the raw, dried cannabis product
through volatile extraction processes, thereby generating high
yields of cannabis extracts and distillates. In addition, Lowell
Farms personnel have the practical experience and knowledge
necessary to conduct secondary processing of cannabis biomass into
crude cannabis oil, distillate, and concentrates, including
shatter, wax and crystals, and to utilize the natural terpenes in
cannabis to formulate premium vaporizer oils. Terpenes are the oils
that give cannabis plants their smell. They come from the same
components as tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) and
cannabidiol (“CBD”).
With regard to
product development and manufacturing, Lowell Farms recruits
individuals with professional culinary education for edibles
product development for its edibles division, and personnel have
extensive experience in confectionary product development and
manufacturing, particularly with regard to cannabis edibles,
including chocolates, candies, cookies, gummies, beverages and
tinctures.
With regard to
sales & distribution, we recruit employees who retain a high
degree of industry awareness and knowledge who can interface with
dispensaries state-wide and introduce our products with the
intention of retaining and potentially increasing shelf-space and
the intention of maintaining or increasing market share. Our sales
and distribution teams are important conduits for collecting
intelligence on consumer behavior and trends. Our distribution
capabilities are critical to building trust with dispensaries that
they will receive inventory on a timely and consistent
basis.
Lowell Farms
currently possesses all specialized skills and knowledge it
requires, but will continue to compete with other cannabis and
manufacturing companies to secure and retain such
staff.
As of June 30,
2021, we had 212 full-time employees and 4 part-time employees, all
of which are located in California. Additionally, Lowell Farms
utilizes contract employees in security, cultivation, packaging and
warehousing activities. The use of contract employees enables
Lowell Farms to manage variable staffing needs and in the case of
cultivation and security personnel, access to experienced,
qualified and readily available human resources.
In 2018, the
manufacturing personnel of Lowell Farms were organized by UFCW
Local 5. In 2020, prior to the completion of a collective
bargaining agreement, the union workers voted to decertify UFCW
Local 5. Under California law, the holder of a cannabis license
with 20 or more employees must enter into a “labor peace
agreement” with a union or provide a notarized statement to
the Bureau of Cannabis Control that it will do so. A “labor
peace agreement” is a private contract between an employer
and a union that requires both parties to waive certain rights
under federal labor law in connection with union organizing
activities. Following the decertification of UFCW Local 5, Lowell
Farms provided such a notarized statement to the Bureau of Cannabis
Control. There has been no further union organizing activity of
which the Company is aware involving its employees.
United States Regulatory
Environment
Below is a
discussion of the federal and state-level U.S. regulatory regimes
in those jurisdictions where Lowell Farms is currently involved,
directly or through its subsidiaries in the cannabis industry.
Lowell Farms is directly engaged in the manufacture, extraction,
cultivation, package, sale or distribution of cannabis in the
adult-use and/or medical industries in the State of California. The
Company derives all of its revenues from the cannabis industry in
the State of California, which industry is illegal under U.S.
federal law. The Company’s cannabis-related activities are
compliant with applicable State and local law, and the related
licensing framework, and the Company is not aware of any
non-compliance with applicable State and local law, and the related
licensing framework, by any of the Company’s clients to whom
the Company renders services. Nonetheless, such activities remain
illegal under U.S. federal law. The enforcement of relevant laws is
a significant risk.
The Company
evaluates, monitors and reassesses this disclosure, and any related
risks, on an ongoing basis, and the same will be supplemented and
amended to investors in public filings, including in the event of
government policy changes or the introduction of new or amended
guidance, laws or regulations regarding marijuana regulation. Any
non-compliance, citations or notices of violation which may have an
impact on the Company’s licenses, business activities or
operations will be promptly disclosed by the Company.
United States Federal
Overview
The United States
federal government regulates drugs in large part through the CSA.
Marijuana, which is a form of cannabis, is classified as a Schedule
I controlled substance. As a Schedule I controlled substance, the
federal Drug Enforcement Agency, or DEA, considers marijuana to
have a high potential for abuse; no currently accepted medical use
in treatment in the United States; and a lack of accepted safety
for use of the drug under medical supervision. According to the
U.S. federal government, cannabis having a concentration of
tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, greater than 0.3% on a dry weight
basis is marijuana. Cannabis with a THC content below 0.3% is
classified as hemp. The scheduling of marijuana as a Schedule I
controlled substance is inconsistent with what we believe to be
widely accepted medical uses for marijuana by physicians,
researchers, patients, and others. Moreover, as of January 30, 2021
and despite the clear conflict with U.S. federal law, 36 states and
the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for medical use,
while 15 of those states and the District of Columbia have
legalized the adult-use of cannabis for recreational purposes. In
November 2020, voters in Arizona, Montana, New Jersey and South
Dakota voted by referendum to legalize marijuana for adult use, and
voters in Mississippi and South Dakota voted to legalized marijuana
for medical use. As further evidence of the growing conflict
between the U.S. federal treatment of cannabis and the societal
acceptance of cannabis, the FDA on June 25, 2018 approved
Epidiolex. Epidiolex is an oral solution with an active ingredient
derived from the cannabis plant for the treatment of seizures
associated with two rare and severe forms of epilepsy,
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome, in patients two years
of age and older. This is the first FDA-approved drug that contains
a purified substance derived from the cannabis plant. In this case,
the substance is cannabidiol, or CBD, a chemical component of
marijuana that does not contain the psychoactive properties of
THC.
Unlike in Canada,
which uniformly regulates the cultivation, distribution, sale and
possession of marijuana at the federal level under the Cannabis Act
(Canada), marijuana is largely regulated at the State level in the
United States. State laws regulating marijuana are in conflict with
the CSA, which makes marijuana use and possession federally
illegal. Although certain States and territories of the United
States authorize medical or adult-use marijuana production and
distribution by licensed or registered entities, under United
States federal law, the possession, use, cultivation, and transfer
of marijuana and any related drug paraphernalia is illegal.
Although our activities are compliant with the applicable State and
local laws in California, strict compliance with state and local
laws with respect to cannabis may neither absolve us of liability
under United States federal law nor provide a defense to any
federal criminal action that may be brought against
us.
In 2013, as more
and more states began to legalize medical and/or adult-use
marijuana, the federal government attempted to provide clarity on
the incongruity between federal law and these State-level
regulatory frameworks. Until 2018, the federal government provided
guidance to federal agencies and banking institutions through a
series of Department of Justice, or DOJ, memoranda. The most
notable of this guidance came in the form of a memorandum issued by
former U.S. Deputy Attorney General James Cole on August 29, 2013,
which we refer to as the Cole Memorandum.
The Cole Memorandum
offered guidance to federal agencies on how to prioritize civil
enforcement, criminal investigations and prosecutions regarding
marijuana in all states and quickly set a standard for
marijuana-related businesses to comply with. The Cole Memorandum
put forth eight prosecution priorities:
|
1.
|
Preventing the
distribution of marijuana to minors;
|
|
2.
|
Preventing revenue
from the sale of marijuana from going to criminal enterprises,
gangs and cartels;
|
|
3.
|
Preventing the
diversion of marijuana from states where it is legal under state
law in some form to other states;
|
|
4.
|
Preventing the
state-authorized marijuana activity from being used as a cover or
pretext for the trafficking of other illegal drugs or other illegal
activity;
|
|
5.
|
Preventing violence
and the use of firearms in the cultivation and distribution of
marijuana;
|
|
6.
|
Preventing drugged
driving and the exacerbation of other adverse public health
consequences associated with marijuana use;
|
|
7.
|
Preventing the
growing of marijuana on public lands and the attendant public
safety and environmental dangers posed by marijuana production on
public lands; and
|
|
8.
|
Preventing marijuana
possession or use on federal property.
|
On January 4, 2018,
former United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions rescinded the
Cole Memorandum by issuing a new memorandum to all United States
Attorneys, which we refer to as the Sessions Memo. Rather than
establishing national enforcement priorities particular to
marijuana-related crimes in jurisdictions where certain marijuana
activity was legal under State law, the Sessions Memo simply
rescinded the Cole Memorandum and instructed that “[i]n
deciding which marijuana activities to prosecute... with the
[DOJ’s] finite resources, prosecutors should follow the
well-established principles that govern all federal
prosecutions.” Namely, these include the seriousness of the
offense, history of criminal activity, deterrent effect of
prosecution, the interests of victims, and other
principles.
Neither Attorney
General William Barr, who succeeded Attorney General Sessions, nor
any subsequent Acting Attorney General provided a clear policy
directive for the United States as it pertains to State-legal
marijuana-related activities. President-elect Biden has nominated
Merrick Garland to serve as Attorney General in his administration.
It is not yet known whether the Department of Justice under
President-elect Biden and Attorney General Garland, if confirmed,
will re-adopt the Cole Memorandum or announce a substantive
marijuana enforcement policy.
Nonetheless, there
is no guarantee that State laws legalizing and regulating the sale
and use of marijuana will not be repealed or overturned, or that
local governmental authorities will not limit the applicability of
State laws within their respective jurisdictions. Unless and until
the United States Congress amends the CSA with respect to marijuana
(and as to the timing or scope of any such potential amendments
there can be no assurance), there is a risk that federal
authorities may enforce current U.S. federal law. Currently, in the
absence of uniform federal guidance, as had been established by the
Cole memorandum, enforcement priorities are determined by
respective United States Attorneys.
As an industry best
practice, despite the recent rescission of the Cole Memorandum, the
Company abides by the following standard operating policies and
procedures to ensure compliance with the guidance provided by the
Cole Memorandum:
1.
|
ensure that its
operations are compliant with all licensing requirements as
established by the applicable State, county, municipality, town,
township, borough, and other political/administrative
divisions;
|
2.
|
ensure that its
cannabis related activities adhere to the scope of the licensing
obtained (for example: in the States where cannabis is permitted
only for adult-use, the products are only sold to individuals who
meet the requisite age requirements);
|
3.
|
implement policies
and procedures to ensure that cannabis products are not distributed
to minors;
|
4.
|
implement policies
and procedures to ensure that funds are not distributed to criminal
enterprises, gangs or cartels;
|
5.
|
implement an
inventory tracking system and necessary procedures to ensure that
such compliance system is effective in tracking inventory and
preventing diversion of cannabis or cannabis products into those
States where cannabis is not permitted by State law, or across any
State lines in general;
|
6.
|
ensure that its
State-authorized cannabis business activity is not used as a cover
or pretense for trafficking of other illegal drugs, is engaged in
any other illegal activity or any activities that are contrary to
any applicable anti-money laundering statutes; and
|
7.
|
ensure that its
products comply with applicable regulations and contain necessary
disclaimers about the contents of the products to prevent adverse
public health consequences from cannabis use and prevent impaired
driving.
|
In addition, the
Company conducts background checks to ensure that the principals
and management of its operating subsidiaries are of good character,
have not been involved with other illegal drugs, engaged in illegal
activity or activities involving violence, or use of firearms in
cultivation, manufacturing or distribution of cannabis. The Company
will also conduct ongoing reviews of the activities of its cannabis
businesses, the premises on which they operate and the policies and
procedures that are related to possession of cannabis or cannabis
products outside of the licensed premises, including the cases
where such possession is permitted by regulation. See
“Risk
Factors”.
Although the Cole
Memorandum has been rescinded, one legislative safeguard for the
medical marijuana industry remains in place: Congress has passed a
so-called “rider” provision in the Fiscal Years 2015,
2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 Consolidated Appropriations Acts to
prevent the federal government from using congressionally
appropriated funds to enforce federal marijuana laws against
regulated medical marijuana actors operating in compliance with
State and local law. The rider is known as the
“Rohrabacher-Farr” Amendment after its original lead
sponsors (it is also sometimes referred to as the
“Rohrabacher-Blumenauer” or “Joyce-Leahy”
Amendment, but it is referred to in Registration Statement on Form
S-1 as the “Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment”). Most
recently, the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment was included in the
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2019, which was signed by
President Trump on February 14, 2019 and funds the departments of
the federal government through the fiscal year ending September 30,
2019. In signing the Act, President Trump issued a signing
statement noting that the Act “provides that the DOJ may not
use any funds to prevent implementation of medical marijuana laws
by various States and territories,” and further stating
“I will treat this provision consistent with the
President’s constitutional responsibility to faithfully
execute the laws of the United States.” While the signing
statement can fairly be read to mean that the executive branch
intends to enforce the CSA and other federal laws prohibiting the
sale and possession of medical marijuana, the president did issue a
similar signing statement in 2017 and no major federal enforcement
actions followed. On September 27, 2019 the Rohrabacher-Farr
Amendment was temporarily renewed through a stopgap spending bill
and was similarly renewed again on November 21, 2019. The Fiscal
Year 2020 omnibus spending bill was ultimately passed on December
20, 2019, making the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment effective through
September 30, 2020. In signing the spending bill, President Trump
again released a statement similar to the ones he made May 2017 and
February 2019 regarding the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment. On December
27, 2020 the amendment was renewed through the signing of the
Fiscal Year 2021 omnibus spending bill, effective through September
30, 2021.
United States Border Entry
CBP enforces the
laws of the United States as they pertain to lawful travel and
trade into and out of the U.S. Crossing the border while in
violation of the CSA and other related United States federal laws
may result in denied admission, seizures, fines, and apprehension.
CBP officers administer determine the admissibility of travelers
who are non-U.S. citizens into the United States pursuant to the
United States Immigration and Nationality Act. An investment in our
Subordinate Voting Shares, if it became known to CBP, could have an
impact on a non-U.S. citizen’s admissibility into the United
States and could lead to a lifetime ban on admission.
Because marijuana
remains illegal under United States federal law, those investing in
Canadian companies with operations in the United States cannabis
industry could face detention, denial of entry, or lifetime bans
from the United States for their business associations with United
States marijuana businesses. Entry happens at the sole discretion
of CBP officers on duty, and these officers have wide latitude to
ask questions to determine the admissibility of a non-US citizen or
foreign national. The government of Canada has started warning
travelers that previous use of marijuana, or any substance
prohibited by United States federal laws, could mean denial of
entry to the United States. Business or financial involvement in
the marijuana industry in the United States could also be reason
enough for CBP to deny entry. On September 21, 2018, CBP released a
statement outlining its current position with respect to
enforcement of the laws of the United States. It stated that
Canada’s legalization of cannabis will not change CBP
enforcement of United States laws regarding controlled substances
and because marijuana continues to be a controlled substance under
United States law, working in or facilitating the proliferation of
the legal marijuana industry in U.S. states where it is deemed
legal may affect admissibility to the United States. As a result,
CBP has affirmed that, employees, directors, officers, managers and
investors of companies involved in business activities related to
marijuana in the United States (such as Lowell Farms), who are not
United States citizens, face the risk of being barred from entry
into the United States.
Anti-Money Laundering Laws and Access to
Banking
The Company is
subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the United States
that involve anti-money laundering, financial recordkeeping and the
proceeds of crime, including the Currency and Foreign Transactions
Reporting Act of 1970 (referred to herein as the “Bank
Secrecy Act”), as amended by Title III of the Uniting and
Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to
Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act), and
any related or similar rules, regulations or guidelines, issued,
administered or enforced by governmental authorities in the United
States.
Additionally, under
United States federal law, it may potentially be a violation of
federal anti-money laundering statutes for financial institutions
to take any proceeds from the sale of any Schedule I controlled
substance. Banks and other financial institutions could potentially
be prosecuted and convicted of money laundering under the Bank
Secrecy Act for providing services to cannabis businesses.
Therefore, under the Bank Secrecy Act, banks or other financial
institutions that provide a cannabis business with a checking
account, debit or credit card, small business loan, or any other
financial service could be charged with money laundering or
conspiracy.
While there has
been no change in U.S. federal banking laws to accommodate
businesses in the large and increasing number of U.S. states that
have legalized medical or adult-use marijuana, FinCEN, in 2014,
issued guidance, or the FinCEN Guidance, to prosecutors of money
laundering and other financial crimes. The FinCEN Guidance advised
prosecutors not to focus their enforcement efforts on banks and
other financial institutions that serve marijuana-related
businesses so long as that marijuana-related business activities
are legal in their state and none of the federal enforcement
priorities referenced in the Cole Memorandum are being violated
(such as keeping marijuana out of the hands of organized crime).
The FinCEN Guidance also clarifies how financial institutions can
provide services to marijuana-related businesses consistent with
their Bank Secrecy Act obligations, including thorough customer due
diligence, but makes it clear that they are doing so at their own
risk. The customer due diligence steps typically
include:
|
1.
|
Verifying with the
appropriate State authorities whether the business is duly licensed
and registered;
|
|
2.
|
Reviewing the license
application (and related documentation) submitted by the business
for obtaining a State license to operate its marijuana-related
business;
|
|
3.
|
Requesting available
information about the business and related parties from State
licensing and enforcement authorities;
|
|
4.
|
Developing an
understanding of the normal and expected activity for the business,
including the types of products to be sold and the type of
customers to be served (e.g., medical versus adult-use
customers);
|
|
5.
|
Ongoing monitoring of
publicly available sources for adverse information about the
business and related parties;
|
|
6.
|
Ongoing monitoring
for suspicious activity, including for any of the red flags
described in the FinCEN Guidance; and
|
|
7.
|
Refreshing
information obtained as part of customer due diligence on a
periodic basis and commensurate with the risk.
|
With respect to
information regarding State licensure obtained in connection with
such customer due diligence, a financial institution may reasonably
rely on the accuracy of information provided by state licensing
authorities, where States make such information
available.
While the FinCEN
Guidance decreased some risk for banks and financial institutions
considering servicing the cannabis industry, in practice it has not
increased banks’ willingness to provide services to
marijuana-related businesses. This is because current U.S. federal
law does not guarantee banks immunity from prosecution, and it also
requires banks and other financial institutions to undertake
time-consuming and costly due diligence on each marijuana-related
business they accept as a customer.
Those
State-chartered banks and/or credit unions that have agreed to work
with marijuana businesses are typically limiting those accounts to
small percentages of their total deposits to avoid creating a
liquidity risk. Since, theoretically, the federal government could
change the banking laws as it relates to marijuana-related
businesses at any time and without notice, these banks and credit
unions must keep sufficient cash on hand to be able to return the
full value of all deposits from marijuana-related businesses in a
single day, while also keeping sufficient liquid capital on hand to
service their other customers. Those State-chartered banks and
credit unions that do have customers in the marijuana industry can
charge marijuana businesses high fees to cover the added cost of
ensuring compliance with the FinCEN Guidance.
As an industry best
practice and consistent with its standard operating procedures,
Lowell Farms adheres to all customer due diligence steps in the
FinCEN Guidance and any additional requirements imposed by those
financial institutions it utilizes. However, in the event that any
of our operations, or any proceeds thereof, any dividends or
distributions therefrom, or any profits or revenues accruing from
such operations in the United States were found to be in violation
of anti-money laundering legislation or otherwise, such
transactions could be viewed as proceeds of crime under one or more
of the statutes noted above or any other applicable legislation.
This could restrict or otherwise jeopardize our ability to declare
or pay dividends or effect other distributions.
In the United
States, the “SAFE Banking Act” has been put forth which
would grant banks and other financial institutions immunity from
federal criminal prosecution for servicing marijuana-related
businesses if the underlying marijuana business follows State law.
The SAFE Banking Act was adopted by the House of Representatives
during the 2020 legislative session. On December 4, 2020, the U.S.
House of Representatives also passed the Marijuana Opportunity
Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act. The MORE Act would remove
marijuana from the CSA and eliminate criminal penalties for
individuals who manufacture, distribute or possess marijuana. While
there is strong support in the public and within Congress for
legislation such as the Safe Banking Act and the MORE Act, there
can be no assurance that any such legislation will be enacted. In
both Canada and the United States, transactions involving banks and
other financial institutions are both difficult and unpredictable
under the current legal and regulatory landscape. Legislative
changes could help to reduce or eliminate these challenges for
companies in the cannabis space and would improve the efficiency of
both significant and minor financial transactions.
Tax Concerns
An additional
challenge for marijuana-related businesses is that the provisions
of Internal Revenue Code Section 280E are being applied by the IRS
to businesses operating in the medical and adult-use marijuana
industry. Section 280E prohibits marijuana businesses from
deducting their ordinary and necessary business expenses, forcing
them to pay higher effective federal tax rates than similar
companies in other industries. The effective tax rate on a
marijuana business depends on how large its ratio of non-deductible
expenses is to its total revenues. Therefore, businesses in the
legal cannabis industry may be less profitable than they would
otherwise be. Furthermore, although the IRS issued a clarification
allowing the deduction of cost of goods sold, the scope of such
eligible cost items is interpreted very narrowly, and the bulk of
operating costs and general administrative costs are not permitted
to be capitalized as part of inventory cost basis and deducted as
part of cost of goods sold, or otherwise deducted from gross
profit, in determining taxable income.
The 2018 Farm Bill
CBD is a
non-psychoactive chemical found in cannabis and is often derived
from hemp, which contains, at most, only trace amounts of THC. On
December 20, 2018, President Trump signed the Agriculture
Improvement Act of 2018 (popularly known as the 2018 Farm Bill)
into law. Until the 2018 Farm Bill became law, hemp fell within the
definition of “marijuana” under the CSA and the DEA
classified hemp as a Schedule I controlled substance because hemp
is part of the cannabis plant.
The 2018 Farm Bill
defines hemp as the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of the
plant with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% by dry
weight and removes hemp from the CSA. The 2018 Farm Bill requires
the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or USDA, to, among other
things: (1) evaluate and approve regulatory plans approved by
individual states for the cultivation and production of industrial
hemp, and (2) promulgate regulations and guidelines to establish
and administer a program for the cultivation and production of hemp
in the U.S. The regulations promulgated by the USDA will be in lieu
of those States not adopting State-specific hemp regulations. Hemp
and products derived from it, such as CBD, may then be sold into
commerce and transported across State lines provided that the hemp
from which any product is derived was cultivated under a license
issued by an authorized state program approved by the USDA and
otherwise meets the definition of hemp. The 2018 Farm Bill also
explicitly preserved the authority of the FDA to regulate
hemp-derived products under the U.S. Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
The Company expects that the FDA will promulgate its own rules for
the regulation of hemp-derived products in the coming year.
Notwithstanding the pending FDA rules, on October 29, 2019, the
USDA published its proposed rules for the regulation of hemp,
(referred to herein as the “USDA Rule”). The USDA Rule
will go into effect immediately upon the conclusion of the public
comment period and publication in the federal register by the USDA.
The USDA Rule, among other things, sets minimum standards for the
cultivation and production of hemp, as well as requirements for
laboratory testing of hemp.
State Level Overview and Compliance
Summary
In the United
States, cannabis is largely regulated at the State level. Although
California authorizes medical and adult-use marijuana production
and distribution by licensed entities, and numerous other states
have legalized marijuana in some form, under U.S. federal law, the
possession, use, cultivation, and transfer of marijuana and any
related drug paraphernalia remains illegal, and any such acts are
criminal acts under U.S. federal law. Although we believe that our
business activities are compliant with applicable State and local
laws, strict compliance with State and local laws with respect to
marijuana may neither absolve us of liability under U.S. federal
law, nor provide a defense to any federal proceeding which may be
brought against us. Any such proceedings brought against us may
result in a material adverse effect on our business.
California Regulatory
Landscape
In 1996, California
was the first State to legalize medical marijuana through
Proposition 215, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996. This provided
an affirmative defense for defendants charged with the use,
possession and cultivation of medical marijuana by patients with a
physician recommendation for treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS,
chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraine, or any
other illness for which marijuana provides relief. In 2003, Senate
Bill 420 was signed into law, decriminalizing the use, possession,
and collective cultivation of medical marijuana, and establishing
an optional identification card system for medical marijuana
patients.
In September 2015,
the California legislature passed three bills collectively known as
the “Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act,” or
MCRSA. The MCRSA established a licensing and regulatory framework
for medical marijuana businesses in California. The system created
testing laboratories and distributors. Edible infused product
manufacturers would require either volatile solvent or non-volatile
solvent manufacturing licenses depending on their specific
extraction methodology. Multiple agencies would oversee different
aspects of the program and businesses would require a State license
and local approval to operate. However, in November 2016, voters in
California overwhelmingly passed Proposition 64, the “Adult
Use of Marijuana Act,” or AUMA, creating an adult-use
marijuana program for adult-use 21 years of age or older. In June
2017, the California State Legislature passed Senate Bill No. 94,
known as Medicinal and Adult-Use Marijuana Regulation and Safety
Act, or MAUCRSA, which amalgamated MCRSA and AUMA to provide a set
of regulations to govern the medical and adult-use licensing regime
for marijuana businesses in the State of California. MAUCRSA went
into effect on January 1, 2018. The three primary licensing
agencies that regulate marijuana at the state level are the Bureau
of Cannabis Control, or BCC, California Department of Food and
Agriculture, or CDFA, and the California Department of Public
Health, or CDPH.
One of the central
features of MAUCRSA is known as “local control.” In
order to legally operate a medical or adult-use marijuana business
in California, an operator must have both a local and State
license. This requires license-holders to operate in cities or
counties with marijuana licensing programs. Cities and counties in
California are allowed to determine the number of licenses they
will issue to marijuana operators, or, alternatively, can choose to
ban marijuana licenses.
Licenses
Once an operator
obtains local approval, the operator must obtain State licenses
before conducting any commercial marijuana activity. There are
multiple license categories that cover all commercial activity.
Lowell Farms and its subsidiaries are licensed to operate Medical
and Adult-Use Manufacturing, Nursery, Cultivation and Distribution
facilities under applicable California and local jurisdictional
law. Lowell Farms’ licenses permit it to possess, cultivate,
process, dispense and wholesale medical and adult-use cannabis in
the State of California pursuant to the terms of the various
licenses issued by the BCC, California Department of Public Health
(“CDPH”) and California Department of Food and
Agriculture (“CDFA”) under the provision of the MAUCRSA
and California Assembly Bill No. 133. The licenses are
independently issued for each approved activity for use at the
Lowell Farms facilities in California.
The following
licenses are held by Cypress Manufacturing Company:
Agency
|
License
|
City/County
|
Type of License
|
CDFA
|
CCL18-0003496
|
Monterey
County
|
Nursery
|
CDFA
|
CCL18-0003514
|
Monterey
County
|
Processor
|
CDFA
|
CCL18-0003504 –
CCL 18-0003509
|
Monterey
County
|
Cultivation: Small
Mixed-Light Tier 1
|
CDFA
|
CCL18-0003497 –
CCL 18-0003503
|
Monterey
County
|
Cultivation: Small
Mixed-Light Tier 2
|
BCC
|
C11 0000816
LIC
|
Salinas
|
Distributor
Provisional (Salinas)
|
BCC
|
C11
0000685
|
Los
Angeles
|
Distributor
Provisional (Los Angeles)
|
CDPH
|
CDPH-10002196
|
Salinas
|
Manufacturing Type 7:
Volatile Extraction
|
The following
license is held by 20800 Spence Road LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary
of Lowell SR LLC:
Agency
|
License
|
City/County
|
Type of License
|
CDFA
|
CCL20-0002424
|
Monterey
County
|
Processor
|
California State
and local licenses, including for the City of Los Angeles, are
renewed annually. Each year, licensees are required to submit a
renewal application per guidelines published by the BCC. While
renewals are annual, there is no limit on the number of permitted
annual renewals. To renew a DCR license, a renewal application and
renewal fee are required to be paid by the licensee no earlier than
120 calendar days before the expiration of the license, and no
later than 60 calendar days before the expiration of the license.
At the time of a license renewal application, a licensee must
include updated annual licensing documents. As part of the renewal
process, the DCR may require modification to the licensee’s
security plan. To renew a license, a licensee must be in good
standing as required by the DCR and shall not be delinquent on any
City tax or fee.
In respect of the
renewal process, provided that the requisite renewal fees are paid,
the renewal application is submitted in a timely manner, and there
are no material violations noted against the applicable license,
Lowell Farms would expect to receive the applicable renewed license
in the ordinary course of business. While Lowell Farms’
compliance controls have been developed to mitigate the risk of any
material violations of a license arising, there is no assurance
that Lowell Farms’ licenses will be renewed in the future in
a timely manner. Any unexpected delays or costs associated with the
licensing renewal process could impede the ongoing or planned
operations of Lowell Farms and have a material adverse effect on
Lowell Farms’ business, financial condition, results of
operations or prospects.
California License and
Regulations
The Adult-Use and
Medicinal Cultivation licenses that have been granted to Lowell
Farms permit cannabis cultivation activity, which means any
activity involving the planting, growing, harvesting, drying,
curing, grading or trimming of cannabis. Such licenses further
permit the production of a limited number of non-manufactured
cannabis products and the sales of cannabis to certain licensed
entities within the State of California for resale or manufacturing
purposes.
Lowell Farms’
Adult-Use and Medicinal Manufacturing licenses permit Lowell Farms
to extract concentrated cannabis, THC, CBD and other cannabis
extracts from cannabis plants, then convert them to cannabis
concentrates, edibles, balms, beverages, vapes and a variety of
other consumer goods. Lowell Farms also packages and labels these
goods, including processed flower (the smokable part of the
cannabis plant) for wholesale delivery.
The Adult-Use and
Medicinal Distribution licenses permit Lowell Farms to complete
cannabis related distribution activity which means the procurement,
sale, and transportation of cannabis and cannabis products between
licensed entities. Distribution activity is permissible to and from
certain Lowell Farms and non-Lowell Farms licensees.
In the State of
California, only cannabis that is grown in California can be sold
in the state. Although California is not a vertically integrated
system, Lowell Farms is vertically integrated and has the
capabilities to cultivate, harvest, manufacture and wholesale
cannabis and cannabis products to licensed retail dispensaries.
Under manufacturing, distribution and cultivation licenses, the
State of California also allows Lowell Farms to make a wholesale
purchase of cannabis from, or a distribution of cannabis and
cannabis product to, another licensed entity within the
state.
California – Local Licensure, Zoning and
Land Use Requirements
To obtain a State
license, cannabis operators must first obtain local authorization,
which is a prerequisite to obtaining State licensure. All three
State regulatory agencies require confirmation from the applicable
locality that an applicant is in compliance with local requirements
and has either been granted authorization to, upon State licensure,
continue previous cannabis activities or commence cannabis
operations. One of the basic aspects of obtaining local
authorization is compliance with all local zoning and land use
requirements. Local governments are permitted to prohibit or
otherwise regulate the types and number of cannabis businesses
allowed in their locality. Some localities have limited the number
of authorizations an entity may hold in total or for various types
of cannabis activity. Others have tiered the authorization process,
granting the initial rounds of local authorization to applicants
that previously conducted cannabis activity pursuant to the CUA or
those that meet the locality’s definition of social
equity.
California – Record-Keeping and
Continuous Reporting Requirements
California’s
State license application process additionally requires
comprehensive criminal history, regulatory history and personal
disclosures for all beneficial owners. Any criminal convictions or
civil penalties or judgments occurring after licensure must
promptly be reported to the regulatory agency from which the
licensee holds a license. State licenses must be renewed annually.
Disclosure requirements for local authorization may vary, but
generally tend to mirror the State’s
requirements.
Licensees must also
keep detailed records pertaining to various aspects of the business
for up to seven years. Such records must be easily accessible by
the regulatory agency from which the licensee holds a license.
Additionally, licensees must record all business transactions,
which must be uploaded to the statewide traceability system. Lowell
Farms is in compliance in all material respects with these
record-keeping and disclosure requirements.
Storage and Security
To ensure the
safety and security of cannabis business premises and to maintain
adequate controls against the diversion, theft, and loss of
cannabis or cannabis products, Lowell Farms is
required to do the
following:
o
|
maintain fully
operational security alarm systems;
|
o
|
contract for
state-certified security guard services;
|
o
|
maintain video
surveillance systems that records continuously 24 hours a day and
maintains those recordings for at least 90 days;
|
o
|
ensure that the
facility’s outdoor premises have sufficient
lighting;
|
o
|
store cannabis and
cannabis product only in areas per the premises diagram submitted
to the State of California during the licensing
process;
|
o
|
store all cannabis
and cannabis products in a secured, locked room or a
vault;
|
o
|
report to local law
enforcement within 24 hours after being notified or becoming aware
of the theft, diversion, or loss of cannabis; and
|
o
|
ensure the safe
transport of cannabis and cannabis products between licensed
facilities, maintain a delivery manifest in any vehicle
transporting cannabis and cannabis products. Only vehicles
registered with the BCC, that meet BCC distribution requirements,
are to be used to transport cannabis and cannabis
products.
|
Marijuana Taxes in
California
Several types of
taxes are imposed in California for adult use sale. As of January
1, 2020, cultivators have the choice of being taxed at $9.65, per
dry-weight ounce of cannabis flowers or $1.35 per ounce of
wet-weight plants. Further, cultivators are required to pay $2.87
per ounce for cannabis leaves. California also imposes an excise
tax of 15%. Cities and counties apply their sales tax along with
the state’s excise and many cities and counties have also
authorized the imposition of special cannabis business taxes which
can range from 2% to 10% of gross receipts of the
business.
The Company has
retained legal counsel and/or other advisors in connection with
California’s marijuana regulatory program. The Company has
developed standard operating procedures for licenses who are
operational.
California – Operating Procedure
Requirements
License applicants
must submit standard operating procedures describing how the
operator will, among other requirements, secure the facility,
manage inventory, comply with the State’s seed-to-sale
tracking requirements, dispense cannabis, and handle waste, as
applicable to the license sought. Once the standard operating
procedures are determined compliant and approved by the applicable
State regulatory agency, the licensee is required to abide by the
processes described and seek regulatory agency approval before any
changes to such procedures may be made. Licensees are additionally
required to train their employees on compliant operations and are
only permitted to transact with other legal and licensed
businesses.
Lowell Farms
complies with these operational and training requirements by
systematically training employees in various aspects of regulatory
requirements, ensuring that operational and business practices are
aligned with regulatory requirements, and by conducting internal
audits to ensure compliance and identify areas for further
training.
California – Site-Visits &
Inspections
As a condition of
State licensure, operators must consent to random and unannounced
inspections of the commercial cannabis facility as well as the
facility’s books and records to monitor and enforce
compliance with State law. Many localities have also enacted
similar standards for inspections, and the State of California has
already commenced site-visits and compliance inspections for
operators who have received State temporary or annual
licensure.
California – Compliance
Procedures
Lowell Farms
utilizes MAX ERP, an integrated enterprise compliance platform,
which integrates Lowell Farms’ inventory management program
and standard operating procedures with the software’s
compliance and quality features to facilitate compliance with State
and local requirements. MAX ERP features include a compliance
software solution that offers lot and batch control, recall
management, document control and quality analysis. Additionally,
Lowell Farms utilizes standard operating procedure building tools
to facilitate the implementation and maintenance of compliant
operations and tracks all required licensing maintenance
criteria.
City of Los Angeles – Compliance
Procedures
Following
submission of a pre-application request and once compliance with
the business premises location is completed, including all zoning
requirements and sensitive use restrictions, the DCR will request
and review attestations from primary personnel and owner(s)
associated with the application. Following such review, the DCR
will issue a determination of eligibility/ineligibility for further
processing. A determination of eligibility is based on, among other
things, an initial inspection and environmental clearance.
Following a determination of eligibility, the DCR reviews the
application for completeness, including the status of state
licenses and verification of local compliance under way with the
state agencies. Following temporary approval, applicants may apply
for an annual license.
Continued
compliance includes ongoing, unannounced inspections,
investigations and audits conducted by the employees or agents of
the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health or the following
City departments: the DCR, the Department of Building and Safety,
the Department of City Planning, the Police Department, the Fire
Department and the Office of Finance. Inspections may include an
examination of employee practice; cannabis safety; proper storage;
equipment/utensils; facility; plumbing fixtures; sign/license
requirements; record keeping; compliance and enforcement; and
requirements for manufacturing.
Lowell Farms has
developed a robust compliance program designed to ensure
operational and regulatory requirements continue to be satisfied,
and has retained outside counsel to monitor its compliance with
U.S. State and local law on an ongoing basis. Lowell Farms will
continue to work closely with its legal counsel to develop and
improve its internal compliance program and will defer to their
legal opinions and risk mitigation guidance regarding
California’s complex regulatory framework. The internal
compliance program requires continued monitoring by managers and
executives of Lowell Farms to ensure all operations conform to and
comply with required laws, regulations and legally compliant
standard operating procedures.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Lowell Farms
presently leases its facilities through its subsidiaries. The
following table sets forth information about our properties. We
believe that these facilities are generally suitable to meet our
needs.
Location
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
Purpose
|
|
Lease Expiration Dates
|
Salinas
|
|
15,000
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
June 30, 2029
7
|
Salinas
|
|
8,000
|
|
Administrative
|
|
December 31, 2021
8
|
Salinas
|
|
20,000
|
|
Distribution and
flower packaging
|
|
December 31, 2021
9
|
Monterey
County
|
|
225,000
|
|
Cultivation
|
|
December 31, 2034
10
|
Los
Angeles
|
|
10,000
|
|
Distribution
|
|
November 30,
2024
|
Salinas
|
|
40,000
|
|
Cultivation and
packaging
|
|
June 30,
2026
|
Total square
footage
|
|
318,000
|
|
|
|
|
_________________
7 Lowell Farms has
two 4-year extension options.
8 Lowell Farms has
one 4-year extension option.
9 Lowell Farms has
four 2-year extension options.
10 Lowell Farms has
five 5-year extension options.
CORPORATE INFORMATION
General
We are incorporated
under the laws of British Columbia, Canada. On April 26, 2019, we
completed a reverse takeover transaction (the “Business
Combination” or the “RTO”) with Indus Holding
Company, a Delaware corporation. On February 25, 2021, we completed
the Lowell Acquisition. Effective March 1, 2021, in connection with
the Lowell Acquisition, we changed our name to Lowell Farms
Inc.
The Company was
incorporated under the Business
Corporations Act (Ontario) on October 27, 2005, under the
name Zoolander Corporation and changed its name to “Mezzotin
Minerals Inc.” on September 10, 2013. We sometimes refer to
the Company in this Form S-1 as “Mezzotin” when
referring to the period prior to the Business
Combination.
Prior to the
Business Combination, the Company engaged in the acquisition,
exploration and development of properties prospective for rare
earth metals in Zimbabwe. In October 2018, the Company sold all of
its exploration property interests in Zimbabwe and had no
commercial operations or operating revenues at the time of the
Business Combination.
Indus Holding
Company was formed as a Delaware corporation on January 2, 2015.
Indus Holding Company owns all of our operating
subsidiaries.
Corporate Structure
Set forth below is
the organization chart of the Company, setting out all material
subsidiaries of the Company and their jurisdiction of
incorporation, formation or organization. Each of the subsidiaries
of Indus Holding Company is wholly-owned by it. Indus is presently
carrying on active business operations solely in
California.
The primary purpose
or main business of each entity is as follows:
●
|
Lowell Farms Inc. is
the issuer of our shares traded on the CSE and OTCQX. Lowell Farms
Inc. is a holding company and does not conduct material business
activities.
|
●
|
Indus Holding Company
is the owner of our principal brand intellectual property (other
than the Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell Smokes brands acquired in the
Lowell Acquisition) and an intermediate holding company for our
operating entities.
|
●
|
Cypress Manufacturing
Company conducts the majority of our cannabis operations, including
cultivation, extraction, manufacturing and distribution, and holds
all manufacturing and distribution licenses. Licensed activities
acquired by Indus LF LLC in the Lowell Acquisition are being
transitioned to Cypress Manufacturing Company.
|
●
|
Cypress Holding
Company owns the majority of our equipment and is a lessee for
facility and equipment leases.
|
●
|
Wellness Innovation
Group Incorporated provides sales, marketing, administrative and
managerial services to our other operating entities.
|
●
|
Indus LF LLC is the
owner of the brands, product portfolio and assets acquired in the
Lowell Acquisition.
|
|
|
●
|
Lowell SR LLC is the
owner of our drying and midstream processing facility located in
Monterey County, located at 20800 Spence Road, and has a wholly
owned subsidiary, 20800 Spence Road LLC, which holds certain
permits related to the processing facility. LFS will be operated
under Lowell SR LLC.
|
The head office of
the Company is located at 19 Quail Run Circle – Suite B,
Salinas, California 93907 USA. The registered office of the Company
is Suite 2200, HSBC Building, 885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver,
BC V6C 3E8 Canada. Our website address is
https://www.lowellfarms.direct.com/. No information available on or
through our website shall be deemed to be incorporated into this
Registration Statement on Form S-1.
The Business Combination
On March 29, 2019.
the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Indus Holding
Company and certain other parties pursuant to which the Company
effected the Business Combination. The Business Combination
resulted in a reverse take-over of the Company by the
securityholders of Indus Holding Company.
In connection with
the Business Combination:
●
|
Mezzotin created (i)
the Subordinate Voting Shares as a new class of equity securities
and all outstanding common shares of Mezzotin were reclassified as
Subordinate Voting Shares at a ratio of one Subordinate Voting
Share for every 485.3 common shares and (ii) a new class of
non-participating securities of Mezzotin designated super voting
shares (“Super Voting Shares”) (collectively, the
“Share Terms Amendment”).
|
●
|
Indus Holding Company
was recapitalized by an amendment and restatement of its
certificate of incorporation. Pursuant to the recapitalization, the
voting Class A Common Shares (“Indus Class A Common Shares
“) and the non-voting Class B Common Shares (“Indus
Class B Common Shares “) of Indus Holding Company were
created, and all outstanding shares of stock of Indus Holding
Company were reclassified as Indus Class B Common Shares on a
one-for-one basis. Indus Class B Common Shares are redeemable at
the option of the holder for Subordinate Voting Shares on a
one-for-one basis or, at Indus Holding Company’s option, for
cash.
|
Simultaneously, the
Company subscribed for and became the sole holder of the Indus
Class A Common Shares. The purchase price for the Class A Common
Shares was paid from the proceeds of a subscription receipts
financing conducted in connection with the Business
Combination.
The Convertible Debenture
Offering
Effective April 16,
2020, in connection with the completion of a private placement of
convertible debentures and warrants (the “Convertible
Debenture Offering”), the certificate of incorporation of the
Company (at that time named Indus Holdings, Inc.) was amended to
create a class of non-voting Class C Common Shares. The debentures
issued in the Convertible Debenture Offering are convertible into
Indus Class C Common Shares. The Indus Class C Common Shares are
redeemable at the option of the holder for Subordinate Voting
Shares on a one-for-one basis. See “General Development of
the Business – Financing Transactions” below for
further details as to the Convertible Debenture
Offering.
Name Change
Effective March 1,
2021, in connection with the Lowell Acquisition, the Company
changed its name from Indus Holdings, Inc. to Lowell Farms Inc. On
March 5, 2021, the Subordinate Voting Shares began trading on the
Canadian Securities Exchange (the “CSE”) under the
ticker symbol LOWL and the warrants (the “December 2020
Warrants”) issued by the Company (then named Indus Holdings,
Inc.) in its December 2020 Unit offering described herein (the
“December 2020 Unit Offering”) began trading on the CSE
under the ticker symbol LOWL.WT. Also on March 5, 2021, the
Subordinate Voting Shares began trading on the OTCQX under the
ticker symbol LOWLF.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no legal
proceedings material to the Company to which the Company or a
subsidiary thereof is a party or of which any of their respective
property is the subject matter, nor or any such proceedings known
to the Company to be contemplated, and there have been no such
legal proceedings during the Company’s most recently
completed financial year.
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDENDS ON COMMON EQUITY AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Market
Information. The Subordinate Voting Shares are listed
for trading on the CSE under the symbol “LOWL” and the
warrants are listed on the CSE under the symbol
“LOWL.WT.” The Subordinate Voting Shares commenced
trading on the CSE effective April 30, 2019. Our shares are also
traded over-the-counter in the United States on the OTCQX under the
symbol “LOWLF.” Any over-the-counter market quotations
reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down, or
commission and may not necessarily represent actual
transactions.
The following table
sets forth trading information for the Subordinate Voting Shares
for the periods indicated, as quoted on the CSE.
|
Period
|
|
|
High Trading Price
C($)
|
|
|
Low Trading Price
C($)
|
|
|
|
Q3 2021 thru
8/24/21
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
|
Q2 2021
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
Q1 2021
|
|
|
$
|
2.73
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
|
Q4 2020
|
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
Q3 2020
|
|
|
$
|
1.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
Q2 2020
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.295
|
|
|
|
Q1 2020
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
Q4 2019
|
|
|
$
|
3.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
Q3 2019
|
|
|
$
|
9.15
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
|
4/30/19-6/30/19
|
|
|
$
|
15.95
|
|
|
$
|
5.80
|
|
The following table
sets forth trading information for the Subordinate Voting Shares
for the periods indicated, as quoted on the OTCQX.
|
Period
|
|
|
High Trading Price
US ($)
|
|
|
Low Trading Price
US($)
|
|
|
|
Q3 2021 thru
8/24/21
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
Q2 2021
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
Q1 2021
|
|
|
$
|
2.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
Q4 2020
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
Q3 2020
|
|
|
$
|
1.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
Q2 2020 starting
5/7/20
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
Shareholders. We had
approximately 154 shareholders of record of Subordinate Voting
Shares as of July 30, 2021. This does not include shares held in
the name of a broker, bank or other nominees (typically referred to
as being held in “street name”).
Dividends. The Company has not
paid dividends and currently intends to reinvest any future
earnings to finance the development and growth of its business. As
a result, the Company does not intend to pay dividends on the
Subordinate Voting Shares in the foreseeable future. Any future
determination to pay distributions will be at the discretion of the
Board and will depend on the financial condition, business
environment, operating results, capital requirements, any
contractual restrictions on the payment of distributions and any
other factors that the Board deems relevant. Apart from the
requirement to comply with applicable corporate law in connection
with the declaration of any dividend, Lowell Farms is restricted
from declaring any dividends or other distributions pursuant to the
terms and conditions of the purchase agreement relating to the
Convertible Debenture Offering.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans
The following table
provides information as of December 31, 2020, with respect to all
of our compensation plans under which equity securities are
authorized for issuance.
Plan Category
|
|
Number of securities
to be issued upon exercise of outstanding
options, warrants and rights(1)
|
|
|
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding
options, warrants and rights
|
|
|
Number of securities remaining available for
future issuance
|
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by stockholders
|
|
|
6,260,750(2)
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
1,851,066
|
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved by stockholders
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
_____________________
(1)
|
In connection with
the RTO, the Company assumed the 2016 stock incentive plan of Indus
Holding Company and outstanding option awards thereunder became
exercisable for Subordinate Voting Shares. Of the Company’s
6,260,750 outstanding awards at December 31, 2020, 922,000 were
issued under the legacy 2016 stock incentive plan and the remainder
were issued under the Company’s 2019 stock incentive plan. No
further awards will be made pursuant to the 2016 stock incentive
plan.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Excludes 450,000
restricted stock units granted at $0.33.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2021 AND 2020
This management’s discussion and
analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company is for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, and the years ended December
31, 2020 and 2019. It is supplemental to, and should be read in
conjunction with, the Company’s consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, and the years ended December 31, 2020
and 2019. All dollar amounts in this MD&A are expressed in
thousands of United States dollars (“$” or
“US$”), unless otherwise indicated.
This MD&A contains certain
“forward-looking statements” as defined under
applicable United States securities laws. Please refer to the
discussion of forward-looking statements and information set out
under the heading “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Information,” in this Form S-1. As a result of many factors,
the Company’s actual results may differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements and
information.
OVERVIEW OF THE COMPANY
We are a
California-based cannabis company with vertically integrated
operations including large scale cultivation, extraction,
processing, manufacturing, branding, packaging and wholesale
distribution to retail dispensaries. We manufacture and distribute
proprietary and third-party brands throughout the State of
California, the largest cannabis market in the world. We also
provide manufacturing, extraction and distribution services to
third-party cannabis and cannabis branding companies. We operate a
225,000 square foot greenhouse cultivation facility and a 40,000
square foot processing facility in Monterey County, a 15,000 square
foot manufacturing and laboratory facility in Salinas, California,
a separate 20,000 square foot distribution facility in Salinas,
California and a warehouse depot and distribution vehicles in Los
Angeles, California.
Our present product
offerings include flower, vape pens, oils, extracts, chocolate
edibles, mints, gummies, topicals, tinctures and pre-rolls. We sell
our products under owned and third-party brands. Brands we own
include the following: Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell Smokes (premium
packaged flower, pre-roll, concentrates, and vape products);
Cypress Reserve (a premium flower brand); Flavor Extracts (crumble
and terp sugar products): Kaizen (premium brand cannabis
concentrates); House Weed (a value driven flower and concentrates
offering delivering a flavorful and potent experience); Moon (a
range of high-potency, high-quality and high-value edibles); Altai
(hand-crafted and award-winning edibles); Humble Flower (a premium
brand offering cannabis-infused topical creams, balms and oils);
Original Pot Company (baked edibles); CannaStripe (gummy edibles);
and Acme Elixirs (high quality, lab-tested vaporizing pens). We
also exclusively manufacture and distribute third party brands in
California and provide third party extraction processing and
distribution services and bulk extraction concentrates and flower
to licensed manufacturers and distributors.
We conduct cannabis
cultivation operations located in Monterey County, California. We
currently operate a cultivation facility which includes four
greenhouses totaling approximately 225,000 square feet sited on 10
acres located on Zabala Road. Farming cannabis at this scale
enables us to curate specialized strains and maintain greater
control over the quantity and quality of cannabis available for our
products, preserving the consistency of our flower and cannabis
feedstocks for our extraction laboratory and product manufacturing
operations. We maintain a strict quality control process which
facilitates a predictable output yield of pesticide-free
products.
Our manufacturing
facility is located in Salinas, California and houses our edible
product operations and extraction and distillation operations. The
edible product operations utilize internally produced cannabis oil,
which can also be supplied from multiple external sources. Our
manufacturing operations produce a wide variety of cannabis-infused
products in our 15,000 square foot manufacturing facility in
Salinas. Our products include chocolate confections, tinctures,
baked goods, hard and soft non-chocolate confections, and topical
lotions and balms. Lowell Farms utilizes modern commercial
production equipment and employs food grade manufacturing
protocols, including industry-leading standard operating procedures
designed so that its products meet stringent quality standards. We
have implemented updated compliance, packaging and labeling
standards to meet the requirements of the California Medical and
Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act with the advent of
adult use legalization in California.
We also operate an
automated flower packaging line and a pre-roll assembly line for
making finished goods in those respective categories with feedstock
grown at our cultivation operations.
On June 29, 2021 we
announced that we acquired real property and related assets of a
first-of-its-kind cannabis drying and midstream processing facility
located in Monterey County, nearby our flagship cultivation
operation. The 10-acre, 40,000 square foot processing facility will
provide drying, bucking, trimming, sorting, grading, and packaging
operations for up to 250,000 lbs. of wholesale cannabis flower
annually. The new facility will process nearly all the cannabis
that we grow at our existing cultivation operations. Additionally,
we are commissioning a new business unit called Lowell Farm
Services (“LFS”), which will engage in fee-based
processing services for regional growers from the Salinas Valley
area, one of the largest and fastest growing cannabis cultivation
regions in the country. LFS operations are expected to become
operational during the third quarter of 2021.
Our business is
conducted by the following subsidiaries of the
Company:
|
●
|
Indus Holding Company
is the owner of our principal brand intellectual property (other
than the Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell Smokes brands) and an
intermediate holding company for our operating
entities.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Cypress Manufacturing
Company conducts the majority of our cannabis operations, including
cultivation, extraction, manufacturing and distribution, and holds
all manufacturing and distribution licenses.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Cypress Holding
Company owns the majority of our equipment and is a lessee for
facility and equipment leases.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Wellness Innovation
Group Incorporated provides sales, marketing, administrative and
managerial services to our other operating entities.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Indus LF LLC is the
owner of the brands and assets acquired in the Lowell Acquisition.
Licensed activities acquired by Indus LF LLC in the Lowell
Acquisition have been transitioned to Cypress Manufacturing
Company.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Lowell SR LLC is the
owner of our drying and midstream processing facility located in
Monterey County, located at 20800 Spence Road, and is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Lowell SR LLC, which holds certain permits
related to the processing facility. LFS will be operated under
Lowell SR LLC.
|
The Company’s
corporate office and principal place of business is located at 19
Quail Run Circle, Salinas, California. As of June 30, 2021, we had
212 full-time employees and 4 part-time employees, substantially
all of which are located in California. Additionally, Lowell Farms
utilizes contract employees in security, cultivation, packaging and
warehousing activities. The use of contract employees enables
Lowell Farms to manage variable staffing needs and in the case of
cultivation and security personnel, access to experienced,
qualified and readily available human resources.
Recent
Developments
Acquisitions
On February 25,
2021, we acquired the Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell Smokes trademark
brands, product portfolio and production assets from The Hacienda
Group, a California limited liability company
(“Hacienda”), and its subsidiaries. The acquisition is
referred to in this registration statement as the “Lowell
Acquisition.” The Lowell Acquisition expanded our product
offerings by adding a highly regarded, mature line of premium
branded cannabis pre-rolls, including infused pre-rolls, to our
product portfolio under the Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell Smokes
brands. The Lowell Acquisition also expanded our offerings of
premium packaged flower, concentrates, and vape products. Upon the
completion of the acquisition of certain regulatory assets in the
Lowell Acquisition, we acquired certain non-hydrocarbon extraction
assets used for the production of oils, water hashish, bubble
hashish and rosin. The acquisition was valued at approximately $41
million, comprised of $4.1 million in cash and the issuance of
22,643,678 Subordinate Voting Shares. In connection with this
acquisition, the Company changed its corporate name to Lowell Farms
Inc. effective March 1, 2021.
On June 29, 2021,
we acquired real property and related assets, and commissioned a
first-of-its-kind cannabis drying and midstream processing facility
located in Monterey County. The 10-acre, 40,000 square foot
processing facility will provide drying, bucking, trimming,
sorting, grading, and packaging operations for up to 250,000 lbs.
of wholesale cannabis flower annually. The new facility will
process nearly all the cannabis that we grow at our existing
cultivation operations. Additionally, we will commission a new
business unit called Lowell Farm Services (“LFS”),
which will engage in fee-based processing services for regional
growers from the Salinas Valley area. LFS operations are expected
to become operational during the third quarter of
2021.
Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial
and Performance Measures
The Company has
provided certain supplemental non-GAAP financial measures in this
MD&A. Where the Company has provided such non-GAAP financial
measures, we have also provided a reconciliation below to the most
comparable GAAP financial measure, see “Reconciliations of
Non-GAAP Financial and Performance Measures” in this
MD&A. These supplemental non-GAAP financial measures should not
be considered superior to, as a substitute for or as an alternative
to, and should only be considered in conjunction with, the GAAP
financial measures presented herein.
In this MD&A, reference is made to
adjusted EBITDA and working capital which are not measures of
financial performance under GAAP. The Company calculates each as
follows:
|
●
|
EBITDA is net income (loss), excluding the
effects of income taxes (recovery); net interest expense;
depreciation and amortization; and adjusted EBITDA also includes
non-cash fair value adjustments on investments; unrealized foreign
currency gains/losses; share-based compensation expense; and other
transactional and special expenses, such as out-of-period insurance
recoveries and acquisition costs and expenses related to the markup
of acquired finished goods inventory, which are inconsistent in
amount and frequency and are not what we consider as typical of our
continuing operations. Management believes this measure provides
useful information as it is a commonly used measure in the capital
markets and as it is a close proxy for repeatable cash generated by
operations. We use adjusted EBITDA internally to understand,
manage, make operating decisions related to cash flow generated
from operations and evaluate our business. In addition, we use
adjusted EBITDA to help plan and forecast future
periods.
|
|
●
|
Working capital is current assets less current
liabilities. Management believes the calculation of working capital
provides additional information to investors about the
Company’s liquidity. We use working capital internally to
understand, manage, make operating decisions related to cash flow
required to fund operational activity and evaluate our business
cash flow needs. In addition, we use working capital to help plan
and forecast future periods.
|
These measures are not necessarily comparable
to similarly titled measures used by other
companies.
The table below
reconciles Net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$731
|
$(8,757)
|
$(5,988)
|
$(16,631)
|
Interest
expense
|
598
|
726
|
1,215
|
1,576
|
Provision for income
taxes
|
75
|
25
|
138
|
50
|
Depreciation in cost of
goods sold
|
584
|
514
|
1,168
|
1,283
|
Depreciation and
amortization in operating expenses
|
167
|
371
|
491
|
479
|
Depreciation in other
income (expense)
|
195
|
-
|
195
|
-
|
EBITDA
|
2,350
|
(7,121)
|
(2,781)
|
(13,243)
|
Investment and currency
(gains)/ losses
|
(19)
|
(306)
|
(125)
|
(391)
|
Share-based
compensation
|
336
|
213
|
625
|
1,825
|
Net effect of cost of
goods on mark-up of acquired finished goods inventory
|
497
|
-
|
662
|
-
|
Transaction and other
special charges
|
(2,424)
|
-
|
(2,424)
|
-
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
$740
|
$(7,214)
|
$(4,043)
|
$(11,809)
|
______________
(1) Non-GAAP measure
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three
and Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 Compared to Three and Six Months
Ended June 30, 2020
Revenue
We derive our
revenue from sales of extracts, distillates, branded and packaged
cannabis flower, pre-rolls, concentrates and edible products to
retail dispensaries in the state of California. In addition, we
distribute proprietary and third-party brands throughout the state
of California. The Company recognizes revenue upon delivery of
goods to customers since at this time performance obligations are
satisfied.
The Company
classifies its revenues into three major categories: Owned, Agency
and Distributed brands.
|
●
|
Owned brands are the
proprietary brands of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Agency brands are
third-party brands that the Company manufactures and/or sells
utilizing our in-house sales team and distributes on behalf of the
third-party.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Distributed brands
are brands in which the Company provides distribution services to
retail dispensaries.
|
Revenue by
Category
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2021 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
$14,539
|
$7,231
|
101%
|
Agency
|
535
|
1,981
|
-73%
|
Distributed
|
83
|
682
|
-88%
|
Net
revenue
|
$15,157
|
$9,894
|
53%
|
|
●
|
Revenue increases
compared to the same quarter in the prior year were driven by
expanded cultivation capacity, resulting in flower and pre-roll
brand sales increasing approximately 98% which included over $5.8
million in Lowell brand sales, and the reorganization of owned
brand product offerings resulting in edible brand sales increasing
10% and concentrates brand sales declining 22%. Customer onboarding
and targeted marketing initiatives also favorably impacted owned
brand sales.
|
|
●
|
Revenues in the
quarter ended June 30, 2021 were adversely impacted by a strategic
decision to focus only on the agency and distributed brands that
realize a higher per order sales level. As a result, agency and
distributed brands revenues declined $2.1 million or 77% for the
quarter ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same period in the
prior year, and no new agency or distributed brands were onboarded
in the three months ended June 30, 2021.
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30,
2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
$24,204
|
$12,438
|
95%
|
Agency
|
1,765
|
4,690
|
-62%
|
Distributed
|
214
|
2,208
|
-90%
|
Net
revenue
|
$26,183
|
$19,336
|
35%
|
|
●
|
Revenue increases
compared to the same period in the prior year were driven by
expanded cultivation capacity, resulting in flower and pre-roll
brand sales increasing approximately 107%, which included over $6.7
million in Lowell brand sales, and the reorganization of owned
brand product offerings resulting in edible brand sales increasing
14% and concentrates brand sales declining 7%. Customer onboarding
and targeted marketing initiatives also favorably impacted owned
brand sales.
|
|
●
|
Revenues in the six
months ended June 30, 2021 were adversely impacted by a strategic
decision to focus only on the agency and distributed brands that
realize a higher per order sales level. As a result, agency and
distributed brands revenues declined $4.9 million or 71% for the
six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same six months in
the prior year, and no new agency or distributed brands were
onboarded in the six months ended June 30, 2021.
|
Lowell expects to
continue its focus on profitable sales growth in 2021 primarily
through increased cultivation yields as a result of completing
greenhouse renovations in 2020, including installation of
environmental monitoring equipment designed to significantly reduce
plant stress should the Company encounter severe temperature and
atmospheric conditions as occurred at the end of the summer in
2020. Flower capacity in 2021 is expected to increase to
approximately 40,000 pounds harvested, more than twice the harvest
in 2020. The increased output will also increase internally sourced
materials for distillation and concentrate products. Revenues are
also expected to increase, although at a slower pace, through
improved penetration of edible products and selective new product
introductions including pre-rolls, vapes and gummies. Our focus on
agency and distributed brand sales will continue to be on those
brands that realize a higher per order sales level that will enable
profitable growth. As a result, we expect agency and distributed
brand sales to continue to decline from 2020 levels. Lastly, LFS
revenue is expected to be modest in the third quarter and begin to
ramp up in the fourth quarter as new customers are
onboarded.
Cost of Sales,
Gross Profit and Gross Margin
Cost of goods sold
consist of direct and indirect costs of production and
distribution, and includes amounts paid for direct labor, raw
materials, packaging, operating supplies, and allocated overhead,
which includes allocations of right of use asset depreciation,
insurance, managerial salaries, utilities, and other expenses, such
as employee training, cultivation taxes and product testing. The
Company manufactures products for certain brands that do not have
the capability, licensing or capacity to manufacture their own
products. The fees earned for these activities absorbs fixed
overhead in manufacturing. Our focus in 2021 is on flower,
pre-rolls and concentrates from our expanded cultivation
operations, and on increased vertical integration utilizing greater
internally sourced biomass for edible and vape products. We are
focusing on executing smaller, more frequent production runs to
lower inventory working capital, optimize efficiencies and expedite
product getting to the market faster, while continuing to decrease
third party manufacturing activities.
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2021 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2020:
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Net
revenue
|
$15,157
|
$9,894
|
Cost of goods
sold
|
9,413
|
11,157
|
Gross profit
(loss)
|
$5,744
|
$(1,263)
|
Gross
margin
|
37.9%
|
(12.8)%
|
Gross margin was
37.9% and (12.8)% in the quarters ended June 30, 2021 and 2020,
respectively. The improvement between periods in gross profit and
gross margin is primarily due to efficiencies from the $7.3
million, or 101% increase in owned brand revenue, reflecting
increased cultivation output of flower and biomass which more than
doubled in the second quarter of 2021 compared to the same quarter
in the prior year, on a similar cost base. Additionally, the $2.0
million, or 77% reduction in revenue in the second quarter of 2021
compared to the same quarter in the prior year, from lower margin
agency and distributed brands had an unfavorable impact on gross
profit of approximately $0.2 million in the second quarter of 2021,
while having a favorable impact on gross margin in the current
quarter.
In the quarter
ended June 30, 2021, as a result of the change in brand product mix
and increased cultivation output, cost of goods sold decreased 16%
compared to the 53% increase in revenue resulting in the gross
margin improvement over the same period last year. Cultivation
yields returned to levels realized in the same period in the prior
year as a result of the introduction of new genetics in
2021.
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30,
2020:
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Net
revenue
|
$26,183
|
$19,336
|
Cost of goods
sold
|
21,915
|
22,328
|
Gross profit
(loss)
|
$4,268
|
$(2,992)
|
Gross
margin
|
16.3%
|
(15.5)%
|
Gross margin was
16.3% and (15.5)% in the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020,
respectively. The improvement between periods in gross profit and
gross margin is primarily due to efficiencies from the $11.8
million, or 95% increase in owned brand revenue, reflecting
increased cultivation output of flower and biomass which more than
doubled in the current quarter compared to the same quarter in the
prior year, on a similar cost base. Additionally, the $4.9 million,
or 71% reduction in revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2021
compared to the same period in the prior year, from lower margin
agency and distributed brands had an unfavorable impact on gross
profit of approximately $0.5 million in the current year to date
period, while having a favorable impact on gross margin in the
current year to date period.
In the six months
ended June 30, 2021, as a result of the change in brand product mix
and increased cultivation output, cost of goods sold decreased 2%
compared to the 35% increase in revenue resulting in the gross
margin improvement over the same period last year. Cultivation
yields returned to levels realized in the same period in the prior
year as a result of the introduction of new genetics in
2021.
Total
Operating Expenses
Total operating
expenses consist primarily of costs incurred at our corporate
offices; personnel costs; selling, marketing, and other
professional service costs including legal and accounting; and
licensing costs. Sales and marketing expenses consist of selling
costs to support our customer relationships, including investments
in marketing and brand activities and corporate infrastructure
required to support our ongoing business. We expect marketing
expenses to increase as we invest in the development of our
proprietary brands while selling costs as a percentage of revenue
decrease as our business continues to grow, due to efficiencies
associated with scaling the business, and reduced focus on non-core
brands. We expect to incur periodic acquisition and transaction
costs related to expansion efforts and to continue to invest where
appropriate in the general and administrative function to support
the increasing complexity of the cannabis business.
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2021 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2020:
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Total operating
expenses
|
$6,217
|
$3,525
|
Total operating
expenses increased $2.7 million for the quarter ended June 30,
2021, compared to the same quarter in the prior year. Operating
expenses increased as a percentage of sales from 36% in the quarter
ended June 30, 2020, to 41% in the same quarter this year. While
operating expenses are expected to increase as owned brand
marketing and infrastructure expenditures are incurred in support
of revenue increases, operating expenses as a percentage of sales
are expected to continue to decline.
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30,
2020:
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Total operating
expenses
|
$10,443
|
$8,905
|
Total operating
expenses increased $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30,
2021, compared to the same period in the prior year. Stock based
compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2021
decreased compared to the same period in the prior year by $1.2
million as restricted stock unit grants associated with the reverse
takeover fully vested at the end of the first quarter in 2020.
Operating expenses declined as a percentage of sales from 46% in
the year to date period of 2020 to 40% in the same period of 2021.
Operating expenses are expected to increase as owned brand
marketing and infrastructure expenditures are incurred in support
of revenue increases, and operating expenses as a percentage of
sales are expected to be similar to the percentage in the first six
months of the current year.
Other Income
(Expense)
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2021 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2020:
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Total other
income/(expense)
|
$1,278
|
$(3,944)
|
Other income in the
three months ended June 30, 2021 includes a $2.6 million insurance
recovery associated with claims filed as a result of plant stress
incurred in the third quarter of 2020 while other expense in the
three months ended June 30, 2020 included a $3.5 million loss
related to selling the rights to Nevada operations and associated
assets. Interest expense in the three months ended June 30, 2021
decreased $128 from the same period in 2020, reflecting the impact
of the issuance of convertible debentures in the second quarter
last year refinancing the higher interest bridge financing that was
in place previously.
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30,
2020:
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Total other income
(expense)
|
$325
|
$(4,684)
|
Other income in the
six months ended June 30, 2021 includes the insurance recovery
realized in the second quarter while other income in the six months
ended June 30, 2020 included the loss on disposing the Nevada
operations in the second quarter last year. Interest expense in the
six months ended June 30, 2021 decreased $361 from the same period
in 2020, due to higher interest bridge financing being outstanding
through mid-April until being refinanced by the convertible
debenture offering.
Net Income
(Loss)
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2021 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2020:
|
|
|
(in thousands, except
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net income
(loss)
|
$731
|
$(8,757)
|
Net income (loss) per
share:
|
|
|
Basic
|
$0.01
|
$(0.26)
|
Diluted
|
$0.00
|
$(0.26)
|
Shares used in per
share calculation:
|
|
|
Basic
|
71,021
|
33,307
|
Diluted
|
201,278
|
33,307
|
We generated net
income of $731 in the quarter ended June 30, 2021, compared to a
net loss of $8,757 for the same period of the prior year, as a
result of the factors noted above.
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021, compared to Six Months Ended June 30,
2020:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$(5,988)
|
$(16,631)
|
Net loss per
share:
|
|
|
Basic
|
$(0.10)
|
$(0.50)
|
Diluted
|
$(0.10)
|
$(0.50)
|
Shares used in per
share calculation:
|
|
|
Basic
|
33,025
|
28,931
|
Diluted
|
61,956
|
28,931
|
We generated net
loss of $5,988 in the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to a
net loss of $16,631 for the same period of the prior year, as a
result of the factors noted above.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES
Our primary need
for liquidity is to fund the working capital requirements of our
business, capital expenditures, general corporate purposes, and to
a lesser extent debt service. Our primary source of liquidity is
funds generated by financing activities. Our ability to fund our
operations, to make planned capital expenditures, to make scheduled
debt payments and to repay or refinance indebtedness depends on our
future operating performance and cash flows, and ability to obtain
equity or debt financing, which are subject to prevailing economic
conditions, as well as financial, business and other factors, some
of which are beyond our control. Cash generated from ongoing
operations in 2020 were not sufficient to fund operations and, in
particular, to fund the Company’s cultivation capital
expenditures in the short-term, and growth initiatives in the
long-term. The Company raised additional funds from a $16.1 million
convertible debenture and warrant financing which was initially
funded in April 2020 and finalized in May 2020 and a $25.0 million
unit financing (with each unit consisting of one Subordinate Voting
Share and one-half of one warrant, each whole warrant exercisable
for a Subordinate Voting Share) in December 2020.
As of June 30,
2021, the Company had $9.1 million of cash and cash equivalents and
$22.0 million of working capital, compared to $25.8 million of cash
and cash equivalents and $30.9 million of working capital as of
December 31, 2020.
The Company is
focused on improving its balance sheet by improving accounts
receivable collections, right-sizing inventories and increasing
gross profits. We have taken a number of steps to improve our cash
position and to continue to fund operations and capital
expenditures including:
|
●
|
Accelerated
cultivation facility renovations which are expected to result in an
increase in flower and trim output by approximately two times in
2021, compared to the prior year,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Installation of new
automated environmental and irrigation equipment designed to
improve yields and optimize greenhouse environmental
conditions,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Developed new
cultivation genetics focused on increasing yields and
potency,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Scaled back our
investment in and support for non-core brands,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Focus marketing and
brand development activities on significantly growing the Lowell
brands acquired in the first quarter of 2021,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
As a result of the
Lowell brand acquisition, restructured our organization and
identified operating, selling and administrative expense cost
efficiencies, and,
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Developed LFS, which
will commence operations in the second half of 2021 to add revenue
and cash flow generation.
|
The Company
realized margin improvement in the first six months of 2021,
compared to the same period in the prior year, as greenhouse
renovations were substantially completed, low profit agency and
distributed brands were eliminated, and operational efficiencies
improved. The Company anticipates improvement in gross margin for
the balance of the year, due in large part to yield improvements in
cultivation.
Cash Flows
The following table
presents the Company’s net cash inflows and outflows from the
condensed interim consolidated financial statements of the Company
for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in
operating activities
|
$(10,785)
|
$(7,473)
|
$(3,312)
|
(44)%
|
Net cash used in
investing activities
|
(5,271)
|
(1,367)
|
(3,904)
|
(286)%
|
Net cash (used)
provided by financing activities
|
(582)
|
14,197
|
(14,779)
|
(104)%
|
Change in cash and cash
equivalents and restricted cash
|
$(16,638)
|
$5,357
|
$(21,995)
|
(411)%
|
Cash used in
operating activities
Net cash used in
operating activities was $10.8 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2021, an increase of $3.3 million or 44%, compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2020. The increase was primarily driven
by inventory increasing $1.5 million in the six months ended June
30, 2021 compared to a reduction of $2.0 million in the first six
months of 2020, and accounts receivable increasing by $1.5 million
in the six months ended June 30, 2021 due to higher sales levels,
compared to a decrease of $1.4 million in the first six months of
2020.
Cash used in
investing activities
Net cash used in
investing activities was $5.3 million for the six months ended June
30, 2021, an increase of $3.9 million compared to the same period
of the prior year. Cash used in the Lowell brand acquisition was
$4.6 million, which was off-set by the termination of the W Vapes
acquisition agreement. See Note 2 in notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements. Capital expenditures were $0.6
million in the six months ended June 30, 2021, principally
associated with greenhouse renovations, compared to $4.1 million in
capital expenditures in the same period last year. Greenhouse
renovations were substantially completed at the end of the third
quarter in 2020. Remaining construction at the cultivation facility
consists primarily of the construction of a head house for
processing of flower and biomass, which is expected to be completed
around the end of the third quarter in 2021.
Cash (used in)
provided by financing activities
Net cash used in
financing activities was $0.6 million for the six months ended June
30, 2021, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of
$14.2 million in the same period of the prior year, primarily due
to proceeds from the note payable financing in the prior
year.
We expect that our
cash on hand and cash flows from operations will be adequate to
meet our operational needs for the next 12 months. The Company
intends to seek additional external financing to fund new business
initiatives, including the construction or expansion of additional
cultivation sites.
Working
Capital and Cash on Hand
The following table
presents the Company’s cash on hand and working capital
position as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital(1)
|
$21,970
|
$30,882
|
$(8,912)
|
(29)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$9,113
|
$25,751
|
$(16,638)
|
(65)%
|
______________
(1) Non-GAAP
measure - see Non-GAAP Financial Measures in this
MD&A.
|
At
December 31, 2020, we had $25.8 million cash and $30.9 million of
working capital, compared to $9.1 million of cash and $22.0 million
of working capital at June 30, 2021. The decrease in cash was
primarily due to funding operational losses and cash used in the
Lowell brand asset acquisition.
The Company’s
future working capital is expected to be significantly impacted by
the growth in operations, increased cultivation output, and
continuing margin improvement.
CHANGES IN OR ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
This MD&A
should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements
of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2020. Also see Note
1 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for
the three months ended June 30, 2021, and 2020, and the six months
ended June 30, 2021, and 2020 for changes of adoption of accounting
pronouncements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING
ESTIMATES
The preparation of
the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements
requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions
that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, and revenue and expenses. Actual results
may differ from these estimates. The estimates and underlying
assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to
accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the
estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in
the period of the revision and future periods if the review affects
both current and future periods.
Significant
judgments, estimates and assumptions that have the most significant
effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial
statements are described below.
|
●
|
Estimated Useful
Lives and Depreciation of Property and Equipment –
Depreciation of property and equipment is dependent upon estimates
of useful lives which are determined through the exercise of
judgment. The assessment of any impairment of these assets is
dependent upon estimates of recoverable amounts that take into
account factors such as economic and market conditions and the
useful lives of assets.
|
|
●
|
Estimated Useful
Lives and Amortization of Intangible Assets – Amortization of
intangible assets is recorded on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives, which do not exceed the contractual period,
if any.
|
|
●
|
Identifiable assets
acquired and liabilities assumed are recognized at the acquisition
date fair values as defined by accounting standards related to fair
value measurements.
|
|
●
|
Fair Value of
Investments in Private Entities – The Company uses discounted
cash flow model to determine fair value of its investment in
private entities. In estimating fair value, management is required
to make certain assumptions and estimates such as discount rate,
long term growth rate and, estimated free cash flows.
|
|
●
|
Share-Based
Compensation – The Company uses the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options
and warrants granted. In estimating fair value, management is
required to make certain assumptions and estimates such as the
expected life of units, volatility of the Company’s future
share price, risk free rates, future dividend yields and estimated
forfeitures at the initial grant date. Changes in assumptions used
to estimate fair value could result in materially different
results.
|
|
●
|
Deferred Tax Asset
and Valuation Allowance – Deferred tax assets, including
those arising from tax loss carry-forwards, requires management to
assess the likelihood that the Company will generate sufficient
taxable earnings in future periods in order to utilize recognized
deferred tax assets. Assumptions about the generation of future
taxable profits depend on management’s estimates of future
cash flows. In addition, future changes in tax laws could limit the
ability of the Company to obtain tax deductions in future periods.
To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ
significantly from estimates, the ability of the Company to realize
the net deferred tax assets recorded at the reporting date could be
impacted.
|
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL
RISK
The Company’s
financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities;
current portion of long-term debt; and long-term debt. The carrying
values of these financial instruments approximate their fair
values.
Financial
instruments recorded at fair value are classified using a fair
value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used
to make the measurements. The hierarchy is summarized as
follows:
|
●
|
Level 1 —
Quoted prices (unadjusted) that are in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities
|
|
●
|
Level 2 —
Inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly (prices) for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets or indirectly (derived from prices) for identical assets or
liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent
transactions
|
|
●
|
Level 3 —
Inputs for assets or liabilities that are not based upon observable
market data
|
The Company has
exposure to the following risks from its use of financial
instruments and other risks to which it is exposed and assess the
impact and likelihood of those risks. These risks include: market,
credit, liquidity, asset forfeiture, banking and interest rate
risk.
Credit
Risk
|
●
|
Credit risk is the
risk of a potential loss to the Company if a customer or third
party to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual
obligations. The maximum credit exposure at June 30, 2021, and
December 31, 2020, is the carrying amount of cash and cash
equivalents and accounts receivable. All cash and cash equivalents
are placed with U.S. and Canadian financial
institutions.
|
|
●
|
The Company provides
credit to its customers in the normal course of business and has
established credit evaluation and monitoring processes to mitigate
credit risk but has limited risk as a significant portion of its
sales are transacted with cash.
|
Liquidity
Risk
|
●
|
Liquidity risk is the
risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial
obligations associated with financial liabilities. The Company
manages liquidity risk through the management of its capital
structure. The Company’s approach to managing liquidity is to
ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to settle obligations
and liabilities when due.
|
|
●
|
In addition to the
commitments outlined in Note 15, the Company has the following
contractual obligations at June 30, 2021:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Accounts payable and
Other accrued liabilities
|
$8,325
|
$-
|
Market
Risk
|
●
|
Strategic and
operational risks arise if the Company fails to carry out business
operations and/or to raise sufficient equity and/or debt financing.
These strategic opportunities or threats arise from a range of
factors that might include changing economic and political
circumstances and regulatory approvals and competitor actions. The
risk is mitigated by consideration of other potential development
opportunities and challenges which management may
undertake.
|
Interest Rate
Risk
|
●
|
Interest rate risk is
the risk that the fair value or the future cash flows of a
financial instrument will fluctuate as a result of changes in
market interest rates. The Company’s interest-bearing loans
and borrowings are all at fixed interest rates; therefore, the
Company is not exposed to interest rate risk on these financial
liabilities. The Company considers interest rate risk to be
immaterial.
|
Price
Risk
|
●
|
Price risk is the
risk of variability in fair value due to movements in equity or
market prices. Cannabis is a developing market and subject to
volatile and possibly declining prices year over year as a result
of increased competition. Because adult-use cannabis is a newly
commercialized and regulated industry in the State of California,
historical price data is either not available or not predictive of
future price levels. There may be downward pressure on the average
price for cannabis. There can be no assurance that price volatility
will be favorable or in line with expectations. Pricing will depend
on general factors including, but not limited to, the number of
licenses granted by the local and state governments, the supply
such licensees are able to generate, activity by unlicensed
producers and sellers and consumer demand for cannabis. An adverse
change in cannabis prices, or in investors’ beliefs about
trends in those prices, could have a material adverse outcome on
the Company and its valuation.
|
Asset Forfeiture
Risk
|
●
|
Because the cannabis
industry remains illegal under U.S. federal law, any property owned
by participants in the cannabis industry which are either used in
the course of conducting such business, or are the proceeds of such
business, could be subject to seizure by law enforcement and
subsequent civil asset forfeiture. Even if the owner of the
property were never charged with a crime, the property in question
could still be seized and subject to an administrative proceeding
by which, with minimal due process, it could be subject to
forfeiture.
|
Banking
Risk
|
●
|
Notwithstanding that
a majority of states have legalized medical marijuana, there has
been no change in U.S. federal banking laws related to the deposit
and holding of funds derived from activities related to the
marijuana industry. Given that U.S. federal law provides that the
production and possession of cannabis is illegal, there are
arguments that financial institutions cannot accept for deposit
funds from businesses involved with the marijuana industry and
legislative efforts to provide greater certainty to financial
institutions have not been successful. Consequently, businesses
involved in the marijuana industry often have difficulty accessing
the U.S. banking system and traditional financing sources. The
inability to open bank accounts with certain institutions may make
it difficult to operate the business of the Company, its
subsidiaries and investee companies, and leaves their cash holdings
vulnerable.
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except
per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$11,026
|
$15,157
|
Gross profit
(loss)
|
$(1,477)
|
$5,744
|
Operating
loss
|
$(5,702)
|
$(473)
|
Income (loss) before
income taxes
|
$(6,656)
|
$805
|
Net income
(loss)
|
$(6,719)
|
$731
|
Income (loss) per share
- basic
|
$(0.13)
|
$0.01
|
Income (loss) per share
- diluted
|
$(0.13)
|
$0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$9,442
|
$9,894
|
Gross loss
|
$(1,729)
|
$(1,263)
|
Operating
loss
|
$(7,109)
|
$(4,788)
|
Loss before income
taxes
|
$(7,849)
|
$(8,732)
|
Net loss
|
$(7,874)
|
$(8,757)
|
Loss per share -
basic
|
$(0.24)
|
$(0.26)
|
Loss per share -
diluted
|
$(0.24)
|
$(0.26)
|
Consolidated Financial
Position
|
|
|
Cash
|
$9,113
|
$25,751
|
Current
assets
|
$34,216
|
$46,604
|
Property, plant and
equipment, net
|
$64,496
|
$49,243
|
Total
assets
|
$140,589
|
$97,416
|
Current
liabilities
|
$12,246
|
$15,723
|
Working
capital
|
$21,970
|
$30,883
|
Long-term notes payable
including current portion
|
$23,211
|
$15,217
|
Capital lease
obligations including current portion
|
$37,670
|
$38,834
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
$70,241
|
$31,156
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
Not
applicable.
OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA
As of August 13,
2021, the Company had the following securities issued and
outstanding:
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
(on an as
converted basis)
|
Issued and
Outstanding
|
|
Subordinate voting
shares
|
92,609
|
Super voting
shares
|
203
|
Reserved for
Issuance
|
|
Options
|
6,787
|
Restricted Stock
Units
|
1,835
|
Warrants
|
15,058
|
Convertible debenture
shares
|
77,629
|
Convertible debenture
warrants
|
78,629
|
|
272,749
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Year
Ended December 31, 2020, Compared to Year Ended December 31,
2019
Revenue
We derive our
revenue from sales of extracts, distillates, branded and packaged
cannabis flower, concentrates and edible products to retail
dispensaries in the state of California. In addition, we distribute
proprietary and third-party brands throughout the state of
California. The Company recognizes revenue upon delivery of goods
to customers since at this time performance obligations are
satisfied.
The Company
classifies its revenues into three major categories: Owned, Agency
and Distributed brands.
●
|
Owned are the
proprietary brands of the Company.
|
●
|
Agency brands are
third-party brands that the Company manufactures and/or sells
utilizing our in-house sales team and distributes on behalf of the
third-party.
|
●
|
Distributed brands
are brands in which the Company provides distribution services to
retail dispensaries. Distributed brands also include third-party
sourced bulk product sales.
|
Revenue by Category
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
$31,955
|
$15,366
|
108%
|
Agency
|
7,778
|
13,470
|
-42%
|
Distributed
|
2,885
|
8,209
|
-65%
|
Net revenue
|
$42,618
|
$37,045
|
15%
|
In the year ended
December 31, 2020:
●
|
Revenue increases
compared to the prior year were driven by expanded cultivation
capacity, resulting in flower brand sales increasing 167% over 2019
and expansion of owned brand product offerings resulting in
concentrates brand sales increasing 154% over 2019 and edible brand
sales increasing 103% over 2019. Customer onboarding and targeted
marketing initiatives also favorably impacted owned brand
sales.
|
●
|
Revenues in 2020 were
adversely impacted by a strategic decision to focus on agency and
distributed brands that realize a higher per order sales level. As
a result, the number of agency brands carried by the Company in
2020 declined by approximately 60% and no new agency brands were
onboarded, and, the number of distributed brands carried by the
Company declined by approximately 85%, and only two new distributed
brands were onboarded in 2020.
|
Lowell Farms
expects to continue its focus on profitable sales growth in 2021
primarily through increased cultivation yields as a result of
completing greenhouse renovations in 2020, including installation
of environmental monitoring equipment designed to significantly
reduce plant stress should the Company encounter severe temperature
and atmospheric conditions as occurred at the end of the summer in
2020. Flower capacity in 2021 is expected to increase to over
40,000 pounds harvested, more than twice the harvest in 2020. The
increased output will also increase internally sourced materials
for distillation and concentrate products. Revenues are also
expected to increase, although at a lesser pace, through improved
penetration of edible products and selective new product
introductions including pre-rolls, vapes and gummies. Our focus on
agency and distributed brand sales will continue to be on those
brands that realize a higher per order sales level that will enable
profitable growth. As a result, we expect agency and distributed
brand sales to decline from 2020 levels.
Cost of Sales, Gross Profit and Gross
Margin
Cost of goods sold
consist of direct and indirect costs of production and
distribution, and includes amounts paid for direct labor, raw
materials, packaging, operating supplies, and allocated overhead,
which includes allocations of rent, insurance, managerial salaries,
utilities, and other expenses, such as employee training and
product testing. The Company manufactures products for certain
brands that do not have the capability, licensing or capacity to
manufacture their own products. The fees earned for these
activities absorbs fixed overhead in manufacturing. Our focus in
2021 is on flower, pre-rolls and concentrates from our expanded
cultivation operations, and on increased vertical integration
utilizing greater internally sourced biomass for edible and vape
products. We are focusing on executing smaller, more frequent
production runs to lower inventory working capital, optimize
efficiencies and expedite product getting to the market faster,
while continuing to decrease third party manufacturing
activities.
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Net
revenue
|
$42,618
|
$37,045
|
Cost of goods
sold
|
$40,413
|
$47,790
|
Gross profit
(loss)
|
$2,205
|
$(10,745)
|
Gross
margin
|
5.2%
|
-29.0%
|
Gross margin was
5.2% and (29.0)% in the year ended December 31, 2020, and 2019,
respectively. The improvement between periods in gross profit and
gross margin is primarily due efficiencies from the $16.6 million,
108% increase in owned brand revenue, reflecting increased
cultivation output of flower and biomass which more than doubled in
2020 over 2019 on a similar cost base. Additionally, the $11.0
million, or 51% reduction in revenue from lower margin agency and
distributed brands had an unfavorable impact on gross profit of
approximately $0.7 million while having a favorable year-to-year
impact on gross margin.
In 2020, as a
result of the change in brand product mix and cost efficiencies
related to the increased yields in cultivation, the Company
incurred approximately $2.9 million in additional cost of goods
sold related to the $16.6 million increase in owned brand product
sales when compared to 2019. Additionally, cost of goods sold in
2020 declined approximately $10.3 million from 2019 as a result of
the $11.0 million reduction in agency and distributed brand product
sales.
Total Operating Expenses
Total operating
expenses consist primarily of costs incurred at our corporate
offices; personnel costs; selling, marketing, and other
professional service costs including legal and accounting; and
licensing costs. Sales and marketing expenses consist of selling
costs to support our customer relationships, including investments
in marketing and brand activities and corporate infrastructure
required to support our ongoing business. We expect selling costs
as a percentage of revenue to decrease as our business continues to
grow, due to efficiencies associated with scaling the business, and
reduced focus on non-core brands. We expect to incur periodic
acquisition and transaction costs related to expansion efforts and
to continue to invest where appropriate in the general and
administrative function to support the increasing complexity of the
cannabis business.
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Total operating
expenses
|
$18,013
|
$34,836
|
Total operating
expenses decreased $16,823 for the year ended December 31, 2020,
compared to the prior year. The decrease is primarily attributable
to the reduction in general and administrative salaries and
expenses through cost cutting initiatives and fully burdening
distribution operations in cost of goods sold. Stock based
compensation expense in 2020 decreased $1,185 as restricted stock
unit grants associated with the reverse takeover fully vested at
the end of the first quarter in 2020. In addition, operating
expenses in 2019 include $2,251 of transaction costs related to the
reverse takeover and acquisition-related costs. Operating expenses
declined as a percentage of sales from 100% in 2019 to 48% in 2020.
While operating expenses are expected to increase as owned brand
marketing and infrastructure expenditures are incurred in support
of revenue increases, operating expenses as a percentage of sales
are expected to continue to decline.
Total other income (expense),
net
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Total other
income/(expense)
|
$(5,878)
|
$(4,148)
|
Other expense in
2020 included a loss of $4,367 on the termination of the agreement
to purchase the Nevada and Oregon operations of W Vapes and the
sale of the Las Vegas facility while 2019 included $2,250 in
unrealized losses from investments. Interest expense increased
$1,179 in 2020 due to bridge financing and convertible debentures
entered into in the current year.
Net Loss
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
(in thousands, except
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$(21,910)
|
$(49,934)
|
Net loss per
share:
|
|
|
Basic and
Diluted
|
$(0.65)
|
$(1.59)
|
Shares used in per
share calculation:
|
|
|
Basic and
Diluted
|
33,940
|
31,379
|
Net loss reduced
$37,920, or 75%, in 2020 as a result of the factors noted
above.
Summary of Quarterly
Results
The table below
presents selected financial information for each of the eight most
recently completed quarters
(in thousands, except
per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$9,442
|
$9,894
|
$14,131
|
$9,151
|
Gross profit
(loss)
|
$(1,729)
|
$(1,263)
|
$4,979
|
$218
|
Operating income
(loss)
|
$(7,109)
|
$(4,788)
|
$772
|
$(4,683)
|
Income(loss) before
income taxes
|
$(7,849)
|
$(8,732)
|
$(1,052)
|
$(4,053)
|
Net income
(loss)
|
$(7,874)
|
$(8,757)
|
$(1,171)
|
$(4,108)
|
Loss per share –
basic and diluted
|
$(0.24)
|
$(0.26)
|
$(0.04)
|
$(0.11)
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$6,434
|
$9,689
|
$10,119
|
$10,803
|
Gross profit
(loss)
|
$2,487
|
$(1,021)
|
$(7,524)
|
$(4,687)
|
Operating
loss
|
$(1,500)
|
$(8,923)
|
$(19,139)
|
$(16,019)
|
Income before income
taxes
|
$(2,676)
|
$(8,176)
|
$(21,343)
|
$(17,534)
|
Net loss
|
$(2,676)
|
$(8,679)
|
$(20,884)
|
$(17,965)
|
Loss per share - basic
and diluted
|
|
$(0.27)
|
$(0.65)
|
$(0.55)
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES
Our primary need
for liquidity is to fund the working capital requirements of our
business, capital expenditures, general corporate purposes, and to
a lesser extent debt service. Our primary source of liquidity is
funds generated by financing activities. Our ability to fund our
operations, to make planned capital expenditures, to make scheduled
debt payments and to repay or refinance indebtedness depends on our
future operating performance and cash flows, and ability to obtain
equity or debt financing, which are subject to prevailing economic
conditions, as well as financial, business and other factors, some
of which are beyond our control. Cash generated from ongoing
operations in 2020 were not sufficient to fund operations and, in
particular, to fund the Company’s cultivation capital
expenditures in the short-term, and growth initiatives in the
long-term. The Company raised additional funds from a $16.1 million
convertible debt financing which was initially funded in April 2020
and finalized in May 2020 and a $25.0 million equity financing in
December 2020.
As of December 31,
2020, the Company had $25.8 million of cash and cash equivalents,
and $30.9 million of working capital, compared to $1.3 million of
cash and cash equivalents and $9.3 million of working capital as of
December 31, 2019.
The Company is
focused on improving its balance sheet by improving accounts
receivable collections, right-sizing inventories and increasing
gross profits. We have taken a number of steps to improve our cash
position and to continue to fund operations and capital
expenditures including:
●
|
Entered into a $16.1
million senior secured convertible debenture and warrant purchase
agreement in April 2020. The debentures bear interest at 5.5% per
annum and will mature in October 2023. See Note 14 in the
consolidated financial statements.
|
●
|
Accelerated
cultivation facility renovations which are expected to result in an
increase in flower and trim output by over two times in 2021, and
over 4 times compared to 2019.
|
●
|
Completed a 23
million subordinate voting share offering in December 2020 which
generated $25.0 million in net proceeds.
|
●
|
Terminated the
technology agreement with our e-commerce partner to reduce
distribution expenses.
|
●
|
Scaled back our
investment in and support for non-core brands.
|
●
|
Reduced accounts
receivable in excess of $2.3 million in 2020.
|
●
|
Restructured our
organization and identified operating, selling and administrative
expense cost reductions, which includes component cost reductions,
reorganization of our sales and commission structure and
realignment or our discount programs.
|
The Company
realized considerable margin improvement in 2020 as greenhouse
renovations were substantially completed, low profit agency and
distributed brands were eliminated and operational efficiencies
improved.
Private
Placement
In connection with
the RTO, on April 2, 2019 , we completed a private placement
offering (the “Private Placement”), in which 3,436
subscription receipts (“Subscription Receipts”) of a
special purpose finance vehicle (“Finance Co”) were
issued at a price of CDN$15.65 per Subscription Receipt for gross
proceeds of approximately US$40 million. The gross proceeds of the
Private Placement, less certain associated expenses, were deposited
into escrow (the “Escrowed Proceeds”) pending
satisfaction of certain specified release conditions (the
“Escrow Release Conditions”), all of which were
satisfied immediately prior to the completion of the RTO. As a
result, the Escrowed Proceeds were released to FinanceCo prior to
the closing of the RTO, and each Subscription Receipt was
automatically converted, for no additional consideration, into one
common share of FinanceCo. Following satisfaction of the Escrow
Release Conditions, in connection with the RTO, the Company
acquired all of the issued and outstanding FinanceCo shares
pursuant to a three-cornered amalgamation, and the former holders
thereof (including the former holders of FinanceCo Shares acquired
upon conversion of the Subscription Receipts) each received one
Subordinate Voting Share in exchange for each FinanceCo share
held.
Cash
Flows
The following table
presents the Company’s net cash inflows and outflows from the
condensed interim consolidated financial statements of the Company
for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019.
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ %
|
|
Net cash used in
operating activities
|
|
$
|
(7,752
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39,323
|
)
|
|
$
|
31,571
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
Net cash used in
investing activities
|
|
|
(5,607
|
)
|
|
|
(10,061
|
)
|
|
|
4,454
|
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
Net cash provided (used)
by financing activities
|
|
|
37,765
|
|
|
|
40,418
|
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
-7
|
%
|
Change in cash and cash
equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
$
|
24,406
|
|
|
$
|
(8,966
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,372
|
|
|
|
372
|
%
|
Cash used in operating
activities
Net cash used in
operating activities was $7,752 for the year ended December 31,
2020, a decrease of $31.6 million or 80%, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2019. The reduction was primarily driven by the
$28.0 million reduction in net loss. Inventory decreased $0.5
million in the current year compared to a reduction of $1.6 million
in 2019, reflecting a continuing focus on reducing inventory days
on hand for manufactured product. Accounts receivable decreased by
$1.0 million in 2020 compared to an increase of $6.2 million in
2019 reflecting significant collections focus in the current
year.
Cash used in investing
activities
Net cash used in
investing activities was $5,607 for the year ended December 31,
2020, a decrease of $4.5 million, compared to the prior year.
Capital expenditures of $6.9 million, principally associated with
greenhouse renovations, were comparable to $10.0 million in capital
expenditures in the same period last year. Capital expenditures in
2019 included a $4.1 million purchase of a building in Nevada which
was sold in 2020, and the Company received $0.5 million of proceeds
in the current year and an additional $2.8 million in January 2021.
Greenhouse renovations were substantially completed at the end of
the third quarter in 2020. Remaining construction at the
cultivation facility consists primarily of the construction of a
head house for drying and processing of flower and biomass, which
is expected to be completed around the end of the first quarter in
2021.
Cash provided by financing
activities
Net cash provided
by financing activities was $37,765 for the year ended December 31,
2020, compared to $40,418 in the prior year. The inflow consisted
primarily of $15.2 million in net proceeds from the convertible
debenture financing in the second quarter and $25.0 million in net
proceeds from the subordinate voting share offering in the fourth
quarter. The inflow in 2019 was the result of the $40 million
Private Placement financing.
We expect that our
cash on hand and cash flows from operations, will be adequate to
meet our capital requirements and operational needs for the next 12
months.
Working Capital and Cash on
Hand
The following table
presents the Company’s cash on hand and working capital
position as of December 31, 2020, and 2019.
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ %
|
|
Working
capital(1)
|
|
$
|
30,883
|
|
|
$
|
9,330
|
|
|
$
|
21,553
|
|
|
|
231
|
%
|
Cash on
hand
|
|
$
|
25,751
|
|
|
$
|
1,344
|
|
|
$
|
24,407
|
|
|
1816%
|
|
(1)
Non-GAAP measure - see Non-GAAP Financial Measures in this
MD&A.
|
|
At December 31,
2020, we had $25,751 of cash and $30,883 of working capital,
compared with $1,344 of cash and $9,330 of working capital at
December 31, 2019. The increase in cash was primarily due to the
convertible debenture financing and subordinate voting share
offering, offset by capital expenditures and increases in
inventories and biological assets.
The Company’s
working capital is expected to be significantly impacted by the
growth in operations, increased cultivation output, and continuing
margin improvement.
CHANGES IN OR ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
This MD&A
should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements
of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019. The
Company implemented the following additional policies beginning
January 1, 2019:
In May 2020, the
SEC adopted the final rule under SEC release No. 33-10786,
Amendments to Financial
Disclosures about Acquired and Disposed Businesses, amending
Rule 1-02(w)(2) which includes amendments to certain of its rules
and forms related to the disclosure of financial information
regarding acquired or disposed businesses. Among other changes, the
amendments impact SEC rules relating to (1) the definition of
“significant” subsidiaries, (2) requirements to provide
financial statements for “significant” acquisitions,
and (3) revisions to the formulation and usage of pro forma
financial information. The final rule becomes effective on January
1, 2021; however, voluntary early adoption is permitted. The
Company early adopted the provisions of the final rule in 2020. The
guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In February 2016,
FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases
(Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires that a lessee recognize
the assets and liabilities that arise from operating leases. A
lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a
liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a
right-of-use (ROU) asset representing its right to use the
underlying asset for the lease term. For leases with a term of 12
months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy
election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets
and lease liabilities. In transition, lessees and lessors are
required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the
earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach.
In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases
and ASU 2018-11, Leases Topic 842 Target improvements, which
provides an additional (and optional) transition method whereby the
new lease standard is applied at the adoption date and recognized
as an adjustment to retained earnings. In March 2019, the FASB
issued ASU 2019-01, Leases (Topic
842) Codification Improvements, which further clarifies the
determination of fair value of the underlying asset by lessors that
are not manufacturers or dealers and modifies transition disclosure
requirements for changes in accounting principles and other
technical updates. The Company adopted the standard effective
January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective adoption method
which allowed it to initially apply the new standard at the
adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the
opening balance of accumulated deficit. In connection with the
adoption of the new lease pronouncement, the Company recorded a
charge to accumulated deficit of $847.
Effects of Adoption
The Company has
elected to use the practical expedient package that allows us to
not reassess: (1) whether any expired or existing contracts are or
contain leases, (2) lease classification for any expired or
existing leases and (3) initial direct costs for any expired or
existing leases. The Company additionally elected to use the
practical expedients that allow lessees to: (1) treat the lease and
non-lease components of leases as a single lease component for all
of its leases and (2) not recognize on its balance sheet leases
with terms less than twelve months.
The Company
determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. The Company
leases certain manufacturing facilities, warehouses, offices,
machinery and equipment, vehicles and office equipment under
operating leases. Under the new standard, operating leases result
in the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheet. ROU assets represent our right to use
the leased asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent
our obligation to make lease payments. Under the new standard,
operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at
commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over
the lease term. As most of the Company’s leases do not
provide an implicit rate, upon adoption of the new standard, we
used our estimated incremental borrowing rate based on the
information available, including lease term, as of January 1, 2019
to determine the present value of lease payments. Operating lease
ROU assets are adjusted for any lease payments made prior to
January 1, 2019 and any lease incentives. Certain of our leases may
include options to extend or terminate the original lease term. The
Company generally concluded that it is not reasonably certain to
exercise these options due primarily to the length of the original
lease term and its assessment that economic incentives are not
reasonably certain to be realized. Operating lease expense under
the new standard is recognized on a straight-line basis over them
lease term. Current finance lease obligations consist primarily of
cultivation, manufacturing and distribution facility
leases.
Refer to the
Summary of Effects of Lease
Accounting Standard Update Adopted in First Quarter of 2019
below for further details.
Leases accounted
for under the new standard have initial remaining lease terms of
one to seven years. Certain of our lease agreements include rental
payments adjusted periodically for inflation. The Company’s
lease agreements do not contain any material residual value
guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
Summary of Effects of Lease Accounting
Standard Update Adopted in First Quarter of
2019
The cumulative
effects of the changes made to our consolidated balance sheet as of
the beginning of the first quarter of 2019 as a result of the
adoption of the accounting standard update on leases were as
follows:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of adoption of lease
accounting
standard update related to:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, $US)
|
|
As filed
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Recognition of
Operating Leases
|
|
|
Total Effects
of Adoption
|
|
|
With effect of
lease accounting
standard update
January 1, 2019
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment,
net
|
|
$
|
4,063
|
|
|
$
|
23,594
|
|
|
$
|
23,594
|
|
|
$
|
27,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of
long-term debt
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
Long-term debt,
net
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
23,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
(20,201
|
)
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
|
|
(21,047
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
23,728
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
23,728
|
|
In June 2016, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic
326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments,” and subsequent amendments to the initial
guidance: ASU 2018-19 ”Codification Improvements to Topic 326,
Financial Instruments-Credit Losses,” ASU 2019-04
“Codification Improvements
to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815,
Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial
Instruments,” ASU 2019-05 “Financial Instruments-Credit
Losses,” ASU 2019-11 “Codification Improvements to Topic 326,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses” (collectively, Topic
326), ASU 2020-02 Financial
Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) and Leases (Topic
842), and ASU 2020-03 Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments. Topic 326 requires
measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial
assets held. This guidance is effective for the year ended December
31, 2020. The Company believes that the most notable impact of this
ASU will relate to its processes around the assessment of the
adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts on trade accounts
receivable and the recognition of credit losses. We continue to
monitor the economic implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, however
based on current market conditions, the adoption of the ASU did not
have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
In November 2018,
the FASB issued ASU 2018-18, Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808),
Clarifying the Interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606.
This guidance amended Topic 808 and Topic 606 to clarify that
transactions in a collaborative arrangement should be accounted for
under Topic 606 when the counterparty is a customer for a distinct
good or service (i.e., unit of account). The amendments preclude an
entity from presenting consideration from a transaction in a
collaborative arrangement as revenue from contracts with customers
if the counterparty is not a customer for that transaction. This
guidance is effective for the year ended December 31, 2020. The
adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Years Ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except
per share amounts)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Consolidated Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
42,618
|
|
|
$
|
37,045
|
|
|
$
|
17,199
|
|
|
$
|
15,468
|
|
|
$
|
4,676
|
|
Gross
profit/(loss)
|
|
$
|
2,205
|
|
|
$
|
(10,745
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,063
|
|
|
$
|
1,763
|
|
|
$
|
692
|
|
Operating
loss
|
|
$
|
(15,808
|
)
|
|
$
|
(45,581
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,330
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,976
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,358
|
)
|
Loss before income
taxes
|
|
$
|
(21,686
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,729
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,614
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,258
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,439
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(21,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,934
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,711
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,280
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,439
|
)
|
Net loss per share -
basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding - basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
33,940
|
|
|
$
|
31,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial
Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
25,751
|
|
|
$
|
1,344
|
|
|
$
|
10,310
|
|
|
$
|
2,229
|
|
|
$
|
2,807
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
$
|
46,605
|
|
|
$
|
21,381
|
|
|
$
|
31,253
|
|
|
$
|
8,809
|
|
|
$
|
4,949
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment, net
|
|
$
|
49,243
|
|
|
$
|
42,972
|
|
|
$
|
4,063
|
|
|
$
|
1,649
|
|
|
$
|
960
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
97,416
|
|
|
$
|
68,534
|
|
|
$
|
37,465
|
|
|
$
|
12,171
|
|
|
$
|
6,133
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
$
|
15,723
|
|
|
$
|
12,051
|
|
|
$
|
4,436
|
|
|
$
|
7,753
|
|
|
$
|
1,126
|
|
Working
capital
|
|
$
|
30,883
|
|
|
$
|
9,330
|
|
|
$
|
26,817
|
|
|
$
|
1,056
|
|
|
$
|
3,823
|
|
Long-term notes payable
including current portion
|
|
$
|
15,217
|
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
|
$
|
12,276
|
|
|
$
|
4,524
|
|
Capital lease
obligations including current portion
|
|
$
|
45,393
|
|
|
$
|
35,836
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
31,156
|
|
|
$
|
23,686
|
|
|
$
|
32,640
|
|
|
$
|
(5,211
|
)
|
|
$
|
541
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
Not
applicable.
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
Below are the names
of and certain information regarding our executive officers and
directors:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
George
Allen
|
|
46
|
|
Chairman
|
Mark
Ainsworth
|
|
47
|
|
Chief Executive
Officer and Director
|
Stephanie
Harkness
|
|
78
|
|
Director
|
William
Anton
|
|
80
|
|
Director
|
Kevin
McGrath
|
|
48
|
|
Director
|
Brian
Shure
|
|
45
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer and Director
|
Bruce
Gates
|
|
60
|
|
Director
|
Jenny
Montenegro
|
|
38
|
|
Chief Operating
Officer
|
Kelly
McMillin
|
|
58
|
|
Chief Compliance
Officer
|
George Allen has
served as the non-executive Chairman and a director of the Company
since April 2020. Mr. Allen is the Founder of Geronimo Capital LLC,
a cannabis-industry investment firm, and has been its Managing
Member since April 2019. Mr. Allen was the President of Acreage
Holdings, a cannabis multi-state operator, from August 2017 to
April 2019. At the time of his departure from Acreage Holdings, it
was the largest multi-state operator with the broadest footprint in
the United States. Mr. Allen was the Chief Investment Officer of
Cambridge Information Group, a family investment office, from July
2015 to August 2017. Mr. Allen holds a Bachelor of Science degree
in Mechanical Engineering from Yale University. From 2011 to 2014
Mr. Allen led an acquisition-driven restructuring of Blucora
(NASDAQ: BCOR) into a leading provider of wealth management and tax
software. Prior to Blucora, Mr. Allen spent nine years at Warburg
Pincus, where he managed investments in the communication, media
and technology sectors. He also worked at Goldman Sachs in New York
and Hong Kong, where he invested capital in distressed securities
The Company believes that Mr. Allen’s extensive public
company and executive-level experience and his expertise in
strategy, mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance qualify
him to serve as our Chairman.
Mark Ainsworth has
served as Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company
since April 2019. Mr. Ainsworth previously served as the
Company’s Chief Operating Officer (November 2019 to April
2020) and Executive Vice President (April 2019 to April 2020) and
as Executive Vice President of Indus Holding Company (inception to
April 2019). In 2006, Mr. Ainsworth founded Pastry Smart, an
American Humane Certified and Organic bakery and confectionery
manufacturer. He has been a member of the American Culinary
Federation since 2013. The Company believes that Mr.
Ainsworth’s long history as an entrepreneur and as a
co-founder of the Company as well as his executive-level experience
qualify him to serve as a member of our Board.
Stephanie Harkness
has served as an independent director of the Company since April
2019. Ms. Harkness is the Managing General Partner of OPES
Holdings, LLC, a venture capital and private equity firm. From 1980
to 2011 Ms. Harkness was CEO of Pacific Plastics & Engineering,
a leading medical device manufacturer in the San Francisco Bay
area. Ms. Harkness was formerly the Chairperson of the National
Association of Manufacturers, a member of the Board of Directors
for Dignity Health Hospital, and Chair of the Silicon Valley
Capital Club Board of Governors. Ms. Harkness holds a B.S. degree
from California Polytechnic State University. The Company believes
that Ms. Harkness’ extensive experience as a senior executive
and director and her lengthy history of value creation with
companies at both early and later stages of their development
qualify her to serve as a member of our Board.
William Anton has
served as an independent director of the Company since April 2019.
Mr. Anton has served as Chairman and CEO of Anton Enterprises, Inc.
since 2005 and Managing Partner of Anton Venture Capital Fund LLC
since 2004. Prior to Anton Enterprises he was Chairman of Anton
Airfood, Inc. from 1989 to 2005, the airport foodservice company he
founded. Mr. Anton is Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees of
the Culinary Institute of America. He also serves on the Board of
Trustees of Media Research Corporation, the Board of Directors of
QSpex Technologies Inc., and is a member of the Board of Governors
of the Thalians Foundation for Mental Health at Cedars-Sinai. Mr.
Anton formerly served on the Board of Directors of Air Chef
Corporation, a leading private aviation catering firm in North
America, the Board of Directors for Morton’s Restaurant
Group, the Board of the British Restaurant Association, the Board
of Trustees of the William F. Harrah College - University of Nevada
in Las Vegas, and the National Restaurant Association Education
Foundation. The Company believes that Ms. Anton’s extensive
experience as a senior executive and director and his lengthy
history of value-creation as a founder and entrepreneur qualify him
to serve as a member of our Board.
Kevin McGrath has
served as an independent director of the Company since April 2020.
Mr. McGrath holds stakes in privately held medical cannabis
companies such as Theraplant LLC and Leafline Labs LLC as well as
being an early investor and former special advisor to
GrowGeneration. Mr. McGrath is a member of the board of directors
of NextGen Pharma/Bwell Group. Prior to joining the Company’s
board Mr. McGrath was a founding partner of Merus Capital Partners,
a New York City-based Hedge Fund. Mr. McGrath has held portfolio
manager titles at Millennium Capital Management, Quad Capital
Advisors and First New York securities. Mr. McGrath is a graduate
of the University of Notre Dame. The Company believes that Ms.
McGrath’s experience as a director, his expertise in
corporate finance and his deep knowledge of the cannabis industry
qualify him to serve as a member of our Board.
Brian Shure has
served as a director of the Company since April 2020 and was
appointed as Chief Financial Officer in November 2020. Mr. Shure
leads Ambrose Capital Partners, an investment management firm,
directing public and private investments where he has served as
President since 2008. Mr. Shure served as Chief Financial Officer
of MedData, a revenue cycle management company in the healthcare
industry, where he oversaw significant organic and M&A growth.
Mr. Shure joined MedData following the company’s acquisition
of Cardon Outreach, where he led finance and M&A strategy as
Chief Financial Officer. The Company believes that Mr.
Shure’s extensive experience as a financial executive and his
expertise in mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance qualify
him to serve as a member of our Board.
Bruce Gates has
served as an independent director of the Company since October
2020. Mr. Gates founded and since November 2017 has served as the
President of Three Oaks Strategies, LLC, a multi-disciplined
consultancy firm, and of Three Oaks Asset Management, LLC, a family
office and venture capital firm. Mr. Gates was the Senior Vice
President, External Affairs for Altria Group, Inc. from 2008 until
October 2017. Mr.Gates served as a directors of Cronos Group Inc.
(Nasdaq: CRON) and as the Chair of its compensation committee from
March 2019 to March 2020. Mr. Gates received his B.A. from the
University of Georgia. The Company believes that Mr. Gates’
extensive experience as a senior executive and director qualifies
him to serve as a member of our Board.
Jenny Montenegro
joined the Company leadership team in June 2020. Previously Ms.
Montenegro served as Vice President of Commercialization from
August 2019 to June 2020. She was responsible for planning and
managing the timeline of the launch of brand products into the
market. Prior to joining Lowell Farms, Ms. Montenegro served as the
Founding Vice President of Consumer Packaged Goods and Operations.
Ms. Montenegro served as Vice President – Operations and
Marketing of The Organic Coop from April 2016 to August 2019. Prior
to that, Ms. Montenegro served as a regional buyer at Costco
Wholesale, where she worked from October 2001 to April
2016.
Kelly McMillin has
served as Chief Compliance Officer of the Company since October
2017. As Chief of the Salinas Police Department beginning June
2012, Mr. McMillin served as a board member of the California
Cities Violence Prevention Network and a representative to the U.S.
Department of Justice’s National Forum on Youth Violence
Prevention. Mr. McMillin holds a Bachelor of Arts from Saint
Mary’s College of California and a Master of Public Policy
from the Panetta Institute at Cal State University, Monterey Bay.
He is a 2003 graduate of the 213th session of the FBI National
Academy at Quantico.
Family Relationships
There are no family
relationships among any of our executive officers or
directors.
Arrangements between Officers and
Directors
Except as set forth
in this registration statement on Form S-1, to our knowledge, there
is no arrangement or understanding between any of our officers or
directors and any other person pursuant to which such officer or
director was selected to serve as an officer or director of the
Company.
Involvement in Certain Legal
Proceedings
To the best of the
Company’s knowledge, no director or executive officer of the
Company has been involved in any legal proceedings in the past ten
years relating to any matters in bankruptcy, insolvency, criminal
proceedings (other than traffic and other minor offenses), or being
subject to any of the items set forth under Item 401(f) of
Regulation S-K.
Director Independence
Our Board of
Directors is comprised of George Allen, Mark Ainsworth, Stephanie
Harkness, William Anton, Kevin McGrath, Brian Shure and Bruce
Gates, of which all members except George Allen, Mark Ainsworth and
Brian Shure are deemed to be independent. George Allen is not
considered independent because of his position as the founder of
Geronimo Capital, LLC, the lead lender that participated in the
Convertible Debenture Offering. Mark Ainsworth and Brian Shure are
not considered independent because of their executive positions
with the Company. Although our securities are not listed on any
U.S. national securities exchange, for purposes of independence we
use the definition of independence applied by the New York Stock
Exchange to determine which directors are “independent”
in accordance with such definition. We also use the definition of
independence under NI 58-101.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Executive and Director
Compensation
Summary Compensation Table
The following table
provides the compensation paid to our principal executive officer
and other executive officers whose total compensation exceeded
$100,000 for the years ended December 31, 2020, and December 31,
2019.
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus (1)
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Nonequity incentive plan compensation
|
|
|
Nonqualified deferred
compensation earnings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Mark Ainsworth
(1)
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
38,205
|
|
|
$
|
85,427
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
388,632
|
|
Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
2019
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
758,626
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,008,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Shure
(2)
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
36,059
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
37,266
|
|
|
$
|
158,114
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
231,439
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
2019
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jenny Montenegro
(3)
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
121,875
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
136,875
|
|
Chief Operating
Officer
|
|
2019
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly
McMillin
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
131,794
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10,438
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
152,232
|
|
Chief Compliance
Officer
|
|
2019
|
|
$
|
128,291
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
151,725
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
280,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Weakley
(4)
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
109,375
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
109,375
|
|
Former Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
2019
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
758,626
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,133,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Neil
(5)
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
220,833
|
|
|
$
|
16,250
|
|
|
$
|
63,675
|
|
|
$
|
94,519
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
395,277
|
|
Former Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
2019
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tina Maloney
(6)
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Former Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
2019
|
|
$
|
238,942
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
606,900
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
845,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Bayern
(7)
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
President
|
|
2019
|
|
$
|
293,365
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
151,725
|
|
|
$
|
577, 001
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,052,873
|
|
(1)
|
Appointed as Chief
Executive Officer in April 2020.
|
(2)
|
Appointed as Chief
Financial Officer in November 2020.
|
(3)
|
Appointed as Chief
Operating Officer in June 2020.
|
(4)
|
Resigned as Chief
Executive Officer in April 2020. Mr. Weakley received $200,000 in
severance payments during 2020 pursuant to a separation agreement
that became effective at the time of his resignation as Chief
Executive Officer.
|
(5)
|
Appointed as Chief
Financial Officer in April 2020 and served until November
2020.
|
(6)
|
Retired December 31,
2019.
|
(7)
|
Appointed as
President in January 2019 and resigned in December
2019.
|
Executive Employment
Agreements
Mark Ainsworth – The Company is
party to an employment agreement with Mark Ainsworth dated as of
July 1, 2020. Mr. Ainsworth is entitled to an annual base salary of
$250,000. He is also eligible to receive annual bonuses in such
amounts and subject to such performance metrics or other criteria
determined by our board of directors (the “Board”) or
its Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee from time to
time, including performance-based bonuses or programs as determined
at the discretion of the Board. Mr. Ainsworth is also eligible to
receive discretionary grants of options. In the event of Mr.
Ainsworth’s termination without cause, for a period of nine
months from the date of such termination, he is entitled to receive
continued payment of his base salary and continuation of health
insurance benefits. In addition, in the event that, within six
months following a “change of control” of the Company,
Mr. Ainsworth’s title and/or responsibilities are materially
diminished or Mr. Ainsworth is terminated without cause, he is
entitled, upon notice to the Company given not later than thirty
(30) days following such material diminishment or termination, to
acceleration of vesting of half of the remaining unvested portion
of any stock options or restricted stock awards previously granted
to him and any unvested portion shall continue to vest ratably, or
be forfeited, in accordance with the terms of such
grants.
Brian Shure – The Company is party
to an employment agreement with Brian Shure dated as of November
10, 2020. Mr. Shure is entitled to an annual base salary of
$250,000. He is also eligible to receive annual bonuses in such
amounts and subject to such performance metrics or other criteria
determined by the Board or its Compensation and Corporate
Governance Committee from time to time, including performance-based
bonuses or programs as determined at the discretion of the Board.
Mr. Shure was granted options to purchase 300,000 shares of
Subordinate Voting Stock of the Company under its 2019 Stock
Incentive Plan. 50,000 of the options were vested immediately upon
grant. The remaining 250,000 options will vest in four equal annual
installments on each anniversary of the date of the grant. In the
event of Mr. Shure’s termination without cause, for a period
of six months from the date of such termination, he is entitled to
receive continued payment of his base salary and continuation of
health insurance benefits. In addition, in the event that, within
twelve months following a “change of control” of the
Company, Mr. Shure’s title and/or responsibilities are
materially diminished or Mr. Shure is terminated without cause, he
is entitled, upon notice to the Company given not later than thirty
(30) days following such material diminishment or termination, to
acceleration of vesting of the remaining unvested portion of the
options granted.
Non-Employee Director
Compensation
The following table
summarizes the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for
the year ended December 31, 2020.
Name
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
|
Total
|
|
George
Allen
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
William
Anton
|
|
$
|
42,450
|
|
|
$
|
42,450
|
|
Bruce
Gates
|
|
$
|
9,340
|
|
|
$
|
9,340
|
|
Stephanie
Harkness
|
|
$
|
42,450
|
|
|
$
|
42,450
|
|
Kevin
McGrath
|
|
$
|
37,266
|
|
|
$
|
37,266
|
|
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL
YEAR-END
The following table
sets forth certain information regarding equity-based awards held
by our named executive officers as of December 31,
2020.
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised
Options (#) Exercisable
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised
Options (#) Unexercisable
|
|
|
Option Exercise Price ($)
|
|
|
Option Expiration Date
|
|
|
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have
Not Vested (#)
|
|
|
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That
Have Not Vested ($)
|
|
Mark
Ainsworth
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
1/2/26
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
110,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
0.346
|
|
|
4/15/26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Shure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
11/9/26
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
82,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jenny
Montenegro
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
12/10/25
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
93,925
|
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
1/2/26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
0.346
|
|
|
4/15/26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly
McMillin
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
2.0348
|
|
|
10/16/23
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
27,625
|
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
1/2/26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS
Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions
The following
includes a summary of transactions during our fiscal years ended
December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 to which we have been a party,
including transactions in which the amount involved in the
transaction exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or 1% of the average of
our total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal
years and in which any of our directors, executive officers or, to
our knowledge, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our capital
stock or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing
persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest,
other than equity and other compensation, termination, change in
control and other arrangements, which are described elsewhere in
this registration statement. We are not otherwise a party to a
current related party transaction and no transaction is currently
proposed, in which the amount of the transaction exceeds the lesser
of $120,000 or 1% of the average of our total assets at year-end
for the last two completed fiscal years and in which a related
person had or will have a direct or indirect material
interest.
Prior to January 1,
2021, we contracted with Edible Management, LLC, a California
limited liability company controlled by Robert Weakley and Mark
Ainsworth for various management services, including the
development and marketing of our brands, the development of
standard operating procedures for the sale of our products in
California, industry specific strategic marketing advice, quarterly
reporting, sales, legal and human resources support services and
coordination efforts with our licensees. In exchange for such
services, we reimbursed Edible Management for payroll and all other
out-of-pocket expenses on a dollar-for-dollar basis and provide
rent free office space to Edible Management. Prior to January 1,
2020, Cypress Manufacturing Company, one of our subsidiaries, also
contracted with Edible Management for management services. In
addition to the reimbursement of expenses and the provision of free
office space, Cypress Manufacturing Company paid Edible Management
a monthly incentive commission of 2% of gross sales through June
30, 2018, which amounted to a payment of $650,000 in the aggregate.
Effective as of January 1, 2021, the services of Edible Management
were discontinued and Wellness Innovation Group Incorporated, a
subsidiary of Indus Holding Company, assumed all functions
previously conducted by Edible Management. Amounts paid to Edible
Management pursuant to the foregoing arrangements were $11.4
million, $15.9 million and $6.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The tables below
sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of
our Super Voting Shares and Subordinate Voting Shares as of July
30, 2021, by:
|
●
|
each person or entity
known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding
Subordinate Voting Shares;
|
|
●
|
each of our directors
and executive officers individually; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
all of our executive
officers and directors as a group.
|
The Super Voting
Shares carry 1,000 votes per share. The Subordinate Voting Shares
carry 1 vote per share. As of July 30, 2021, the Subordinate Voting
Shares represented approximately 28.1% of the voting power of our
outstanding voting securities and approximately 57.4% of the voting
power of our voting securities on a fully diluted basis, and the
Super Voting Shares represented approximately 71.9% of the voting
power of our outstanding voting securities and the Super Voting
Shares represented approximately 42.6% of the voting power of our
voting securities on a fully diluted basis. Fully diluted
calculations take into account Subordinate Voing Shares issuable
upon the conversion of outstanding debentures, the redemption of
Class B Common Shares of our subsidiary, Indus Holding Company, and
the exercise of outstanding warrants and options and Subordinate
Voting Shares subject to unvested restricted stock
units.
The Super Voting
Shares are held by Robert Weakley. Mr. Weakley served as Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from the date of the
reverse takeover transaction with Indus Holding Company (the
“RTO”) until April 2020 and thereafter as a member of
our board of directors until October 2020. Mr. Weakley has entered
into an agreement with the Company to vote the Super Voting Shares
in accordance with the voting agreement described below (the
“Voting Agreement”) and otherwise as directed by our
board of directors.
In connection with
the closing effective April 16, 2020 of the Corporation’s
private placement of convertible debentures and warrants (the
“Convertible Debenture Offering”), the Company and Mr.
Weakley entered into the Voting Agreement with the investors in the
Convertible Debenture Offering. Pursuant to the Voting Agreement,
Mr. Weakley and such investors have agreed to maintain the size of
our board of directors at seven directors and to vote all of their
voting securities (including the Super Voting Shares) to elect
three persons (currently George Allen, Brian Shure, and Kevin
McGrath) designated by a majority in interest of the debenture
holders (“Investor Directors”), three persons
(currently Mark Ainsworth, William Anton, and Stephanie Harkness)
designated by a majority of the incumbent directors or their
successors or, in the event no such director is then serving, Mr.
Weakley (“Indus Directors”) and one person designated
by mutual agreement of a majority of the Investor Directors and a
majority of the Indus Directors (currently Bruce Gates). In
addition, the parties to the Voting Agreement agreed to take such
actions as are within their control to maintain audit,
compensation, and corporate governance committees consisting of an
equal number of non-employee Investor Directors and Indus
Directors.
Mr. Weakley is also
party to an investment agreement with the Company pursuant to which
the Super Voting Shares may be transferred only with the
Company’s consent. The Company has agreed to grant its
consent to a transfer by Mr. Weakley to certain family members,
trusts for their benefit, and entities controlled by Mr. Weakley or
such family members, in each case subject to the entry by the
transferee into an accession agreement with the Company providing
for the same restrictions on transfer and pursuant to which the
transferee agrees to comply with Mr. Weakley’s obligations
under the Voting Agreement. The investment agreement prohibits the
Company from consenting to a transfer that would result in the
Super Voting Shares being acquired pursuant to a change of control
transaction, as defined in the investment agreement. Pursuant to
the investment agreement, in the event of a non-permitted transfer
by Mr. Weakley, or upon a change of control transaction, the Super
Voting Shares shall be redeemed by the Company for their original
purchase price of $40,000. The holders of Subordinate Voting Shares
will not be entitled to participate in any such permitted transfer
or redemption under the terms of the Subordinate Voting Shares or
under any coattail or similar agreement.
To our knowledge,
except as discussed above, none of the shares listed below are held
under a voting trust or similar agreement, except as noted. To our
knowledge, there is no arrangement, including any pledge by any
person of our securities or any of our parents, the operation of
which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of our
company. Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each other
person listed on the table is c/o Lowell Farms Inc., 19 Quail Run
Circle – Suite B, Salinas, California 93907.
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and
generally includes voting or investment power with respect to
securities. In accordance with the SEC rules, our shares that may
be acquired upon exercise or vesting of equity awards within 60
days of the date of the table below are deemed beneficially owned
by the holders of such equity awards and are deemed outstanding for
the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such
person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of
computing the percentage of ownership of any other person. As of
July 30, 2021, 202,590 Super Voting Shares and 78,992,636
Subordinate Voting Shares were issued and outstanding.
Except as set out
below, to the knowledge of the directors and officers of the
Corporation, as of July 30, 2021, no person beneficially owns or
exercises control over, directly or indirectly, voting securities
carrying 10% or more of the voting rights attached to any class of
voting securities of the Corporation:
Super Voting
Shares
|
|
Super Voting Shares Beneficially
Owned
|
|
|
Percentage of Super Voting Shares Beneficially
Owned (%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
Weakley
|
|
|
202,590
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
George Allen
(1)
|
|
|
202,590
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Geronimo Fund
(2)
|
|
|
202,590
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
(1)
|
Mr. Allen is the sole
manager of Geronimo CVOF Manager, LLC, which is the sole manager of
Geronimo Central Valley Opportunity Fund, LLC (Geronimo CVOF
Manager, LLC and Geronimo Central Valley Opportunity Fund, LLC,
collectively, the “Geronimo Fund”). Pursuant to the
terms of the Voting Agreement, the Geronimo Fund, as the holder of
a majority in interest of the debentures, has the right to require
that the Super Voting Shares be voted for three director nominees
designated by the Geronimo Fund. Mr. Allen disclaims beneficial
ownership of the Super Voting Shares.
|
(2)
|
Pursuant to the terms
of the Voting Agreement, the Geronimo Fund, as the holder of a
majority in interest of the debentures, has the right to require
that the Super Voting Shares be voted for three director nominees
designated by the Geronimo Fund. The Geronimo Fund disclaims
beneficial ownership of the Super Voting Shares.
|
Subordinate
Voting Shares
|
|
Subordinate Voting Shares Beneficially
Owned
|
|
|
Percentage of Subordinate Voting Shares
Beneficially Owned (%)
|
|
Directors and Named Executive
Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George Allen
(1)
|
|
|
114,311,245
|
|
|
|
59.22
|
%
|
Mark Ainsworth
(2)
|
|
|
1,607,265
|
|
|
|
2.01
|
%
|
Stephanie Harkness
(3)
|
|
|
1,494,559
|
|
|
|
1.86
|
%
|
William Anton
(4)
|
|
|
3,360,831
|
|
|
|
4.08
|
%
|
Kevin McGrath
(5)
|
|
|
10,854,968
|
|
|
|
12.17
|
%
|
Brian Shure
(6)
|
|
|
357,776
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Bruce
Gates
|
|
|
8,200
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kelly McMillin
(7)
|
|
|
91,058
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jenny Montenegro
(8)
|
|
|
92,326
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All executive
officers and directors as a group (9 persons)
|
|
|
132,178,228
|
|
|
|
63.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% or Greater Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geronimo Fund
(9)
|
|
|
104,702,546
|
|
|
|
57.00
|
%
|
Geronimo CVOF
Manager, LLC (10)
|
|
|
106,302,672
|
|
|
|
57.37
|
%
|
Geronimo Capital, LLC
(11)
|
|
|
7,608,606
|
|
|
|
8.79
|
%
|
The Hacienda Company,
LLC
|
|
|
22,643,678
|
|
|
|
28.67
|
%
|
Hannah Buchan
(12)
|
|
|
22,643,678
|
|
|
|
28.67
|
%
|
Beehouse Entities
(13)
|
|
|
25,050,640
|
|
|
|
31.62
|
%
|
Gregory Heyman
(13)
|
|
|
25,050,640
|
|
|
|
31.62
|
%
|
C Quadrant
LLC
|
|
|
7,997,520
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
%
|
________________
*
|
Represents beneficial
ownership of less than 1%.
|
(1)
|
Includes 52,351,273
Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon the conversion of
convertible debentures and 52,351,273 Subordinate Voting Shares
issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by Geronimo Central
Valley Opportunity Fund, LLC (Geronimo CVOF Manager, LLC and
Geronimo Central Valley Opportunity Fund, LLC, collectively, the
“Geronimo Fund”); 800,063 Subordinate Voting Shares
issuable upon the conversion of convertible debentures and 800,063
Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants
held by Geronimo CVOF Manager, LLC; 3,804,303 Subordinate Voting
Shares issuable upon the conversion of convertible debentures and
3,804,303 Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon the exercise of
warrants held by Geronimo Capital, LLC; and 133,500 Subordinate
Voting Shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by Mr.
Allen. Mr. Allen is the sole member of Geronimo Capital, LLC and
the sole manager of Geronimo CVOF Manager, LLC. Geronimo CVOF
Manager, LLC is the sole manager of Geronimo Central Valley
Opportunity Fund, LLC.
|
(2)
|
Includes 1,019,765
Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon redemption of Indus
Redeemable Shares and 137,500 Subordinate Voting Shares issuable
upon the exercise of options held by Mr. Ainsworth.
|
(3)
|
Includes 811,104
Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon redemption of Indus
Redeemable Shares, 177,500 Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon
the exercise of warrants and 10,000 Subordinate Voting Shares
issuable upon the exercise of options held by Ms. Harkness; and
190,231 Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon redemption of Indus
Redeemable Shares and 245,724 Subordinate Voting Shares issuable
upon the exercise of warrants held by a family trust of which Ms.
Harkness is a trustee. Excludes 482,667 Subordinate Voting Shares
issuable upon redemption of Indus Redeemable Shares and 22,500
Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants
held by Ms. Harkness’ spouse, as to which Ms. Harkness
disclaims beneficial ownership.
|
(4)
|
Includes 1,026,095
Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon the conversion of
convertible debentures, 1,271,819 Subordinate Voting Shares
issuable upon the exercise of warrants, and 532,917 Subordinate
Voting Shares issuable upon redemption of Indus Redeemable Shares
held by Anton Enterprises, Inc. Mr. Anton is the president and sole
stockholder of Anton Enterprises, Inc. Also includes 460,000
Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon redemption of Indus
Redeemable Shares and 10,000 Subordinate Voting Shares issuable
upon the exercise of options held by Mr. Anton.
|
(5)
|
Includes 5,015,984
Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon the conversion of
convertible debentures and 5,150,984 Subordinate Voting Shares
issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by Mr.
McGrath.
|
(6)
|
Includes 50,000
Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon the exercise of options and
91,000 Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon the exercise of
warrants held by Mr. Shure.
|
(7)
|
Includes 25,000
Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon redemption of Indus
Redeemable Shares and 63,750 Subordinate Voting Shares issuable
upon the exercise of options held by Mr. McMillin.
|
(8)
|
Includes 88,750
Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon the exercise of options
held by Ms. Montenegro.
|
(9)
|
Consists of
52,351,273 Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon the conversion
of convertible debentures and 52,351,273 Subordinate Voting Shares
issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by Geronimo
Fund.
|
(10)
|
Consists of 800,063
Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon the conversion of
convertible debentures and 800,063 Subordinate Voting Shares
issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by Geronimo Capital,
LLC.
|
(11)
|
Consists of 3,804,303
Subordinate Voting Shares issuable upon the conversion of
convertible debentures and 3,804,303 Subordinate Voting Shares
issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by Geronimo Capital,
LLC.
|
(12)
|
Consists of
22,643,678 Subordinate Voting Shares held by The Hacienda Company,
LLC (“Hacienda”). Ms. Buchan is the sole manager of
Hacienda.
|
(13)
|
Consists of
22,643,678 Subordinate Voting Shares held by Hacienda and 2,183,462
Subordinate Voting Shares and 500 warrants to purchase 223,500
subordinate voting shares held by Beehouse Partners, LP
(“Beehouse Partners”). Beehouse, LLC is the investment
manager of two SPVs that collectively own a majority interest in
Hacienda and is also the investment manager of Beehouse Partners.
Beehouse Manager, LLC (together with Beehouse, LLC, the
“Beehouse Entities”) is the manager of Beehouse, LLC.
Mr. Heyman is the sole and managing member of Beehouse Manager,
LLC.
|
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Each Selling
Securityholder of the securities and any of their pledgees,
assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell
any or all of their securities covered hereby on the principal
trading market for such securities or any other stock exchange,
market or trading facility on which the securities are traded or in
private transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated
prices. A Selling Securityholder may use any one or more of the
following methods when selling securities:
●
|
ordinary brokerage
transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits
purchasers;
|
●
|
block trades in which
the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the securities as agent but
may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to
facilitate the transaction;
|
●
|
purchases by a
broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its
account;
|
●
|
an exchange
distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable
exchange;
|
●
|
privately negotiated
transactions;
|
●
|
settlement of short
sales;
|
|
|
●
|
through the distribution
of the Common Stock by any Selling Stockholder to its partners,
members or stockholders;
|
●
|
in transactions
through broker-dealers that agree with the Selling Securityholders
to sell a specified number of such securities at a stipulated price
per security;
|
●
|
through the writing
or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether
through an options exchange or otherwise;
|
●
|
a combination of any
such methods of sale; or
|
●
|
any other method
permitted pursuant to applicable law.
|
The Selling
Securityholders may also sell securities under Rule 144 or any
other exemption from registration under the Securities Act, if
available, rather than under this prospectus.
Broker-dealers
engaged by the Selling Securityholders may arrange for other
brokers dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive
commissions or discounts from the Selling Securityholders (or, if
any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of securities,
from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated, but, except as set
forth in a supplement to this Prospectus, in the case of an agency
transaction not in excess of a customary brokerage commission in
compliance with FINRA Rule 2440; and in the case of a principal
transaction a markup or markdown in compliance with FINRA
IM-2440.
In connection with
the sale of the securities or interests therein, the Selling
Securityholders may enter into hedging transactions with
broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn
engage in short sales of the securities in the course of hedging
the positions they assume. The Selling Securityholders may also
sell securities short and deliver these securities to close out
their short positions, or loan or pledge the securities to
broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The Selling
Securityholders may also enter into option or other transactions
with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or create one
or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such
broker-dealer or other financial institution of securities offered
by this prospectus, which securities such broker-dealer or other
financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as
supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).
The Selling
Securityholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved
in selling the securities may be deemed to be
“underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act
in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions
received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the
resale of the securities purchased by them may be deemed to be
underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act.
Each Selling Securityholder has informed the Company that it does
not have any written or oral agreement or understanding, directly
or indirectly, with any person to distribute the
securities.
The Company is
required to pay certain fees and expenses incurred by the Company
incident to the registration of the securities. The Company has
agreed to indemnify the Selling Securityholders against certain
losses, claims, damages and liabilities, including liabilities
under the Securities Act.
We agreed in
Section 4.4 of the purchase agreement by and among Lowell SR, LLC,
Lowell Farms Inc., Michael Gregory, C Quadrant LLC, and AMAG
Holdings, LLC, dated June 29, 2021 (“C Quadrant Purchase Agreement”),
incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.12 to this registration
statement, to keep this prospectus effective until the earlier of
(i) two (2) years after the effective date of the Resale
Registration Statement or (ii) such time as the Subordinate Voting
Shares subject to this registration statement become eligible for
resale without any volume limitations or other restrictions
pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act, or any other rule of
similar effect. The resale securities will be sold only through
registered or licensed brokers or dealers if required under
applicable state securities laws. In addition, in certain states,
the resale securities covered in this registration statement may
not be sold unless they either have been registered or qualified
for sale in the applicable state or are exempt from
registration.
Under applicable
rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in
the distribution of the resale securities may not simultaneously
engage in market making activities with respect to the common stock
for the applicable restricted period, as defined in Regulation M,
prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the
Selling Securityholders will be subject to applicable provisions of
the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder,
including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and
sales of the common stock by the Selling Securityholders or any
other person. We will make copies of this prospectus available to
the Selling Securityholders and have informed them of the need to
deliver a copy of this prospectus to each purchaser at or prior to
the time of the sale (including by compliance with Rule 172 under
the Securities Act).
CERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX
CONSIDERATIONS
The following
discussion is a summary of certain material U.S. Federal income tax
considerations for U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders (each as
defined below) relating to the ownership and disposition of the
Subordinate Voting Shares. This summary is general in nature and
does not discuss all aspects of U.S. Federal income taxation that
may be relevant to a holder of the Subordinate Voting Shares in
light of its particular circumstances. In addition, this summary
does not address the U.S. Federal alternative minimum tax, the
Medicare tax on net investment income, U.S. Federal estate and gift
taxes, U.S. state and local taxes or foreign taxes. This summary
deals only with Subordinate Voting Shares held as capital assets
within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the “Code”), (generally, property held
for investment), and does not address tax considerations applicable
to any holder that may be subject to special treatment under the
U.S. Federal income tax laws, including the following
holders:
●
|
a bank or other
financial institution;
|
●
|
a tax-exempt or
governmental organization;
|
●
|
a retirement plan or
other tax-deferred account (other than with respect to U.S. Holders
in the 401(k) Plan),
|
●
|
a partnership, an S
corporation or other entity treated as a partnership or
pass-through (or an investor therein);
|
●
|
a mutual fund,
regulated investment company or real estate investment
trust;
|
●
|
a person that
purchases or sells Unit Shares as part of a wash sale for tax
purposes;
|
●
|
a dealer or broker in
stocks and securities, or currencies;
|
●
|
a trader in
securities that elects mark-to-market treatment;
|
●
|
a holder of Unit
Shares subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the
Code;
|
●
|
a holder of Unit
Shares that received Unit Shares through the exercise of an
employee stock option, through a tax qualified retirement plan or
otherwise as compensation;
|
●
|
a person that owns
(or is deemed to own) 5% or more of the outstanding Unit
Shares;
|
●
|
a U.S. Holder whose
functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;
|
●
|
a person that holds
Unit Shares as part of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale,
conversion or other integrated transaction;
|
●
|
a person required to
accelerate the recognition of any item of gross income with respect
to the Unit Shares as a result of such income being recognized on
an applicable financial statement;
|
●
|
“controlled
foreign corporations” within the meaning of the
Code;
|
●
|
“passive
foreign investment companies” within the meaning of the Code;
or
|
This summary is
based on the Code, treasury regulations promulgated under the Code
(“Treasury
Regulations”), and rulings and judicial decisions, all
as in effect as of the date hereof, and all of which are subject to
change or differing interpretations at any time, possibly with
retroactive effect. The Corporation has not sought, and does not
intend to seek, any ruling from the IRS with respect to the
statements made and the conclusions reached in the following
summary, and no assurance can be given that the IRS will agree with
the views expressed herein, or that a court will not sustain any
challenge by the IRS in the event of litigation.
THIS DISCUSSION IS
INTENDED ONLY AS A GENERAL SUMMARY OF CERTAIN MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL
INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES TO A HOLDER OF THE SUBORDINATE VOTING
SHARES AND SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DISCUSSION OF
CANADIAN TAX CONSIDERATIONS HEREIN. THE CORPORATION URGES
BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF THE SUBORDINATE VOTING SHARES TO CONSULT THEIR
OWN TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES OF
THE OFFERING IN LIGHT OF THEIR PARTICULAR
CIRCUMSTANCES.
U.S.
Holders
For purposes of
this discussion, a “U.S.
Holder” of the Subordinate Voting Shares means a
holder that is for U.S. Federal income tax purposes:
●
|
An individual citizen
or resident of the U.S. (by reason of green card status or meeting
the “substantial presence test” over the three-year
period ending on the end of the current calendar
year);;
|
●
|
A corporation (or
other entity taxable as a corporation) created or organized in or
under the laws of the U.S. or any state thereof or the District of
Columbia;
|
●
|
An estate the income
of which is subject to U.S. Federal income taxation regardless of
its source; or
|
●
|
A trust if it: (1) is
subject to the primary supervision of a court within the U.S. and
one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust; or (2) has a valid election in
effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a
U.S. person.
|
Residents are
generally treated for U.S. Federal income tax purposes as if they
were U.S. citizens. Residents who are also residents or citizens of
Canada should also review the discussion of Canadian Tax
Considerations and are urged to consult their own tax advisors
regarding the tax consequences of acquiring, holding and disposing
of the Subordinate Voting Shares. Note that the Company expects to
be treated as a Canadian corporation for Canadian tax purposes and
a U.S. corporation for U.S. Federal income tax
purposes.
Non-U.S.
Holders
A
“Non-U.S.
Holder” is a beneficial owner of the Subordinate
Voting Shares (other than an entity or arrangement classified as a
partnership for U.S. Federal income tax purposes) that is not a
U.S. Holder.
Tax
Classification as a U.S. Domestic
Corporation
The Company is
treated as a United States corporation for U.S Federal income tax
purposes under Section 7874 of the Code and is subject to U.S.
Federal income tax on its worldwide income, notwithstanding that
the Company is organized under the provisions of the Business Corporations Act (British
Columbia) in Canada.
Tax
Considerations for U.S. Holders
Acquisition of Shares
The purchase price
paid by a U.S. Holder in the acquisition of a Subordinate Voting
Share will establish a U.S. Holder’s initial tax basis
therein for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.
Distributions on Shares
The Company has not
and does not foresee making distributions with respect to its
Subordinate Voting Shares. Distributions of cash or property with
respect to the Subordinate Voting Shares will constitute dividends
for U.S. Federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from the
Company’s current or accumulated earnings and profits, as
determined under U.S. Federal income tax principles. Dividends will
generally be taxable to a non-corporate U.S. Holder at the
preferential rates applicable to long-term capital gains, provided
that such holder meets certain holding period and other
requirements. Distributions in excess thereof will generally be
treated first, as a return of capital and be applied against, and
then reduce, a U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its
Subordinate Voting Shares, but not below zero, and thereafter be
treated as capital gain and treated as described under “
– Sale or Other Taxable Disposition” below.
Such distributions may also be
subject to Canadian withholding taxes.
Dividends received
by corporate U.S. Holders may be eligible for a dividends received
deduction, subject to certain restrictions relating to, among
others, the corporate U.S. Holder’s taxable income, holding
period and debt financing.
Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of
Shares
Upon the sale or
other taxable disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares, a U.S.
Holder will generally recognize capital gain or loss equal to the
difference between (i) the amount realized by such U.S. Holder in
connection with such sale or other taxable disposition, and (ii)
such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis. Capital gain or loss
will generally be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S.
Holder’s holding period in such stock is more than twelve
months. U.S. Holders who are individuals are eligible for
preferential rates of taxation respecting their long-term capital
gains. Deductions for capital losses are subject to
limitations.
Foreign Tax Credit
Limitations
Because it is
anticipated that the Company will be subject to tax both as a U.S.
domestic corporation and as a Canadian corporation, a U.S. Holder
may pay, through withholding, Canadian tax, as well as U.S. Federal
income tax, with respect to dividends paid on Subordinate Voting
Shares. For U.S. Federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Holder
generally may elect for any taxable year to receive either a credit
or a deduction for foreign income taxes paid by the holder during
the year. Complex limitations apply to the foreign tax credit,
including a general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the
proportionate share of a taxpayer’s U.S. Federal income tax
that the taxpayer’s foreign source taxable income bears to
the taxpayer’s worldwide taxable income. In applying this
limitation, items of income and deduction must be classified, under
complex rules, as either foreign source or U.S. source. The status
of the Company as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. Federal
income tax purposes will cause dividends paid by the Company to be
treated as U.S. source rather than foreign source for this purpose.
As a result, by virtue of the U.S. source character of a dividend
paid by the Company and the U.S. foreign tax credit limitation, a
foreign tax credit may be unavailable to U.S. Holders for any
Canadian tax paid on dividends received from the Company.
Similarly, to the extent a sale or disposition of the Subordinate
Voting Shares by a U.S. Holder results in Canadian tax payable by
the U.S. Holder (for example, in the event the Subordinate Voting
Shares constitute taxable Canadian property within the meaning of
the Income Tax Act
(Canada)), a U.S. foreign tax credit may be unavailable to the U.S.
Holder for such Canadian tax. In each case, however, the U.S.
Holder should be able to take a deduction for the U.S.
Holder’s Canadian tax paid, provided that the U.S. Holder has
not elected to credit other foreign taxes during the same taxable
year. The foreign tax credit rules are complex, and each U.S.
Holder should consult its own tax advisors regarding these
rules.
Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding
U.S. backup
withholding (currently 24%) is imposed upon certain payments to
persons that fail (or are unable) to furnish the information
required pursuant to U.S. information reporting requirements.
Distributions to U.S. Holders will generally be exempt from backup
withholding, provided the U.S. Holder meets applicable
certification requirements, including providing a U.S. taxpayer
identification number on a properly completed IRS Form W-9, or
otherwise establishes an exemption. The Company must report
annually to the IRS and to each U.S. Holder the amount of
distributions and dividends paid to that U.S. Holder and the
proceeds from the sale or other disposition of Subordinate Voting
Shares, unless such U.S. Holder is an exempt
recipient.
Backup withholding
does not represent an additional tax. Any amounts withheld from a
payment to a U.S. Holder under the backup withholding rules will
generally be allowed as a credit against such U.S. Holder’s
U.S. Federal income tax liability, and may entitle such U.S. Holder
to a refund, provided the required information and returns are
timely furnished by such U.S. Holder to the IRS.
Tax
Considerations for Non-U.S. Holders
Distributions on Shares
The Company has not
and does not foresee making distributions with respect to its
Subordinate Voting Shares. Distributions of cash or property on
Subordinate Voting Shares will constitute U.S. source dividends for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from the
Company’s current or accumulated earnings and profits, as
determined under U.S. Federal income tax principles. Distributions
in excess thereof will first constitute a return of capital and be
applied against and then reduce a Non-U.S. Holder’s adjusted
tax basis in its Subordinate Voting Shares, but not below zero, and
thereafter be treated as capital gain and will be treated as
described under “Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of
Shares” below.
Subject to the
discussions under “Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding” below and under “FATCA” below, any
dividend paid to a Non-U.S. Holder of Subordinate Voting Shares
generally will be subject to U.S. Federal withholding tax at a rate
of 30%, or such lower rate as may be specified under an applicable
income tax treaty, unless the dividend is effectively connected
with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business
within the U.S. In order to receive a reduced treaty rate, a
Non-U.S. Holder must provide its financial intermediary with an IRS
Form W-8BEN or IRS Form W-8BEN-E, as applicable (or an appropriate
successor form), properly certifying such holder’s
eligibility for the reduced rate. If a Non-U.S. Holder holds
Subordinate Voting Shares through a financial institution or other
agent acting on the Non-U.S. Holder’s behalf, the Non-U.S.
Holder will be required to provide appropriate documentation to
such agent, and the Non-U.S. Holder’s agent will then be
required to provide such (or a similar) certification to us, either
directly or through other intermediaries. A Non-U.S. Holder that
does not timely furnish the required certification, but that
qualifies for a reduced treaty rate, generally may apply for and
obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by timely filing an
appropriate claim for refund with the IRS.
Dividends paid to a
Non-U.S. Holder that are effectively connected with the Non-U.S.
Holder’s conduct of a trade or business in the U.S. (or, if
required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a
U.S. permanent establishment, or fixed base, of the Non-U.S.
Holder) generally will be exempt from the withholding tax described
above and instead will be subject to U.S. Federal income tax on a
net income basis at regular graduated U.S. Federal income tax rates
applicable to U.S. Holders.
Non-U.S. Holders
should consult their own tax advisors regarding the foregoing and
their potential entitlement to benefits under any applicable tax
treaties.
Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of
Shares
A Non-U.S. Holder
generally will not be subject to U.S. Federal income or withholding
tax in respect of gain recognized on a sale, taxable exchange or
other taxable disposition of a Subordinate Voting Share, subject to
the discussions below under “Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding” and “FATCA,” unless:
●
|
the gain is
effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by
the Non-U.S. Holder within the United States (and, if an applicable
tax treaty so requires, is attributable to a U.S. permanent
establishment or fixed base maintained by the Non-U.S.
Holder);
|
●
|
the Non-U.S. Holder
is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days
or more in the taxable year of disposition and certain other
conditions are met; or
|
●
|
the Company is or has
been a United States real property holding corporation
(“USRPHC”) for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes at any time during the shorter of
the five-year period ending on the date of disposition or the
period that the Non-U.S. Holder held the Subordinate Voting Share,
and, in the case where the shares are regularly traded on an
established securities market, the Non-U.S. Holder has owned,
directly or constructively, more than 5% of our shares at any time
within the shorter of (i) the five-year period preceding the
disposition or (ii) such Non-U.S. Holder’s holding period for
the shares. There can be no assurance that Unit Shares will be
treated as regularly traded on an established securities market for
this purpose.
|
Gain described in
the first bullet point above will be subject to tax at generally
applicable U.S. Federal income tax rates. Any such gains of a
Non-U.S. Holder that is a foreign corporation may also be subject
to an additional “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate (or
lower applicable treaty rate). Gain described in the second bullet
point above generally will be subject to a flat 30% U.S. Federal
income tax. Non-U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax
advisors regarding possible eligibility for benefits under income
tax treaties and the availability of U.S. source capital losses to
offset gain described in the second bullet point.
If the third bullet
point above applies to a Non-U.S. Holder, gain recognized on the
sale, taxable exchange or other disposition of Subordinate Voting
Shares (by virtue of USRPHC status of the Company) will be subject
to tax at generally applicable U.S. Federal income tax rates. In
addition, a buyer of Subordinate Voting Shares from such holder may
be required to withhold U.S. income tax at a rate of 15% of the
amount realized upon such disposition. The Company has not
performed any analysis to determine whether it is currently, or has
ever been, a USRPHC. You are urged to consult your own tax advisors
regarding the application of these rules. USRPHC status generally
means that the real estate interests owned by the corporation in
fair market value terms equals or exceeds 50% of the fair market
value of all of its real estate and business related
assets.
Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding
With respect to
distributions and dividends on Subordinate Voting Shares, the
Company must report annually to the IRS and to each Non-U.S. Holder
the amount of distributions and dividends paid to such Non-U.S.
Holder and any tax withheld with respect to such distributions and
dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required with
respect thereto. Copies of the information returns reporting such
dividends and distributions and withholding also may be made
available to the tax authorities in the country in which the
Non-U.S. Holder resides or is established under the provisions of
an applicable income tax treaty, tax information exchange agreement
or other arrangement. A Non-U.S. Holder will be subject to backup
withholding for dividends and distributions paid to such Non-U.S.
Holder unless either (i) such Non-U.S. Holder certifies under
penalty of perjury that it is not a U.S. person (as defined in the
Code), which certification is generally satisfied by providing a
properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN, IRS Form W-8BEN-E, or IRS Form
W-8ECI (or appropriate successor form), and the payor does not have
actual knowledge or reason to know that such holder is a U.S.
person, or (ii) such Non-U.S. Holder otherwise establishes an
exemption.
With respect to
sales or other dispositions of Subordinate Voting Shares,
information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup
withholding will apply to the proceeds of a sale or other
disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares within the U.S. or
conducted through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries,
unless either (i) such Non-U.S. Holder certifies under penalty of
perjury that it is not a U.S. person (as defined in the Code),
which certification is generally satisfied by providing a properly
executed IRS Form W-8BEN, IRS Form W-8BEN-E, or IRS Form W-8ECI (or
appropriate successor form), and the payor does not have actual
knowledge or reason to know that such holder is a U.S. person, or
(ii) such Non-U.S. Holder otherwise establishes an
exemption.
Whether with
respect to distributions and dividends, or the sale or other
disposition of Subordinate Voting shares, backup withholding is not
an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against a
Non-U.S. Holder’s U.S. Federal income tax liability, if any,
provided the required information is timely furnished to the
IRS.
FATCA
A 30% withholding
tax may be imposed on dividends paid with regard to Subordinate
Voting Shares, under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
(“FATCA”)
(Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Code), in the case of payments
to non-U.S. financial institutions and certain other non-U.S.
entities, as discussed below.
Such 30% FATCA
withholding will not apply to a “foreign financial
institution” (as defined in the Code) if such institution
undertakes certain diligence and reporting obligations, or
otherwise qualifies for an exemption from these rules. The
diligence and reporting obligations include, among others, entering
into an agreement with the U.S. Department of Treasury pursuant to
which the foreign financial institution must (i) undertake to
identify accounts held by certain “specified United States
persons” or “United States-owned foreign
entities” (each as defined in the Code), (ii) annually report
certain information about such accounts, and withhold 30% on
certain payments to non-compliant foreign financial institutions
and certain other account holders. Foreign financial institutions
located in jurisdictions that have an intergovernmental agreement
with the U.S. governing FATCA may be subject to different
rules.
The 30% FATCA
withholding will not apply to a “non-financial foreign
entity” which either certifies that it does not have any
“substantial United States owners” (each as defined in
the Code), furnishes identifying information regarding each
substantial United States owner, or otherwise qualifies for an
exemption from these rules. Where FATCA 30% withholding applies,
the regular 30% withholding on U.S. source investment-type income
such as dividends and interest does not apply.
THE FOREGOING SUMMARY IS NOT INTENDED TO
CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF ALL TAX CONSEQUENCES THAT MAY
BE RELEVANT TO PARTICULAR HOLDERS OF SUBORDINATE VOTING SHARES AND
IS NOT TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE. HOLDERS OF SUBORDINATE VOTING SHARES
SHOULD ALSO REVIEW THE DISCLOSURE CONCERNING CANADIAN TAX
CONSIDERATIONS AND SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE
PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM (INCLUDING THE APPLICATION AND
EFFECT OF ANY STATE, LOCAL, NON-U.S. INCOME AND OTHER TAX LAWS) OF
ACQUIRING, HOLDING AND DISPOSING OF. SUBORDINATE VOTING
SHARES.
CANADIAN TAX CONSIDERATIONS
Although the Company is organized under the
provisions of the Business
Corporations Act (British Columbia) in Canada and will be
deemed to be resident in Canada and be a taxable Canadian
corporation for purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada), the Company is
also treated as a U.S. corporation for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Prospective investors should carefully review the following section
as well as the discussion under the headings above “Risk
Factors - The Company is a tax resident of both the U.S. and Canada
and generally subject to both U.S. and Canadian taxation, which may
adversely affect its results of
operations.”
The following is a
summary of the principal Canadian federal income tax considerations
pursuant to the Income Tax Act
(Canada) and the regulations thereunder (the “Tax
Act”) that generally apply to the acquisition, holding and
disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares by a person who, at all
material times, is neither resident nor deemed to be resident in
Canada for purposes of the Tax Act, is a resident of the U.S. for
purposes of the Canada - United
States Tax Convention (1980), as amended, (the
“Treaty”) and acquires a beneficial interest in
Subordinate Voting Shares (a “U.S.
Holder”).
This summary
applies only to a U.S. Holder who, at all relevant times, for
purposes of the Tax Act:
●
|
holds Subordinate
Voting Shares as capital property;
|
●
|
does not, and is not
deemed to, use or hold Subordinate Voting Shares in the course of
carrying on a business in Canada;
|
●
|
deals at arm’s
length with and is not affiliated with the Selling Securityholders;
and
|
●
|
is a
“qualifying person” or otherwise entitled to benefits
under the Treaty.
|
Special rules,
which are not discussed in this summary, may apply to a
U.S. Holder that is
an insurer carrying on business in Canada and elsewhere or that is
an “authorized foreign bank” (as defined in the Tax
Act). Such U.S. Holders should consult their own tax
advisors.
Generally,
Subordinate Voting Shares will be considered to be capital property
to a U.S. Holder unless they are held or acquired in the course of
carrying on a business of trading or dealing in securities or as
part of an adventure or concern in the nature of trade. Any such
U.S. Holder to which this summary does not apply should consult its
own tax advisor with respect to the Canadian tax consequences of
this offering.
This summary is
based on the current provisions of the Tax Act, all specific
proposals to amend the Tax Act publicly announced by or on behalf
of the Minister of Finance (Canada) prior to the date hereof
(“Tax Proposals”), and an understanding of the current
administrative policies and assessing practices of the Canada
Revenue Agency (the “CRA”) made publicly available
prior to the date hereof. This summary assumes the Tax Proposals
will be enacted in the form proposed, however, no assurance can be
given that the Tax Proposals will be enacted in the form proposed,
or at all. Except for the Tax Proposals, this summary does not take
into account or anticipate any changes in law or administrative
policies or assessing practices of the CRA, whether by legislative,
governmental or judicial action, nor does it take into account
other federal or any provincial, territorial or foreign income tax
legislation or considerations, which may differ significantly from
those discussed herein.
This summary is not
exhaustive of all possible Canadian federal income tax
considerations that apply to an investment in Subordinate Voting
Shares. Moreover, the income and other tax consequences of
acquiring, holding or disposing of Subordinate Voting Shares will
vary depending on an investor’s particular circumstances.
Accordingly, this summary is of a general nature only and is not
intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax
advice to any investor. Consequently, investors should consult
their own tax advisors for advice with respect to the income tax
consequences of an investment in Subordinate Voting Shares based on
their particular circumstances.
Generally, for the
purposes of the Tax Act, all amounts relating to the acquisition,
holding or disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares (including
dividends, adjusted cost base and proceeds of disposition) must be
expressed in Canadian dollars. Amounts denominated U.S. dollars
must be converted into Canadian dollars using the applicable rate
of exchange (for the purposes of the Tax Act) quoted by the Bank of
Canada on the date such amounts arose, or such other rate of
exchange as is acceptable to the CRA.
Dividends
Under the Treaty,
the rate of withholding tax on dividends paid or credited by the
Company to a U.S. Holder is generally limited to 15% of the gross
amount of the dividend. The rate of withholding tax is further
reduced to 5% if the beneficial owner of such dividend is a U.S.
Holder that is a company that owns at least 10% of the voting stock
of the Company. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors
regarding the application of the Treaty.
Disposition of
Subordinate Voting Shares
A U.S. Holder will
not be subject to tax under the Tax Act in respect of any capital
gain realized on a disposition or deemed disposition of a
Subordinate Voting Share unless the Subordinate Voting Share
constitutes “taxable Canadian property” (as defined in
the Tax Act) of the U.S. Holder at the time of disposition and the
U.S. Holder is not entitled to relief under the
Treaty.
Provided that the
Subordinate Voting Shares are listed on a “designated stock
exchange” for the purposes of the Tax Act (which currently
includes the CSE) at the time of disposition, the Subordinate
Voting Shares generally will not constitute taxable Canadian
property of a U.S. Holder at that time, unless at any time during
the 60 month period immediately preceding the disposition, (i) 25%
or more of the issued shares of any class or series of the capital
stock of the Company were owned by, or belonged to, any combination
of (a) the U.S. Holder, (b) persons with whom the U.S. Holder did
not deal at arm’s length (for purposes of the Tax Act), and
(c) partnerships in which the U.S. Holder or a person described in
(b) holds a membership interest directly or indirectly through one
or more partnerships; and (ii) at such time, more than 50% of the
fair market value of such shares was derived, directly or
indirectly, from any combination of real or immovable property
situated in Canada, “Canadian resource property” (as
defined in the Tax Act), “timber resource property” (as
defined in the Tax Act), or options in respect of, interests in, or
for civil law rights in such properties, whether or not such
property exists. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Subordinate
Voting Shares may also be deemed to be taxable Canadian property to
a U.S. Holder for purposes of the Tax Act in certain other
circumstances. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors
as to whether their Subordinate Voting Shares constitute
“taxable Canadian property” in their own particular
circumstances.
In the event that a
Subordinate Voting Share constitutes taxable Canadian property of a
U.S. Holder, the U.S. Holder should consult its own tax
advisor.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES TO BE
REGISTERED
The authorized
capital of the Company is comprised of an unlimited number of
Subordinate Voting Shares and an unlimited number of Super Voting
Shares. As of July 30, 2021, there are 78,992,636 Subordinate
Voting Shares and 202,590 Super Voting Shares outstanding. The
following is a summary of the rights, privileges, restrictions and
conditions attached to the Subordinate Voting Shares.
Holders of
Subordinate Voting Shares are entitled to receive as and when
declared by the Board, dividends in cash or property of the
Company. In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up
of the Company, the holders of Subordinate Voting Shares will,
subject to the rights of the holders of any shares of the Company
ranking in priority to the Subordinate Voting Shares, be entitled
to participate ratably along with all other holders of Subordinate
Voting Shares. The only outstanding shares ranking in priority to
the Subordinate Voting Shares upon liquidation are the Super Voting
Shares, which have a liquidation preference equal to their
aggregate original issuance price of US$40,000.
Holders of
Subordinate Voting Shares are entitled to notice of and to attend
at any meeting of the shareholders of the Company, except a meeting
solely of the Super Voting Shares (or any meeting of another
particular class or series of shares of the Company as may be
created in the future). Holders of Subordinate Voting Shares are
entitled to one vote in respect of each Subordinate Voting Share
held and holders of Super Voting Shares are entitled to 1,000 votes
in respect of each Super Voting Share held. As of March 1, 2021,
our outstanding Subordinate Voting Shares represent approximately
25% of the voting power of our outstanding voting securities and
our outstanding Super Voting Shares represent approximately 75% of
the voting power of our outstanding voting securities.
As long as any
Subordinate Voting Shares remain outstanding, we may not, without
the consent of the holders of the Subordinate Voting Shares by
separate special resolution, prejudice or interfere with any right
or special right of the Subordinate Voting Shares. A special
resolution means either (a) a resolution approved by at least
two-thirds of the votes cast on the resolution at a properly called
meeting of the shareholders or (b) a resolution approved in writing
by all of the shareholders holding shares that carry the right to
vote at a general shareholders meeting. Special rights and
restrictions of the Subordinate Voting Shares consist of the
following special rights and restrictions included in Article 27 of
our articles and summarized herein: (i) voting, (ii) alteration to
rights of Subordinate Voting Shares, (iii) dividends, (iv)
liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, (v) right to subscribe,
preemptive and (vi) subdivision or consolidation.
The Subordinate
Voting Shares are not convertible into any other class or series of
capital stock of the Company and are not subject to redemption. The
Company and certain of its subsidiaries have outstanding securities
that are convertible into, exercisable for or redeemable for
Subordinate Voting Shares. See “Risk Factors – Risks
Related to the Securities of the Company - Future sales of
Subordinate Voting Shares in the public market, or the perception
that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the prevailing
market price of the Subordinate Voting Shares.”
Holders of
Subordinate Voting Shares are not entitled to a right of first
refusal to subscribe for, purchase or receive any part of any issue
of Subordinate Voting Shares, or bonds, debentures or other
securities of the Company now or in the future.
No subdivision or
consolidation of the Subordinate Voting Shares or Super Voting
Shares shall occur unless, simultaneously, the Subordinate Voting
Shares and Super Voting Shares are subdivided or consolidated in
the same manner or such other adjustment is made so as to maintain
and preserve the relative rights (including voting rights) of the
holders of the shares of each of the said classes.
In connection with
the RTO, the Company and Indus Holding Company entered into a
Support Agreement dated as of April 26, 2019, which was amended and
restated as of April 10, 2020 in connection with the closing of the
Convertible Debenture Offering (the “Support
Agreement”). The purpose of the Support Agreement is to
ensure that pro rata ownership of the Company’s operating
subsidiaries by holders of Subordinate Voting Shares relative to
holders of Indus Redeemable Shares is not diluted as Indus Class B
Common Shares and Indus Class C Common Shares are redeemed for
Subordinate Voting Shares or as other securities are issued by the
Company. In order to avoid such dilution, the Support Agreement
provides that upon any redemption of Indus Class B Common Shares or
Indus Class C Common Shares for Subordinate Voting Shares, or upon
any issuance of additional Subordinate Voting Share by the Company,
an equivalent number of Indus Class A Common Shares will be issued
to the Company by Indus Holding Company.
Pursuant to the
Support Agreement, the Company has agreed that, so long as any
Indus Redeemable Shares not owned by or its affiliates are
outstanding or any Indus Redeemable Shares are issuable pursuant to
the exercise, conversion or exchange of any outstanding securities
of Indus Holding Company, the Company shall:
o
|
take all actions
reasonably necessary or desirable to permit Indus Holding Company
to pay and perform its redemption obligations with respect to Indus
Redeemable Shares, including by take all actions reasonably
necessary or desirable to permit Indus Holding Company to deliver
the Subordinate Voting Shares and/or cash due to holders of Indus
Redeemable Shares upon such redemption in accordance with the
provisions of the articles of incorporation of Indus Holding
Company; and
|
o
|
in the event any
Subordinate Voting Shares are issued upon such redemption,
subscribe for a number of Indus Class A Common Shares equal to the
number of Subordinate Voting Shares so issued (with the
consideration therefor payable by the Company in Subordinate Voting
Shares delivered to the holder of such Indus Redeemable Shares, or,
in the case of Indus Class B Common Shares, cash in amount equal to
the cash value of such Indus Redeemable Shares as provided in the
articles of incorporation of Indus Holding Company).
|
The Support
Agreement also provides, in connection with a primary issuance of
Subordinate Voting Shares by the Company, that the Company will
subscribe for an equivalent number of Indus Class A Common Shares
in cash using the net proceeds, if any, received by the Company
from the issuance of Subordinate Voting Shares.
Pursuant to the
Support Agreement, the Company has agreed in good faith take all
reasonable actions and do all things as are reasonably necessary or
desirable to cause Subordinate Voting Shares delivered pursuant to
the Support Agreement to be listed, quoted or posted for trading on
the CSE and any other stock exchanges and quotation systems on
which outstanding Subordinate Voting Shares are listed, quoted or
posted for trading.
The Support
Agreement provides that in the event that a tender offer, share
exchange offer, issuer bid, take-over bid, arrangement, business
combination, or similar transaction with respect to Subordinate
Voting Shares is proposed by the Company or is proposed to the
Company or its shareholders and is recommended by the Board, or is
otherwise effected or to be effected with the consent or approval
of the Board, the Company will use reasonable efforts to take such
actions as are necessary or desirable to permit holders of Indus
Redeemable Shares (other than the Company and its affiliates) to
participate in the offer to the same extent and on an economically
equivalent basis as the holders of Subordinate Voting
Shares.
Our articles of
incorporation provides that the Supreme Court of the Province of
British Columbia, Canada and the appellate Courts therefrom are the
sole and exclusive forum for any derivative action brought on
behalf of the company. Our articles of incorporation do not limit
the ability of investors to bring direct actions outside of British
Columbia, Canada, including those arising under the Exchange Act
and the Securities Act. Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), creates
exclusive federal jurisdiction over actions brought to enforce any
duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and
regulations thereunder, and Section 22 of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), creates
concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits
brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities
Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Neither investor nor
the Company and may waive compliance with the federal securities
laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, and it is therefore
uncertain whether the exclusive forum provision of our charter
would be enforced by a court as to derivative claims brought under
the Exchange Act or the Securities Act. Furthermore, the exclusive
forum provision of our charter may increase the costs to investors
in bringing claims, may discourage investors from bringing claims
and may limit investors’ ability to bring claims in a
judicial forum that they find favorable.
INTERESTS OF NAMED EXPERTS AND
COUNSEL
No expert named in
this registration statement as having prepared or certified any
part hereof, nor any counsel for the registrant or Selling
Securityholders named in this prospectus as having given an opinion
upon the validity of the securities being registered hereunder or
other legal matters in connection with the registration or offering
of such securities, who was employed for such purpose on a
contingent basis, or at the time of preparation, certification or
opinion or at any time thereafter, through the state of
effectiveness of the registration statement or that part of the
registration statement to which such preparation, certification or
opinion relates, had, or is to receive in connection hereunder, a
substantial interest, direct or indirect, in the registrant or was
connected with the registrant as a promoter, managing underwriter,
voting trustee, director, officer or employee.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the
securities offered through this prospectus has been passed on by
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP.
EXPERTS
The consolidated
financial statements of Lowell Farms as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 included in this prospectus have
been audited by GreenGrowth CPAs, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein, and
are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon
their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
HOW TO GET MORE INFORMATION
We file periodic
reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as we are subject to the information
requirements of the Exchange Act. Our SEC filings will be available
to you on the SEC’s website at
http://www.sec.gov.
Any statement
contained in a document incorporated or deemed to be incorporated
by reference in this prospectus will be deemed to be modified or
superseded to the extent that a statement contained herein or in
any other subsequently filed document which also is or is deemed to
be incorporated by reference in this prospectus modifies or
supersedes that statement. Any statement so modified or superseded
will not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to
constitute a part of this prospectus.
If you make a
request for such information in writing or by telephone, we will
provide you, without charge, a copy of any or all of the
information incorporated by reference into this prospectus. Any
such request should be directed to:
Lowell Farms
Inc.
19 Quail Run
Circle
Suite
B
Salinas, California
93907
Attn: Investor
Relations
You should rely
only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not
authorized any person to provide you with any information that is
different.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
LOWELL FARMS INC.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements as of June 30, 2021, the Three Months Ended June 30,
2021 and 2020, and the Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 and
2020:
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
F-4
|
|
F-5
|
|
F-6
|
|
F-7
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of
December 31, 2020, and the Years Ended December 31, 2020, and
2019
|
F-24
|
|
F-22
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
|
|
|
F-23
|
|
F-24
|
|
F-25
|
|
F-26
|
|
F-27
|
THE HACIENDA COMPANY, LLC
|
F-53
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS:
|
|
|
F-54
|
|
F-55
|
|
F-56
|
|
F-57
|
|
F-58
|
LOWELL FARMS INC. AND THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
Consolidated Financial
Statements
As of June 30, 2021 and 2020, for the Three
Months Ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, and for the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021 and 2020
and
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and for the
Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018
(Expressed in United States
Dollars)
LOWELL FARMS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
9,113
|
|
|
$
|
25,751
|
|
Accounts Receivable - net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $1,024 and $1,389 at June 30, 2021 and
December 2020, respectively
|
|
|
6,223
|
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
14,736
|
|
|
|
9,933
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
4,144
|
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
|
34,216
|
|
|
|
46,604
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
64,496
|
|
|
|
49,243
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
Other intangibles, net
|
|
|
40,919
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
140,589
|
|
|
$
|
97,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
3,313
|
|
|
$
|
2,137
|
|
Accrued payroll and benefits
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
Notes payable, current portion
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
Lease obligation, current portion
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
5,012
|
|
|
|
8,860
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
12,246
|
|
|
|
15,723
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Lease obligation
|
|
|
35,260
|
|
|
|
36,533
|
|
Convertible debentures
|
|
|
13,646
|
|
|
|
13,701
|
|
Mortgage obligation
|
|
|
8,938
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
70,348
|
|
|
|
66,260
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
170,613
|
|
|
|
125,540
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(100,372
|
)
|
|
|
(94,384
|
)
|
Total stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
70,241
|
|
|
|
31,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
140,589
|
|
|
$
|
97,416
|
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
LOWELL FARMS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(LOSS)
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
Three Months
Ended
|
|
|
Six Months
Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
15,157
|
|
|
$
|
9,894
|
|
|
$
|
26,183
|
|
|
$
|
19,336
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
9,413
|
|
|
|
11,157
|
|
|
|
21,915
|
|
|
|
22,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
5,744
|
|
|
|
(1,263
|
)
|
|
|
4,268
|
|
|
|
(2,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,817
|
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
|
|
6,285
|
|
|
|
4,733
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
2,233
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
3,667
|
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
1,762
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
6,217
|
|
|
|
3,525
|
|
|
|
10,443
|
|
|
|
8,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
|
|
(4,788
|
)
|
|
|
(6,175
|
)
|
|
|
(11,897
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Loss on termination of investment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,524
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,524
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of
investment
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
|
|
(726
|
)
|
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|
|
(1,576
|
)
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
(3,944
|
)
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(4,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
(8,732
|
)
|
|
|
(5,850
|
)
|
|
|
(16,581
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Net income
(loss)
|
|
$
|
731
|
|
|
$
|
(8,757
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,988
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
71,021
|
|
|
|
33,307
|
|
|
|
61,956
|
|
|
|
33,025
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
201,278
|
|
|
|
33,307
|
|
|
|
61,956
|
|
|
|
33,025
|
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
LOWELL FARMS INC.
CONDENDSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinate
|
|
|
Super
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders’
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance—March
31, 2021
|
|
|
83,221
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
161,006
|
|
|
$
|
(101,103
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,903
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
Shares issued in connection with conversion of
convertible debentures
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Issuance of shares associated with
acquisitions
|
|
|
7,998
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,023
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,023
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
Balance—June 30,
2021
|
|
|
92,423
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
170,613
|
|
|
$
|
(100,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
70,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinate
|
|
|
Super
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders’
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance—March
31, 2020
|
|
|
32,988
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
97,772
|
|
|
$
|
(80,348
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,757
|
)
|
|
|
(8,757
|
)
|
Shares issued in connection with conversion of
convertible debentures
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Issuance of warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
Balance—June 30,
2020
|
|
|
33,342
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
99,603
|
|
|
$
|
(89,105
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinate
|
|
|
Super
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders’
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2020
|
|
|
57,617
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
125,540
|
|
|
$
|
(94,384
|
)
|
|
$
|
31,156
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,988
|
)
|
|
|
(5,988
|
)
|
Shares issued in connection with conversion of
convertible debentures
|
|
|
2,393
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
Issuance of shares associated with
acquisitions
|
|
|
30,641
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
43,259
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
43,259
|
|
Exercise of warrants
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
Balance—June 30,
2021
|
|
|
92,423
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
170,613
|
|
|
$
|
(100,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
70,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinate
|
|
|
Super
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders’
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2019
|
|
|
32,844
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
96,160
|
|
|
$
|
(72,474
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(16,631
|
)
|
|
|
(16,631
|
)
|
Shares issued in connection with conversion of
convertible debentures
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Issuance of warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
Balance—June 30,
2020
|
|
|
33,342
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
99,603
|
|
|
$
|
(89,105
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,498
|
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
LOWELL FARMS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
CASH FLOW FROM
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(5,988
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,631
|
)
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
1,762
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
Termination of branding rights
agreement
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of
investments
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,526
|
)
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(1,501
|
)
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
|
|
(4,320
|
)
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
Other current and long-term
liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Net cash used in
operating activities
|
|
$
|
(10,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,473
|
)
|
CASH FLOW FROM
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from asset sales
|
|
$
|
1,979
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
|
|
(4,110
|
)
|
Disposition of business interest, net of cash
received
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,743
|
|
Acquisition of business assets, net
|
|
|
(6,642
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Investment in corporate interests
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net cash used in
investing activities
|
|
$
|
(5,271
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,367
|
)
|
CASH FLOW FROM
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on lease
obligations
|
|
$
|
(1,164
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,053
|
)
|
Payments on notes payable
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Proceeds from convertible notes, net of
financing costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,663
|
|
Issuance of warrants associated with convertible
notes offering
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
Proceeds from brokered private
placement
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Proceeds from lease financing
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of warrants and
options
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issuance of subordinate voting shares for
acquisition
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Payment of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net cash (used)
provided by financing activities
|
|
$
|
(582
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents and
restricted cash
|
|
$
|
(16,638
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,357
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of
year
|
|
|
25,751
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents
and restricted cash—end of period
|
|
$
|
9,113
|
|
|
$
|
6,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for
interest
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
|
$
|
1,403
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income
taxes
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER NONCASH
INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment acquired via capital
lease
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
578
|
|
Disposition of business interests
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,743
|
|
Issuance of warrants
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,556
|
|
Shares issued for services in connection with
convertible debenture offering
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
Issuance of subordinate voting shares in
exchange for net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
43,259
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Liabilities assumed and receivable forgiveness
in exchange for net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
2,910
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Debt and associated accrued interest converted
to subordinate voting shares
|
|
$
|
478
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of
Presentation
The interim
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included
herein have been prepared by Lowell Farms Inc. (the
“Company” or “Lowell”) pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”), including Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in
annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America have
been condensed or omitted. The interim unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of
management, all adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments), to present a fair statement of results for
the interim periods presented. The operating results for any
interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for other interim periods or the full fiscal year.
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the
Company’s Form 10 filed for the year ended December 31, 2020.
There have been no material changes to our significant accounting
policies as of and for the six months ended June 30,
2021.
The condensed
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries after the elimination of
all intercompany balances and transactions.
The condensed
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2020, has been derived
from the audited consolidated financial statements but does not
include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (“U.S.
GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates in
these financial statements include allowance for doubtful accounts
and credit losses, carrying value of inventory, revenue
recognition, accounting for stock-based compensation expense, and
income taxes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The global COVID-19
pandemic has impacted the operations and purchasing decisions of
companies worldwide. It also has created and may continue to create
significant uncertainty in the global economy. The Company has
undertaken measures to protect its employees, partners, customers,
and vendors. In addition, the Company’s personnel are subject
to various travel restrictions, which limit the ability of the
Company to provide services to customers and affiliates. This
impacts the Company's normal operations. To date, the Company has
been able to provide uninterrupted access to its products and
services, including certain employees that are working remotely,
and its pre-existing infrastructure that supports secure access to
the Company’s internal systems. If, however, the COVID-19
pandemic has a substantial impact on the productivity of the
Company’s employees or its partners’ or
customers’ decision to use the Company’s products and
services, the results of the Company’s operations and overall
financial performance may be adversely impacted. The duration and
extent of the impact from the COVID-19 pandemic depends on future
developments that cannot be accurately predicted at this time. As
of the date of issuance of the financial statements, the Company is
not aware of any specific event or circumstance that would require
updates to the Company’s estimates and judgments or revisions
to the carrying value of its assets or liabilities. These estimates
may change, as new events occur and additional information is
obtained, and are recognized in the condensed consolidated
financial statements as soon as they become known. Actual results
could differ from those estimates and any such differences may be
material to the financial statements.
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
In May 2020, the
SEC adopted the final rule under SEC release No. 33-10786,
Amendments to Financial Disclosures about Acquired and Disposed
Businesses, amending Rule 1-02(w)(2) which includes amendments to
certain of its rules and forms related to the disclosure of
financial information regarding acquired or disposed businesses.
Among other changes, the amendments impact SEC rules relating to
(1) the definition of “significant” subsidiaries, (2)
requirements to provide financial statements for
“significant” acquisitions, and (3) revisions to the
formulation and usage of pro forma financial information. The final
rule became effective on January 1, 2021; however, voluntary early
adoption was permitted. The Company early adopted the provisions of
the final rule in 2020. The guidance did not have a material impact
on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements
and disclosures.
In February 2016,
FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires
that a lessee recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from
operating leases. A lessee should recognize in the statement of
financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease
liability) and a right-of-use (ROU) asset representing its right to
use the underlying asset for the lease term. For leases with a term
of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting
policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease
assets and lease liabilities. In transition, lessees and lessors
are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of
the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective
approach. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification
Improvements to Topic 842, Leases and ASU 2018-11, Leases Topic 842
Target improvements, which provides an additional (and optional)
transition method whereby the new lease standard is applied at the
adoption date and recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings.
In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-01, Leases (Topic 842)
Codification Improvements, which further clarifies the
determination of fair value of the underlying asset by lessors that
are not manufacturers or dealers and modifies transition disclosure
requirements for changes in accounting principles and other
technical updates. The Company adopted the standard effective
January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective adoption method
which allowed it to initially apply the new standard at the
adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the
opening balance of accumulated deficit. In connection with the
adoption of the new lease pronouncement, the Company recorded a
charge to accumulated deficit of $847. Refer to the Summary of
Effects of Lease Accounting Standard Update Adopted in First
Quarter of 2019 in the audited consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto in the Company’s Form 10 filed for the year
ended December 31, 2020.
In June 2016, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit
Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments” and subsequent amendments to the initial
guidance: ASU 2018-19 “Codification Improvements to Topic
326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses”, ASU 2019-04
“Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial
Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and
Topic 825, Financial Instruments”, ASU 2019-05
“Financial Instruments-Credit Losses”, ASU 2019-11
“Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial
Instruments - Credit Losses” (collectively, Topic 326),ASU
2020-02 Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) and
Leases (Topic 842) and ASU 2020-03 Codification Improvements to
Financial Instruments. Topic 326 requires measurement and
recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held.
This guidance is effective for the year ended December 31, 2020.
The Company believes that the most notable impact of this ASU will
relate to its processes around the assessment of the adequacy of
its allowance for doubtful accounts on trade accounts receivable
and the recognition of credit losses. We continue to monitor the
economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, however based on current
market conditions, the adoption of the ASU did not have a material
impact on the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In November 2018,
the FASB issued ASU 2018-18, Collaborative Arrangements (Topic
808), Clarifying the Interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606.
This guidance amended Topic 808 and Topic 606 to clarify that
transactions in a collaborative arrangement should be accounted for
under Topic 606 when the counterparty is a customer for a distinct
good or service (i.e., unit of account). The amendments preclude an
entity from presenting consideration from a transaction in a
collaborative arrangement as revenue from contracts with customers
if the counterparty is not a customer for that transaction. This
guidance is effective for the year ended December 31, 2020. The
adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our
condensed consolidated financial statements.
In December 2019,
the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying
the Accounting for Income Taxes. This guidance removes certain
exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and enhances and
simplifies various aspects of the income tax accounting guidance,
including requirements such as tax basis step-up in goodwill
obtained in a transaction that is not a business combination,
ownership changes in investments, and interim-period accounting for
enacted changes in tax law. This standard is effective for fiscal
years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2020. This guidance was effective for the Company in
our fiscal year and interim periods beginning on January 1, 2021
and did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
In January 2020,
the FASB issued ASU 2020-01 Investments-Equity Securities (Topic
321), Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Clarifying the Interactions
between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815. This guidance
addresses accounting for the transition into and out of the equity
method and provides clarification of the interaction of rules for
equity securities, the equity method of accounting, and forward
contracts and purchase options on certain types of securities. This
standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within
those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. We are
currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2020-01 on our Consolidated
Financial Statements, which was effective for the Company in our
fiscal year and interim periods beginning on January 1, 2021 and
did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Accounting
standards not yet adopted
In August 2020, the
FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other
Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and
Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic
815-40). This update amends the guidance on convertible instruments
and the derivatives scope exception for contracts in an entity's
own equity and improves and amends the related EPS guidance for
both Subtopics. This standard is effective for fiscal years and
interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2021, which means it will be effective for our fiscal year
beginning January 1, 2022. Early adoption is permitted. We are
currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2020-06 on our condensed
consolidated financial statements.
No other recently
issued accounting pronouncements had or are expected to have a
material impact on our condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2. ACQUISITIONS
Completed Acquisitions
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Humble
|
|
|
The Hacienda
|
|
|
Lowell Farm
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Kaizen Inc.
|
|
|
Flower Co.
|
|
|
Company, LLC
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Total
|
|
CONSIDERATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent
Payment
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,019
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,019
|
|
Transaction
costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
Note payable and
other obligations
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
3,115
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
12,380
|
|
Fair value of
subordinate voting shares
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
34,358
|
|
|
|
9,610
|
|
|
|
44,085
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
|
$
|
41,920
|
|
|
$
|
18,800
|
|
|
$
|
61,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PURCHASE PRICE ALLOCATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
3,300
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3,306
|
|
Accounts receivable
- net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,312
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,312
|
|
Other tangible
assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
15,750
|
|
|
|
16,489
|
|
Intangible assets -
brands and tradenames
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
37,299
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
37,483
|
|
Intangible assets -
technology and know-how and other
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
|
|
3,336
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables and other
liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(730
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(730
|
)
|
Fair value of net assets
acquired
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
|
$
|
41,920
|
|
|
$
|
18,800
|
|
|
$
|
61,196
|
|
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The Company
completed the following asset acquisitions, and allocated the
purchase price as follows:
The Kaizen Inc. and
The Humble Flower Co. acquisitions qualified as a business
combination under ASC 805. The Hacienda Company, LLC acquisition
qualified as an asset acquisition under ASU 2017.01. Consideration
has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. No
goodwill was recognized. The results of these acquisitions are
included in the Company’s net earnings from the date of
acquisition.
The fair value of
the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed for Kaizen Inc. and
the Humble Flower Company were finalized in the quarter ended June
30, 2020.
On May 1, 2019, the
Company acquired all of the assets, global rights and business
interests of Kaizen Inc. for a purchase price of $556 that will be
paid as and if financial performance targets are met during the
period beginning on May 1, 2019 and ending on April 30, 2023.
Kaizen is a premium brand offering a full spectrum of cannabis
concentrates. Effective July 15, 2020 the asset purchase agreement
was modified, eliminating payments associated with meeting
financial performance targets in exchange for the issuance of 225
thousand options to purchase Subordinate Voting Shares and a note
payable of $200, with payments over two years. Had the
modifications been reflected as of the date of acquisition, net
assets would have decreased $223 at December 31, 2019 and net loss
in 2019 would have been reduced by $21.
On April 18, 2019,
the Company acquired all of the assets, global rights and business
interests associated with the brand Humble Flower Co. for a
purchase price of $472 that will be paid as and if financial
performance targets are met during the period beginning on April
19, 2019 and ending on April 18, 2023. The acquisition marks the
Company’s expansion into cannabis-infused topical creams,
balms, and oils. Effective June 1, 2020 the asset purchase
agreement was modified, eliminating payments associated with
meeting financial performance targets in exchange for the issuance
of 225 thousand options to purchase Subordinate Voting Shares and a
note payable of $65, with payments commencing on January 1, 2021
for 24 months. Had the modifications been reflected as of the date
of acquisition, net assets would have decreased $308 at December
31, 2019 and net loss in 2019 would have been reduced by
$34.
●
|
The Hacienda Company, LLC.
|
On February 25,
2021, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of the
Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell Smokes trademark brands, product
portfolio, and production assets from The Hacienda Company, LLC for
a purchase price of $41,920. Lowell Herb Co. is a leading
California cannabis brand that manufactures and distributes
distinctive and highly regarded premium packaged flower, pre-roll,
concentrates, and vape products. The acquisition consideration was
comprised of $4.1 million in cash and the issuance of 22,643,678
subordinate voting shares and obligations assumed. In connection
with this acquisition, the Company completed a change in its
corporate name to Lowell Farms Inc. effective March 1,
2021.
On June 29, 2021,
we acquired real property and related assets of a first-of-its-kind
cannabis drying and midstream processing facility located in
Monterey County for a purchase price of $18,800. The 10-acre,
40,000 square foot processing facility will provide drying,
bucking, trimming, sorting, grading, and packaging operations for
up to 250,000 lbs. of wholesale cannabis flower annually. The new
facility will process nearly all the cannabis that we grow at our
existing cultivation operations. Additionally, we commissioned a
new business unit called Lowell Farm Services (“LFS”),
which will engage in fee-based processing services for regional
growers from the Salinas Valley area. The acquisition consideration
was comprised primarily of a note payable of $9.0 million and the
issuance of 7,997,520 subordinate voting shares and obligations
assumed. LFS operations are expected to become operational during
the third quarter of 2021.
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Terminated Acquisition
On May 14, 2019,
the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the
assets of W The Brand (“W Vapes”), a manufacturer and
distributor in Nevada and Oregon of cannabis concentrates,
cartridges and disposable pens, in a cash and stock transaction.
Under the terms of the agreement, the purchase consideration to W
Vapes shareholders consisted of $10 million in cash and $10 million
in Subordinate Voting Shares (based on a deemed value of CDN$15.65
per share). In November 2019, the definitive agreement was amended
whereby the Company advanced $2 million in non-recourse funds to
the seller in exchange for release of $10 million of cash held in
escrow related to the acquisition and in December 2019, the Company
purchased the Las Vegas, Nevada facility for $4.1
million.
On July 17, 2020,
the Company announced the termination of the definitive agreement
with W Vapes and the obligation to acquire the assets of W Vapes
was terminated. The termination coincided with an asset acquisition
announcement between W Vapes and Planet 13 Holdings Inc.
(“Planet 13”). Additionally, the Company sold the Las
Vegas facility to certain affiliates of Planet 13 for a cash
payment of approximately $500, and an additional cash payment of
approximately $2.8 million upon regulatory approval of the W Vapes
and Planet 13 transaction which was received in January 2021, and
in the third quarter the Company finalized a note payable of $843
to the owners of W Vapes, payable coinciding with the receipt of
the $2.8 million payment from the facility sale, which was paid in
January 2021. As a result, the Company reflected a $4.4 million
loss in loss on termination of investments, net on its consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2020.
3. PREPAID AND OTHER CURRENT
ASSETS
Prepaid and other
current assets were comprised of the following items:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
533
|
|
|
$
|
572
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
Supplier
advances
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
Nevada building
sale proceeds
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
Total prepaid and other current
assets
|
|
$
|
4,144
|
|
|
$
|
6,391
|
|
4. INVENTORY
Inventory was
comprised of the following items:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
$
|
11,852
|
|
|
$
|
7,950
|
|
Work in
process
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Finished
goods
|
|
|
2,839
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
Total inventory
|
|
$
|
14,736
|
|
|
$
|
9,933
|
|
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
5. OTHER CURRENT
LIABILITIES
Other current
liabilities were comprised of the following items:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Excise and cannabis
tax
|
|
$
|
3,912
|
|
|
$
|
5,780
|
|
Third party brand
distribution accrual
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
Insurance and
professional fee accrual
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
Other
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
Total other current
liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,012
|
|
|
$
|
8,860
|
|
6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
A reconciliation of
the beginning and ending balances of property and equipment and
accumulated depreciation during the six months ended June 30, 2021
and property and equipment, net as of December 31, 2020, are as
follows:
|
|
Land and
|
|
|
Leasehold
|
|
|
Furniture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Right of
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
and Fixtures
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
in Process
|
|
|
Use Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10,799
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
1,276
|
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
$
|
2,528
|
|
|
$
|
41,530
|
|
|
$
|
57,037
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
Business
Acquisitions
|
|
|
14,529
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,942
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance—June 30, 2021
|
|
$
|
14,529
|
|
|
$
|
10,872
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
2,957
|
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
$
|
3,342
|
|
|
$
|
41,530
|
|
|
$
|
74,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(634
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(427
|
)
|
|
$
|
(411
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(6,275
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,794
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,527
|
)
|
|
|
(1,844
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance—June 30, 2021
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(801
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(499
|
)
|
|
$
|
(488
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(7,802
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value-June 30,
2021
|
|
$
|
14,529
|
|
|
$
|
10,071
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2,458
|
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
$
|
3,342
|
|
|
$
|
33,728
|
|
|
$
|
64,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value -December 31,
2020
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10,165
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
$
|
2,528
|
|
|
$
|
35,255
|
|
|
$
|
49,243
|
|
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Construction in
process represent assets under construction related to cultivation,
manufacturing, and distribution facilities not yet completed or
otherwise not placed in service.
Depreciation
expense of $946 and $1,044 were recorded for the three months ended
June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, of which $584 and $769
respectively, were included in cost of goods sold. Depreciation
expense of $195 was also recorded in other income (expense) for the
three months ended June 30, 2021.
Depreciation
expense of $1,844 and $1,909 were recorded for the six months ended
June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, of which $1,168 and $1,283
respectively, were included in cost of goods sold. Depreciation
expense of $195 was also recorded in other income (expense) for the
six months ended June 30, 2021.
7. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
Goodwill
A reconciliation of
the beginning and ending balances of goodwill during the six months
ended June 30, 2021 is as follows:
The Company
evaluates goodwill for impairment annually during the fiscal third
quarter and when an event occurs, or circumstances change such that
it is reasonably possible that impairment may exist. The Company
accounts for goodwill and evaluates its goodwill balances and tests
them for impairment in accordance with related accounting
standards. The Company performed its annual impairment assessment
in its third quarter of fiscal 2020, and its analysis indicated
that the Company had no impairment of goodwill.
Other Intangible Assets
A reconciliation of
the beginning and ending balances of intangible assets and
accumulated amortization during the six months ended June 30, 2021
and intangible assets, net as of December 31, 2020, are as
follows:
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2020
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
-
|
|
Business
Acquisitions
|
|
|
-
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance - June 30, 2021
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
|
Definite Life Intangibles
|
|
|
Indefinite Life Intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branding
|
|
|
Technology/
|
|
|
Brands &
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
Know How
|
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
408
|
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
Business
acquisition
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
|
|
37,299
|
|
|
|
40,349
|
|
Agreement
termination
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
Balance—June 30, 2021
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3,258
|
|
|
$
|
37,707
|
|
|
$
|
40,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
$
|
(93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(130
|
)
|
Agreement
termination
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance—June 30, 2021
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2021
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3,212
|
|
|
$
|
37,707
|
|
|
$
|
40,919
|
|
Net Book Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
408
|
|
|
$
|
736
|
|
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Intangible assets
with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Amortization periods of assets with finite lives are based on
management's estimates at the date of acquisition. The Company
recorded amortization expense of $14, and $44 for the six months
ended June 30, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
The Company
estimates that amortization expense for our existing other
intangible assets will be approximately $220 annually for each of
the next five fiscal years. Actual amortization expense to be
reported in future periods could differ from these estimates as a
result of new intangible asset acquisitions, changes in useful
lives or other relevant factors or changes.
8. SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
Shares Outstanding
The table below
details the change in Company shares outstanding by class during
the six months ended June 30, 2021:
|
|
Subordinate
|
|
|
Super
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Voting Shares
|
|
|
Voting Shares
|
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
|
57,617
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
Shares issued in
connection with exercise of warrants
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Shares issued in
connection with conversion of convertible debentures
|
|
|
2,393
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Shares issued in
connection with asset acquisition
|
|
|
30,641
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issuance of vested
restricted stock units
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock issued in
connection with exercised of stock options
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance—June 30, 2021
|
|
|
92,423
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,898
|
|
Warrants issued in
conjunction with broker option exercise (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Warrants
expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
Warrants converted
into subordinate voting shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
Balance—June 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,703
|
|
(1) Excluded 390 warrants issuable should
underwriter options be exercised.
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
9. DEBT
Debt at June 30,
2021 and December 31, 2020, was comprised of the
following:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Current portion of long-term
debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle
loans(1)
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
Note
payable(3)
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
Total short-term
debt
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle
loans(1)
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Note
payable(2)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Note
payable(3)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Mortgage
payable(4)
|
|
|
8,938
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Convertible
debenture(5)
|
|
|
13,646
|
|
|
|
13,701
|
|
Total long-term
debt
|
|
|
22,842
|
|
|
|
14,004
|
|
Total Indebtedness
|
|
$
|
23,211
|
|
|
$
|
15,217
|
|
(1) Primarily fixed term loans on
transportation vehicles. Weighted average interest rate at June 30,
2021 was 8.1%.
|
(2) Note payable in connection with Acme
acquisition to be paid as and if financial performance targets are
met over the earnout period.
|
(3) Note payable in connection with Humble
Flower and Kaizen acquisitions and termination of the W Vapes
acquisition. Weighted
average interest rate at June 30, 2021 was 4%.
|
|
(4) Net of deferred financing costs of
$422.
|
|
(5) Net of deferred financing costs of
$1,879.
|
|
Stated maturities
of debt obligations are as follows as of June 30,
2021:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2021
|
|
2021
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
2022
|
|
|
321
|
|
2023
|
|
|
15,876
|
|
2024
|
|
|
383
|
|
2025
|
|
|
421
|
|
2026 and
thereafter
|
|
|
8,113
|
|
Total debt obligations
|
|
$
|
25,382
|
|
10. LEASES
The Company adopted
ASU 2016-02 (Topic 842) effective January 1, 2019 using the
modified retrospective adoption method which allowed it to
initially apply the new standard at the adoption date and recognize
a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of
accumulated deficit. In connection with the adoption of the new
lease pronouncement, the Company recorded a charge to accumulated
deficit of $847.
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
A reconciliation of
lease obligations for the six months ended June 30, 2021, is as
follows:
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Lease
Liability:
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
$
|
38,834
|
|
Lease principal
payments
|
|
|
(1,164
|
)
|
June 30, 2021
|
|
$
|
37,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
Lease obligation,
current portion
|
|
$
|
2,410
|
|
Lease obligation,
long-term portion
|
|
|
35,260
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
37,670
|
|
All extension
options that are reasonably certain to be exercised have been
included in the measurement of lease obligations. The Company
reassesses the likelihood of extension option exercise if there is
a significant event or change in circumstances within its
control.
The components of
lease expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and
2020 are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Amortization of
leased assets (1)
|
|
$
|
785
|
|
|
$
|
839
|
|
|
$
|
1,527
|
|
|
$
|
1,631
|
|
Interest on lease
liabilities (2)
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,419
|
|
|
$
|
1,330
|
|
|
$
|
2,724
|
|
|
$
|
2,595
|
|
____________
(1) Included in cost of goods sold and general
and administrative in the consolidated statement of
operations.
|
(2) Included in interest expense in the
consolidated statement of operations.
|
The key assumptions
used in accounting for leases as of June 30, 2021 were a weighted
average remaining lease term of 17.6 years and a weighted average
discount rate of 6%. The key assumptions used in accounting for
leases as of December 31, 2020 were a weighted average remaining
lease term of 18.1 years and a weighted average discount rate of
6.0%.
The future lease
payments with initial remaining terms in excess of one year as of
June 30, 2021 were as follows:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2021
|
|
Balance of
2021
|
|
$
|
1,187
|
|
2022 -
2023
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
2024 -
2025
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
2026 and
beyond
|
|
|
27,502
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
37,670
|
|
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
11. SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
During 2019 the
Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2019 Stock and
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which was amended in April
2020 and March 2021. The Plan permits the issuance of stock
options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, share units,
performance shares, performance units and other stock-based awards,
and, as of June 30, 2021, 13.2 million shares have been authorized
to be issued under the Plan and 4.6 million are available for
future grant. The Plan provides for the grant of options as either
non-statutory stock options or incentive stock options and
restricted stock units to employees, officers, directors, and
consultants of the Company to attract and retain persons of ability
to perform services for the Company and to reward such individuals
who contribute to the achievement by the Company of its economic
objectives. The awards granted generally vest in 25% increments
over a four-year period and option awards expire 6 years from grant
date.
The Plan is
administered by the Board or a committee appointed by the Board,
which determines the persons to whom the awards will be granted,
the type of awards to be granted, the number of awards to be
granted, and the specific terms of each grant, including the
vesting thereof, subject to the provisions of the
Plan.
During the three
and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company granted
shares to certain employees as compensation for services. These
shares were accounted for in accordance with ASC 718 –
Compensation – Stock Compensation. The Company amortizes
awards over the service period and until awards are fully
vested.
For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, share-based compensation
expense was as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Cost of goods
sold
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
General and
administrative expense
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
Total share-based
compensation
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
625
|
|
|
$
|
1,825
|
|
The following table
summarizes the status of stock option grants and unvested awards at
and for the six months ended June 30, 2021:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
(in thousands
except per share amounts)
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding—December 31,
2020
|
|
|
6,260
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(1,153
|
)
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding—June 30,
2021
|
|
|
6,987
|
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable—June 30,
2021
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest—June 30,
2021
|
|
|
6,987
|
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,254
|
|
The
weighted-average fair value of options granted during the three and
six months ended June 30, 2021, estimated as of the grant date,
were $1.18 and $1.41, respectively. As of June 30, 2021, there was
$1,252 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested options, which is expected to be recognized over a
remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.0
years.
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The following table
summarizes the status of restricted stock unit (“RSU”)
grants and unvested awards at and for the six months ended June 30,
2021:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
(in thousands
except per share amounts)
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding—December 31,
2020
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
|
1.15
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
Outstanding—June 30,
2021
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
As of June 30,
2021, there was $963 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested restricted stock units, which is expected to
be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of
20 months.
The fair value of
the stock options and RSUs granted were determined using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions at the time of grant.
Stock Options
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest
rate
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Expected term in
years
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest
rate
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
Expected term in
years
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
12. INCOME TAXES
Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic
Security Act
On March 27, 2020,
the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the
“CARES Act”) was enacted and signed into law in
response to the market volatility and instability resulting from
the COVID-19 pandemic. It includes a significant number of tax
provisions and lifts certain deduction limitations originally
imposed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017
Act”). The changes are mainly related to: (1) the business
interest expense disallowance rules for 2019 and 2020; (2) net
operating loss rules; (3) charitable contribution limitations; (4)
employee retention credit; and (5) the realization of corporate
alternative minimum tax credits.
The Company
continues to assess the impact and future implication of these
provisions; however, it does not anticipate any amounts that could
give rise to a material impact to the overall consolidated
financial statements.
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The provision for
income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2021, was
$74, representing an effective tax rate of 9.20%, compared to an
income tax expense of $25 for the three months ended June 30, 2020,
representing an effective tax rate of 0.29%. The provision for
income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2021, was
$138, representing a effective tax rate of 2.36% compared to an
income tax expense of $50 for the six months ended June 30, 2020,
representing an effective tax rate of 0.30%.
13. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER
SHARE
Net income (loss)
per share represents the net earnings/loss attributable to
shareholders divided by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the period on an as converted
basis.
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
(in thousands
except per share amounts)
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
731
|
|
|
$
|
(8,757
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,988
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
Weighted average
shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
71,021
|
|
|
|
33,307
|
|
|
|
61,956
|
|
|
|
33,025
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
201,278
|
|
|
|
33,307
|
|
|
|
61,956
|
|
|
|
33,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
potentially diluted shares (1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
shares
|
|
|
71,021
|
|
|
|
33,307
|
|
|
|
61,956
|
|
|
|
33,025
|
|
Options
|
|
|
2,908
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
60,767
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Convertible
debentures
|
|
|
64,796
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Restricted stock
units
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total weighted
average potentially diluted shares:
|
|
|
201,278
|
|
|
|
33,307
|
|
|
|
61,956
|
|
|
|
33,025
|
|
(1) For the above net loss periods, the
inclusion of options, warrants, convertible debentures and
restricted stock units in the calculation of diluted earnings per
share would be anti-dilutive, and accordingly, were excluded from
the diluted loss per share calculation.
14. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Accounting
standards define fair value as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation
techniques used to measure fair value. An asset’s or
liability’s level is based on the lowest level of input that
is significant to the fair value measurement. Assets and
liabilities carried at fair value are valued and disclosed in one
of the following three levels of the valuation
hierarchy:
Level 1: Quoted
market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level 2: Observable
market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by
market data.
Level 3:
Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entity’s own
assumptions.
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
At June 30, 2021
and 2020, and December 31, 2020 the carrying value of cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expense and other current
assets, accounts payable and other current liabilities approximate
fair value due to the short-term nature of such
instruments.
The carrying value
of the Company's debt approximates fair value based on current
market rates (Level 2).
Nonrecurring fair value
measurements
The Company uses
fair value measures when determining assets and liabilities
acquired in an acquisition as described above in the Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which are considered a
Level 3 measurement.
15. COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
Commitments
In January 2021,
the Company signed a letter of intent to expand its cultivation
footprint. The agreement contemplates a land-lease from a developer
that has prepared the property for cannabis cultivation. Lowell
would be responsible for construction costs of greenhouses using
cash raised in the equity offering in December 2020 and cash
generated from operations. The transaction is subject to final site
due-diligence and negotiation of construction contracts. In the
event the transaction contemplated in the letter of intent is
pursued, the Company anticipates the site will be ready for
operation in 2023.
Contingencies
The Company’s
operations are subject to a variety of local and state regulation.
Failure to comply with one or more of those regulations could
result in fines, restrictions on its operations, or losses of
permits that could result in the Company ceasing operations. While
management of the Company believes that the Company is in
compliance with applicable local and state regulation as of June
30, 2021, cannabis regulations continue to evolve and are subject
to differing interpretations. As a result, the Company may be
subject to regulatory fines, penalties or restrictions in the
future. In 2020, the Company entered into a payment plan offered by
California regulatory authorities to pay certain excise and
cultivation taxes over a 12 month period. If such taxes are not
paid in accordance with the agreed payment plan the Company could
be subject to certain late payment penalties.
Litigation and Claims
From time to time,
the Company may be involved in litigation relating to claims
arising out of operations in the normal course of business. As of
June 30, 2021, there were no pending or threatened lawsuits that
could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the
results of the Company’s operations. There are also no
proceedings in which any of the Company’s directors, officers
or affiliates are an adverse party or have a material interest
adverse to the Company’s interest.
Insurance Claims
In September 2020
the Company experienced a small fire at its manufacturing facility
which resulted in suspending certain operations until the facility
was repaired. As a result, the company filed a business
interruption claim which resulted in a payment of $1.4 million from
the insurance carrier in March 2021. The proceeds from the claim
were reflected in other income on the consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.
In August 2020 the
Company experienced adverse air quality conditions that resulted in
the Company closing the air vents in its greenhouse facilities at a
time when extreme temperatures existed. As a result, plant health
suffered due to the situation. The Company filed a business
interruption claim which resulted in a payment of $2.65 million
from the insurance carrier in July 2021, and is included in other
income (expense) in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of income (loss).
LOWELL FARMS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
16. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES
For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, general and administrative
expenses were comprised of:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Salaries and
benefits
|
|
$
|
1,561
|
|
|
$
|
980
|
|
|
$
|
2,398
|
|
|
$
|
1,976
|
|
Professional
fees
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
Share-based
compensation
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Total general and administrative
expenses
|
|
$
|
3,817
|
|
|
$
|
1,456
|
|
|
$
|
6,286
|
|
|
$
|
4,733
|
|
17. RELATED-PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with
related parties are entered into in the normal course of business
and are measured at the amount established and agreed to by the
parties.
Lowell received
certain administrative, operational and consulting services through
a Management Services Agreement with Edible Management, LLC
(“EM”). EM is a limited liability company owned by the
co-founders of Lowell and was formed to provide Lowell with certain
administrative functions comprising: cultivation, distribution, and
production operations support; general administration; corporate
development; human resources; finance and accounting; marketing;
sales; legal and compliance. The agreement provided for the
dollar-for-dollar reimbursement of expenses incurred by EM in
performance of its services. Amounts paid to EM for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2020 was $2,201 and $5,041, respectively.
The Management Services Agreement with EM was terminated as of
December 31, 2020.
In April 2015,
Lowell entered into a services agreement with Olympic Management
Group (“OMG”), for advisory and technology support
services, including the access and use of software licensed to OMG
to perform certain data processing and enterprise resource planning
(ERP) operational services. OMG is owned by one of the
Company’s co-founders. The agreement provides for the
dollar-for-dollar reimbursement of expenses incurred by OMG in
performance of its services. There were no amounts paid to OMG for
the quarters ended June 30, 2021 and 2020. Amounts paid to OMG for
the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, were $nil and $5,
respectively.
18. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company's
operations are comprised of a single reporting operating segment
engaged in the production and sale of cannabis products in the
United States. As the operations comprise a single reporting
segment, amounts disclosed in the financial statements also
represent a single reporting segment.
19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has
evaluated subsequent events through August 16, 2021, the date the
financial statements were available to be issued.
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
To the Board of
Directors and Shareholders
of Lowell Farms
Inc., formerly known as Indus Holdings, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial
Statements
We have audited the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lowell Farms Inc.,
formerly known as Indus Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2020 and
2019, and the related consolidated statements of income,
comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2020, and the related notes collectively referred to as the
financial statements. In our opinion, the financial statements
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a
public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required
to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with
the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We conducted our
audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an
audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of
our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express
no such opinion.
Our audits included
performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement
of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and
performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures
included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also
included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Emphasis of Matter Regarding
Restatement
As discussed in
Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the 2020, 2019 and
2018 financial statements have been restated to correct a
misstatement. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this
matter.
Critical Audit Matters
Critical audit
matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the
financial statements that were communicated or required to be
communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts
or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and
(2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex
judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not
alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial
statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the
critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the
critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which
they relate.
Description of the Matter
|
Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts
As described in the Balance Sheet and Note 2
to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has
established an allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.389 million as
of December 31, 2020. Auditing management’s evaluation of
allowance was challenging due to the level of subjectivity and
significant judgment associated with collectability of accounts
receivable.
|
How We Addressed the
Matter in Our Audit
|
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the
design, and tested the implementation of controls over the
Company’s accounting process for allowance of doubtful
accounts. Our procedures consisted of performing retrospective
review of the allowance by comparing historical reserve to
historical write-offs, analyzing accounts receivable aging buckets,
and sending confirmations. Based on the audit procedures performed,
we found the reserve levels to be reasonable.
|
|
We have served as the Company’s auditor
since 2018.
|
|
Los Angeles, California
|
|
April 12, 2021
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL
POSITION
|
(Amounts Expressed in
United States Dollars Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Note
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,751
|
|
|
$
|
1,344
|
|
Accounts receivable—net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $1,389 and $2,595 at December 31, 2020 and
2019, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
6,890
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9,933
|
|
|
|
10,418
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
|
|
2,729
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,605
|
|
|
|
21,381
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
49,243
|
|
|
|
42,972
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
Other intangibles, net
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,416
|
|
|
$
|
68,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,137
|
|
|
$
|
4,704
|
|
Accrued payroll and benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
Notes payable, current portion
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Lease obligation, current portion
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
2,325
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8,860
|
|
|
|
4,356
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,723
|
|
|
|
12,051
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
Lease obligation
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
36,533
|
|
|
|
31,480
|
|
Convertible debentures
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13,701
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,260
|
|
|
|
44,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,540
|
|
|
|
96,160
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94,384
|
)
|
|
|
(72,474
|
)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,156
|
|
|
|
23,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,416
|
|
|
$
|
68,534
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
(Amounts Expressed in
United States Dollars Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December
31,
|
|
(in thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
Note
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,618
|
|
|
$
|
37,045
|
|
|
$
|
17,199
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,413
|
|
|
|
47,790
|
|
|
|
13,136
|
|
Gross profit/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
|
|
(10,745
|
)
|
|
|
4,063
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
11,762
|
|
|
|
25,814
|
|
|
|
8,779
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,169
|
|
|
|
8,029
|
|
|
|
2,513
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,10
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,013
|
|
|
|
34,836
|
|
|
|
11,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,808
|
)
|
|
|
(45,581
|
)
|
|
|
(7,330
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
Loss on termination of investment,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,201
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Unrealized gain/(loss) on change in fair value
of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
(2,250
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gain/(Loss) on foreign currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(3,331
|
)
|
|
|
(2,152
|
)
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
Total other income/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,878
|
|
|
|
(4,148
|
)
|
|
|
(1,284
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,686
|
)
|
|
|
(49,729
|
)
|
|
|
(8,614
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,934
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,711
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share
– basic and diluted
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic and diluted
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
33,940
|
|
|
|
31,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
(Amounts Expressed in
United States Dollars Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
Shareholders of the Parent
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Class A/B
Shares
|
|
|
Subordinate Voting
Shares
|
|
|
Super Voting
Shares
|
|
|
Share
Capital
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2017
|
|
|
16,631
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
7,772
|
|
|
$
|
(12,982
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,211
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,711
|
)
|
|
|
(8,711
|
)
|
Shares issued in connection with conversion of
convertible debentures
|
|
|
1,947
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
Issuance of shares associated with
acquisitions
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Issuance of Series B preferred stock, net of
issuance costs
|
|
|
9,831
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41,873
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41,873
|
|
Issuance of warrants in exchange for
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2018
|
|
|
28,497
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
54,333
|
|
|
$
|
(21,693
|
)
|
|
$
|
32,640
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(49,934
|
)
|
|
|
(49,934
|
)
|
Adoption of lease accounting
standard
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
Issuance of subordinate voting shares in
exchange for Class A/B shares, net
|
|
|
(28,497
|
)
|
|
|
28,497
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Private placement in connection with reverse
takeover, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,433
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36,762
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36,762
|
|
Shares issued to acquiree in connection with
reverse takeover
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
Issuance of supervoting shares
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,385
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,385
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2019
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
32,844
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
96,160
|
|
|
$
|
(72,474
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,686
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(21,910
|
)
|
|
|
(21,910
|
)
|
Issuance of stock warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
Shares issued in connection with convertible
debenture offering
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Shares issued in connection with subordinate
voting share offering
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,021
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,021
|
|
Shares issued in connection with conversion of
convertible debentures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Issuance of stock options associated with
acquisitions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Issuance of shares associated with
acquisitions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
Reduction in supervoting share purchase
price
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Exercise of warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2020
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
57,617
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
125,540
|
|
|
$
|
(94,384
|
)
|
|
$
|
31,156
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
(Amounts Expressed in
United States Dollars Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
|
Year Ended December
31,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
CASH FLOW FROM
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
(restated)
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
|
(restated)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(21,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,934
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,711
|
)
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,912
|
|
|
|
3,914
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
3,385
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
2,346
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Allowance for inventory
obsolescence
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss on termination of investment
|
|
|
4,359
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Warrants issued in exchange for
services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on change in fair value
of investments
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
1,713
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
(6,230
|
)
|
|
|
(1,693
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
|
|
(8,127
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
(1,043
|
)
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
(1,568
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
5,207
|
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
Net cash used in
operating activities
|
|
$
|
(7,752
|
)
|
|
|
(39,323
|
)
|
|
|
(18,232
|
)
|
CASH FLOW FROM
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from asset sales
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net cash received from disposition of business
interest
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(6,850
|
)
|
|
|
(9,991
|
)
|
|
|
(2,628
|
)
|
Investment in corporate interests
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,525
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
Net cash used in
investing activities
|
|
$
|
(5,607
|
)
|
|
|
(10,061
|
)
|
|
|
(2,776
|
)
|
CASH FLOW FROM
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on lease
obligations
|
|
|
(2,951
|
)
|
|
|
(1,155
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Payments on notes payable
|
|
|
(4,267
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(850
|
)
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Proceeds from lease financing
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from convertible debentures, net of
financing costs
|
|
|
15,281
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from subordinate voting share
offering
|
|
|
26,930
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fees on subordinate voting share
offering
|
|
|
(1,909
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from share offering
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29,479
|
|
Proceeds from brokered private
placement
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40,195
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fees on public brokered private
placement
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,919
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of warrants
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issuance of subordinate voting shares for
acquisition
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net cash provided by
financing activities
|
|
$
|
37,765
|
|
|
|
40,418
|
|
|
|
29,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents and
restricted cash
|
|
|
24,407
|
|
|
|
(8,966
|
)
|
|
|
8,081
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of
year
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
2,229
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents
and restricted cash—end of period
|
|
$
|
25,751
|
|
|
$
|
1,344
|
|
|
$
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for
interest
|
|
$
|
3,332
|
|
|
$
|
2,147
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income
taxes
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER NONCASH
INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment not yet paid
for
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Property and equipment acquired via capital
lease
|
|
$
|
7,416
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
Shares Issued in exchange for asset
investment
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
Issuance of warrants
|
|
$
|
1,620
|
|
|
$
|
2,291
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Shares issued to acquiree in connection with
reverse takeover
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Issuance of supervoting shares
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Acquisition of private entities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,028
|
|
|
$
|
571
|
|
Shares issued in connection with convertible
debenture conversion
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Shares issued in connection with debt and
accured interest conversion
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
13,006
|
|
Stock options issued associated with an
acquisition
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 2020 AND 2019
|
All amounts in these Notes are expressed in
thousands of United States dollars (“$” or
“US$”), unless otherwise indicated.
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS
On November 13,
2018, Indus Holding Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of Indus
Holdings, Inc.) and Mezzotin Minerals Inc. (“Mezzotin”)
entered into a combination agreement whereby the parties agreed to
combine their respective businesses, which would result in the
reverse takeover of Mezzotin by the security holders of Indus.
Mezzotin Minerals was originally incorporated under the Business
Corporations Act (Ontario) on October 27, 2005 as Zoolander
Corporation. On September 10, 2013, Zoolander changed its name to
Mezzotin Minerals Inc. On April 26, 2019, the reverse takeover
transaction concluded. In connection with the agreement, Mezzotin
changed its name from Mezzotin Minerals Inc. to Indus Holdings,
Inc. (the “Company”, “Pubco”, or
“Indus”). Effective at the close of markets on April
29, 2019, the common shares of the Company (“Existing
Mezzotin Shares”) were delisted from the NEX board of the TSX
Venture Exchange, and the subordinate voting shares of the Company
commenced trading on the Canadian Stock Exchange effective at
market open on April 30, 2019, under the new symbol
“INDS”.
Indus Holding
Company (“IHC”), a Delaware corporation, was formed in
2014. Indus Holdings, Inc. became the indirect parent of IHC in
connection with the reverse takeover transaction.
Indus Holdings,
Inc., through its licensed subsidiaries, is a vertically integrated
cannabis company that owns, manages and operates cultivation,
extraction, distribution and manufacturing facilities in
California. Effective March 1, 2021, Indus Holdings, Inc. changed
its name to Lowell Farms Inc. See Note 23.
The Company’s
corporate office and principal place of business is located at 19
Quail Run Circle, Salinas, California.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Estimates
The World Health
Organization categorized the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as
a pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a severe global health
crisis, along with economic and societal disruptions and
uncertainties, which have negatively impacted business and
healthcare activity globally. As a result of healthcare systems
responding to the demands of managing the pandemic, governments
around the world imposing measures designed to reduce the
transmission of the COVID-19 virus, and individuals responding to
the concerns of contracting the COVID-19 virus, many optical
practitioners & retailers, hospitals, medical offices and
fertility clinics closed their facilities, restricted access, or
delayed or canceled patient visits, exams and elective medical
procedures, and many customers that have reopened are experiencing
reduced patient visits. This has had, and we believe will continue
to have, an adverse effect on our sales, operating results and cash
flows.
The preparation of
Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, as well as the reported amounts of net sales and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates particularly as it relates to estimates
reliant on forecasts and other assumptions reasonably available to
the Company and the uncertain future impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic and related economic disruptions. The extent to which the
COVID-19 pandemic and related economic disruptions impact our
business and financial results will depend on future developments
including, but not limited to, the continued spread, duration and
severity of the COVID-19 pandemic; the occurrence, spread, duration
and severity of any subsequent wave or waves of outbreaks; the
actions taken by the U.S. and foreign governments to contain the
COVID-19 pandemic, address its impact or respond to the reduction
in global and local economic activity; the occurrence, duration and
severity of a global, regional or national recession, depression or
other sustained adverse market event; the impact of the
developments described above on our customers and suppliers; and
how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating
conditions can resume. The accounting matters assessed included,
but were not limited to:
●
|
allowance for
doubtful accounts and credit losses
|
●
|
carrying value of
inventory
|
●
|
the carrying value
of goodwill and other long-lived assets.
|
There was not a
material impact to the above estimates in the Company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements for fiscal 2020. The Company
continually monitors and evaluates the estimates used as additional
information becomes available. Adjustments will be made to these
provisions periodically to reflect new facts and circumstances that
may indicate that historical experience may not be indicative of
current and/or future results. The Company’s future
assessment of the magnitude and duration of COVID-19, as well as
other factors, could result in material changes to the estimates
and material impacts to the Company’s Consolidated Financial
Statements in future reporting periods.
Basis
of Preparation
Management’s
significant accounting policies include estimates and judgments
which are an integral part of financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (GAAP). We believe that the accounting policies
described in this section address the more significant policies
utilized by management when preparing our consolidated financial
statements in accordance with GAAP. We believe that the accounting
policies and estimates employed are appropriate and resulting
balances are reasonable; however, actual results could differ from
the original estimates, requiring adjustment to these balances in
future periods. The accounting policies that reflect our more
significant estimates, judgments and assumptions and which we
believe are the most important to aid in fully understanding and
evaluating our reported financial results are:
Basis
of Measurement
These consolidated
financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis,
under the historical cost convention, except for certain financial
instruments, which are measured at fair value. Historical cost is
generally based upon the fair value of the consideration given in
exchange for assets.
Functional
Currency
The Company and its
subsidiaries’ functional currency, as determined by
management, is the United States (“U.S.”) dollar. These
consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars,
unless otherwise stated.
Financial and other
metrics, such as shares outstanding, are presented in thousands
unless otherwise noted.
Basis
of Consolidation
Subsidiaries are
entities controlled by the Company. Control exists when the Company
has the power, directly and indirectly, to govern the financial and
operating policies of an entity and be exposed to the variable
returns from its activities. The financial statements of the
subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements
from the date that control commences until the date that control
ceases.
These consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries:
●
|
Indus Holding
Company, a Delaware corporation, wholly owned by Indus Holdings,
Inc.
|
●
|
Cypress Holding
Company, a Delaware limited liability company, wholly owned by
Indus Holding Company
|
●
|
Cypress
Manufacturing Company, a California corporation, wholly owned by
Indus Holding Company
|
●
|
Indus Nevada LLC, a
Nevada limited liability corporation, wholly owned by Indus Holding
Company
|
●
|
Wellness Innovation
Group Incorporated, a California corporation, wholly owned by Indus
Holding Company
|
Intercompany
balances, and any unrealized gains and losses or income and
expenses arising from transactions with subsidiaries, are
eliminated.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash
equivalents include cash on hand, cash deposits in financial
institutions, and other deposits that are readily convertible into
cash. The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid
investments purchased with maturities of three months or less to be
cash equivalents. These investments are carried at cost, which
approximates fair value.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivables are classified as loans and receivable financial
assets. Accounts receivables are recognized initially at fair value
and subsequently measured at amortized cost, less any provisions
for impairment. When an accounts receivable is uncollectible, it is
written off against the provision. Subsequent recoveries of amounts
previously written off are credited to the consolidated statements
of operations.
Inventories
Inventories are
valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Costs related
to raw materials and finished goods are determined on the first-in,
first-out basis. Specific identification and average cost methods
are also used primarily for certain packing materials and operating
supplies. The Company reviews inventory for obsolete, redundant and
slow-moving goods and any such inventory is written-down to net
realizable value.
Property and
Equipment
Property and
equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses, if any. Depreciation is calculated on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset
using the following terms and methods:
Category
|
|
Useful Life
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
The lesser of the
estimated useful life or length of the lease
|
Office
equipment
|
|
3–5
years
|
Furniture and
fixtures
|
|
3–7
years
|
Vehicles
|
|
4–5
years
|
Machinery and
equipment
|
|
3–6
years
|
Buildings
|
|
35
years
|
Construction in
progress
|
|
Not
depreciated
|
The assets’
residual values, useful lives and methods of depreciation are
reviewed at each financial year-end and adjusted prospectively if
appropriate. An item of equipment is derecognized upon disposal or
when no future economic benefits are expected from its use. Any
gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as
the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying
value of the asset) is included in the consolidated statements of
operations in the year the asset is derecognized.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents
the excess of the purchase price paid for the acquisition of an
entity over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible
assets acquired. Goodwill that has an indefinite useful life is not
subject to amortization and is tested annually for impairment, or
more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that
goodwill might be impaired. Any goodwill impairment loss is
recognized in the consolidated statements of operations in the
period in which the impairment is identified. Impairment losses on
goodwill are not subsequently reversed.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible assets
are recorded at cost, less accumulated amortization and impairment
losses, if any. Intangible assets acquired in a business
combination are measured at fair value at the acquisition date.
Amortization is recorded on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives, which do not exceed the contractual period,
if any. The estimated useful lives, residual values, and
amortization methods are reviewed at each year-end, and any changes
in estimates are accounted for prospectively.
Branding rights are
measured at fair value at the time of acquisition and are amortized
on a straight-line basis over a period of 15 years. In addition,
the Company has certain brand and tradenames with indefinite lives,
which are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis.
Impairment of Long-lived
Assets
Long-lived assets,
including property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are
reviewed for impairment at each statement of financial position
date or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount. For
the purpose of impairment testing, assets that cannot be tested
individually are grouped together into the smallest group of assets
that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are largely
independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets
(the cash-generating unit, or “CGU”). The recoverable
amount of an asset or a CGU is the higher of its fair value, less
costs to sell, and its value in use. If the carrying amount of an
asset exceeds its recoverable amount, an impairment charge is
recognized immediately in profit or loss equal to the amount by
which the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount. Where an
impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the
asset is increased to the lesser of the revised estimate of the
recoverable amount, and the carrying amount that would have been
recorded had no impairment loss been recognized
previously.
Leased
Assets
A lease of property
and equipment is classified as a capital lease if it transfers
substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership to
the Company. Lease right-of-use assets represent the right to use
an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities
represent the obligation to make payments arising from the lease
agreement. These assets and liabilities are recognized at the
commencement of the lease based upon the present value of the
future minimum lease payments over the lease term. The lease term
reflects the noncancelable period of the lease together with
periods covered by an option to extend or terminate the lease when
management is reasonably certain that it will exercise such option.
Changes in the lease term assumption could impact the right-of-use
assets and lease liabilities recognized on the balance sheet. As
our leases typically do not contain a readily determinable implicit
rate, we determine the present value of the lease liability using
our incremental borrowing rate at the lease commencement date based
on the lease term on a collateralized basis.
Income
Taxes
The Company is a
United States C corporation for income tax purposes. Income tax
expense consisting of current and deferred tax expense is
recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. Current
tax expense is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for
the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at
year-end, adjusted for amendments to tax payable with regards to
previous years.
Deferred tax assets
and liabilities and the related deferred income tax expense or
recovery are recognized for deferred tax consequences attributable
to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted
or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply when the asset
is realized or the liability settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that substantive enactment occurs. A deferred
tax asset is recognized to the extent that it is probable that
future taxable income will be available against which the asset can
be utilized.
Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable
right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities
and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation
authority and the Company intends to settle its current tax assets
and liabilities on a net basis.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is
recognized upon transfer of control of promised products or
services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration
the Company expects to receive in exchange for those products or
services. The Company enters contracts that can include various
combinations of products and services, which are generally capable
of being distinct and accounted for as separate performance
obligations. Revenue is recognized net of allowances for returns
and any taxes collected from customers, which are subsequently
remitted to governmental authorities.
Branded Products
For the
Company’s branded products, revenue is recognized when it
satisfies a performance obligation by transferring a promised
cannabis good to a customer. A contract, whether a verbal or
written sales order, is established with customers prior to order
fulfillment with agreement upon unit prices, delivery dates, and
payment terms. The transaction price is based on market pricing
while considering the value of the Company’s brand and
quality. Transaction price is allocated to each product sold based
upon the negotiated unit sales price associated with each product
line scheduled for delivery within the order. Performance
obligation satisfaction occurs upon delivery to customer premises.
These types of revenues accounted for under ASC Topic 606,
generally, do not require significant estimates or judgments based
on the nature of the Company’s revenue stream. The sales
prices, including discounts, are fixed at the point of sale and all
consideration from contracts is included in the transaction price.
The Company’s contracts do not include multiple performance
obligations or material variable consideration.
Third
Party Manufactured Products
The Company has
certain licenses to manufacture and distribute third party products
to retail dispensaries and deliveries in return for paying royalty
payments to the third parties. The Company is a principal in the
arrangement, it assumes primary responsibility for fulfilling the
customer promise to retail dispensaries and deliveries, and it
holds the inventory risk. Revenue is recognized when it satisfies a
performance obligation by transferring a promised cannabis good to
a retail dispensary or retail delivery. A contract, whether a
verbal or written sales order, is established with customers prior
to order fulfillment with agreement upon unit prices, delivery
dates, and payment terms. The transaction price is based on market
pricing while considering the value of the Company’s brand
and quality. Transaction price is allocated to each product sold
based upon the negotiated unit sales price associated with each
product line scheduled for delivery within the order. Performance
obligation satisfaction occurs upon delivery to customer premises.
These types of revenues accounted for under ASC Topic 606,
generally, do not require significant estimates or judgments based
on the nature of the Company’s revenue stream. The sales
prices, including discounts, are fixed at the point of sale and all
consideration from contracts is included in the transaction price.
The Company’s contracts do not include multiple performance
obligations or material variable consideration.
Distribution
The Company
distributes certain third party brands and bulk flower. The Company
is a principal in the arrangement, it assumes primary
responsibility for fulfilling the customer promise to retail
dispensaries and deliveries and other wholesale customers, and it
holds the inventory risk. Revenue is recognized when it satisfies a
performance obligation by transferring a promised cannabis good to
a customer. A contract, whether a verbal or written sales order, is
established with customers prior to order fulfillment with
agreement upon unit prices, delivery dates, and payment terms. The
transaction price is based on market pricing while considering the
value of the Company’s brand and quality. Transaction price
is allocated to each product sold based upon the negotiated unit
sales price associated with each product line scheduled for
delivery within the order. Performance obligation satisfaction
occurs upon delivery to customer premises. These types of revenues
accounted for under ASC Topic 606, generally, do not require
significant estimates or judgments based on the nature of the
Company’s revenue stream. The sales prices, including
discounts, are fixed at the point of sale and all consideration
from contracts is included in the transaction price. The
Company’s contracts do not include multiple performance
obligations or material variable consideration.
Research and
Development
Research costs are
expensed as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and
December 31, 2019, research costs are immaterial.
Development
expenditures are capitalized only if development costs can be
measured reliably, the product or process is technically and
commercially feasible, future economic benefits are probable, and
the Company intends to and has sufficient resources to complete the
development to use or sell the asset. To date, no development costs
have been capitalized.
Share-Based
Compensation
The Company has a
share-based compensation plan. The Company measures equity settled
share-based payments based on their fair value at the grant date
and recognizes compensation expense over the vesting period based
on the Company’s estimate of equity instruments that will
eventually vest.
For shares granted
to non-employees, the compensation expense is measured at the fair
value of the goods and services received, except where the fair
value cannot be estimated, in which case, it is measured at the
fair value of the equity instruments granted. The fair value of
share-based compensation to non-employees is periodically
re-measured until counterparty performance is complete, and any
change therein is recognized over the period and in the same manner
as if the Company had paid cash instead of paying with or using
equity instruments.
Business
Combinations
A business
combination is defined as an acquisition of assets and liabilities
that constitute a business. A business consists of inputs,
including non-current assets and processes, including operational
processes, that when applied to those inputs have the ability to
create outputs that provide a return to the Company. Business
combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of
accounting. The consideration of each acquisition is measured at
the aggregate of the fair values of tangible and intangible assets
obtained, liabilities and contingent liabilities incurred or
assumed, and equity instruments issued by the Company at the date
of acquisition. Key assumptions routinely utilized in allocation of
purchase price to intangible assets include projected financial
information such as revenue projections for companies acquired. As
of the acquisition date, goodwill is measured as the excess of
consideration given, generally measured at fair value, and the net
of the acquisition date fair values of the identifiable assets
acquired and the liabilities assumed.
Significant Accounting, Estimates and
Assumptions
The preparation of
the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires
management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect
the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, and revenue and expenses. Actual results may differ
from these estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions are
reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are
recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised if the
revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision
and future periods if the review affects both current and future
periods.
Significant
judgments, estimates and assumptions that have the most significant
effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial
statements are described below.
●
|
Estimated Useful
Lives and Depreciation of Property and Equipment–
Depreciation of property and equipment is dependent upon estimates
of useful lives which are determined through the exercise of
judgment. The assessment of any impairment of these assets is
dependent upon estimates of recoverable amounts that take into
account factors such as economic and market conditions and the
useful lives of assets.
|
●
|
Estimated Useful
Lives and Amortization of Intangible Assets– Amortization of
intangible assets is recorded on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives, which do not exceed the contractual period,
if any.
|
●
|
Fair Value of
Investments in Private Entities – The Company uses discounted
cash flow model to determine fair value of its investment in
private entities. In estimating fair value, management is required
to make certain assumptions and estimates such as discount rate,
long term growth rate, estimated free cash flows.
|
●
|
Share-Based
Compensation– The Company uses the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options
and warrants granted. In estimating fair value, management is
required to make certain assumptions and estimates such as the
expected life of units, volatility of the Company’s future
share price, risk free rates, future dividend yields and estimated
forfeitures at the initial grant date. Changes in assumptions used
to estimate fair value could result in materially different
results.
|
●
|
Deferred Tax Asset
and Valuation Allowance– Deferred tax assets, including those
arising from tax loss carry-forwards, requires management to assess
the likelihood that the Company will generate sufficient taxable
earnings in future periods in order to utilize recognized deferred
tax assets. Assumptions about the generation of future taxable
profits depend on management’s estimates of future cash
flows. In addition, future changes in tax laws could limit the
ability of the Company to obtain tax deductions in future periods.
To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ
significantly from estimates, the ability of the Company to realize
the net deferred tax assets recorded at the reporting date could be
impacted.
|
Restatement
The Company
previously filed its consolidated financial statements for the
periods ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020 with incorrect
calculations within the consolidated statements of financial
position and consolidated statement of operations related to the
conversion from international financial reporting standards to
GAAP. The financial statements have been restated to properly
reflect inventory and cost of goods sold in accordance with GAAP.
The effect of the restatement was to decrease inventory and
increase accumulated deficit $4,765 at December 31, 2020, increase
inventory and reduce accumulated deficit by $6,183 at December 31,
2019 and change cost of goods sold by $10,498, $(316) and $(5,867)
for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively
and earnings per share by $(0.32) and $0.01 for the years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Additionally, the
Company reclassified certain depreciation expense from operating
expense to cost of goods sold to reflect depreciation expense
associated with right of use operating assets in cost of goods
sold. The effect of the reclassification was to increase cost of
goods sold and decrease operating expenses by $2,589 and $2,329 for
the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019,
respectively.
The consolidated
statements of cash flows were impacted by the resulting offsetting
changes in net loss and inventory, resulting in no change in net
cash used in operating activities for the periods presented. The
consolidated statements of change in stockholders’ equity
were impacted by the change in net loss for the periods
presented.
3. CHANGES IN OR ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
The following
accounting pronouncements were recently adopted:
In May 2020, the
SEC adopted the final rule under SEC release No. 33-10786,
Amendments to Financial
Disclosures about Acquired and Disposed Businesses, amending
Rule 1-02(w)(2) which includes amendments to certain of its rules
and forms related to the disclosure of financial information
regarding acquired or disposed businesses. Among other changes, the
amendments impact SEC rules relating to (1) the definition of
“significant” subsidiaries, (2) requirements to provide
financial statements for “significant” acquisitions,
and (3) revisions to the formulation and usage of pro forma
financial information. The final rule becomes effective on January
1, 2021; however, voluntary early adoption is permitted. The
Company early adopted the provisions of the final rule in 2020. The
guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In February 2016,
FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases
(Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires that a lessee recognize
the assets and liabilities that arise from operating leases. A
lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a
liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a
right-of-use (ROU) asset representing its right to use the
underlying asset for the lease term. For leases with a term of 12
months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy
election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets
and lease liabilities. In transition, lessees and lessors are
required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the
earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach.
In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases
and ASU 2018-11, Leases Topic 842 Target improvements, which
provides an additional (and optional) transition method whereby the
new lease standard is applied at the adoption date and recognized
as an adjustment to retained earnings. In March 2019, the FASB
issued ASU 2019-01, Leases (Topic
842) Codification Improvements, which further clarifies the
determination of fair value of the underlying asset by lessors that
are not manufacturers or dealers and modifies transition disclosure
requirements for changes in accounting principles and other
technical updates. The Company adopted the standard effective
January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective adoption method
which allowed it to initially apply the new standard at the
adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the
opening balance of accumulated deficit. In connection with the
adoption of the new lease pronouncement, the Company recorded a
charge to accumulated deficit of $847.
Effects of Adoption
The Company has
elected to use the practical expedient package that allows us to
not reassess: (1) whether any expired or existing contracts are or
contain leases, (2) lease classification for any expired or
existing leases and (3) initial direct costs for any expired or
existing leases. The Company additionally elected to use the
practical expedients that allow lessees to: (1) treat the lease and
non-lease components of leases as a single lease component for all
of its leases and (2) not recognize on its balance sheet leases
with terms less than twelve months.
The Company
determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. The Company
leases certain manufacturing facilities, warehouses, offices,
machinery and equipment, vehicles and office equipment under
operating leases. Under the new standard, operating leases result
in the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheet. ROU assets represent our right to use
the leased asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent
our obligation to make lease payments. Under the new standard,
operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at
commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over
the lease term. As most of the Company’s leases do not
provide an implicit rate, upon adoption of the new standard, we
used our estimated incremental borrowing rate based on the
information available, including lease term, as of January 1, 2019
to determine the present value of lease payments. Operating lease
ROU assets are adjusted for any lease payments made prior to
January 1, 2019 and any lease incentives. Certain of our leases may
include options to extend or terminate the original lease term. The
Company generally concluded that it is not reasonably certain to
exercise these options due primarily to the length of the original
lease term and its assessment that economic incentives are not
reasonably certain to be realized. Operating lease expense under
the new standard is recognized on a straight-line basis over them
lease term. Current finance lease obligations consist primarily of
cultivation, manufacturing and distribution facility
leases.
Refer to the
Summary of Effects of Lease
Accounting Standard Update Adopted in First Quarter of 2019
below for further details.
Leases accounted
for under the new standard have initial remaining lease terms of
one to seven years. Certain of our lease agreements include rental
payments adjusted periodically for inflation. The Company’s
lease agreements do not contain any material residual value
guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
Summary of Effects of Lease Accounting
Standard Update Adopted in First Quarter of
2019
The cumulative
effects of the changes made to our consolidated balance sheet as of
the beginning of the first quarter of 2019 as a result of the
adoption of the accounting standard update on leases were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of adoption of lease
accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
standard update related to:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, $US)
|
|
As filed December 31,
2018
|
|
|
Operating
Leases
|
|
|
Total Effects
of Adoption
|
|
|
With effect of lease accounting standard update
January 1, 2019
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and
equipment, net
|
|
$
|
4,063
|
|
|
$
|
23,594
|
|
|
$
|
23,594
|
|
|
$
|
27,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of
long-term debt
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
Long-term debt,
net
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
23,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
(20,201
|
)
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
|
|
(21,047
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
23,728
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
23,728
|
|
In June 2016, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, ”Financial Instruments-Credit Losses
(Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments” and subsequent amendments to the initial
guidance: ASU 2018-19 ”Codification Improvements to Topic 326,
Financial Instruments-Credit Losses”, ASU 2019-04
“Codification Improvements
to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815,
Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial
Instruments”, ASU 2019-05 “Financial Instruments-Credit
Losses”, ASU 2019-11 “Codification Improvements to Topic 326,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses” (collectively, Topic
326),ASU 2020-02 Financial
Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) and Leases (Topic
842) and ASU 2020-03 Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments. Topic 326 requires
measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial
assets held. This guidance is effective for the year ended December
31, 2020. The Company believes that the most notable impact of this
ASU will relate to its processes around the assessment of the
adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts on trade accounts
receivable and the recognition of credit losses. We continue to
monitor the economic implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, however
based on current market conditions, the adoption of the ASU did not
have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
In November 2018,
the FASB issued ASU 2018-18, Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808),
Clarifying the Interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606.
This guidance amended Topic 808 and Topic 606 to clarify that
transactions in a collaborative arrangement should be accounted for
under Topic 606 when the counterparty is a customer for a distinct
good or service (i.e., unit of account). The amendments preclude an
entity from presenting consideration from a transaction in a
collaborative arrangement as revenue from contracts with customers
if the counterparty is not a customer for that transaction. This
guidance is effective for the year ended December 31, 2020. The
adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following
accounting pronouncements issued have not yet been
adopted:
In December 2019,
the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the
Accounting for Income Taxes. This guidance removes certain
exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and enhances and
simplifies various aspects of the income tax accounting guidance,
including requirements such as tax basis step-up in goodwill
obtained in a transaction that is not a business combination,
ownership changes in investments, and interim-period accounting for
enacted changes in tax law. This standard is effective for fiscal
years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2020. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU
2019-12 on our Consolidated Financial Statements, which is
effective for the Company in our fiscal year and interim periods
beginning on January 1, 2021.
In January 2020,
the FASB issued ASU 2020-01 Investments-Equity Securities (Topic 321),
Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Clarifying the Interactions
between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815. This guidance
addresses accounting for the transition into and out of the equity
method and provides clarification of the interaction of rules for
equity securities, the equity method of accounting, and forward
contracts and purchase options on certain types of securities. This
standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within
those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. We are
currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2020-01 on our Consolidated
Financial Statements, which is effective for the Company in our
fiscal year and interim periods beginning on January 1,
2021.
In August 2020, the
FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options
(Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in
Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). This update
amends the guidance on convertible instruments and the derivatives
scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity and
improves and amends the related EPS guidance for both Subtopics.
This standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods
within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, which
means it will be effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1,
2022. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the
impact of ASU 2020-06 on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
No other recently
issued accounting pronouncements had or are expected to have a
material impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
4. REVERSE TAKEOVER AND PRIVATE
PLACEMENT
Reverse
Takeover
As discussed in
Note 1, on November 13, 2018, Indus Holding Company
(“IHC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Indus Holdings,
Inc., and Mezzotin Minerals Inc. (“Mezzotin”) entered
into a combination agreement whereby the parties agreed to combine
their respective businesses, which would result in the reverse
takeover of Mezzotin by the security holders of Indus. On March 29,
2019, IHC and Mezzotin signed the Definitive Agreement subject to
regulatory approval and on April 26, 2019 concluded the
transaction. In connection with the agreement, Mezzotin changed its
name from Mezzotin Minerals Inc. to Indus Holdings, Inc. Effective
at the close of markets on April 29, 2019, the common shares of the
Company (“Existing Mezzotin Shares”) were delisted from
the NEX board of the TSX Venture Exchange, and the subordinate
voting shares of the Company (“Subordinate Voting
Shares”) commenced trading on the Canadian Securities
Exchange effective at market open on April 30, 2019, under the new
symbol “INDS”.
Pursuant to the
Transaction, the Existing Mezzotin Shares were redesignated as a
new class of Subordinate Voting Shares on the basis of one
Subordinate Voting Shares for every 485.3 Existing Mezzotin Shares.
In addition, Indus created a new class of voting common shares and
a new class of non-voting redeemable common shares
(“Convertible Shares”) and the outstanding shares of
Indus (“Indus Shares”) were reclassified as Convertible
Shares at a rate of one (1) Convertible Share for every one (1)
Indus Share held. The Company also amended its articles in
connection with the Transaction to (i) continue from the Province
of Ontario to the Province of British Columbia; and (ii) change its
name from Mezzotin Minerals Inc. to Indus Holdings,
Inc.
The transaction has
been accounted for in accordance with ASC 805 as an asset
acquisition. In consideration for the acquisition of Mezzotin,
Indus is deemed to have issued 130 shares of Indus subordinate
voting shares representing $1,513 total value based on the
concurrent financing subscription price of CAD$15.65 (US$11.60).
The excess of the purchase price over net assets acquired was
charged to the consolidated statements of operations as RTO
expense. Mezzotin equity was eliminated.
There were no
identifiable assets of Mezzotin on the date of acquisition. The
acquisition costs have been allocated as follows:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
CONSIDERATION
|
|
|
|
Fair value of
subordinate voting shares issued
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
Transaction
costs
|
|
|
191
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
$
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS ACQUIRED
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable
net assets acquired
|
|
|
-
|
|
Listing
expenses
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
1,704
|
|
Under the
Transaction: (i) non-U.S. shareholders of Indus (and such U.S.
shareholders of Indus as elected to participate) then contributed
their Convertible Shares to the Company in exchange for Subordinate
Voting Shares at a rate of one (1) Subordinate Voting Share for
every one (1) Convertible Share contributed, and on a going-forward
basis, U.S. shareholders of Indus may from time to time elect to
redeem their Convertible Shares in exchange for Subordinate Voting
Shares at the same rate (or under certain circumstances for the
cash value of such shares as provided in the share terms for the
Convertible Shares); (ii) a designated founder of Indus subscribed
for non-participating, super-voting shares of the Company carrying
voting rights that, in the aggregate, represent approximately 85%
of the voting rights of the Company upon completion of the
Transaction on a fully diluted basis; (iii) all warrants of Indus
(including compensation options issued to financial advisors)
remained outstanding and will now entitle the holders thereof to
acquire Convertible Shares on the same terms and conditions and on
an economically equivalent basis; and (iv) all stock options of
Indus outstanding under Indus’ existing equity incentive plan
were assumed by the Company and will now entitle the holders
thereof to acquire Subordinate Voting Shares on the same terms and
conditions and on an economically equivalent basis in lieu of
securities of Indus.
Private
Placement
In connection with
the Transaction, Indus completed a private placement offering (the
“Private Placement”) through a special purpose finance
company (“FinanceCo”) on April 2, 2019, pursuant to
which FinanceCo issued an aggregate of 3,436 subscription receipts
(“Subscription Receipts”) at a price of CDN$15.65 per
Subscription Receipt to raise aggregate gross proceeds of
approximately US$40 million. The gross proceeds of the Private
Placement, less certain associated expenses, were deposited into
escrow (the “Escrowed Proceeds”) pending satisfaction
of certain specified release conditions (the “Escrow Release
Conditions”), all of which were satisfied immediately prior
to the completion of the Transaction. As a result, the Escrowed
Proceeds were released to FinanceCo prior to the closing of the
Transaction, and each Subscription Receipt was automatically
converted, for no additional consideration, into one common share
of FinanceCo. Following satisfaction of the Escrow Release
Conditions, in connection with the Transaction, the Company
acquired all of the issued and outstanding FinanceCo shares
pursuant to a three-cornered amalgamation, and the former holders
thereof (including the former holders of FinanceCo Shares acquired
upon conversion of the Subscription Receipts) each received one
Subordinate Voting Share in exchange for each FinanceCo share
held.
Also in connection
with the Private Placement, FinanceCo issued an aggregate of 198
broker warrants to the agents under the offering as partial
consideration for their services in connection with the Private
Placement, each of which was exercisable to acquire one FinanceCo
share at an exercise price of CDN$15.65 for a period of two (2)
years from the satisfaction of the Escrow Release Conditions. Upon
completion of the amalgamation, the Broker Warrants were exchanged
for compensation options of the Company which are exercisable to
acquire Subordinate Voting Shares in lieu of FinanceCo Shares,
otherwise upon the same terms and conditions.
5. ACQUISITIONS
Completed
Acquisitions
During 2019, the
Company completed the following acquisitions, and allocated the
purchase price as follows:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
The Humble
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Kaizen Inc.
|
|
|
Flower Co.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
CONSIDERATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent
Payment
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
Note
Payable
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
Fair value of
subordinate voting shares
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
|
$
|
476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PURCHASE PRICE ALLOCATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Intangible assets -
brands and trademarks
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Intangible assets -
technology and know-how
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total identifiable
net assets
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets
acquired
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
|
$
|
476
|
|
These acquisitions
qualified as a business combination under ASC 805 and the
consideration has been allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the
date of acquisition. No goodwill was recognized. The purchases have
been accounted for by the acquisition method, with the results
included in the Company’s net earnings from the date of
acquisition.
The fair value of
the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed were finalized in
the quarter ended June 30, 2020.
The Company also
incurred $47 in transactional costs related to the above
acquisitions which were recorded in general and administrative
expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
●
Kaizen Inc.
On May 1, 2019, the
Company acquired all of the assets, global rights and business
interests of Kaizen Inc. for a purchase price of $556 that will be
paid as and if financial performance targets are met during the
period beginning on May 1, 2019 and ending on April 30, 2023.
Kaizen is a premium brand offering a full spectrum of cannabis
concentrates. Effective July 15, 2020 the asset purchase agreement
was modified, eliminating payments associated with meeting
financial performance targets in exchange for the issuance of 225
thousand options to purchase Subordinate Voting Shares and a note
payable of $200, with payments over two years. Had the
modifications been reflected as of the date of acquisition, net
assets would have decreased $223 at December 31, 2019 and net loss
in 2019 would have been reduced by $21.
●
The Humble Flower
Co.
On April 18, 2019,
the Company acquired all of the assets, global rights and business
interests associated with the brand Humble Flower Co. for a
purchase price of $472 that will be paid as and if financial
performance targets are met during the period beginning on April
19, 2019 and ending on April 18, 2023. The acquisition marks the
Company’s expansion into cannabis-infused topical creams,
balms, and oils. Effective June 1, 2020 the asset purchase
agreement was modified, eliminating payments associated with
meeting financial performance targets in exchange for the issuance
of 225 thousand options to purchase Subordinate Voting Shares and a
note payable of $65, with payments commencing on January 1, 2021
for 24 months. Had the modifications been reflected as of the date
of acquisition, net assets would have decreased $308 at December
31, 2019 and net loss in 2019 would have been reduced by
$34.
●
Shredibles LLC
On June 12, 2019,
the Company completed the acquisition of 70% of the outstanding
capital stock of Shredibles LLC (“Shredibles”), a
manufacturer of CBD infused health products, from its shareholders.
In February 2020, the Company determined that Shredibles was not a
strategic fit for the Company and reached an agreement with the
Shredibles co-founders to nullify the investment. The termination
has been reflected as being effective as of December 31, 2019 in
the consolidated financial statements. The operations of
Shredibles, and the termination of the agreement, did not have a
material impact on the results of operations of the Company in
2019.
Terminated
Acquisition
On May 14, 2019,
the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the
assets of W The Brand (“W Vapes”), a manufacturer and
distributor in Nevada and Oregon of cannabis concentrates,
cartridges and disposable pens, in a cash and stock transaction.
Under the terms of the agreement, the purchase consideration to W
Vapes shareholders consisted of $10 million in cash and $10 million
in Subordinate Voting Shares (based on a deemed value of CDN$15.65
per share). In November 2019, the definitive agreement was amended
whereby the Company advanced $2 million in non-recourse funds to
the seller in exchange for release of $10 million of cash held in
escrow related to the acquisition and in December 2019, the Company
purchased the Las Vegas, Nevada facility for $4.1
million.
On July 17, 2020,
the Company announced the termination of the definitive agreement
with W Vapes and is no longer obligated to acquire the assets of W
Vapes. The termination of the agreement coincided with an asset
acquisition announcement between W Vapes and Planet 13 Holdings
Inc. (“Planet 13”). Additionally, the Company sold the
Las Vegas facility to certain affiliates of Planet 13 for a cash
payment of approximately $500, and an additional cash payment of
approximately $2.8 million upon regulatory approval of the W Vapes
and Planet 13 transaction which was received in January 2021, and
in the third quarter the Company finalized a note payable of $843
to the owners of W Vapes, payable coinciding with the receipt of
the $2.8 million payment from the facility sale, which was paid in
January 2021. As a result, the Company has reflected a $4.4 million
loss in loss on termination of investments, net on its consolidated
statement of operations.
The Company
incurred $251 in transactional costs related to the above
acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2019, which were
recorded in general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
6. PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT
ASSETS
Prepaid expenses
and other current assets were comprised of the following
items:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
572
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
Supplier
advances
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
Nevada building
sale proceeds
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
Total Prepaid Expenses and Other Current
Assets
|
|
$
|
6,391
|
|
|
$
|
2,729
|
|
7. INVENTORY
Inventory was
comprised of the following items:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
$
|
7,950
|
|
|
$
|
7,645
|
|
Work in
process
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Finished
goods
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
2,739
|
|
Total Inventory
|
|
$
|
9,933
|
|
|
$
|
10,418
|
|
8. OTHER CURRENT
LIABILITIES
Other current
liabilities were comprised of the following items:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Excise and cannabis
tax
|
|
$
|
5,780
|
|
|
$
|
2,903
|
|
Third party brand
distribution accrual
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Insurance and
professional accrual
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
Total Accrued Liabilities
|
|
$
|
8,860
|
|
|
$
|
4,356
|
|
9. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
A reconciliation of
the beginning and ending balances of property and equipment and
accumulated depreciation during the years ended December 31, 2020
and 2019 is as follows:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
Land and
|
|
|
Leasehold
|
|
|
Furniture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Right of
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
and Fixtures
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
in Process
|
|
|
Use Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2018
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,509
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
2,062
|
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
5,031
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
4,098
|
|
|
|
2,766
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
10,520
|
|
|
|
20,511
|
|
IFRS 16
Adoption
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23,594
|
|
|
|
23,594
|
|
Business
Acquisitions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,179
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,179
|
)
|
Balance—December
31, 2019
|
|
$
|
4,098
|
|
|
$
|
4,275
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
|
$
|
813
|
|
|
$
|
2,533
|
|
|
$
|
34,114
|
|
|
$
|
46,982
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
4,604
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
6,851
|
|
Lease Option
Reassessment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,310
|
|
|
|
7,310
|
|
Disposals/Transfers
|
|
|
(4,106
|
)
|
|
|
4,587
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,609
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,106
|
)
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10,799
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
1,276
|
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
$
|
2,528
|
|
|
$
|
41,530
|
|
|
$
|
57,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2018
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(260
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(570
|
)
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(969
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,854
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
812
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2019
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(422
|
)
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
(261
|
)
|
|
$
|
(249
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(3,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,011
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,250
|
)
|
|
|
(3,848
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(634
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(427
|
)
|
|
$
|
(411
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(6,275
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,794
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,249
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1,492
|
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,063
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
$
|
4,090
|
|
|
$
|
3,853
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
839
|
|
|
$
|
565
|
|
|
$
|
2,533
|
|
|
$
|
31,089
|
|
|
$
|
42,972
|
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10,165
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
$
|
2,528
|
|
|
$
|
35,255
|
|
|
$
|
49,243
|
|
Construction in
progress represent assets under construction related to
cultivation, manufacturing, and distribution facilities not yet
completed or otherwise not placed in service.
Depreciation
expense of $3,848, $3,854 and $312 were recorded for the years
ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, of which
$2,830, $2,921 and $211, respectively, were included in cost of
goods sold.
10. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
Goodwill
A reconciliation of
the beginning and ending balances of goodwill during the year ended
December 31, 2020 is as follows:
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2019
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
-
|
|
Business
Acquisitions
|
|
|
-
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
The Company
evaluates goodwill for impairment annually during the fiscal third
quarter and when an event occurs, or circumstances change such that
it is reasonably possible that impairment may exist. The Company
accounts for goodwill and evaluates its goodwill balances and tests
them for impairment in accordance with related accounting
standards. The Company performed its annual impairment assessment
in its third quarter of fiscal 2020, and its analysis indicated
that the Company had no impairment of goodwill.
Other
Intangible Assets
A reconciliation of
the beginning and ending balances of intangible assets and
accumulated amortization during the year ended December 31, 2020 is
as follows:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
Definite Life Intangibles
|
|
|
Indefinite Life Intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branding
|
|
|
Customer
|
|
|
Technology/
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Brands &
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
Relationships
|
|
|
KnowHow
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2019
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
522
|
|
|
$
|
1,273
|
|
Business
acquisition
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
Purchase price
adjustment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
(586
|
)
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
408
|
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2019
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(120
|
)
|
Purchase price
adjustment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
$
|
(93
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(37
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
522
|
|
|
$
|
1,153
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
408
|
|
|
$
|
736
|
|
Intangible assets
with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Amortization periods of assets with finite lives are based on
management’s estimates at the date of acquisition. The
Company recorded amortization expense of $64, $71 and $17 for the
years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As
described in Note 4, during the quarter ended June 30, 2020, the
Company modified certain purchase agreements resulting in
adjustments to certain intangible assets.
The Company
estimates that amortization expense for our existing other
intangible assets will be approximately $40 annually for each of
the next five fiscal years. Actual amortization expense to be
reported in future periods could differ from these estimates as a
result of new intangible asset acquisitions, changes in useful
lives or other relevant factors or changes.
11. INVESTMENTS
The Company from
time to time acquires interest in various corporate entities for
investment purposes.
In March 2019, the
Company entered into a strategic partnership with Orchid Ventures
(“Orchid”). Under the terms of the partnership, Indus
secured the exclusive sales and distribution rights to
Orchid’s line of Orchid Essentials vape devices in
California. In addition, Indus acquired an interest in Orchid for
$1,500 during Orchid’s RTO financing round. The
Company’s investment in Orchid is accounted for in accordance
with ASC 321 and classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
The Company adjusted its carrying value based on the share price at
the balance sheet date, recognizing an unrecognized gain of $73 in
its Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31,
2020.
In October 2018,
the Company contributed 77,689 shares of Series B preferred shares
at a value of $350, to a joint venture arrangement with Dametra
LLC, in which each partner has 50% ownership. Under the arrangement
Indus is the exclusive manufacturer and distributor of Canna Stripe
branded products in the state of California. The investment was
accounted for in accordance with ASC 323. In 2019, due to the highly
competitive gummy product market, the Company determined that the
carrying value of the investment was nominal and a ($350) loss was
recognized. In November 2020, the Company acquired the Dametra LLC
50% ownership through the issuance of 150 thousand subordinate
voting shares with a market value of $170.
In the fourth
quarter of 2018, the Company acquired an interest for $148 in a
long-standing business partner who creates and markets cannabis
brands. The business partner was acquired by Green Thumb Industries
in February 2019. The Company’s investment in Green Thumb
Industries is accounted for in accordance with ASC 321. The Company
sold approximately 66% and the remaining 34% of its interests in
2019 and 2020, respectively, recognizing a realized gain of $476
and $656 in 2019 and 2020, respectively.
The Company issued
325 shares of common stock valued at $650 in exchange for shares in
Haight & Ashbury Corp, a technology company developing an
e-commerce platform. Due to the lack of extensive roll out of the
e-commerce platform with brands and dispensaries within California
and in other states, the Company determined that the carrying value
of the investment was nominal. As such, a ($650) loss was
recognized in 2019.
12. SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
Shares
Outstanding
The table below
details the change in Company shares outstanding by class during
the year ended December 31, 2020:
|
|
Subordinate
|
|
|
Super
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Voting Shares
|
|
|
Voting Shares
|
|
Balance—December 31,
2019
|
|
|
32,844
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
Shares issued in
connection with convertible debenture offering
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Shares issued in
connection with subordinate voting share offering
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Shares issued in
connection with exercise of warrants
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Shares issued in
connection with conversion of convertible debentures
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Shares issued in
connection with asset purchase
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issuance of vested
restricted stock units
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
|
57,617
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
In December 2020,
the Company complete a CAD$34.5 million share offering resulting in
the issuance of 11.5 million subordinate voting shares priced at
CAD$1.50 per share. The offering resulting in approximately $25
million in proceeds, net of offering expenses. The use of proceeds
were for the development of a cultivation and production facility
and working capital and other corporate purposes.
As discussed in
Note 4, in consideration for the acquisition of Mezzotin in
connection with the reverse takeover, Indus issued 130 shares of
Indus subordinate voting shares representing $1,513 total value
based on the concurrent financing subscription price of CAD$15.65
(US$11.60). The excess of the purchase price over net assets
acquired was charged to the consolidated statements of operations
as RTO expense in general and administrative expenses.
Warrants
A reconciliation of
the beginning and ending balance of warrants outstanding is as
follows:
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Balance—December 31,
2019
|
|
|
2,769
|
|
Warrants issued in
conjunction with convertible debenture offering
|
|
|
80,379
|
|
Warrants issued in
conjunction with equity offering(1)
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
Warrants converted
into subordinate voting shares
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
Balance—December 31,
2020
|
|
|
93,898
|
|
_____________
(1) Excludes 553 warrants issuable should
underwriter options be exercised.
13. DEBT
Debt at December
31, 2020 and 2019 was comprised of the following:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Current portion of long-term
debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle
loans(1)
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
Note
payable(3)
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total short-term
debt
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle
loans(1)
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Note
payable(2)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Note
payable(3)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Convertible
debenture(4)
|
|
|
13,701
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total long-term
debt
|
|
|
14,004
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
Total Indebtedness
|
|
$
|
15,217
|
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
_____________
(1) Primarily fixed term loans on
transportation vehicles. Weighted average interest rate at December
31, 2020 was 8.8%.
(2) Note payable in connection with Acme
acquisition to be paid as and if financial performance targets are
met over the earnout period.
(3) Note payable in connection with Humble
Flower and Kaizen acquisitions and termination of the W Vapes
acquisition. Weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2020
was 4%.
(4) Net of deferred financing costs of
$2,300.
Stated maturities
of debt obligations are as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
2021
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
2022
|
|
|
228
|
|
2023
|
|
|
16,050
|
|
2024
|
|
|
21
|
|
2025 and
thereafter
|
|
|
6
|
|
Total debt obligations
|
|
$
|
17,462
|
|
On April 13, 2020,
the Company entered into a $15.1 million senior secured convertible
debenture and warrant purchase agreement. In late April and May
2020 an additional $1 million was funded to bring the total
convertible debenture amount to $16.1 million. The convertible
debentures are convertible, at a conversion price of $0.20 per
share, into an aggregate of 80.4 million subordinate voting shares
of the Company, and the Company issued warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 80.4 million subordinate voting shares at an exercise
price of $.28 per share. The financing yielded the Company
approximately $11.5 million after repayment of $3.8 million in
bridge financing received during the first quarter, plus accrued
interest thereon, and transaction related expenses of approximately
$600. The debentures bear interest at 5.5% per annum and will
mature in October 2023, and the warrants expire in October 2023.
During 2020, $75 of convertible debentures were converted into 375
thousand subordinate voting shares.
14. LEASES
The Company adopted
IFRS 16 - Leases effective
January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective adoption method
which allowed it to initially apply the new standard at the
adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the
opening balance of accumulated deficit. In connection with the
adoption of the new lease pronouncement, the Company recorded a
charge to accumulated deficit of $847.
A reconciliation of
lease obligations for the year ended December 31, 2020 was
comprised of the following:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Lease Liability
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
$
|
33,805
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
120
|
|
Lease
reassessment
|
|
|
7,310
|
|
Lease principal
payments
|
|
|
(2,401
|
)
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
$
|
38,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease obligation,
current portion
|
|
$
|
2,301
|
|
Lease obligation,
long-term portion
|
|
$
|
36,533
|
|
All extension
options that are reasonably certain to be exercised have been
included in the measurement of lease obligations. The Company
reassesses the likelihood of extension option exercise if there is
a significant event or change in circumstances within its
control.
The components of
lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 were as
follows:
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
Amortization of
leased assets(1)
|
|
$
|
3,250
|
|
Interest on lease
liabilities(2)
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,116
|
|
(1) Included in cost of goods sold and general
and administrative in the consolidated statement of
operations.
|
(2) Included in interest expense in the
consolidated statement of operations.
|
|
|
The key assumptions
used in accounting for leases as of December 31, 2020 were a
weighted average remaining lease term of 18.1 years and a weighted
average discount rate of 6.0%.
The future lease
payments with initial remaining terms in excess of one year as of
December 31, 2020 were as follows:
(in
thousands)
|
|
December 31,
2020
|
|
1 - 3
years
|
|
$
|
14,138
|
|
4 - 5
Years
|
|
|
7,361
|
|
Greater than 5
years
|
|
|
17,335
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
38,834
|
|
15. SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
During 2019 the
Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2019 Stock and Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”), which was amended in April 2020. The Plan
permits the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights,
stock awards, share units, performance shares, performance units
and other stock-based awards, and, as of December 31, 2020, 8.2
million shares have been authorized to be issued under the Plan and
1.85 million are available for future grant. The Plan provides for
the grant of options as either non-statutory stock options or
incentive stock options and restricted stock units to employees,
officers, directors, and consultants of the Company to attract and
retain persons of ability to perform services for the Company and
to reward such individuals who contribute to the achievement by the
Company of its economic objectives. The awards granted generally
vest in 25% increments over a four-year period and option awards
expire 6 years from grant date.
The Plan is
administered by the Board or a committee appointed by the Board,
which determines the persons to whom the awards will be granted,
the type of awards to be granted, the number of awards to be
granted, and the specific terms of each grant, including the
vesting thereof, subject to the provisions of the
Plan.
During the year
ended December 31, 2020, the Company granted shares to certain
employees as compensation for services. These shares were accounted
for in accordance with ASC 718 – Compensation – Stock
Compensation. The Company amortizes awards over the service
period and until awards are fully vested.
For the years ended
December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, share-based compensation expense
recorded to the Company’ s consolidated statements of
operations were:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Cost of goods
sold
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
General and
administrative expense
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
3,385
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
Total share based
compensation
|
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
|
$
|
3,385
|
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
The following table
summarizes the status of stock option grants and unvested awards as
at and for the year ended December 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
(in thousands
except per share amounts)
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
Outstanding—December 31,
2019
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
5,315
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding—December 31,
2020
|
|
|
6,260
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable—December 31,
2020
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest—December 31,
2020
|
|
|
6,260
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,162
|
|
The
weighted-average fair value of each option granted during fiscal
2020, estimated as of the grant date, was $.25. As of December 31,
2020, there was $1,928 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested options, which is expected to be recognized
over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 4.7
years.
The following table
summarizes the status of restricted stock unit grants and unvested
awards as at and for the year ended December 31, 2020:
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
(in thousands
except per share amounts)
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Outstanding—December 31,
2019
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
1.63
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
Outstanding—December 31,
2020
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
As of December 31,
2020, there was $81 of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to nonvested restricted stock units, which is expected to be
recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 10
months.
The fair value of
the restricted stock units and stock options granted was determined
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
weighted average assumptions at the time of grant.
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest
rate
|
|
|
0.95
|
%
|
Expected term in
years
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
16. INCOME TAXES
Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic
Security Act
On March 27, 2020,
the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES
Act) was enacted and signed into law in response to the market
volatility and instability resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. It
includes a significant number of tax provisions and lifts certain
deduction limitations originally imposed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act of 2017 (the 2017 Act). The changes are mainly related to: (1)
the business interest expense disallowance rules for 2019 and 2020;
(2) net operating loss rules; (3) charitable contribution
limitations; (4) employee retention credit; and (5) the realization
of corporate alternative minimum tax credits.
The Company
continues to assess the impact and future implications of these
provisions; however, it does not anticipate any amounts that could
give rise to a material impact to the overall consolidated
financial statements.
The provision for
income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and
2018 consisted of the following:
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
State
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Total Current
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense
(benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
(2,406
|
)
|
|
|
(601
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(9,127
|
)
|
|
|
(7,329
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
Total deferred tax benefit
|
|
|
(8,227
|
)
|
|
|
(9,735
|
)
|
|
|
(1,247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
allowance
|
|
|
8,227
|
|
|
|
9,735
|
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
As the Company
operates in the cannabis industry, it is subject to the limitations
of IRC Section 280E, under which the Company is only allowed to
deduct expenses directly related to sales of product. This results
in permanent differences between ordinary and necessary business
expenses deemed non-allowable under IRC Section 280E. Therefore,
the effective tax rate can be highly variable and may not
necessarily correlate with pre-tax income or loss.
In December 2017,
the United States (“U.S.”) Congress passed and the
President signed referred to as the 2017 Tax Act, which contains
many significant changes to the U.S. tax laws, including, but not
limited to, reducing theU.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to
21% and utilization limitations of net operating loss carryforwards
created in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 to 80% of
taxable income with an indefinite carryforward period. As the
Company has a full valuation allowance against its U.S. deferred
tax assets, the revaluation of net deferred tax assets resulting
from the reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate
did not impact the Company’s effective tax rate. Additional
guidance may be issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, the
Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), or other
standard-setting bodies, which may result in adjustments to the
amounts recorded, including the valuation allowance. Significant
components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and
liabilities at December 31, 2020 and 2019, are as
follows:
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss
carryforwards
|
|
$
|
9,104
|
|
|
$
|
10,836
|
|
Accruals and
reserves
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Valuation
allowance
|
|
|
(9,104
|
)
|
|
|
(10,836
|
)
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals and
reserves
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Share-based
compensation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Management assesses
the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if
sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the
existing deferred tax assets. A significant piece of objective
negative evidence evaluated was the cumulative losses incurred
through the year ended December 31, 2020. Such objective evidence
limits the ability to consider other subjective evidence, such as
the Company’s projections for future growth. On the basis of
this evaluation, the Company has determined that it is more likely
than not that the Company will not recognize the benefits of the
federal and state net deferred tax assets, and, as a result, a full
valuation allowance totaling $12.0 million and $9.7 million has
been recorded against its net deferred tax assets as of December
31, 2020 and 2019. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered
realizable, however, could be adjusted if estimates of future
taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced or
increased or if objective negative evidence in the form of
cumulative losses is no longer present and additional weight may be
given to subjective evidence such as our projections for
growth.
A reconciliation of
the provision for income taxes attributable to income from
operations and the amount computed by applying the statutory
federal income tax rate of 21% to income before income taxes for
the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 is as
follows:
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Computed expected
provision (benefit) for taxes
|
|
$
|
(4,554
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,443
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,809
|
)
|
Increase (Decrease)
in taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State
taxes
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Non-deductible
stock compensation
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Non-deductible
expenses under section 280e
|
|
|
5,099
|
|
|
|
7,965
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
Valuation allowance
and other, net
|
|
|
(1,007
|
)
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
(853
|
)
|
Actual provision
for income taxes
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
As of December 31,
2020 and 2019, the Company had federal net operating loss
(“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $16.8 million
and $9.2 million respectively. The Company had state NOL
carryforwards of approximately $86.3 million and $50.4 million,
respectively, which will begin to expire in 2035. Utilization of
some of the federal and state NOL carryforwards to reduce future
income taxes will depend on the Company’s ability to generate
sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of the
carryforwards. Under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code,
the NOLs and tax credit carryforwards are subject to review and
possible adjustment by the IRS and state tax authorities. NOLs and
tax credit carryforwards may become subject to an annual limitation
in the event of certain cumulative changes in the ownership
interest of significant stockholders over a three-year period in
excess of 50%, as defined under Sections 382 and 383 of the
Internal Revenue Code, as well as similar state provisions. This
could limit the amount of tax attributes that can be utilized
annually to offset future taxable income or tax liabilities. The
amount of the annual limitation is determined based on the value of
the Company immediately prior to the ownership change. The Company
has not performed a comprehensive Section 382 study to determine
any potential loss limitation with regard to the NOL carryforwards
and tax credits. Any limitations would not impact the results of
the Company’s operations and cash flows because the Company
has recorded a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax
assets.
The Company
recognizes the impact of a tax position in the financial statements
if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on a
tax return upon examination by the relevant taxing authority, based
on the technical merits of the position. As of December 31, 2020
and 2019, the Company had no unrecognized tax
benefits.
The Company
recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters in
income tax expense. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company
had no accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions.
The Company is
subject to examination for its US federal and state jurisdictions
for each year in which a tax return was filed, due to the existence
of NOL carryforwards. These tax filings in major U.S. jurisdictions
are open to examination by tax authorities, such as the IRS from
2019 forward and by tax authorities in various US states from 2015
forward.
17. EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER
SHARE
Net earnings/(loss)
per share represents the net earnings/loss attributable to
shareholders divided by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the period on an as converted
basis.
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(in thousands
except per share amounts)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Net
earnings/(loss)
|
|
$
|
(21,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,934
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
subordinate voting shares(1)
|
|
|
33,940
|
|
|
|
31,379
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per
share
|
|
$
|
(0.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
subordinate voting shares(1)
|
|
|
33,940
|
|
|
|
31,379
|
|
Effects of Potential Dilutive
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Restricted stock
units
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Diluted weighted
average subordinate voting shares
|
|
|
33,940
|
|
|
|
31,379
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per
share
|
|
$
|
(0.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.59
|
)
|
_____________
(1) On an as converted
basis.
As the Company is
in a loss position for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019,
the inclusion of options, warrants, convertible debentures and
restricted stock units in the calculation of diluted earnings per
share would be anti-dilutive, and accordingly, were excluded from
the diluted loss per share calculation.
18. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Accounting
standards define fair value as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation
techniques used to measure fair value. An asset’s or
liability’s level is based on the lowest level of input that
is significant to the fair value measurement. Assets and
liabilities carried at fair value are valued and disclosed in one
of the following three levels of the valuation
hierarchy:
Level 1: Quoted
market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level 2: Observable
market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by
market data.
Level 3:
Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entity’s own
assumptions.
At December 31,
2020 and 2019, the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, prepaid expense and other current assets,
accounts payable and other current liabilities approximate fair
value due to the short-term nature of such
instruments.
The carrying value
of the Company’s debt approximates fair value based on
current market rates (Level 2).
Nonrecurring fair value
measurements
The Company uses
fair value measures when determining assets and liabilities
acquired in an acquisition as described in Note 5 which are
considered a Level 3 measurement.
19. COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
Commitments
In January 2021,
the company signed a letter of intent to expand its cultivation
footprint. The agreement contemplates a land-lease from a developer
that has prepared the property for cannabis cultivation. Indus
would be responsible for constructions costs of greenhouses using
cash raised in the equity offering in December 2020. The
transaction is subject to final site due-diligence and negotiation
of construction contracts. In the event the transaction
contemplated in the letter of intent is pursued, the Company
anticipates the site will be ready for operation in the first half
of 2022.
Contingencies
The Company’s
operations are subject to a variety of local and state regulation.
Failure to comply with one or more of those regulations could
result in fines, restrictions on its operations, or losses of
permits that could result in the Company ceasing operations. While
management of the Company believes that the Company is in
compliance with applicable local and state regulation as of
December 31, 2020, cannabis regulations continue to evolve and are
subject to differing interpretations. As a result, the Company may
be subject to regulatory fines, penalties or restrictions in the
future. In 2020, the Company entered into a payment plan offered by
California regulatory authorities to pay certain excise and
cultivation taxes over a 12 month period. If such taxes are not
paid in accordance to the agreed payment plan the Company could be
subject to certain late payment penalties.
Litigation and
Claims
From time to time,
the Company may be involved in litigation relating to claims
arising out of operations in the normal course of business. There
are no proceedings in which any of the Company’s directors,
officers or affiliates are an adverse party or have a material
interest adverse to the Company’s interest. In November 2019,
however, a putative class action captioned Guzman v. The Hacienda
Company, LLC was filed asserting claims against Hacienda and
individual and unnamed Doe defendants for alleged wage and hour
violations, unfair competition and private attorney general claims.
In February 2020, a second putative class action captioned Kincey
v. Lowell Farms, LLC was filed asserting claims against a
subsidiary of Hacienda and unnamed Doe defendants for alleged wage
and hour violations and unfair competition general claims. The
named plaintiff in the Guzman action and Hacienda have entered into
a proposed settlement establishing a gross settlement fund of $1.2
million based on the assumptions set forth in the proposed
settlement. If approved by the court before which the Guzman action
is pending, the Company believes that the settlement will encompass
claims in both the Guzman and Kincey actions. The claims in the
Guzman and Kincey actions are non-assumed liabilities under the
acquisition described in Note 15 – Subsequent Events for
which Lowell Farms Inc. is indemnified.
Insurance Claims
In September 2020
the Company experienced a small fire at its manufacturing facility
which resulted in suspending certain operations until the facility
was repaired. As a result, the company filed a business
interruption claim which resulted in a payment of $1.4 million from
the insurance carrier in March 2021. The proceeds from the claim
are reflected in other income on the consolidated statement of
operations.
In August 2020 the
Company experienced adverse air quality conditions that resulted in
the Company closing the air vents in its greenhouse facilities at a
time when extreme temperatures existed. As a result, plant health
suffered due to the situation. The Company has filed a business
interruption claim which is presently being reviewed by the
insurance carrier. There is no certainty on the results of the
carrier review of the claim, and as a result, the Company has not
recorded an estimate of claim proceeds as of December 31, 2020. The
Company anticipates the claims process will be completed in the
quarter ended June 30, 2021.
20. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES
For the years ended
December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, general and administrative
expenses were comprised of:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Salaries and
benefits
|
|
$
|
5,032
|
|
|
$
|
12,697
|
|
|
$
|
3,452
|
|
Professional
fees
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
2,229
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
Licensing and
supplies
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
Share-based
compensation
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
3,385
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
2,613
|
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
|
|
3,861
|
|
Transaction and
other special charges(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,341
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total general and administrative
expenses
|
|
$
|
11,762
|
|
|
$
|
25,814
|
|
|
$
|
8,779
|
|
_______________
(1) Include charges associated with
acquisitions and the Company’s reverse
takeover.
21. RELATED-PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with
related parties are entered into in the normal course of business
and are measured at the amount established and agreed to by the
parties.
Indus receives
certain administrative, operational and consulting services through
a Management Services Agreement with Edibles Management, LLC
(“EM”). EM is a limited liability company owned by the
cofounders of Indus and was formed to provide Indus with certain
administrative functions comprising: cultivation, distribution, and
production operations support; general administration; corporate
development; human resources; finance and accounting; marketing;
sales; legal and compliance. The agreement provides for the
dollar-for-dollar reimbursement of expenses incurred by EM in
performance of its services. Amounts paid to EM for the years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2019 were $11,385 and $15,858, respectively.
The Management Services Agreement with EM was terminated as of
December 31, 2020.
In April 2015,
Indus entered into a services agreement with Olympic Management
Group (“OMG”), for advisory and technology support
services, including the access and use of software licensed to OMG
to perform certain data processing and enterprise resource planning
(ERP) operational services. OMG is owned by one of the
Company’s co-founders. The agreement provides for the
dollar-for-dollar reimbursement of expenses incurred by OMG in
performance of its services. Amounts paid to OMG for the years
ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were $5 and $86,
respectively.
22. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company’s
operations are comprised of a single reporting operating segment
engaged in the production and sale of cannabis products in the
United States. As the operations comprise a single reporting
segment, amounts disclosed in the financial statements also
represent a single reporting segment.
23. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On February 25,
2021, the Company announced the acquisition of substantially all of
the assets of the Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell Smokes trademark
brands, product portfolio, and production assets from The Hacienda
Company, LLC, a California limited liability company
(“Hacienda”). Lowell Herb Co. is a leading California
cannabis brand that manufactures and distributes distinctive and
highly regarded premium packaged flower, pre-roll, concentrates,
and vape products. The acquisition was valued at approximately $39
million, comprised of $4.1 million in cash and the issuance of
22,643,678 subordinate voting shares. Hacienda has agreed to
continue to produce Lowell products for an interim period for the
account of the Company pending completion of the transfer of
certain regulatory assets. In connection with this acquisition, the
Company completed a change in its corporate name to Lowell Farms
Inc effective March 1, 2021.
The Company has
evaluated subsequent events through April 12, 2021, the date the
financial statements were available to be issued.
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING
ACCOUNTS
Three Years Ended December 31,
2020
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
(Deductions)
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
Recoveries/
|
|
|
End of
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
of Year
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Allowance for doubtful
accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December
31, 2020
|
|
$
|
2,595
|
|
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
|
$
|
(2,401
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,389
|
|
Year Ended December
31, 2019
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
2,346
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,595
|
|
Year Ended December
31, 2018
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
(90
|
)
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
(1) Consists of
recoveries, less deductions representing receivables written off as
uncollectible.
|
To the Board of
Directors and Shareholders
of The Hacienda
Company, LLC,
Opinion on the Financial
Statements
We have audited the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Hacienda Company,
LLC as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December
31, 2020, and the related notes collectively referred to as the
financial statements. In our opinion, the financial statements
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a
public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required
to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with
the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We conducted our
audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an
audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of
our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express
no such opinion.
Our audits included
performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement
of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and
performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures
included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also
included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
Critical audit
matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the
financial statements that were communicated or required to be
communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts
or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and
(2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex
judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not
alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial
statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the
critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the
critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which
they relate.
Description of the Matter
|
Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts
As described in the Balance Sheet and Note 2
to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has
established an allowance for doubtful accounts of $805 thousand as
of December 31, 2020. Auditing management’s evaluation of
allowance was challenging due to the level of subjectivity and
significant judgment associated with collectability of accounts
receivable.
|
How We Addressed the
Matter in Our Audit
|
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the
design, and tested the implementation of controls over the
Company’s accounting process for allowance of doubtful
accounts. Our procedures consisted of performing retrospective
review of the allowance by comparing historical reserve to
historical write-offs, analyzing accounts receivable aging buckets,
and sending confirmations. Based on the audit procedures performed,
we found the reserve levels to be reasonable.
|
We have served as the Company’s auditor
since 2019.
|
|
Los Angeles, California
|
|
April 26, 2021
|
THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL
POSITION
|
(Amounts Expressed in
United States Dollars Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Note
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,602
|
|
|
$
|
12,037
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4,993
|
|
|
|
5,847
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,020
|
|
|
|
21,160
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
|
6,640
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,726
|
|
|
$
|
29,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,413
|
|
|
$
|
4,115
|
|
Accrued payroll and benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Notes payable, current portion
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Lease obligation, current portion
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,807
|
|
|
|
4,688
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
Lease obligation
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,039
|
|
|
|
7,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,728
|
|
|
|
47,267
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,041
|
|
|
|
(26,104
|
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,687
|
|
|
|
21,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,726
|
|
|
$
|
29,027
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
THE HACIENDA COMPANY.
LLC
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
(Amounts Expressed in
United States Dollars Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,895
|
|
|
$
|
20,765
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,626
|
|
|
|
25,411
|
|
Gross profit/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
(4,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
8,264
|
|
|
|
9,151
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
4,008
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
2,182
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,959
|
|
|
|
15,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,690
|
)
|
|
|
(19,987
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Loss on termination of investments,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,735
|
)
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(1,044
|
)
|
Total other income/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,247
|
)
|
|
|
(2,053
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,937
|
)
|
|
|
(22,040
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13,937
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,040
|
)
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
(Amounts Expressed in
United States Dollars Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
|
Attributable to
Shareholders of the Parent
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders’
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2018
|
|
$
|
6,233
|
|
|
$
|
(4,041
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,192
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(22,040
|
)
|
|
|
(22,040
|
)
|
Adoption of lease accounting
standard
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Private placements, net
|
|
|
46,734
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46,734
|
|
Share redemption
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
Capital draws
|
|
|
(700
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(700
|
)
|
Balance—December
31, 2019
|
|
$
|
47,267
|
|
|
$
|
(26,104
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(13,937
|
)
|
|
|
(13,937
|
)
|
Capital draws
|
|
|
(1,539
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,539
|
)
|
Balance—December
31, 2020
|
|
$
|
45,728
|
|
|
$
|
(40,041
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,687
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
|
STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS
|
(Amounts Expressed in
United States Dollars Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
|
Year Ended December
31,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
CASH FLOW FROM
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(13,937
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,040
|
)
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
Loss on termination of investment
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Impairment of investment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
686
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
(2,851
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
(5,078
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
|
|
(1,751
|
)
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
Net cash used in
operating activities
|
|
|
(10,151
|
)
|
|
|
(24,996
|
)
|
CASH FLOW FROM
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from asset sales
|
|
|
3,068
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
(2,830
|
)
|
Investment in café
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,083
|
)
|
Net cash used in
investing activities
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
|
|
(4,913
|
)
|
CASH FLOW FROM
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on lease
obligations
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
Payments on notes payable
|
|
|
(2,863
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from share offering
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46,734
|
|
Fees on share offering
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Payments for share redemption
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
Draw on share capital
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
(700
|
)
|
Net cash provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
(1,620
|
)
|
|
|
40,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents and
restricted cash
|
|
|
(9,435
|
)
|
|
|
10,857
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of
year
|
|
|
12,037
|
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents
and restricted cash—end of period
|
|
$
|
2,602
|
|
|
$
|
12,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for
interest
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
1,044
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income
taxes
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 2020 AND 2019
|
All amounts in these Notes are expressed in
thousands of United States dollars (“$” or
“US$”), unless otherwise indicated.
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS
The Hacienda
Company, LLC (“THC” or the Company), a California
limited liability company, was formed in 2016.
THC, through its
licensed subsidiaries, is a cannabis company that owns, manages and
operates extraction, distribution and manufacturing operations in
California.
The Company’s
corporate office and principal place of business is located at
11618 Pendleton Street, Sun Valley, California.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Estimates
The World Health
Organization categorized the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as
a pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a severe global health
crisis, along with economic and societal disruptions and
uncertainties, which have negatively impacted business and
healthcare activity globally. As a result of healthcare systems
responding to the demands of managing the pandemic, governments
around the world imposing measures designed to reduce the
transmission of the COVID-19 virus, and individuals responding to
the concerns of contracting the COVID-19 virus, many optical
practitioners & retailers, hospitals, medical offices and
fertility clinics closed their facilities, restricted access, or
delayed or canceled patient visits, exams and elective medical
procedures, and many customers that have reopened are experiencing
reduced patient visits. This has had, and we believe will continue
to have, an adverse effect on our sales, operating results and cash
flows.
The preparation of
Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, as well as the reported amounts of net sales and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates particularly as it relates to estimates
reliant on forecasts and other assumptions reasonably available to
the Company and the uncertain future impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic and related economic disruptions. The extent to which the
COVID-19 pandemic and related economic disruptions impact our
business and financial results will depend on future developments
including, but not limited to, the continued spread, duration and
severity of the COVID-19 pandemic; the occurrence, spread, duration
and severity of any subsequent wave or waves of outbreaks; the
actions taken by the U.S. and foreign governments to contain the
COVID-19 pandemic, address its impact or respond to the reduction
in global and local economic activity; the occurrence, duration and
severity of a global, regional or national recession, depression or
other sustained adverse market event; the impact of the
developments described above on our customers and suppliers; and
how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating
conditions can resume.
The accounting
matters assessed included, but were not limited to:
●
|
allowance for doubtful accounts and credit
losses
|
●
|
carrying value of inventory
|
●
|
the carrying value of long-lived
assets.
|
There was not a
material impact to the above estimates in the Company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements for fiscal 2020. The Company
continually monitors and evaluates the estimates used as additional
information becomes available. Adjustments will be made to these
provisions periodically to reflect new facts and circumstances that
may indicate that historical experience may not be indicative of
current and/or future results. The Company’s future
assessment of the magnitude and duration of COVID-19, as well as
other factors, could result in material changes to the estimates
and material impacts to the Company’s Consolidated Financial
Statements in future reporting periods.
Basis
of Preparation
Management’s
significant accounting policies include estimates and judgments
which are an integral part of financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (GAAP). We believe that the accounting policies
described in this section address the more significant policies
utilized by management when preparing our consolidated financial
statements in accordance with GAAP. We believe that the accounting
policies and estimates employed are appropriate and resulting
balances are reasonable; however, actual results could differ from
the original estimates, requiring adjustment to these balances in
future periods. The accounting policies that reflect our more
significant estimates, judgments and assumptions and which we
believe are the most important to aid in fully understanding and
evaluating our reported financial results are:
Basis
of Measurement
These consolidated
financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis,
under the historical cost convention, except for certain financial
instruments, which are measured at fair value. Historical cost is
generally based upon the fair value of the consideration given in
exchange for assets.
Functional
Currency
The Company and its
subsidiaries’ functional currency, as determined by
management, is the United States (“U.S.”) dollar. These
consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S.
dollars.
Financial and other
metrics, such as shares outstanding, are presented in thousands
unless otherwise noted.
Basis
of Consolidation
Subsidiaries are
entities controlled by the Company. Control exists when the Company
has the power, directly and indirectly, to govern the financial and
operating policies of an entity and be exposed to the variable
returns from its activities. The financial statements of the
subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements
from the date that control commences until the date that control
ceases.
These consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries:
●
|
The Hacienda Company, a California limited
liability company, the parent company
|
●
|
Brand New Concepts, LLC, a California limited
liability company, wholly owned by The Hacienda Company, holder of
manufacturing and distribution licenses
|
●
|
LFLC, LLC, a California limited liability
company, wholly owned by The Hacienda Company, holds vehicle
leases
|
●
|
Lowell Farms, LLC, a California limited
liability corporation, wholly owned by The Hacienda Company,
operated cultivation site, operations terminated in
2020
|
●
|
LFHMP, LLC, a California limited liability
company, wholly owned by The Hacienda Company, not presently in
operation
|
Intercompany
balances, and any unrealized gains and losses or income and
expenses arising from transactions with subsidiaries, are
eliminated.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash
equivalents include cash on hand, cash deposits in financial
institutions, and other deposits that are readily convertible into
cash. The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid
investments purchased with maturities of three months or less to be
cash equivalents. These investments are carried at cost, which
approximates fair value.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivables are classified as loans and receivable financial
assets. Accounts receivables are recognized initially at fair value
and subsequently measured at amortized cost, less any provisions
for impairment. When an accounts receivable is uncollectible, it is
written off against the provision. Subsequent recoveries of amounts
previously written off are credited to the consolidated statements
of operations. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $805 and
$581 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Inventories
Inventories are
valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Costs related
to raw materials and finished goods are determined on the first-in,
first-out basis. Specific identification and average cost methods
are also used primarily for certain packing materials and operating
supplies. The Company reviews inventory for obsolete, redundant and
slow-moving goods and any such inventory is written-down to net
realizable value.
Property and
Equipment
Property and
equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses, if any. Depreciation is calculated on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset
using the following terms and methods:
Category
|
|
Useful
Life
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
The lesser of the estimated useful life or
length of the lease
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
3 – 7 years
|
Vehicles
|
|
4 – 5 years
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
3 – 6 years
|
Land
|
|
Not depreciated
|
The assets’
residual values, useful lives and methods of depreciation are
reviewed at each financial year-end and adjusted prospectively if
appropriate. An item of equipment is derecognized upon disposal or
when no future economic benefits are expected from its use. Any
gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as
the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying
value of the asset) is included in the consolidated statements of
operations in the year the asset is derecognized.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible assets
are recorded at cost, less accumulated amortization and impairment
losses, if any. Intangible assets acquired in a business
combination are measured at fair value at the acquisition date.
Amortization is recorded on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives, which do not exceed the contractual period,
if any. The estimated useful lives, residual values, and
amortization methods are reviewed at each year-end, and any changes
in estimates are accounted for prospectively.
Impairment of Long-lived
Assets
Long-lived assets,
including property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are
reviewed for impairment at each statement of financial position
date or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount. For
the purpose of impairment testing, assets that cannot be tested
individually are grouped together into the smallest group of assets
that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are largely
independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets
(the cash-generating unit, or “CGU”). The recoverable
amount of an asset or a CGU is the higher of its fair value, less
costs to sell, and its value in use. If the carrying amount of an
asset exceeds its recoverable amount, an impairment charge is
recognized immediately in profit or loss equal to the amount by
which the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount. Where an
impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the
asset is increased to the lesser of the revised estimate of the
recoverable amount, and the carrying amount that would have been
recorded had no impairment loss been recognized
previously.
Leased
Assets
A lease of property
and equipment is classified as a capital lease if it transfers
substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership to
the Company. Lease right-of-use assets represent the right to use
an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities
represent the obligation to make payments arising from the lease
agreement. These assets and liabilities are recognized at the
commencement of the lease based upon the present value of the
future minimum lease payments over the lease term. The lease term
reflects the noncancelable period of the lease together with
periods covered by an option to extend or terminate the lease when
management is reasonably certain that it will exercise such option.
Changes in the lease term assumption could impact the right-of-use
assets and lease liabilities recognized on the balance sheet. As
our leases typically do not contain a readily determinable implicit
rate, we determine the present value of the lease liability using
our incremental borrowing rate at the lease commencement date based
on the lease term on a collateralized basis.
Income
Taxes
The Company is a
United States C corporation for income tax purposes. Income tax
expense consisting of current and deferred tax expense is
recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. Current
tax expense is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for
the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at
year-end, adjusted for amendments to tax payable with regards to
previous years.
Deferred tax assets
and liabilities and the related deferred income tax expense or
recovery are recognized for deferred tax consequences attributable
to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted
or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply when the asset
is realized or the liability settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that substantive enactment occurs. A deferred
tax asset is recognized to the extent that it is probable that
future taxable income will be available against which the asset can
be utilized.
Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable
right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities
and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation
authority and the Company intends to settle its current tax assets
and liabilities on a net basis.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is
recognized upon transfer of control of promised products or
services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration
the Company expects to receive in exchange for those products or
services. The Company enters contracts that can include various
combinations of products and services, which are generally capable
of being distinct and accounted for as separate performance
obligations. Revenue is recognized net of allowances for returns
and any taxes collected from customers, which are subsequently
remitted to governmental authorities.
Revenue is
recognized when it satisfies a performance obligation by
transferring a promised cannabis good to a customer. A contract,
whether a verbal or written sales order, is established with
customers prior to order fulfillment with agreement upon unit
prices, delivery dates, and payment terms. The transaction price is
based on market pricing while considering the value of the
Company’s brand and quality. Transaction price is allocated
to each product sold based upon the negotiated unit sales price
associated with each product line scheduled for delivery within the
order. Performance obligation satisfaction occurs upon delivery to
customer premises. These types of revenues accounted for under ASC
Topic 606, generally, do not require significant estimates or
judgments based on the nature of the Company’s revenue
stream. The sales prices, including discounts, are fixed at the
point of sale and all consideration from contracts is included in
the transaction price. The Company’s contracts do not include
multiple performance obligations or material variable
consideration.
Research and
Development
Research costs are
expensed as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and
December 31, 2019, research costs are immaterial.
Development
expenditures are capitalized only if development costs can be
measured reliably, the product or process is technically and
commercially feasible, future economic benefits are probable, and
the Company intends to and has sufficient resources to complete the
development to use or sell the asset. To date, no development costs
have been capitalized.
Significant Accounting, Estimates and
Assumptions
The preparation of
the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires
management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect
the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, and revenue and expenses. Actual results may differ
from these estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions are
reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are
recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised if the
revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision
and future periods if the review affects both current and future
periods.
Significant
judgments, estimates and assumptions that have the most significant
effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial
statements are described below.
●
|
Estimated Useful Lives and Depreciation of
Property and Equipment – Depreciation of property and
equipment is dependent upon estimates of useful lives which are
determined through the exercise of judgment. The assessment of any
impairment of these assets is dependent upon estimates of
recoverable amounts that take into account factors such as economic
and market conditions and the useful lives of assets.
|
●
|
Deferred Tax Asset and Valuation Allowance
– Deferred tax assets, including those arising from tax loss
carry-forwards, requires management to assess the likelihood that
the Company will generate sufficient taxable earnings in future
periods in order to utilize recognized deferred tax assets.
Assumptions about the generation of future taxable profits depend
on management’s estimates of future cash flows. In addition,
future changes in tax laws could limit the ability of the Company
to obtain tax deductions in future periods. To the extent that
future cash flows and taxable income differ significantly from
estimates, the ability of the Company to realize the net deferred
tax assets recorded at the reporting date could be
impacted.
|
3.1. CHANGES IN OR ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
The following
accounting pronouncements were recently adopted:
In February 2016,
FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases
(Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires that a lessee recognize
the assets and liabilities that arise from operating leases. A
lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a
liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a
right-of-use (ROU) asset representing its right to use the
underlying asset for the lease term. For leases with a term of 12
months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy
election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets
and lease liabilities. In transition, lessees and lessors are
required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the
earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach.
In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases
and ASU 2018-11, Leases Topic 842 Target improvements, which
provides an additional (and optional) transition method whereby the
new lease standard is applied at the adoption date and recognized
as an adjustment to retained earnings. In March 2019, the FASB
issued ASU 2019-01, Leases (Topic
842) Codification Improvements, which further clarifies the
determination of fair value of the underlying asset by lessors that
are not manufacturers or dealers and modifies transition disclosure
requirements for changes in accounting principles and other
technical updates. The Company adopted the standard effective
January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective adoption method
which allowed it to initially apply the new standard at the
adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the
opening balance of accumulated deficit. In connection with the
adoption of the new lease pronouncement, the Company recorded a
charge to accumulated deficit of $23.
Effects of Adoption
The Company has
elected to use the practical expedient package that allows us to
not reassess: (1) whether any expired or existing contracts are or
contain leases, (2) lease classification for any expired or
existing leases and (3) initial direct costs for any expired or
existing leases. The Company additionally elected to use the
practical expedients that allow lessees to: (1) treat the lease and
non-lease components of leases as a single lease component for all
of its leases and (2) not recognize on its balance sheet leases
with terms less than twelve months.
The Company
determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. The Company
leases certain manufacturing facilities, warehouses, offices,
machinery and equipment, vehicles and office equipment under
operating leases. Under the new standard, operating leases result
in the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheet. ROU assets represent our right to use
the leased asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent
our obligation to make lease payments. Under the new standard,
operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at
commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over
the lease term. As most of the Company’s leases do not
provide an implicit rate, upon adoption of the new standard, we
used our estimated incremental borrowing rate based on the
information available, including lease term, as of January 1, 2019
to determine the present value of lease payments. Operating lease
ROU assets are adjusted for any lease payments made prior to
January 1, 2019 and any lease incentives. Certain of our leases may
include options to extend or terminate the original lease term. The
Company generally concluded that it is not reasonably certain to
exercise these options due primarily to the length of the original
lease term and its assessment that economic incentives are not
reasonably certain to be realized. Operating lease expense under
the new standard is recognized on a straight-line basis over them
lease term. Current finance lease obligation consists primarily of
the manufacturing and distribution facility lease.
Refer to the
Summary of Effects of Lease
Accounting Standard Update Adopted in First Quarter of 2019
below for further details.
Leases accounted
for under the new standard have initial remaining lease terms of
one to seven years. Certain of our lease agreements include rental
payments adjusted periodically for inflation. The Company’s
lease agreements do not contain any material residual value
guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
Summary of Effects of Lease Accounting
Standard Update Adopted in First Quarter of
2019
The cumulative
effects of the changes made to our consolidated balance sheet as of
the beginning of the first quarter of 2019 as a result of the
adoption of the accounting standard update on leases were as
follows:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of adoption
of lease accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
standard update
related to:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands,
$US)
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
Recognition
of
Operating
Leases
|
|
|
Total
Effects
of
Adoption
|
|
|
With effect
of
least
accounting
standard
update
January 1,
2019
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
3,680
|
|
|
$
|
602
|
|
|
$
|
602
|
|
|
$
|
4,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
Long-term debt, net
|
|
|
2,884
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
$
|
3,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
|
|
(4,041
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,064
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,710
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,710
|
|
In June 2016, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, ”Financial Instruments-Credit Losses
(Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments” and subsequent amendments to the initial
guidance: ASU 2018-19 ”Codification Improvements to Topic 326,
Financial Instruments-Credit Losses”, ASU 2019-04
“Codification Improvements
to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815,
Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial
Instruments”, ASU 2019-05 “Financial Instruments-Credit
Losses”, ASU 2019-11 “Codification Improvements to Topic 326,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses” (collectively, Topic
326),ASU 2020-02 Financial
Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) and Leases (Topic
842) and ASU 2020-03 Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments. Topic 326 requires
measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial
assets held. This guidance is effective for the year ended December
31, 2020. The Company believes that the most notable impact of this
ASU will relate to its processes around the assessment of the
adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts on trade accounts
receivable and the recognition of credit losses. We continue to
monitor the economic implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, however
based on current market conditions, the adoption of the ASU did not
have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
In November 2018,
the FASB issued ASU 2018-18, Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808),
Clarifying the Interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606.
This guidance amended Topic 808 and Topic 606 to clarify that
transactions in a collaborative arrangement should be accounted for
under Topic 606 when the counterparty is a customer for a distinct
good or service (i.e., unit of account). The amendments preclude an
entity from presenting consideration from a transaction in a
collaborative arrangement as revenue from contracts with customers
if the counterparty is not a customer for that transaction. This
guidance is effective for the year ended December 31, 2020. The
adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following
accounting pronouncements issued have not yet been
adopted:
In December 2019,
the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the
Accounting for Income Taxes. This guidance removes certain
exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and enhances and
simplifies various aspects of the income tax accounting guidance,
including requirements such as tax basis step-up in goodwill
obtained in a transaction that is not a business combination,
ownership changes in investments, and interim-period accounting for
enacted changes in tax law. This standard is effective for fiscal
years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2020. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU
2019-12 on our Consolidated Financial Statements, which is
effective for the Company in our fiscal year and interim periods
beginning on January 1, 2021.
In January 2020,
the FASB issued ASU 2020-01 Investments-Equity Securities (Topic 321),
Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Clarifying the Interactions
between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815. This guidance
addresses accounting for the transition into and out of the equity
method and provides clarification of the interaction of rules for
equity securities, the equity method of accounting, and forward
contracts and purchase options on certain types of securities. This
standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within
those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. We are
currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2020-01 on our Consolidated
Financial Statements, which is effective for the Company in our
fiscal year and interim periods beginning on January 1,
2021.
In August 2020, the
FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options
(Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in
Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). This update
amends the guidance on convertible instruments and the derivatives
scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity and
improves and amends the related EPS guidance for both Subtopics.
This standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods
within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, which
means it will be effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1,
2022. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the
impact of ASU 2020-06 on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
No other recently
issued accounting pronouncements had or are expected to have a
material impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
4. INVENTORY
Inventory was
comprised of the following items:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
December
31,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Components and finished goods
|
|
$
|
4,407
|
|
|
$
|
5,234
|
|
Promotional merchandise for resale
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
Total
Inventory
|
|
$
|
4,993
|
|
|
$
|
5,847
|
|
5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
A reconciliation of
the beginning and ending balances of property and equipment and
accumulated depreciation during the year ended December 31, 2020 is
as follows:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold
|
|
|
Furniture
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right of
Use
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Fixtures
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance—December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
3,148
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3,712
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
ASU 2016-02 and 2018-10 adoption
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
Disposals/Transfers
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance—December 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
3,716
|
|
|
$
|
521
|
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
920
|
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
|
$
|
717
|
|
|
$
|
7,259
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
Disposals/Transfers
|
|
|
(3,716
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,754
|
)
|
Balance—December
31, 2020
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
610
|
|
|
$
|
643
|
|
|
$
|
1,558
|
|
|
$
|
706
|
|
|
$
|
717
|
|
|
$
|
4,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance—December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
$
|
(471
|
)
|
ASU 2016-02 and 2018-10 adoption
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
$
|
(116
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Balance—December 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(94
|
)
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(254
|
)
|
|
$
|
(619
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2020
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(265
|
)
|
|
$
|
(189
|
)
|
|
$
|
(561
|
)
|
|
$
|
(232
|
)
|
|
$
|
(392
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
3,716
|
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
544
|
|
|
$
|
825
|
|
|
$
|
645
|
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
|
$
|
6,640
|
|
Balance—December
31, 2020
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
|
$
|
997
|
|
|
$
|
474
|
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
$
|
2,597
|
|
Depreciation
expense of $1,035 and $471 were recorded for the years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
6. INVESTMENTS
In 2018, utilizing
$2.8 million in loan financing, the Company invested in land in
Santa Ynez, California to be developed to cultivate cannabis in
lieu of purchasing the raw material. Due to limited resources,
procedural requirements associated with permitting requirements and
the time required to develop the site, in 2020 the site was sold
resulting in a loss of $652 which is included in other expense as
loss on investments in the accompanying Statements of
Operations.
In 2019, the
Company funded a minority investment in a cannabis-centric lounge
and café in West Hollywood, California and began initial
investments towards opening operations in Oregon and Washington.
Due to restriction on capital availability, the viability of these
operations was considered at risk and an impairment charge of $1
million was recorded in 2019 and the investments were abandoned in
2020 resulting in a loss of $1.1 million. The impairment charge and
loss on closing the operations are included in other expense as
loss on investments in the accompanying Statement of
Operations.
In 2020, the
company received stock as compensation for accounts receivable due
from a customer and in turn sold the stock and recorded a $908 gain
on the sale. The gain has been reflected in other expense, net in
the accompanying Statement of Operations.
7. DEBT
Debt at December
31, 2020 and 2019 was comprised of the following:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
December
31,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Current portion of
long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle loans(1)
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
Note payable(3)
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total short-term debt
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle loans(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Note payable(2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
Total
Indebtedness
|
|
$
|
2,987
|
|
|
$
|
2,930
|
|
(1) Primarily fixed term loans on transportation
vehicles. Weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2020 was
8.3%.
(2) Note payable in connection with farm
acquisition. Interest rated at December 31, 2019 was
10%.
(3) Loan agreement with Worth Capital Holdings,
net of $80 of deferred financing fees. Interest rate at December
31, 2020 was 15%.
Debt obligations
are due in 2021, including the note payable which was paid from
proceeds associated with the sale of the Company’s assets.
See Note 15.
8. LEASES
A reconciliation of
lease obligations for the year ended December 31, 2020 was
comprised of the following:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Lease
Liability
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
508
|
|
Lease principal payments
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
December 31,
2020
|
|
$
|
377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease obligation, current portion
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
Lease obligation, long-term portion
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
All extension
options that are reasonably certain to be exercised have been
included in the measurement of lease obligations. The Company
reassesses the likelihood of extension option exercise if there is
a significant event or change in circumstances within its
control.
The components of
lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 were as
follows:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
Year Ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
Amortization of leased assets(1)
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
Interest on lease liabilities(2)
|
|
|
27
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
(1) Included in
general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement
of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Included in
interest expense in the consolidated statement of
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
The key assumptions
used in accounting for leases as of December 31, 2020 were a
weighted average remaining lease term of 2.4 years and a weighted
average discount rate of 6.0%.
The future lease
payments with initial remaining terms in excess of one year as of
December 31, 2020 were as follows:
(in thousands)
|
|
December
31,
2020
|
|
1 - 3 years
|
|
$
|
377
|
|
9. INCOME TAXES
Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic
Security Act
On March 27, 2020,
the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES
Act) was enacted and signed into law in response to the market
volatility and instability resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. It
includes a significant number of tax provisions and lifts certain
deduction limitations originally imposed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act of 2017 (the 2017 Act). The changes are mainly related to: (1)
the business interest expense disallowance rules for 2019 and 2020;
(2) net operating loss rules; (3) charitable contribution
limitations; (4) employee retention credit; and (5) the realization
of corporate alternative minimum tax credits.
The Company
continues to assess the impact and future implications of these
provisions; however, it does not anticipate any amounts that could
give rise to a material impact to the overall consolidated
financial statements.
The provision for
income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019
consisted of the following:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
Years Ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
State
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
Current
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense
(benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
5,219
|
|
State
|
|
|
4,823
|
|
|
|
3,011
|
|
Total deferred tax
benefit
|
|
|
10,098
|
|
|
|
8,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(10,098
|
)
|
|
|
(8,229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
expense
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
As the Company
operates in the cannabis industry, it is subject to the limitations
of IRC Section 280E, under which the Company is only allowed to
deduct expenses directly related to sales of product. This results
in permanent differences between ordinary and necessary business
expenses deemed non-allowable under IRC Section 280E. Therefore,
the effective tax rate can be highly variable and may not
necessarily correlate with pre-tax income or loss.
In December 2017,
the United States (“U.S.”) Congress passed and the
President signed referred to as the 2017 Tax Act, which contains
many significant changes to the U.S. tax laws, including, but not
limited to, reducing the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35%
to 21% and utilization limitations of net operating loss
carryforwards created in tax years beginning after December 31,
2017 to 80% of taxable income with an indefinite carryforward
period. As the Company has a full valuation allowance against its
U.S. deferred tax assets, the revaluation of net deferred tax
assets resulting from the reduction in the U.S. federal corporate
income tax rate did not impact the Company’s effective tax
rate. Additional guidance may be issued by the U.S. Treasury
Department, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), or
other standard-setting bodies, which may result in adjustments to
the amounts recorded, including the valuation allowance.
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets
and liabilities at December 31, 2020 and 2019, are as
follows:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
Years Ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Deferred tax
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
9,985
|
|
|
$
|
8,229
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(9,985
|
)
|
|
|
(8,229
|
)
|
Total deferred tax
assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Management assesses
the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if
sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the
existing deferred tax assets. A significant piece of objective
negative evidence evaluated was the cumulative losses incurred
through the year ended December 31, 2020. Such objective evidence
limits the ability to consider other subjective evidence, such as
the Company’s projections for future growth. On the basis of
this evaluation, the Company has determined that it is more likely
than not that the Company will not recognize the benefits of the
federal and state net deferred tax assets, and, as a result, a full
valuation allowance totaling $10.0 million and $8.2 million has
been recorded against its net deferred tax assets as of December
31, 2020 and 2019. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered
realizable, however, could be adjusted if estimates of future
taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced or
increased or if objective negative evidence in the form of
cumulative losses is no longer present and additional weight may be
given to subjective evidence such as our projections for
growth.
As of December 31,
2020 and 2019, the Company had federal net operating loss
(“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $24.6 million
and $24.9 million respectively. The Company had state NOL
carryforwards of approximately $37.1 million and $23.2 million.
Utilization of some of the federal and state NOL carryforwards to
reduce future income taxes will depend on the Company’s
ability to generate sufficient taxable income prior to the
expiration of the carryforwards. Under the provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code, the NOLs and tax credit carryforwards are
subject to review and possible adjustment by the IRS and state tax
authorities. NOLs and tax credit carryforwards may become subject
to an annual limitation in the event of certain cumulative changes
in the ownership interest of significant stockholders over a
three-year period in excess of 50%, as defined under Sections 382
and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code, as well as similar state
provisions. This could limit the amount of tax attributes that can
be utilized annually to offset future taxable income or tax
liabilities. The amount of the annual limitation is determined
based on the value of the Company immediately prior to the
ownership change. The Company has not performed a comprehensive
Section 382 study to determine any potential loss limitation with
regard to the NOL carryforwards and tax credits. Any limitations
would not impact the results of the Company’s operations and
cash flows because the Company has recorded a valuation allowance
against its net deferred tax assets.
The Company
recognizes the impact of a tax position in the financial statements
if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on a
tax return upon examination by the relevant taxing authority, based
on the technical merits of the position. As of December 31, 2020
and 2019, the Company had no unrecognized tax
benefits.
The Company
recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters in
income tax expense. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company
had no accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions.
The Company is
subject to examination for its US federal and state jurisdictions
for each year in which a tax return was filed, due to the existence
of NOL carryforwards. These tax filings in major U.S. jurisdictions
are open to examination by tax authorities, such as the IRS from
2016 forward and by tax authorities in various US states from 2016
forward.
10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Accounting
standards define fair value as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation
techniques used to measure fair value. An asset’s or
liability’s level is based on the lowest level of input that
is significant to the fair value measurement. Assets and
liabilities carried at fair value are valued and disclosed in one
of the following three levels of the valuation
hierarchy:
Level 1:
|
Quoted market prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities.
|
Level 2:
|
Observable market-based inputs or
unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market
data.
|
Level 3:
|
Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting
entity’s own assumptions.
|
At December 31,
2020 and 2019, the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, prepaid expense and other current assets,
accounts payable and other current liabilities approximate fair
value due to the short-term nature of such
instruments.
The carrying value
of the Company’s debt approximates fair value based on
current market rates (Level 2).
Nonrecurring fair value
measurements
The Company uses
fair value measures when determining assets and liabilities
acquired in an acquisition as described in Note 5 which are
considered a Level 3 measurement.
11. COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
Commitments
No significant
commitments were outstanding at December 31, 2020.
Contingencies
The Company’s
operations are subject to a variety of local and state regulation.
Failure to comply with one or more of those regulations could
result in fines, restrictions on its operations, or losses of
permits that could result in the Company ceasing operations. In
2019, state regulatory agencies filed a complaint against the
Company alleging the Company was engaged in unlicensed cannabis
activity. While not admitting to any allegations, in 2020 the
Company agreed to a settlement in which it paid $546 in fees and
expenses and agreed to engage a cannabis compliance coordinator for
a period of five years to monitor compliance with local and state
regulations. The settlement expense is included in other expense,
net in the accompanying Statement of Operations. While management
of the Company believes that the Company is in compliance with
applicable local and state regulation as of December 31, 2020,
cannabis regulations continue to evolve and are subject to
differing interpretations. As a result, the Company may be subject
to regulatory fines, penalties or restrictions in the
future.
Litigation and
Claims
From time to time,
the Company may be involved in litigation relating to claims
arising out of operations in the normal course of business. In
2020, the Company reached a settlement with a landlord over a
dispute relating to a facility lease. As a result of the
settlement, the lease was terminated and the Company agreed to a
payment of fees and expenses amounting to $518, which has been
included in other expense, net in the accompanying Statement of
Operations. In November 2019, a putative class action captioned
Guzman v. The Hacienda Company, LLC was filed asserting claims
against Hacienda and individual and unnamed Doe defendants for
alleged wage and hour violations, unfair competition and private
attorney general claims. In February 2020, a second putative class
action captioned Kincey v. Lowell Farms, LLC was filed asserting
claims against a subsidiary of Hacienda and unnamed Doe defendants
for alleged wage and hour violations and unfair competition general
claims. The named plaintiff in the Guzman action and Hacienda have
entered into a proposed settlement establishing a gross settlement
fund of $1.2 million based on assumptions set forth in the proposed
settlement. If approved by the court before which the Guzman action
is pending, the Company believes that the settlement will encompass
claims in both the Guzman and Kincey actions. The claims in the
Guzman and Kincey actions are non-assumed liabilities under the
acquisition described in Note 15 – Subsequent Events for
which Lowell Farms Inc. is indemnified.
12. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES
For the years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2019, general and administrative expenses
were comprised of:
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
Years Ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
$
|
2,656
|
|
|
$
|
3,169
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
|
|
1,593
|
|
Facility expenses
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
Total general and
administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
8,264
|
|
|
$
|
9,151
|
|
13. RELATED-PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with
related parties are entered into in the normal course of business
and are measured at the amount established and agreed to by the
parties.
14. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company’s
operations are comprised of a single reporting operating segment
engaged in the production and sale of cannabis products in the
United States. As the operations comprise a single reporting
segment, amounts disclosed in the financial statements also
represent a single reporting segment.
15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On February 25,
2021, the Company announced the sale of substantially all of the
assets of the Company, including the Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell
Smokes trademark brands, product portfolio, and production assets
to Indus Holdings, Inc. The transaction was valued at approximately
$39 million, comprised of $4.1 million in cash and the issuance of
22,643,678 subordinate voting shares of Indus Holdings,
Inc.
The Company has
evaluated subsequent events through April 26, 2021, the date the
financial statements were available to be issued.
LOWELL FARMS INC. AND THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
INTRODUCTION TO UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The following
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are
based on our historical consolidated financial statements and The
Hacienda Company, LLC historical consolidated financial statements
as adjusted to give effect to the February 25, 2021 acquisition of
substantially all of the assets of the Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell
Smokes trademark brands, product portfolio, and production assets.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations
for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 give effect to the
asset acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 2019. The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheets as of
December 31, 2020 and 2019 give effect to the acquisition as if it
had occurred on January 1, 2019.
The pro forma
condensed combined financial statements do not necessarily reflect
what the combined company’s financial condition or results of
operations would have been had the acquisition occurred on the
dates indicated. They also may not be useful in predicting the
future financial condition and results of operation of the combined
company. The actual financial position and results of operations
may differ significantly from the pro forma amounts reflected
herein due to a variety of factors.
LOWELL FARMS INC. AND THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE
SHEETS
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
December 31,
2020
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Lowell
Farms
Inc.
|
|
|
The
Hacienda
Company,
LLC
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Pro
Forma
Combined
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
25,751
|
|
|
$
|
2,602
|
|
|
$
|
(2,602
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
25,751
|
|
Accounts receivable—net
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,719
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
9,933
|
|
|
|
4,993
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,926
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
|
46,604
|
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
|
|
(2,836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
52,787
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
49,243
|
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
|
(2,341
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
49,499
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,569
|
|
|
(b),(c)
|
|
|
31,662
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
97,416
|
|
|
$
|
11,726
|
|
|
$
|
25,282
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
134,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,137
|
|
|
$
|
2,413
|
|
|
$
|
(2,230
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
2,320
|
|
Accrued payroll and benefits
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
Notes payable, current portion
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
|
|
(2,920
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
Lease obligation, current portion
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
8,860
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
8,860
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
15,723
|
|
|
|
5,807
|
|
|
|
(5,412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
16,118
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Lease obligation
|
|
|
36,533
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,765
|
|
Convertible debentures
|
|
|
13,701
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,701
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
66,260
|
|
|
|
6,039
|
|
|
|
(5,412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
66,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
125,540
|
|
|
|
45,728
|
|
|
|
(11,370
|
)
|
|
(a),(b)
|
|
|
159,898
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(94,384
|
)
|
|
|
(40,041
|
)
|
|
|
42,064
|
|
|
(a),(c)
|
|
|
(92,361
|
)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
31,156
|
|
|
|
5,687
|
|
|
|
30,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
97,416
|
|
|
$
|
11,726
|
|
|
$
|
25,282
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
134,424
|
|
LOWELL FARMS INC. AND THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE
SHEETS
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Lowell
Farms
Inc.
|
|
|
The
Hacienda
Company,
LLC
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Pro
Forma
Combined
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,344
|
|
|
$
|
12,037
|
|
|
$
|
(12,037
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
1,344
|
|
Accounts receivable—net
|
|
|
6,890
|
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,888
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
10,418
|
|
|
|
5,847
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,265
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
2,729
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
2,729
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
|
21,381
|
|
|
|
21,160
|
|
|
|
(12,315
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
30,226
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
397
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
42,972
|
|
|
|
6,640
|
|
|
|
(6,384
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
43,228
|
|
Other intangibles, net
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
28,099
|
|
|
(b),(c)
|
|
|
29,609
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
68,534
|
|
|
$
|
29,027
|
|
|
$
|
8,173
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
4,704
|
|
|
$
|
4,115
|
|
|
$
|
(3,932
|
)
|
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
4,887
|
|
Accrued payroll and benefits
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
531
|
|
Notes payable, current portion
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Lease obligation, current portion
|
|
|
2,325
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
4,356
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
4,356
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
12,051
|
|
|
|
4,688
|
|
|
|
(4,243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
12,496
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
|
|
(2,788
|
)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
382
|
|
Lease obligation
|
|
|
31,480
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,857
|
|
Convertible debentures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
44,848
|
|
|
|
7,864
|
|
|
|
(7,031
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
45,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
96,160
|
|
|
|
47,267
|
|
|
|
(12,909
|
)
|
|
(a),(b)
|
|
|
130,518
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(72,474
|
)
|
|
|
(26,104
|
)
|
|
|
28,113
|
|
|
(a),(c)
|
|
|
(70,465
|
)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
23,686
|
|
|
|
21,163
|
|
|
|
15,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
68,534
|
|
|
$
|
29,027
|
|
|
$
|
8,173
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,734
|
|
LOWELL FARMS INC. AND THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2020
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Lowell
Farms
Inc.
|
|
|
The
Hacienda
Company,
LLC
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Pro
Forma
Combined
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
42,618
|
|
|
$
|
14,895
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,513
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
40,413
|
|
|
|
14,626
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,039
|
|
Gross profit/(loss)
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,762
|
|
|
|
8,264
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,026
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
5,169
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,064
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,882
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
18,013
|
|
|
|
11,959
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(15,808
|
)
|
|
|
(11,690
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
Loss on termination of investment,
net
|
|
|
(4,201
|
)
|
|
|
(1,735
|
)
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(4,201
|
)
|
Unrealized gain/(loss) on change in fair value
of investment
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Gain/(Loss) on foreign currency
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3,331
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(3,365
|
)
|
Total other income/(expense)
|
|
|
(5,878
|
)
|
|
|
(2,247
|
)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
(21,686
|
)
|
|
|
(13,937
|
)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,600
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(21,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,937
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(33,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share -
basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and
diluted
|
|
|
33,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,584
|
|
LOWELL FARMS INC. AND THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2019
|
|
(in thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
Lowell
Farms
Inc.
|
|
|
The
Hacienda
Company,
LLC
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Pro
Forma
Combined
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
37,045
|
|
|
$
|
20,765
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,810
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
47,790
|
|
|
|
25,411
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,201
|
|
Gross profit/(loss)
|
|
|
(10,745
|
)
|
|
|
(4,646
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
25,814
|
|
|
|
9,151
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,965
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
8,029
|
|
|
|
4,008
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,037
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
2,182
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,175
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
34,836
|
|
|
|
15,341
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(45,581
|
)
|
|
|
(19,987
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,568
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Loss on termination of investment,
net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Unrealized gain/(loss) on change in fair value
of investment
|
|
|
(2,250
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,250
|
)
|
Gain/(Loss) on foreign currency
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,152
|
)
|
|
|
(1,044
|
)
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(2,187
|
)
|
Total other income/(expense)
|
|
|
(4,148
|
)
|
|
|
(2,053
|
)
|
|
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
(49,729
|
)
|
|
|
(22,040
|
)
|
|
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,760
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(49,934
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,040
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(69,965
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share -
basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and
diluted
|
|
|
31,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,023
|
|
LOWELL FARMS INC. AND THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
1. Basis of presentation
The unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements are based on Lowell
Farms Inc. (the “Company”) and The Hacienda Company,
LLC historical consolidated and combined financial statements as
adjusted to give effect to the acquisition of substantially all of
the assets of the Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell Smokes trademark
brands, product portfolio, and production assets. The unaudited pro
forma condensed combined statements of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 give effect to the asset
acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 2019. The unaudited
pro forma condensed combined balance sheets as of December 31, 2020
and 2019 give effect to the acquisition as if it had occurred on
January 1, 2019.
2. Purchase price
allocation
On February 25,
2021, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of The
Hacienda Company, LLC for total consideration of approximately $41
million.
The following table
shows the allocation of the purchase price to the acquired
identifiable assets and assumed liabilities:
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
1,312
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
256
|
|
Right-of-use asset
|
|
|
549
|
|
Brands and tradenames
|
|
|
36,298
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
Total Purchase Price,
net
|
|
$
|
40,983
|
|
3. Pro forma adjustments
The pro forma
adjustments are based on our preliminary estimates and assumptions
that are subject to change. The following adjustments have been
reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information:
Adjustments to the
pro forma condensed combined balance sheet –
(a)
|
Reflects the fair value adjustment of $36.3
million for the net assets acquired in the
acquisition.
|
(b)
|
Reflects the fair value of equity issued in
connection with the net asset purchase and the elimination of The
Hacienda Company member equity not acquired
|
(c)
|
Reflects the fair value impact on brand and
tradename intangible acquired as a result of adjustments to the
condensed combined statements of operations
|
Adjustments to the
pro forma condensed statement of operations –
(c)1. Reflects the
elimination of the impact of investments not acquired and the
associated interest on investment debt.
Pro forma per share
information reflects 22,643,678 shares issued in conjunction with
the asset acquisition.
The brand and
tradename intangible acquired is deemed to have an indefinite life
and as such, no amortization has been reflected in the pro forma
adjustments. The property and equipment acquired have a fair market
value approximating the net book value of such assets, and as a
result, no incremental depreciation adjustment is reflected in the
pro forma condensed combined financial statements.
Index for Pro Forma Financial
Statement
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Statements
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Introduction
Lowell Farms Inc.
is providing the following unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information to aid you in your analysis.
The following
unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of November
30, 2020 combines the audited historical consolidated balance sheet
of Lowell Farms as of December 31, 2020 with the audited historical
consolidated balance sheet of Indus as of November 30, 2020, giving
effect to the Mergers as if they had been consummated as of that
date.
The following
unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement for the
year ended November 30, 2020 combines the audited historical
consolidated statement of income of Lowell Farms for the year ended
December 31, 2020 with the audited historical consolidated
statement of operations of Indus for the year ended November 30,
2020, giving effect to the Mergers as if they had occurred on
December 1, 2019.
The historical
financial information of Lowell Farms was derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements of Lowell Farms for the year
ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, included as an Exhibit in this
Form S-1. The historical financial information of Indus was derived
from the audited consolidated financial statements of Indus for the
years ended November 30, 2020 and 2019, included in the proxy
statement/prospectus/information statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in March 2021. This information
should be read together with Lowell Farms’ audited and
unaudited financial statements and related notes, “Lowell
Farms’ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and other
financial information included elsewhere in this Form
S-1.
Basis of Pro
Forma Presentation
The historical
financial information has been adjusted to give pro forma effect to
events that are related and/or directly attributable to the
Mergers, are factually supportable and are expected to have a
continuing impact on the results of the combined company. The
adjustments presented on the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements have been identified and presented to provide
relevant information necessary for an accurate understanding of the
combined company upon consummation of the Mergers.
The unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial information is for illustrative
purposes only. The financial results may have been different had
the companies always been combined. You should not rely on the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information as
being indicative of the historical results that would have been
achieved had the companies always been combined or the future
results that the combined company will experience. Lowell Farms and
Indus have not had any historical relationship prior to the
Mergers. Accordingly, no pro forma adjustments were required to
eliminate activities between the companies.
LOWELL FARMS INC. AND THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE
SHEETS
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
December 31,
2020
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Lowell
Farms
Inc.
|
|
|
The
Hacienda
Company,
LLC
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Pro
Forma
Combined
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
25,751
|
|
|
$
|
2,602
|
|
|
$
|
(2,602
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
25,751
|
|
Accounts Receivable—net
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,719
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
9,933
|
|
|
|
4,993
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,926
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
|
46,604
|
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
|
|
(2,836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
52,787
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
49,243
|
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
|
(2,341
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
49,499
|
|
Intangible Assets, net
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,569
|
|
|
(b),(c)
|
|
|
31,662
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
97,416
|
|
|
$
|
11,726
|
|
|
$
|
25,282
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
134,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,137
|
|
|
$
|
2,413
|
|
|
$
|
(2,230
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
2,320
|
|
Accrued payroll and benefits
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
Notes payable, current portion
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
|
|
(2,920
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
Lease obligation, current portion
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
8,860
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
8,860
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
15,723
|
|
|
|
5,807
|
|
|
|
(5,412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
16,118
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Lease obligation
|
|
|
36,533
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,765
|
|
Convertible debentures
|
|
|
13,701
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,701
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
66,260
|
|
|
|
6,039
|
|
|
|
(5,412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
66,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
125,540
|
|
|
|
45,728
|
|
|
|
(11,370
|
)
|
|
(a),(b)
|
|
|
159,898
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(94,384
|
)
|
|
|
(40,041
|
)
|
|
|
42,064
|
|
|
(a),(c)
|
|
|
(92,361
|
)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
31,156
|
|
|
|
5,687
|
|
|
|
30,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
97,416
|
|
|
$
|
11,726
|
|
|
$
|
25,282
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
134,424
|
|
LOWELL FARMS INC. AND THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE
SHEETS
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Lowell
Farms
Inc.
|
|
|
The
Hacienda
Company,
LLC
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Pro
Forma
Combined
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,344
|
|
|
$
|
12,037
|
|
|
$
|
(12,037
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
1,344
|
|
Accounts Receivable—net
|
|
|
6,890
|
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,888
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
10,418
|
|
|
|
5,847
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,265
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
2,729
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
2,729
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
|
21,381
|
|
|
|
21,160
|
|
|
|
(12,315
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
30,226
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
397
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
42,972
|
|
|
|
6,640
|
|
|
|
(6,384
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
43,228
|
|
Other intangibles, net
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
28,099
|
|
|
(b),(c)
|
|
|
29,609
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
68,534
|
|
|
$
|
29,027
|
|
|
$
|
8,173
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
4,704
|
|
|
$
|
4,115
|
|
|
$
|
(3,932
|
)
|
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
4,887
|
|
Accrued payroll and benefits
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
531
|
|
Notes payable, current portion
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Lease obligation, current portion
|
|
|
2,325
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
4,356
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
4,356
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
12,051
|
|
|
|
4,688
|
|
|
|
(4,243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
12,496
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
|
|
(2,788
|
)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
382
|
|
Lease obligation
|
|
|
31,480
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,857
|
|
Convertible debentures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
44,848
|
|
|
|
7,864
|
|
|
|
(7,031
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
45,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
96,160
|
|
|
|
47,267
|
|
|
|
(12,909
|
)
|
|
(a),(b)
|
|
|
130,518
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(72,474
|
)
|
|
|
(26,104
|
)
|
|
|
28,113
|
|
|
(a),(c)
|
|
|
(70,465
|
)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
23,686
|
|
|
|
21,163
|
|
|
|
15,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
68,534
|
|
|
$
|
29,027
|
|
|
$
|
8,173
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,734
|
|
LOWELL FARMS INC. AND THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2020
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Lowell
Farms
Inc.
|
|
|
The
Hacienda
Company,
LLC
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Pro
Forma
Combined
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
42,618
|
|
|
$
|
14,895
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,513
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
40,413
|
|
|
|
14,626
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,039
|
|
Gross profit/(loss)
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,762
|
|
|
|
8,264
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,026
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
5,169
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,064
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,882
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
18,013
|
|
|
|
11,959
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(15,808
|
)
|
|
|
(11,690
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
Loss on termination of investment,
net
|
|
|
(4,201
|
)
|
|
|
(1,735
|
)
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(4,201
|
)
|
Unrealized gain/(loss) on change in fair value
of investment
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Gain/(Loss) on foreign currency
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3,331
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(3,365
|
)
|
Total other income/(expense)
|
|
|
(5,878
|
)
|
|
|
(2,247
|
)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
(21,686
|
)
|
|
|
(13,937
|
)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,600
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(21,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,937
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(33,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share -
basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and
diluted
|
|
|
33,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,584
|
|
LOWELL FARMS INC. AND THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts Expressed in United States Dollars
Unless Otherwise Stated)
|
|
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2019
|
|
(in thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
Lowell
Farms
Inc.
|
|
|
The
Hacienda
Company,
LLC
|
|
|
Pro
Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Pro
Forma
Combined
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
37,045
|
|
|
$
|
20,765
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,810
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
47,790
|
|
|
|
25,411
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,201
|
|
Gross profit/(loss)
|
|
|
(10,745
|
)
|
|
|
(4,646
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
25,814
|
|
|
|
9,151
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,965
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
8,029
|
|
|
|
4,008
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,037
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
2,182
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,175
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
34,836
|
|
|
|
15,341
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(45,581
|
)
|
|
|
(19,987
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,568
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Loss on termination of investment,
net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Unrealized gain/(loss) on change in fair value
of investment
|
|
|
(2,250
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,250
|
)
|
Gain/(Loss) on foreign currency
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,152
|
)
|
|
|
(1,044
|
)
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(2,187
|
)
|
Total other income/(expense)
|
|
|
(4,148
|
)
|
|
|
(2,053
|
)
|
|
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
(49,729
|
)
|
|
|
(22,040
|
)
|
|
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,760
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(49,934
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,040
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(69,965
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share -
basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and
diluted
|
|
|
31,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,023
|
|
LOWELL FARMS INC. AND THE HACIENDA COMPANY,
LLC
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
1. Basis of presentation
The unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements are based on Lowell
Farms Inc. (the “Company”) and The Hacienda Company,
LLC historical consolidated and combined financial statements as
adjusted to give effect to the acquisition of substantially all of
the assets of the Lowell Herb Co. and Lowell Smokes trademark
brands, product portfolio, and production assets. The unaudited pro
forma condensed combined statements of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 give effect to the asset
acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 2019. The unaudited
pro forma condensed combined balance sheets as of December 31, 2020
and 2019 give effect to the acquisition as if it had occurred on
January 1, 2019.
2. Purchase price
allocation
On February 25,
2021, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of The
Hacienda Company, LLC for total consideration of approximately $41
million.
The following table
shows the allocation of the purchase price to the acquired
identifiable assets and assumed liabilities:
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
1,312
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
256
|
|
Right-of-use asset
|
|
|
549
|
|
Brands and tradenames
|
|
|
36,298
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
Total Purchase Price,
net
|
|
$
|
40,983
|
|
3. Pro forma adjustments
The pro forma
adjustments are based on our preliminary estimates and assumptions
that are subject to change. The following adjustments have been
reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information:
Adjustments to the
pro forma condensed combined balance sheet –
(a)
|
Reflects the fair value adjustment of $36.3
million for the net assets acquired in the
acquisition.
|
(b)
|
Reflects the fair value of equity issued in
connection with the net asset purchase and the elimination of The
Hacienda Company member equity not acquired
|
(c)
|
Reflects the fair value impact on brand and
tradename intangible acquired as a result of adjustments to the
condensed combined statements of operations
|
Adjustments to the
pro forma condensed statement of operations –
(c)1. Reflects the
elimination of the impact of investments not acquired and the
associated interest on investment debt.
Pro forma per share
information reflects 22,643,678 shares issued in conjunction with
the asset acquisition.
The brand and
tradename intangible acquired is deemed to have an indefinite life
and as such, no amortization has been reflected in the pro forma
adjustments. The property and equipment acquired have a fair market
value approximating the net book value of such assets, and as a
result, no incremental depreciation adjustment is reflected in the
pro forma condensed combined financial statements.